remix ethics | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 134 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614367
Today 13
Topics 127560
  
 
Messageboard index
remix ethics
 

offline john is fast from sacramento (United States) on 2003-01-17 02:06 [#00517325]
Points: 638 Status: Regular



when remixing someone, and say they gave you all the
seperate tracks for drums and vocals and all that. what are
the ethics of what you are allowed to do? what I mean is
most people replace drums and sample things here and there
but are you allowed to throw in totally new synth lines
using your own gear or is it generally understood that you
stick to the primary data?
I did a remix of a guy named dusty brown and I replaced the
drums and rearranged the track alot, edit alot of the
sounds. but I also added a fruityloops synth line. I'm not
sure if that was allowed or not.


 

offline vacant from NYC (United States) on 2003-01-17 02:12 [#00517329]
Points: 365 Status: Regular



it's definitely allowed; that is, we've definitely all heard
it done before by professional artists. whether or not what
you produce can, by definition, still be called a remix is
up to you. you might have to call it a 're-creation', if
that isn't too "nine inch nails" for you


 

offline john is fast from sacramento (United States) on 2003-01-17 02:40 [#00517345]
Points: 638 Status: Regular



well I only started wondering after autechre said they remix
lots of artists and only use the original material but they
butcher the sounds to make them new. got me wondering if
thats the way it's done.


 

offline fat kaimo from Finland on 2003-01-17 02:46 [#00517349]
Points: 2003 Status: Lurker



i made a remix for a acoustic guitar driven group 1½ year
ago. all the original material i used was some vocals which
i retuned and bended... the song was originally a slow tempo
sad song but it turned into a fast stupid silly electronic
tune.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-01-17 02:49 [#00517352]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to john is fast: #00517345 | Show recordbag



There are no hard and fast rules for remixing, but:

Generally the BPM is altered (slightly).

You should leave the "hooks" in tact, if nothing else- this
will at least make people associate it with the original.

Something I like doing is if there are looping drums, leave
3 intact, subtley change the fourth one then original 3 and
so on.

There are 4 reasonable tutorials on remixing here.


 

offline KEYFUMBLER from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2003-01-17 04:44 [#00517477]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker



eh............ i do what the hell i like when remixing..
who´s gonna stop me?

Look at Oval´s remix of the entire Big Loada album on Warp
10 Remixes..... not a single recognisable element left and
its bloody brilliant....


 

offline wayout from the street of crocodiles on 2003-01-17 11:18 [#00517927]
Points: 2849 Status: Lurker



yeah, from listening to a lot of remixes.. i'd say there
really arent any rules.. hell, half the remixes aphex twin
submitted for artists had absolutely nothing to do with the
original track


 

offline Darth manchu from Cambridge (United Kingdom) on 2003-01-17 11:20 [#00517928]
Points: 1897 Status: Regular



listen to bogdan raczynski's remix of envane by autechre.

Now thats a 'remix'


 

offline electro from detroit on 2003-01-17 11:57 [#00517951]
Points: 2880 Status: Regular



i like the remix singles of bjork's and orbital
pagan poetry by mathew herbert is wounderfull
and the nothing left remixes too



 


Messageboard index