Why do americans like Bush? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
recycle
w M w
...and 210 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614262
Today 9
Topics 127551
  
 
Messageboard index
Why do americans like Bush?
 

offline CORTEX from Canada on 2002-11-06 17:46 [#00430833]
Points: 3346 Status: Regular



bush, as in their president (of course!). i just dont get
it.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-11-06 17:47 [#00430836]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



few really do


 

offline CORTEX from Canada on 2002-11-06 17:48 [#00430838]
Points: 3346 Status: Regular | Followup to titsworth: #00430836



how'd he get elected?


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-11-06 17:48 [#00430840]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to CORTEX: #00430838



he wasn't


 

offline glass_eater from a blind nerves area (Switzerland) on 2002-11-06 17:48 [#00430841]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



do they?
i dont think so much do...
:/


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2002-11-06 17:49 [#00430843]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



it was a farce.
he was elected by the electoral college but if the election
was based on popular vote he would have lost as more people
voted for Al Gore. this is old news though.


 

offline CORTEX from Canada on 2002-11-06 17:50 [#00430844]
Points: 3346 Status: Regular



even with that electoral scandal, the guy still received
massive votes. at least 40%. so people did vote for him.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-11-06 17:52 [#00430847]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



al gore did win the popular vote, but it's still democrats'
fault bush is in office cos gore had a clearer majority in
terms of people who actually wanted him in office. the
problem is, statistics infer that democrats vote less often
than republicans, which is really lame but hey maybe they've
learned their lesson now. personally i wanted nader in
office, but again -- liberals are too lazy to go vote. it's
sad how many people i know who were strongly in favor of
nader that either didn't register to vote or were registered
and just didn't go to the polls. it really makes all
liberals look bad. once again though.. perhaps we've now
learned our lesson.


 

offline thethirdball from Polly Pisspot (Canada) on 2002-11-06 17:52 [#00430848]
Points: 1629 Status: Lurker



They seem to like him since:

A) Last night, Republicans (his party) scored a huge
victory.

B) His approval ratings are consistently over 65% (very
high)

I think they like the way he's dealing with "homeland
security" and the "evildoers".


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2002-11-06 17:52 [#00430849]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



so in the electoral college, each state has a certain number
of votes depending on the population of the state. Texas
has like 20 something and smaller states like Rhode Island
have much much less. Depending on how many people vote
within a state, the candidate gets a certain number of that
state's electoral votes.

actually what happens is the state votes for delegates who
cast the electoral votes representing the state or some shit
like that.
I don't really understand it, I'm a biologist not a
politician.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2002-11-06 17:53 [#00430851]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



I didn't vote.
i didn't like any of the candidates and we dont get a "none
of the above" vote in this country.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-11-06 17:55 [#00430853]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to CORTEX: #00430844



cortex: why did he get 40% of the votes? well, his campaign
was stronger. i'm not saying i agree with his politics (i'm
actually vehemently opposed to them) or that i believed his
promises (i still don't); i'm just saying that he made a
more compelling case than gore, who really shot himself in
the foot with his poorly run campaign. i guess he figured he
would win since never in the history of the US has an
incumbent vice president with the economy on his side ever
lost when running for president. gore was just THAT bad. he
even lost his home state. what a disgrace. so, bush got so
many votes cos he was a good deceiver, the democratic ticket
was weak, liberals are lazy voters, and the elderly and
upper class never forget to vote.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-11-06 17:57 [#00430855]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to evolume: #00430851



evolume: did you look past the two main choices and, i
dunno, actually read about other candidates' platforms? how
about nader? harry brown? even pat buchanan if that's what
you're into.


 

offline CORTEX from Canada on 2002-11-06 18:03 [#00430866]
Points: 3346 Status: Regular | Followup to titsworth: #00430853



i hear what you're saying, and it's true he had a hell of a
better campaign. but i dont get why this explains why he
got elected. are americans so impressionnable? no matter
who you are or what your ideas are, you'll get elected if
you project a good image? if a total asshole (i.e. hitler)
wanted to run for president and did an amazing electoral
campaign when his oponent, gore, really sucked, would he
have won?

of course im exagerating, but do you get what im saying?


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2002-11-06 18:03 [#00430867]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to titsworth: #00430855



naw, actually i didn't really look either.
i am one of those apathetic lazy liberals. But i also feel
that for me to vote, not really knowing anything about the
candidates, is worse that not voting at all. In other words
i think voting blind is far more destructive than not voting
at all.
when i do vote i always try to really familiarize myself
with the issues at hand and make a well informed decision
but that all takes so much time and well, like i said, i am
lazy and apathetic to the whole thing.



 

offline CORTEX from Canada on 2002-11-06 18:05 [#00430869]
Points: 3346 Status: Regular | Followup to CORTEX: #00430866



what pisses me off and insults me is when i see a bush
speach broadcast live on tv. just the terms he uses and the
sentence formulation he says, it ticks me off.

'hussein is a homicidal tyrant. he's an evildoer and harms
people who love freedom. the us must defend those
freedomlovers blah blah blah...".

not that im pro-hussein, not at all.


 

offline Clic on 2002-11-06 18:06 [#00430872]
Points: 5232 Status: Regular



I'm sure I could put this more eloquently, but fuck George
W. Bush.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-11-06 18:08 [#00430873]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to CORTEX: #00430866



yes, cortex -- "we" are very impressionable. do you honestly
think every president that has been elected in the u.s. has
been the best choice? it's just a game of who puts on the
better show. america was put off by clinton's overt
intelligence and eloquence, not to mention his infidelity to
his wife. as a result, working class americans joined the
people who vote republican no matter what in voting for
"dubya" because of his supposed moralism (despite the fact
that he and his father have both cheated on their wives AND
dubya is a former alcoholic and coke addict... which is of
course totally downplayed) and "plain language" (blatant
stupidity). it's sad but after 8 years of clinton, THAT's
what won over more voters this time around. anyway, that's
the story for 2000, but every election has its own story..
and btw this doesn't just happen in america.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-11-06 18:11 [#00430878]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to evolume: #00430867



evolume: ok, but if you can't take the 20 minutes to read
about other candidates then you have no right to complain
about politics or the decisions those in power make.


 

offline CORTEX from Canada on 2002-11-06 18:16 [#00430890]
Points: 3346 Status: Regular | Followup to titsworth: #00430873



what you're saying is quite possible imo. it's less
frequent that the better man actually wins than the
opposite. by your logic, since bush is such an asshole, he
has no way of winning the next elections, right?


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-11-06 18:21 [#00430897]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to CORTEX: #00430890



just a few months ago his approval rating was like 90% or
something. his team must be made up of geniuses cos the
dingbats in this country are buying up his bullshit hook
like and sinker. i was checking out my college's unofficial
message board earlier and some kid (a supposed democrat)
said he'd go to war in iraq if he had to and that he thinks
it's perfectly valid that our war with them is about iraq.
he didn't even make any bones about it being the true
reason. he said that it'll soon be the 2nd most important
resource in the world and that it's really important or some
bullshit like that. so yea, the people who diss bush make up
a really small minority of people in this country (mostly
the educated youth).


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2002-11-06 18:22 [#00430900]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict



i don't like Bush.


 

offline uviol from United States on 2002-11-06 18:30 [#00430910]
Points: 2496 Status: Lurker



I wasn't really a big fan of Gore OR Bush.. I would've
rather seen one of the 'minority' canditates like Buchanan
or nader give a shot at it.. but I know zero about politics.
I'd rather have Bush than Gore, but just barely. So far I
think he's dealt with the Al-Queda thing decently. The
decision whether or not to go to war will be the determining
factor though..


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2002-11-06 18:33 [#00430915]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict



the gap between democrats and republicans is closing. when i
turn eighteen i'll most likely vote democrat, but i may vote
independent. depends where the issues lie.
i would never vote for an imbecile like bush though. not
sure why 49 percent of the country thought he'd do such a
good job.


 

offline CORTEX from Canada on 2002-11-06 18:34 [#00430917]
Points: 3346 Status: Regular



the problem with independant parties is that, no matter how
good they are, they'll never get elected unfortunately. the
democrats and republicans are too big and so much richer,
theyll eat the independants alive.


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2002-11-06 18:36 [#00430920]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict



yeah. thats strange though, as i've heard many a democrat
say that, and you'd think if they simply went out and voted
independent, instead of drawing forgone conclusions,
independents might actually gain a foothold in politics. our
current bipartisan government is too limited, we need some
room to breathe.


 

offline CORTEX from Canada on 2002-11-06 18:38 [#00430925]
Points: 3346 Status: Regular



or maybe americans that are pro-independant think like me on
that matter. therefore, they wont make the effort of voting
since they think it's a lost cause, when in fact, if they
all voted, they could make a difference...


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2002-11-06 18:40 [#00430933]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict | Followup to CORTEX: #00430925



yeah thats what i meant


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-11-06 18:44 [#00430941]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to zaphod: #00430915



zapod: 49% didn't. problem is, as i said -- fools don't be
votin' up in this bitch.

uviol: i know you don't follow politics, but just so you
know... there's a huge difference between nader and
buchannan. don't assume that any minority candidate is
worthy of being in office. i can't think of anyone i want
less to be president than buchannan. that would be a
monstrosity on a historical scale. within four years he
would be near hitler proportion.

CORTEX: the democrats and republicans haven't always been
the two top parties. people have the power to change things.
sure, it's very gradual, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't
bother. i'm a registered independent.


 

offline pomme de terre from obscure body in the SK System on 2002-11-06 18:45 [#00430943]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I'm American.

George W. Bush is a cocksucker. George Bush Sr. is even more
of a cocksucker.

uviol: love the new avatar...


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2002-11-06 18:46 [#00430946]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict | Followup to titsworth: #00430941



well, i believe 49% of those who voted voted for bush. as he
did lose the popular election and all. but you're right,
hardly anyone in this country votes.


 

offline uviol from United States on 2002-11-06 18:48 [#00430951]
Points: 2496 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00430941



tits: thanks for the info.. Like i said i'm really clueless,
I guess i just meant I'd have liked to have seen someone
other than Gore or Bush in office, sorry for the clumsy
grouping. Although I know a bit about the Green party..

pomme: thank you :)


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-11-06 18:51 [#00430959]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to zaphod: #00430946



zaphod: if everyone voted for who they think should be
president, bush would've lost by more than 1%. that's what
i'm saying.


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2002-11-06 18:52 [#00430962]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict | Followup to titsworth: #00430959



ah, gotcha.


 

offline CORTEX from Canada on 2002-11-06 18:53 [#00430966]
Points: 3346 Status: Regular | Followup to titsworth: #00430959



what do you mean?


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2002-11-06 18:55 [#00430969]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict | Followup to titsworth: #00430959



are you essentially saying that people didn't vote with
their conscience? because i may have to disagree.


 

offline revpersona from Plainfield (United States) on 2002-11-06 18:58 [#00430978]
Points: 3167 Status: Lurker



People are dumb. Many feel we did not instegate 9-11, and
feel that Bush's policy in the middle-east is fine, and thus
many of those people are going to agree with him.

Just look at the Iraq anti-war marches that have been
happening around the D.C. area, tons don't agree with him.


 

offline CORTEX from Canada on 2002-11-06 18:59 [#00430980]
Points: 3346 Status: Regular | Followup to revpersona: #00430978



of course 9-11 was instigated by the us. the sad thing is
that innocent people suffered...


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-11-06 19:01 [#00430985]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to zaphod: #00430969



zaphod: no, i'm repeating that people don't vote, especially
liberals. republicans have more time on their hands, plus
they have more money so they can afford to take off an
afternoon or morning from work in order to vote. plus
they're more informed and aren't likely to "forget" it's
election day. PLUS they generally are less apathetic. that's
what i mean.

the only muthafuckaz that didn't vote with their conscience
are those who supported nader but voted for gore at the last
minute cos of gore's scare campaigns. i don't think they
realized that some states go democratic every election, or
that it was really important for nader to actually RECEIVE
his votes, not just verbal support. a few months before the
election, a poll showed nader with almost 9% of the popular
vote. fuck the supporters who didn't vote for him.


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2002-11-06 19:03 [#00430990]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict | Followup to titsworth: #00430985



yeah. thats exactly what i was talking about. its not enough
to "support" something like the green party. you have to
vote for it simply for it to recieve funding. i wish more
people hadn't wussed out on that.


 

offline CORTEX from Canada on 2002-11-06 23:31 [#00431360]
Points: 3346 Status: Regular



someone sent me this, it suits the subject a little:

"Bush's foreign policy is policy like Madison Square Garden
is a garden..."
-Anon


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2002-11-07 17:10 [#00432314]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to titsworth: #00430878



i don't complain

like i said, i'm apathetic to politics in general. it takes
too much energy to worry about that crap.


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2002-11-07 19:47 [#00432460]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker



DONT VOTE REPUBLICAN!


 

offline afxNUMB from So.Flo on 2002-11-07 22:21 [#00432579]
Points: 7099 Status: Regular



I'm an hispanic american, and I didnt vote cause I didnt
know shit about either sides only about the school
amendment-

I've known a lot of people who like Bush cause they're over
aged hispanics who dont know shit..I dont have a problem
with Bush-I mean he's my president and my friends are in the
Marines is how far my respect goes but either way we're all
gonna die


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-11-07 22:25 [#00432580]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to afxNUMB: #00432579



ignorance is truly bliss, huh?


 

offline Verkrampte from Renton (United States) on 2002-11-07 22:25 [#00432581]
Points: 1182 Status: Regular



he = teh $ux0r


 

offline afxNUMB from So.Flo on 2002-11-07 22:31 [#00432586]
Points: 7099 Status: Regular | Followup to titsworth: #00432580



Are you insulting me?


 


Messageboard index