Drukqs piano tracks | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
Roger Wilco
...and 462 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614240
Today 9
Topics 127550
  
 
Messageboard index
Drukqs piano tracks
 

offline mortsto-x from Trondheim/Bodø (Norway) on 2002-10-23 09:53 [#00414044]
Points: 8062 Status: Lurker



There is a long article about this on www.warprecords.com
Check it out.
"Richard James cannot read conventional musical notation and
he cannot play a keyboard "
Quite surprising


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-10-23 09:57 [#00414053]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to mortsto-x: #00414044 | Show recordbag



He's said in past interview that he sometimes just hits
keys, records it and chops it up, but you're right, I've
never heard of him playing keyboard live...


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2002-10-23 09:57 [#00414054]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker



...reading now......

Thanks! :)


 

offline J-HOK on 2002-10-23 09:59 [#00414059]
Points: 904 Status: Addict



midi-piano


 

offline Bremzen from utrecht (Netherlands, The) on 2002-10-23 10:03 [#00414066]
Points: 653 Status: Lurker



why is that surprising, you don't need to be able to read
music to make a nice piano piece:)


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-10-23 10:03 [#00414068]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



not really suprised. i can see that.

he just has a great great ear.

but they left out one part of the story with the prepared
piano.

while cage did invent this... it was by accident. he was
working on songs, and they didnt work, as is said in the
articale... but he didnt intentionally put stuff in the
piano. his piano was in a room that was being remodled or
fixed, and the box of peices was sitting next to the piano.
he accidently hit it, and they feel in the piano.

and then it hit him

just alittle info i thought id share


 

offline mortsto-x from Trondheim/Bodø (Norway) on 2002-10-23 10:04 [#00414070]
Points: 8062 Status: Lurker



I thought a music-prodigy like him could play a lot of
instruments


 

offline J-HOK on 2002-10-23 10:09 [#00414078]
Points: 904 Status: Addict



i think lots of electronic musicians cant play instruments
to any degree, notable exceptions being squarepusher, mike
paradinas, luke vibert, and you can clearly hear it in their
music, luckily, if you compose with a computer, you can
still go a long way with no instrumental abilities


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-10-23 10:14 [#00414086]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to J-HOK: #00414078 | Show recordbag



Yep, I agree, before computers, you couldn't just have a
slave musician who played whatever you wrote and you could
go, "damn, that's too low" scribbles it out, tries again
etc. You can do that with your own stuff, but other
musicians would get bored to tears. PCs let you compose and
play what you're doing in real time :)


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-10-23 10:14 [#00414087]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



i played drums for 4 years, and bass for 3.

i really just dont enjoy playing live that much

it can be fun, but id never want to be in a band and stuff
(figured this out last year with my band... it was fun, but
just not something i want to do)

i get so much out of just composing. while playing an
instrument can give you another perspective on writting, and
can make programming easier (instead of writting in the
notes, play it on keyboard) its in no way a nessesity to
make great music.

playing is a means to an end in my mind.

that said, i do want to learn piano, just for compositional
reasons, not to perform


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-10-23 10:16 [#00414089]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



yes, but if you were a great composer. you would hear it in
your head. you wouldnt need to have someone play it

(talking about classical music etc...)


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-10-23 10:16 [#00414091]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



John Lennon and Paul McCartney couldn't read or write music
properly. Who needs formal training when you're a bona fide
genious?


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-10-23 10:18 [#00414100]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



yep


 

offline death-pengwin from Medicine Hat (Canada) on 2002-10-23 12:19 [#00414214]
Points: 601 Status: Lurker



i agree


 

offline xlr from Boston (United States) on 2002-10-23 12:33 [#00414232]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



Wow, that's really odd that Richard can't play a keyboard.
I'm not too surprised about not being able to read music
notation, though.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-10-23 12:36 [#00414235]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to xlr: #00414232



i don't believe that for a minute.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-10-23 14:30 [#00414340]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



which one?

the readin, or playing

or both


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-10-23 14:38 [#00414345]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #00414340



both but especially the keyboard playing


 

offline corngrower from the fertile grounds of Iowa, w (United States) on 2002-10-23 14:44 [#00414355]
Points: 4404 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00414345



i agree, anyone can play a fucking keyboard


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-10-23 14:45 [#00414357]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker



I think that "Richard James cannot read conventional musical
notation and
he cannot play a keyboard "

should be:
"Richard James cannot play a keyboard from conventional
musical notation"

Anyone can learn a little bit of conventional musical
notation in an hour and anyone can play the keyboard a bit,
it gets trickier when the two are combined...


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-10-23 14:46 [#00414358]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



meh

i beleive it.

why not?

and why would they make an articale about it?


 

offline corngrower from the fertile grounds of Iowa, w (United States) on 2002-10-23 14:46 [#00414359]
Points: 4404 Status: Lurker | Followup to Laserbeak: #00414357



yeah, that sounds much more realistic


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-10-23 14:47 [#00414361]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



its not that he CANT like he is physically unable to do it.

but he just cant, cause he never tried



 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-10-23 14:49 [#00414364]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



that's total bullshit. i think the article was just to hype
afx in order to get remarks exactly like some of the ones
above ("true geniuses.." etc.). i mean are we supposed to
swallow the story about him making his own custom synths AND
not being able to play a synth correctly? hype hype hype.


 

offline corngrower from the fertile grounds of Iowa, w (United States) on 2002-10-23 14:50 [#00414365]
Points: 4404 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #00414361



you mean he didn't use mostly keyboards and synths on saw
85-92, cause from what I've heard thats the impression I was
under


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-10-23 14:52 [#00414370]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



just cause you use synths doesnt mean that you played them

midis been around since 83, so its quite possible he didnt
play any of it

and tits, no, i dont think thats what it is. anyone can
write music without playing piano, so it doesnt make him any
more special cause he didnt play it.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-10-23 14:53 [#00414373]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #00414370



\/\/


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-10-23 14:55 [#00414375]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



haha

is that supposed to be the whatever sign?

oh no you didnt girlfriend

*snaps fingers
*bobs head


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-10-23 14:58 [#00414379]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



hehe
yea, i just throw that up when i don't feel like arguing


 

offline corngrower from the fertile grounds of Iowa, w (United States) on 2002-10-23 15:02 [#00414387]
Points: 4404 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #00414370



I guess I'm not as knowlegable as you on the subject and you
could very well be right, but listening to saw 85-92 it just
sounds like he was playing most of it on synths... and some
tracks like acrid avid jamshred, it just seems like the
synth line in the background is just too simple for him not
to have been able to play it... I mean, I got on my parents
old keyboard and tought it to myself in like 5 minutes, so
it's just hard to believe for me


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-10-23 15:07 [#00414396]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to corngrower: #00414387



yea, i think anyone who's been making music for at least 17
years (saw 85-92) would have taken the hour or so to
learn how to play notes on a keyboard. i think that article
reprinted on warp was the author's conjecture, not actual
fact.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-10-23 15:09 [#00414401]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



there is a differnce of playing a piano, and playing it well


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-10-23 15:11 [#00414407]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #00414401



there's a difference between walking and running, napping
and sleeping, burping and vomiting...


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-10-23 15:13 [#00414411]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



ok

my point is, ok maybe he can fiddle around on the piano, but
isnt good enough, at least in his mind, to want to record
himself playing live, with out edits (as the articale said
it was all done on a real piano).

i can fiddle around on guitar, but i wouldnt say i can play
one


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2002-10-23 15:14 [#00414413]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



exactely
zeus
1999
into
2000


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-10-23 15:16 [#00414416]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



tits is bang on...

AFX can definately read music notation....

Anyone can...even I can...it's amazingly simple...if anyone
here can't, then take an hr & do some reading on the
web...it's really not a lot different than the standard
Piano-Roll view on Cubase or Logic (or most
sequencers...)...

Even 808s/909s have notation on em...even if it's just a
single bar involved...

And you only have to listen to some of his work to realise
that he can indeed play....he may not be a great live player
but he can certainly play into a sequencer etc...

& his live sequencer work is always good if you catch a rare
live show....



 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-10-23 15:17 [#00414417]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



huh?


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-10-23 15:19 [#00414419]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



jand.

like i said, its not that he CANT, its just that he doesnt.


if he wanted to learn, sure, he could learn... but why? its
not like he has to sight read for an orchestra or compose
symphonies

he is doing relativly simple stuff, that could be done by
using his ear.

and sure, he could play something into a sequencer, at
least, and then quantize...

but the recordings of the piano are real. not sampled, not
sequenced... this is a totally different matter


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-10-23 15:31 [#00414424]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



i don't think most of aphex's work is simple at all
really... and if you think that perhaps you should relisten.
there's a whole lot going on, and no amateur who can't read
musical notation or find the notes on a keyboard could
produce anything like the rdj album, icbyd, saw2 (read my
essay comparing him to reich, who can definitely read and
play), etc.

as for your "he could do it but he doesn't want to"
argument, how do you know? are you going by your ears or by
this one essay that doesn't substantiate or even elaborate
on the claim rdj can't read or play notes?


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-10-23 15:35 [#00414427]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



lots goin on can still be simple.

and i didnt say he didnt know the notes of the keyboard, i
said he couldnt play.

the track veiw on sequencers is a sideways keyboard, so he
would know the notes from there.

and yes, an "amatuer" could write that. hes just got a
really good ear.



 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-10-23 15:38 [#00414431]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



i don't just mean a lot of sounds at the same time.. i meant
lots going on in the figurative sense. it sounds cliche but
i gotta say it: "this music's deep, man." it is. i'm sure
you realize this and are just forgetting at the moment.

as for not being able to play a keyboard and not knowing
what the notes on the keyboard are, isn't that the same
thing? are you just disagreeing with everything i say or do
you fundamentally see a difference between those two things?


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-10-23 15:41 [#00414436]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



i fundamentaly see a difference

i know the notes on a keyboard back and forth easy

but i cant play the piano, in the sense of playing a
bassline and a melody at once, or with chords.

and dude, im being totally serious when I say this, so
please beleive me ok? IM NOT TRYING TO DISAGREE WITH
EVERYTHING YOU SAY.
it just happens we disagree.
seriously man, im not trying to bust your balls and annoy
you. im just stating my views on matters, and we happen to
have different ones.
cool?


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2002-10-23 15:45 [#00414442]
Points: 27799 Status: Regular



of course he can read music, he used to have piano lessons
when he was younger

i read it in an interview


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-10-23 15:46 [#00414447]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



That article was very informative. i enjoyed it. i wanna
buy more john cage cds defineatly when i get the money. i
think that article was there to inform not to hype anything
up. dumb.



 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-10-23 15:49 [#00414451]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



i see your point, but i don't know if the writer intended to
make that distinction. i think he was saying rdj doesn't
know the notes on a keyboard. maybe rdj can't sit down at a
piano and play the drukqs piano songs live, but i think
that's more a function of what he said in an interview -
that some of those tracks CAN'T be physically performed live
(by anyone). ignoring the piano and sticking to synths, from
listening to pre-drukqs rdj i think he played or plays the
keyboard in his music despite the essayist's claim to the
contrary. this is especially true for the music he made in
the days before recycle and other computer apps. i just
don't see how he could have programmed the synth lines in
saw 85-92, classics, etc., or perhaps i don't see WHY he'd
program them if he could.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-10-23 15:50 [#00414453]
Points: 24593 Status: Regular | Followup to earthleakage: #00414442



lmao. i know what cannibalism is, i saw it on tv...


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-10-23 15:52 [#00414455]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



I think those tracks can be preformed live. any one of
those tracks. you CAN you use more than one piano you know.
set up 4 or 5 pianos and have a go on them. id like to
hear it.


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-10-23 15:53 [#00414460]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



why WOULDN'T he program the synths in saw ii or classics?


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-10-23 15:56 [#00414463]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to Amonbrune: #00414455



yea it'd be cool to hear those songs live. but i think rdj
was saying they can't be played live by one human, or
perhaps he meant they can't even be played on a traditional
piano.

i just don't think the melodic synth lines on saw 85-92 and
classics were programmed. they sound like they were played
on a synth, not constructed on a computer or a sequencer.
obviously there's a lot programmed but come on we know he
owns synths, why wouldn't he play them?


 

offline glass_eater from a blind nerves area (Switzerland) on 2002-10-23 15:56 [#00414464]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



rdj does music by instinct and sometimes hes helped by
animals
i mean dont u believe in what he says ?
sinners !
;)))


 


Messageboard index