|
|
cygnus
from nowhere and everyplace on 2007-12-25 22:39 [#02157960]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular
|
|
what a stupid ass movie!!!!!!!
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2007-12-25 22:44 [#02157962]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
yeah, to be honest I really didn't think it was very good. If it had been a bit longer and with narration to explain the finer details of the setting, I think it would have been a bit better. The CGI sucked, and the movie grew pretty ridiculous about half way through. Everyone seems to be raving about how great Will Smith was, and to be honest I don't see it. I think he does an alright job, but I wouldn't consider his performance Oscar-worthy as some people apparently do.
|
|
bogala
from NYC (United States) on 2007-12-25 22:51 [#02157964]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular
|
|
I'm all about the Tim Burton film. I fucking love his films
|
|
magicant
from Canada on 2007-12-25 23:23 [#02157969]
Points: 2465 Status: Lurker
|
|
As a secular humanist, I strenuously object to the new Will Smith film I Am Legend. The movie concludes in such a way that forcefully suggests that there is a God. The character Smith portrays tells another character that he is "listening," which was obviously a way of recanting his previous statement in the film that there was no God; for he realized that he must give up his life for the sake of some greater good. I was turned off totally because I know that people will watch this film and think "Wow this film really makes a statement about God" when really the character is suffering from a schizophrenic delusion, just like all people who think there is a God.
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2007-12-26 00:05 [#02157971]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to magicant: #02157969 | Show recordbag
|
|
well said. That is partly what I was referring to by saying that the movie became ridiculous half-way through, I just didn't feel like getting into it. I'm glad someone is, though.
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2007-12-26 00:08 [#02157972]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #02157971 | Show recordbag
|
|
someone is = someone does*
gew=few
|
|
b6662966
from ? on 2007-12-26 03:41 [#02157983]
Points: 1110 Status: Lurker
|
|
The CGI set design of the post-apocolyptic New York were beautiful.
The CGI of the deer, lions, dogs and Night-walkers were fuckin horrendeous, once again proving that the human eye/brain will make it nearly impossible to ever reporoduce natural movement through CGI.
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2007-12-26 04:36 [#02157990]
Points: 24587 Status: Lurker | Followup to b6662966: #02157983
|
|
I thought the CGI in King Kong was very good.
RE: the movie. I have the book and love it: I haven't seen the film but I know that a) the colour of the protagonist has changed, and b) it has moved from L.A. to New York.
|
|
Indeksical
from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-12-26 06:39 [#02158001]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Followup to magicant: #02157969 | Show recordbag
|
|
Agreed once the movie headed into religious discussion I got completely turned off. The eventual revelation about the meaning of the repeated butterfly symbols made me cringe. However, I thought the first half was very engaging despite the rubbish animals. Overall, very disappointing.
|
|
FlyAgaric
from the discovery (Africa) on 2007-12-26 08:11 [#02158015]
Points: 5776 Status: Regular | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #02157962
|
|
you say that like winning an oscar means something.
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2007-12-26 08:44 [#02158027]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
It wasn't very good at all.
|
|
Sano
on 2007-12-26 08:49 [#02158029]
Points: 2502 Status: Lurker
|
|
I don't watch movies with Will Smith on them.
|
|
bogala
from NYC (United States) on 2007-12-26 08:53 [#02158031]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular
|
|
i liked six degrees of separation, but yeah, thats about it
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2007-12-26 09:18 [#02158035]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to FlyAgaric: #02158015 | Show recordbag
|
|
Yeah, I'm not saying actors are second-rate unless they have an oscar, I'm just going by what I've been reading on the IMDB.com forums of what other people have been saying about his acting.
and I agree with b266966jennyigotyournumber8675309, though. The special effects rendering NYC were spectacular. It's the rubbery, cartoonish faces and bodies of the infected that continually pulled me out of the movie.
|
|
BoxBob-K23
from Finland on 2007-12-26 14:48 [#02158098]
Points: 2440 Status: Regular
|
|
but you have to agree, will smith IS a legend
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2007-12-26 15:18 [#02158105]
Points: 24587 Status: Lurker | Followup to BoxBob-K23: #02158098
|
|
* bell-end
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2007-12-26 15:41 [#02158106]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker
|
|
I read the book recently. I rate it 3 out of 5. A pleasant evening's vampiric diversion. Great premise; unfortunately, Matheson is more of a short story writer than a novelist and it feels like a short story with filler. I mean, not that it isn't consistently amusing - just that it should have had more character development and plot for the length it was.
|
|
Barcode
from United Kingdom on 2007-12-26 16:10 [#02158107]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker
|
|
Smith was freshhhh... now he stinks.
|
|
Wolfslice
from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2007-12-28 04:55 [#02158480]
Points: 4899 Status: Regular
|
|
yeah I didn't care for this either.
the cgi suuuuucked and there were a handful of plot holes.
|
|
The_Funkmaster
from St. John's (Canada) on 2007-12-28 05:37 [#02158497]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to magicant: #02157969
|
|
Well that's really just your opinion ain't it? So quit talking like it's fact, because it's not.
|
|
Barcode
from United Kingdom on 2007-12-28 05:41 [#02158500]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker
|
|
I think you can take it for granted that every opinion expressed on here is representative of the poster in question unless he or she directly quotes another poster or equivalent outside agency.
|
|
DirtyPriest
from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2007-12-28 05:42 [#02158501]
Points: 5499 Status: Lurker | Followup to Barcode: #02158500
|
|
The mistakes that he made lingers on!
|
|
futureimage
from buy FIR from Juno (United Kingdom) on 2007-12-28 09:03 [#02158542]
Points: 6427 Status: Lurker
|
|
It was made a whole lot better by his interpretation of Bob Marley.
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2007-12-28 09:35 [#02158548]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
Heheh, the Bob Marley stuff was corny as shit.
|
|
Ead1528
from Bucks County, PA (United States) on 2007-12-28 09:47 [#02158550]
Points: 203 Status: Lurker
|
|
You people are missing the biggest flaw with the movie. The ending.
It had a horrible christian overtone. I don't want an ending in which the christians prevail. That would mean that the rest of man-kind would become a fucked-up christian society. the Christian religion has already done it's damage to society. That ending just put me in a bad mood.
I should have watched that Sweeney Todd movie.
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2007-12-28 10:04 [#02158555]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ead1528: #02158550
|
|
It sucked and was cheesy and I wouldn't want a christian society to fill a real life void... but, it wasn't real life and that didn't seem like a "flaw" in the film.
What seemed like the biggest flaw to me is that the dark seekers were developed in a schitzo manner. On the one hand they were smart enough to build a fairly elaborate trap, but they were totally brainless mute dumbshits. And absolutely no attempt was made to clarify that.
And the CG looked straight out of 1998.
And the kid played no role whatsoever other than being an annoying wierdo.
And, how did the girl drive onto the island when the bridges were destroyed?
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2007-12-28 10:15 [#02158559]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
Actually, now that I think about it it does seem like a flaw, because how did she know about the colony in Vermont? It probably would've been better if George Burns had come down out of the clouds and said "see i told you it was here." when she drove up to the gates.
So many things happened in this movie without any attempt to explain or justify them. And, its not like they were going for the whole 'mystery' thing.. it's like whoever wrote the screenplay wasn't smart enough to see the wholes.
|
|
swears
from junk sleep on 2007-12-28 10:24 [#02158562]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker
|
|
I am a big fan of "The Omega Man" is it nothing like that?
|
|
Ead1528
from Bucks County, PA (United States) on 2007-12-28 10:37 [#02158563]
Points: 203 Status: Lurker
|
|
I think all apocalypse movies made now are over-shadowed by the film
"28 Days Later". That is by far the best post-apocalyptic movie made in the past 10 years. Just because of it's realism, (and the fact that it was made with British actors). That's why I was pissed that they used american actors for 28 Weeks Later.
|
|
swears
from junk sleep on 2007-12-28 10:40 [#02158566]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ead1528: #02158563
|
|
The girl from that film is in some really rubbish band now, like goth for 12 year olds.
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2007-12-28 11:01 [#02158575]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to swears: #02158562
|
|
No... well, yes it is similar to that, but the zombies don't interact with Nevell at all.
|
|
Indeksical
from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-12-28 12:02 [#02158589]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Followup to swears: #02158562 | Show recordbag
|
|
The Omega Man is far superior IMO.
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2007-12-28 12:30 [#02158594]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
Me 2 IMO.
|
|
Indeksical
from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-12-28 12:33 [#02158595]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
IMO.
|
|
futureimage
from buy FIR from Juno (United Kingdom) on 2007-12-28 13:00 [#02158597]
Points: 6427 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ead1528: #02158563
|
|
This film was a blatent wannabe of 28 Days. There were also many elements from Children Of Men, I realised that when the woman and her son were driving down that road to the colony - how similar to CoM was that???
|
|
FlyAgaric
from the discovery (Africa) on 2007-12-28 13:09 [#02158599]
Points: 5776 Status: Regular
|
|
imhotep
|
|
magicant
from Canada on 2007-12-28 19:34 [#02158775]
Points: 2465 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ead1528: #02158550
|
|
we've discussed the film's implications of God... didn't u read the beginning of the thread?
|
|
X-tomatic
from ze war room on 2007-12-28 19:57 [#02158779]
Points: 2901 Status: Lurker
|
|
I guess they ran out of money for their CGI department after creating an empty and greenish NYC, cos the CGI on all creatures stank. How do you call these things, not zombies,not vampires, well they looked like the CGI mummy from 1999 "The Mummy". Funny that the best creature CGI still hails from Jurrasic Park. Bring back the mix of robotics and CGI anyday plz
And 28 Weeks later was superior to 28 Days Later.
|
|
DirtyPriest
from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2007-12-29 04:12 [#02158808]
Points: 5499 Status: Lurker
|
|
The part where the CGI sucked the post, was when the 3 dogs attack him. They look EXACTLY the same! Also, the creatures look more or less the same, and their mutation is very boring looking. How about some hideously disfigured ones? And the zombie thingies should probably have been make-up, with cgi details in stead. Would have made it cooler.
Other than that, i did feel somewhat entertained watching the movie, i must admit.
|
|
Indeksical
from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-12-29 06:26 [#02158818]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Followup to DirtyPriest: #02158808 | Show recordbag
|
|
Agreed, look at the new breed vampires in Blade 2. Thats how I think they should have done this, real people with CG enhancements. none of the things in I Am Legend had any visual character. The only thing that made one different from another was the ratty clothes they were wearing.
|
|
thecurbcreeper
from United States on 2007-12-29 10:25 [#02158847]
Points: 6045 Status: Lurker
|
|
saw this last night at a friends house (illegal DL action)
i thought it was meh. like most people said:
first half was good plot holes not good cgi needed more time to expand and explain
i could see the book being much better
|
|
Sido Dyas
from a computer on 2007-12-29 10:45 [#02158849]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker | Followup to thecurbcreeper: #02158847
|
|
"first half was good plot holes not good cgi needed more time to expand and explain
i could see the book being much better"
Yeah that kind of sums it up for me too.
|
|
bogala
from NYC (United States) on 2007-12-29 11:32 [#02158864]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular
|
|
They should use stop motion.
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2007-12-29 12:16 [#02158886]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to bogala: #02158864 | Show recordbag
|
|
haha, would've actually been an improvement over the CGI. That is not an exaggeration.
|
|
Sido Dyas
from a computer on 2007-12-29 12:30 [#02158901]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #02158886
|
|
Seriously! The zombies looked like the "I Robot"'s with a different skin rendering. Fucking lazy hollywood .
|
|
horsefactory
from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2007-12-29 12:33 [#02158906]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular
|
|
yeah the zombies were awful, it looked like they'd used the same model for each one.
|
|
J198
from Maastricht (Netherlands, The) on 2007-12-29 12:34 [#02158912]
Points: 7342 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
i m legend, u r history
|
|
Sido Dyas
from a computer on 2007-12-29 12:46 [#02158926]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker
|
|
Well maybe there will be a decent remake in 2250 .
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2007-12-29 12:49 [#02158931]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to horsefactory: #02158906 | Show recordbag
|
|
I thought that, too! Did you notice the scene where the "alpha male" is directing the waves of infected at Neville's house and one of the mutants runs past the Alpha male wearing almost identical clothing? It looked as though the animators made 2 models, a male and a female, and copied and pasted them around the screen, making only minor adjustments to the clothing. sloppy filmmaking.
|
|
Ead1528
from Bucks County, PA (United States) on 2007-12-29 14:36 [#02159002]
Points: 203 Status: Lurker
|
|
The only thing I liked about the film was the fact that it was in New York.
Especially the scene in the Met.
The film must have been made by a religious nutjob. Notice how the outbreak happened in a progressive and artistic city such as New York, and the safe haven was found in some small middle-american religious town in Maryland.
|
|
Messageboard index
|