What if HE's wrong? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
nanotech
...and 369 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614367
Today 13
Topics 127560
  
 
Messageboard index
What if HE's wrong?
 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-12-30 14:53 [#00495578]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Mickey Mouse: #00495575



twas joke


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-30 14:57 [#00495581]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #00495578



I was joking too; I wasn't squashed by a giant foot after
all!

:: does crazy atheist dance ::

WOOOZLE WOOOZIE WEEEEEEE!!!

(apologies to fellow mouse)


 

offline Mickey Mouse from The Moon on 2002-12-30 15:10 [#00495592]
Points: 4130 Status: Addict



COOL-E-O!

WHERE IS THE FUCKING SARCASM TAG!!!!!

I WRITE TO THE WWW PEOPLE BUT THEY SEEM TO IGNORE MY
REQUESTS!!!!!!!!

DAMN IT ALL, DAMN IT ALL TO HELL!

WOOOOZLE WOOOOSIE WEEEEEEE!

*also dances the crazy atheist dance*

why apologieze dood?

CHOOSE LIFE! CHOOSE BANF!


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-30 15:24 [#00495611]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



My proposal for the sarcasm tag:

<fleetmouse>

</fleetmouse>



 

offline Mickey Mouse from The Moon on 2002-12-30 15:38 [#00495627]
Points: 4130 Status: Addict











w00t!


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-12-30 15:45 [#00495641]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #00495558



oh right, God wants us to kill EVERYBODY. way to take
scripture out of context to suit your poorly constructed
point.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-30 16:10 [#00495666]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00495641



My point, poorly constructed or not, is merely that if you
actually read the Bible, God often doesn't seem particularly
loving or even very bright.

Though I do challenge you to explain/justify Numbers 31 in a
way that doesn't make you feel like you need to take a
shower.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-12-30 16:29 [#00495683]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #00495666



of course. the Old Testament and the New Testament show a
vastly different attitude. the Old Testament has lots of
values, but it's mostly just explaining the story that leads
up to the NT, which is what you should pay attention to. not
the wrathful God of old.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-30 17:04 [#00495690]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Ah, the New Testament. "I used to be a blood drinking
sociopath, but I got better."

Or did he?

Jesus fully endorses the Old Testament (with all of its
absurdity and mindless butality) according to Matthew
5:17-19. Not one "jot or tittle" does he disavow.

Remember, this is the fella that is supposedly all knowing
and all powerful. Yet instead of directly forgiving us for
our sins, he sends his son to earth to be tortured and
killed, and uh somehow that makes things better...? ::shrug
::

This is the best plan for salvation he could come up with?
Mister, if that God thing really exists, no WAY is it the
BIG boss. It's a tequila-swilling stock clerk sneaking off
and xeroxing its ass at the celestial staff party.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-12-30 17:12 [#00495696]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #00495690



i didn't say "disavow it", just look at it in context.

i don't question God's intentions.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-30 17:17 [#00495704]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00495696



i don't question God's intentions.

That's the problem, not the solution.


 

offline DaWeeze from WANTED IN 16 STATES! on 2002-12-30 17:21 [#00495706]
Points: 5213 Status: Addict



What if HE's wrong?

I thought of a better question:

What if HE-MAN's wrong?

;)


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2002-12-30 17:25 [#00495710]
Points: 27799 Status: Regular | Followup to DaWeeze: #00495706



greyskull is NEVER wrong


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-30 17:36 [#00495720]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



I'm really tempted to switch to an Orko avatar.

He's already wearing a party hat.


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2002-12-30 18:01 [#00495737]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker



Masters of the Universe, it's the Devils' work i tell ye


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-30 18:07 [#00495740]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Crocomire: #00495737



Skeletor is just a thinly disguised Paul Lynde, so yes.


 

offline DaWeeze from WANTED IN 16 STATES! on 2002-12-30 18:20 [#00495750]
Points: 5213 Status: Addict



Yes! I've subverted the thread! My work here is done...

;)


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-12-30 18:24 [#00495753]
Points: 21462 Status: Regular



titswerth is good comments make


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-30 18:40 [#00495768]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to DaWeeze: #00495750



I have the attention span of a guppy so that's no great
accomplishment.


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2002-12-30 18:59 [#00495784]
Points: 27799 Status: Regular



ram man is da man


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-12-30 19:52 [#00495839]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #00495704



no, the problem is people following the word of religious
nuts, Bible thumpers, and liars, or misinterpreting the
Bible. none of this has anything to do with trusting God.
it's people who get it twisted (believers and non) who are
the problem.


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2002-12-30 20:07 [#00495853]
Points: 27799 Status: Regular



*ironic high five*


 

offline Mickey Mouse from The Moon on 2002-12-30 20:13 [#00495857]
Points: 4130 Status: Addict



dont get it twisted yo! now lets get it all in perspective,
for all yall enjoyment a song yall can step wit, yall
apointed me to bring rap justice, but I aint 5-0, yall know
its NAS yo! Grey goose and a whole lot of hydro!

dont say my cars topless, say the titties is out

you a slave to my page in my rhyme book

this is street hop, now get up off your arse like your seats
hot

knocked a pimp straight down in his pimp cup, thats the way
you get timbaland up

females who are the sexiest are always the nastiest

.....

NAS is gods son, for shizzle

But I dont know, the homeless man I say was pretty god
like.



 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-30 20:19 [#00495863]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00495839



There are basically three approaches to the bible:

1) You read it until you come to realize it's completely
fucked up, vicious, absurd and self-contradictory.
(atheism)

2) You read it until YOU are completely fucked up and the
book looks sane from your now disfigured perspective.
(fundyism)

3) You have your own huggy wuggy teddy bear ideas about what
God and the bible are all about, and you disregard, downplay
or rationalize away all the nasty stuff. (rainbow and
unicorn christians, probably the largest category)


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-12-30 20:19 [#00495866]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00495839



i can't take seriously the idea that the bible is the word
of God. people can have religious experience, communion
with God, write down the messages that came to them in the
inspired state, but it is God filtered through that
individual's genetics, life experience and cultural
upbrining. the purest message of God is the one recieved
personally. not that one can't learn from others'
god-inspiration, like the bible. but i think it's unhealthy
to object criticism of the bible.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-30 21:15 [#00495916]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #00495866



The experience of God you're talking about is not what I'm
talking about. I'm talking about anthropomorphic old
nobodaddy.

Your God is more like an overwhelming intense moment of
clarity when things come together and make sense and you''re
enraptured by the beauty of it... maybe your mind
personifies it as angels or spirit beings, as a way of
making sense of something quite unusual.

Of course when you try to record that insight, that
transcendent experience, it is beyond words. You literally
had to be there.

Maybe humans (and other sapients) are all there is of
intelligence in the universe, and God only exists for those
flickering moments of enlightenment that are like a preview
of what we could become.


 

offline xeno on 2002-12-30 21:17 [#00495918]
Points: 63 Status: Regular



if one is to take biblical concepts literally.. heaven
above, hell below..
well, above is dark matter. the oceans came from beneath..
and the sun [fire] is what gives us life.
thus, satan is our god.
heh

but the devil was conceived biblically too.. so that's a
trap
i havent read the bible


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-30 21:21 [#00495926]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to xeno: #00495918



i havent read the bible

It's one of the greatest works of fiction ever written.


 

offline xeno on 2002-12-30 21:24 [#00495930]
Points: 63 Status: Regular



i'll get around to it when i'm fully jaded.


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2002-12-30 21:26 [#00495935]
Points: 27799 Status: Regular | Followup to fleetmouse: #00495926



who's the publisher?


 

offline xeno on 2002-12-30 21:28 [#00495938]
Points: 63 Status: Regular



lucifer.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-12-30 21:28 [#00495939]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #00495866



yea, i have trouble taking it seriously either. most of it,
i think, is authentic and righteous, but 1) this is God's
word as interpreted by humans, who are by nature imperfect
and, unfortunately, could take the opportunity to misconvey
the message of God 2) the Bible has been translated so many
times that with each new translation more of the meaning is
loss. if there was a way for everyone to read the original
edition of the Bible, free from errors in translation and
so-called "modernizations", that'd be great (but still
tainted by my point #1).


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-12-30 21:29 [#00495940]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #00495916



when mohomed was visited by angels and journeyed to the edge
of the universe as is described, or when abraham was sent
word from god, i have difficulty believing these experiences
are that far off from my experiences with god. all
religions have those who have faith in god as is tought to
them, and those who seek mystical union with god. i've
found myself (not sought) in union with god outside of any
dogmatic system and so i interpret my experience not with a
religious background but with a a broad view and desire to
understand the experience as something universally present
in humanity. the hasids describe a union with god not far
off from my experience, as do the sufis of islam. the god
that i know is not in fact different from the god that these
prophets know, it's just a matter of interpretation of the
experience, a matter of who you are when you come to realize
god.


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2002-12-30 21:32 [#00495942]
Points: 27799 Status: Regular



1. some - one?
2. true - point being? please elaborate


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-12-30 21:33 [#00495943]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00495939



i think i'd have to agree with most of that, but i don't
think humans are imperfect.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-12-30 21:36 [#00495950]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #00495943



you think humans are perfect? i think the human body is
beautiful and intricate, but humans aren't perfect if that's
what you're sayin'...


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-12-30 21:43 [#00495959]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



it's a matter of realizing one's perfection. isn't that
what jesus did? i guess if you believe he was special in a
way that we cannot be, then you'd disagree.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-12-30 21:45 [#00495961]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



everything follows those special laws of physics, down to
your brain matter that perfectly reflects every single
thought and emotion. nature, the entire universe is of
divine perfection.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-12-30 21:46 [#00495962]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



and we are nature


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-12-30 21:50 [#00495963]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #00495959



i think we should aspire to be like Jesus but, though he was
molded to be like man, he was the son of God and thus
special in a way we're not, like you suggested. but i do
think our uniqueness makes us beautiful in a special way,
and in a way that's perfection. and as i said before, our
bodies are brilliantly designed. of course, if they were
perfect, there wouldn't be hereditary disease and they'd be
able to resist infection, etc. but i think i see what you
mean.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-12-30 21:57 [#00495967]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



yeah, there are different ways of looking at it. but
maybe that which makes you think we're imperfect would not
be if we all "woke up" from this "bad dream." shouldn't
rule out possibilities.


 

offline skyfarmer from a bigger, more complex and tun (Russia) on 2002-12-30 22:19 [#00495978]
Points: 1112 Status: Addict | Followup to titsworth: #00495950



Do you mean human body is more perfect than human mind? I
must totally agree, with the note that in the 3-phase
division of human nature the MOST perfect is the spiritual
one. I love music, I love this girl who doesn't give a fuck
about me. If you could only know what I feel, you'd
understand I'm the most beautiful person you know. Add this
up to the fact I'll roll off my sanity one day, and HEY, not
much time left, i'd better stop writing and go find my love
and maybe rape her and then kill myself ahhaha this is
pointless wtf is this topic for me ahahhaha sorry everyone
sorry


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-30 22:23 [#00495980]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #00495940



I think we both agree that people are having transcendent
experiences with something powerful. (whether that something
comes from within or without let's leave aside for the
moment)

I have a hard time calling it God or relating it to
religion. The shapes into which tradition twists the
aftermath of enlightenment are at once comical, sad and
frightening.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-12-30 22:29 [#00495982]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to skyfarmer: #00495978



no i don't think that at all. both are amazing; neither are
perfect.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-30 22:33 [#00495983]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00495982



How do you define perfection?


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-12-30 22:36 [#00495985]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



my point was that, whether or not you like to call this
experience god or a mere internal experience, my experience
is not something special that doesn't relate to these
experiences that religious people have. i'm quite confident
that if you were to measure the brain happenings in me and
in some whirling dervish, there could be found a common
ground. or, you can simply take my word that when i read
accounts of sufi mysticism it becomes obvious beyond doubt
that the experience is not different.

*painfully leaves aside explaination of the percieved
within/without and the chaos continuity of consiousness and
the spirit


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-12-30 22:38 [#00495986]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #00495983



i don't. if perfection exists, i wouldn't be able to define
it.


 

offline skyfarmer from a bigger, more complex and tun (Russia) on 2002-12-30 22:51 [#00495998]
Points: 1112 Status: Addict | Followup to titsworth: #00495982



no, of course not perfect, I mean more close to the
perfection from the start. Or just quasistable, being able
to be out of the competition. Which one would you want to
live forever: the mind, the body, or the spirit?


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-30 22:54 [#00496000]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



my point was that, whether or not you like to call this
experience god or a mere internal experience


Why is it "mere" if it's internal? Seems ta me it's the same
experience; it's only mere (i.e., devalued) in your mind if
you place a greater value on communion with something
external.

Please, tell me about the chaos continuity of consciousness
and the spirit!


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-30 22:55 [#00496001]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00495986



If you say something is imperfect, what are the qualities it
lacks? If you define those qualities then you will define
perfection, at least in a particular if not general way.


 


Messageboard index