You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
Now online (1)
recycle
...and 331 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614278
Today 25
Topics 127553
  
 
Messageboard index
Firemen's Strike
 

offline LuckyPsycho from a long way from home (United Kingdom) on 2002-12-02 08:07 [#00464543]
Points: 369 Status: Lurker



Do you think that if you just gave 100 million quid to the
NHS, or the fire service that things would suddenly get
better?!

They wouldn't, everyone would fight everyone else for as
much of it as possible, it is what has gone on for years,
and what is still going on now. I agree that they need more
money, but money isn't going to solve all the problems in
our public services... is it?!



 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-12-02 08:09 [#00464545]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to bill_hicks: #00464542



Why do you keep stating firefighters are not educated?

Like the robot in Short Circuit. My, you are sooooo
postmodern, kitsch and ironic. You kerrrrrrrrrazy graduate.


 

offline LuckyPsycho from a long way from home (United Kingdom) on 2002-12-02 08:11 [#00464547]
Points: 369 Status: Lurker



I am no expert on fire saftey, but I can see at least 1
clear benefit of joint control rooms.

Major incident occurs... all the emergency services know at
exactly the same time, and have exactly the same
information. This can only speed response times, and
therefore save lives. As well as (obviously) save money,
which can then be spent on firemens wages, or nice soft bog
paper, which ever is needed more. :)


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-12-02 08:12 [#00464549]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to LuckyPsycho: #00464543



No, no, that would be ridiculous. Duhhhhhh!

Investment certainly would solve more problems than
privatisation. When you introduce profit into the equation
corners are cut to increase profit margins and the service,
the workforce and the public suffer.

Show me one instance where privatisation has led to a better
service.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-12-02 08:13 [#00464552]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to LuckyPsycho: #00464547



OK, what do you think of the proposed 10,000 cut in
firefighters? The cut in nightshifts where twice as many
people die from fires? Firefighters being trained as
paramedics and so being called out instead of paramedics?


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2002-12-02 08:14 [#00464555]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to jonesy: #00464545



i slipped into student humour for a second there, sorry. It
must have something to do with the fact that I was a
student. That same criticism could not be placed against
99.5% of your beloved firemen, however.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-12-02 08:24 [#00464559]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to bill_hicks: #00464555



Why do you view yourself and students so highly? Most
students I've met are fucking dumbasses. They just think
they're smart.


 

offline LuckyPsycho from a long way from home (United Kingdom) on 2002-12-02 08:25 [#00464562]
Points: 369 Status: Lurker



'what do you think of the proposed 10,000 cut in
firefighters?' - I don't know how feasible it is, but the
army seem to be doing ok with far less than that.

The cut in nightshifts where twice as many
people die from fires? - More deaths occur during this time
because it take far longer for fires to be detected, as most
people are asleep... not because there aren't enough firemen
to save them!

Firefighters being trained as
paramedics and so being called out instead of paramedics? -
it seems reasonable to expect firemen to have some medical
knowledge, just incase they need it, the more the better...
I don't think they should or could be used instead of
paramedics


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-12-02 08:26 [#00464565]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to jonesy: #00464526 | Show recordbag



No, despite his affluent background he is putting himself
through uni and has considerable debts, he is relying on his
job being well paid when gets out of uni to get out of the
debt.

Not all people who succeed had it easy- my mother is a
headteacher, yet she had a hard childhood and was raised in
foster homes. I also know businessmen form working class
backgrounds who have succeded through ahrd work.

The joint control rooms make perfect sense. Fireman are
against them due to the associated layoffs rather than a
loss in quality of service. Combined control rooms would
save money and improve response times... it is simply
illogical to keep them seperate. Okay, so a few hundred
people across the country will lose their jobs, but why
should people (the public- that's you and I) pay people to
do something unnecessary?


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-12-02 08:28 [#00464572]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to LuckyPsycho: #00464562



Yes, but calls have dropped during the strike, as they did
during the last strike. People realise the situation and
don't call for non-emergencies or if they have got their
head stuck in fences etc.

Yes, granted. But during such a time it is not wise to have
LESS fireman on duty surely.

They already have a lot of medical knowledge but training
them to the level of paramedics is just stretching the job
of one emergency service, rather than utilizing the two.


 

offline LuckyPsycho from a long way from home (United Kingdom) on 2002-12-02 08:30 [#00464577]
Points: 369 Status: Lurker | Followup to jonesy: #00464549



Jonesy - I am 100% against selling our public services to
private companies. However I am 100% for using everything
at our disposal to bring about the improvements that we need
to see. Including (if necessary) job cuts, changed work
patterns, and joint control rooms! Which one of those is
privatisation?


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-12-02 08:31 [#00464582]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00464565



I'd say those people are the exceptions rather than the
rule. Most people would concede there is a link between
poverty, unemployment, social deprivation and poor housing
and underachievement.

But your mate is not the issue here and his view, with all
due respect, displays ignorance.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-12-02 08:32 [#00464586]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to jonesy: #00464559 | Show recordbag



I agree that lots of students are neither intelligent, hard
working or useful. However, many are. I hate the
(predominantley working class) view that all graduates are,
lazy, drunkards, lack common sense and are idealists without
as shred of pragmatism about them. A guy on a train noticed
I was a student and asked if I was a student (because I was
reading!), when I replied in the affirmative he launched
into a tirade about how all the graduates who went into the
navy (where he worked), went straight in as officers, had
all the breaks in life, were "clever" but lacked common
sense and were crap at manual labour. It was with a degree
of smugness that I pointed out my brother went straight from
school into the navy and despite lacking a university
education proceeded to consistantly get top of the year (of
200 students) in the officer training school.


 

offline LuckyPsycho from a long way from home (United Kingdom) on 2002-12-02 08:37 [#00464593]
Points: 369 Status: Lurker | Followup to jonesy: #00464572



Calls have dropped, but not by that much... even the
firefighters concede that the army has done a good job...
not ideal... but good.

Well by that arguement we should have all of the firemen on
duty all of the time... just in case! - The shift patterns
and level of cover are worked out using the average level of
cover needed... OBVIOUSLY!! So it does seem VERY reasonable
to me that if, on average, they require less firemen on the
night shift than the day, then that is what should happen.
The army has just announced that it will be increasing its
numbers during the midday to midnight shift during the next
strike, because that is when they recieve the most call
outs. The fireservice aren't that flexible.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-12-02 08:38 [#00464594]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #00464586 | Show recordbag



And I take offence when people assume I'm rubbish at
practical work simply because I have a formal education- I
can weld, do forge work, basic mechanics, paint and
decorate, move furniture (without breaking it!), intricate
woodwork (hidden dovetail joints etc.) I can build PCs,
networks, databases, program I'm also strong and healthy.
When I worked as a labourer I had a reputation as a fast
efficient worker.

I don't treat people with contempt because they lack an
education. I just wish people would show me the same
couresty...


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2002-12-02 08:39 [#00464596]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to jonesy: #00464559



Because people who go on to further education always will be
the highest paid and have the most infuence on society. What
benefit is there in rewarding the thick who are prepared to
die every day for a wage packet. What is that saying about
our society?

Education is the foundation of society. There is a
hierarchical structure.

It's like this -

1. Do well in school
2. Do well in further education
3. Get a well-paid job.

1. Do badly at school.
2. Don't do further education
3. Get a shit job where you have to risk your neck every
day.
4. Go on strike and use the imagery of dead work-mates to
try and get a ridiculous pay-rise.

And don't chuck that fucking Richard Branson argument at me.
For every richard Branson I could show you a million bums.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-12-02 08:50 [#00464605]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to bill_hicks: #00464596 | Show recordbag



Lots of people (often because the lack an education) don't
understand or cannot grasp exactly what is that well paid
people do. The popular image is of the boss who sits in his
office doing nothing all day whilst the workers work to the
bone is a popular- although overused one- however, usually,
people get paid more because they do a job that few other
people could.

Besides, surely the better educated (due to the fact they
are, after all, educated) are in a better position to decide
who deserves what?


 

offline LuckyPsycho from a long way from home (United Kingdom) on 2002-12-02 08:58 [#00464615]
Points: 369 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00464605



I think its dangerous to assume that those that have more
certificates for learning are better equiped to make
decisions that affect everybody... (didnt you see the
simpsons episode where the clever people took over?!)

Everyone is capable of having an opinion on an issue, and
everyones opinion should be valued.


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2002-12-03 01:59 [#00466085]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker





Fire strike crumbles

THE fire union caved in last night and ditched the eight-day
strike due to start tomorrow.

The sensational move was a clear sign that militant leader
Andy Gilchrist knew he was losing public support.

He and other heads of the Fire Brigades Union agreed to hand
their monster 40 per cent pay claim to arbitration service
ACAS for a ruling.

A tense four-hour meeting of the FBU national executive
ended with them blinking first in the bitter stand-off with
employers.

Mr Gilchrist — who only days earlier threatened a series
of four-week walkouts — was urged by the executive to rein
in his 52,000 strikers.

Polls have shown a wave of sympathy for soldiers, sailors
and airmen on lower pay who have surrendered leave to stand
in for the strikers.

They include war heroes who have not seen their families
since returning from service in the Balkans or Afghanistan.


Relieved military commanders were last night drawing up
plans to give the troops a Christmas break with their
families.

However, the FBU said that another eight-day strike — from
December 16 to Christmas Eve — would go ahead if talks
fail to reach a settlement in the next two weeks.

The arbitration move came after the union and local
authority employers signalled they were ready to meet ACAS
chairman Rita Donaghy.

Mr Gilchrist, the FBU general secretary, said: “These will
be exploratory talks but we have always said we are prepared
to talk.”

He said the Government should not regard the union’s
decision as an act of surrender.


Good.



 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-12-03 02:31 [#00466098]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to bill_hicks: #00466085



For some one as intelligent as yourself, I'm surprised you
cut n' paste from the Sun newspaper.


 

offline Spikee Dragon from Newcastle (United Kingdom) on 2002-12-03 02:38 [#00466101]
Points: 4176 Status: Regular



Hah! I don't read newspapers anymore but I looked at that
and 'ting!' The Sun registered. 'militant leader Andy
Gilchrist' Nuff said like. Spinyspinspin.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-12-03 02:44 [#00466103]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to LuckyPsycho: #00464615 | Show recordbag



I wasn't refering to intellectual academics running the
coutnry- just that people who are better informed/educated
are in a position to make decisions rather than someone
without any level of education.

Jonesy: Nothing wrong with cut 'n paste- look at hip hop and
even DJ shadow ;)


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-12-03 02:51 [#00466105]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00466103



Yeah, but its all about what you sample.


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2002-12-03 02:52 [#00466107]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to jonesy: #00466098



Just the first paper that sprung to mind. Doesn't mean it's
not the truth.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-12-03 03:04 [#00466108]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to jonesy: #00466105 | Show recordbag



Very good :)

Bill: Yes, true- it would be as foolish to dismiss
everything a newspaper says simply because it is a) the
media and b) a tabloid, as it is to blindly believe all you
read in the press.

Saying thing like, "their monster 40 per cent pay claim"
hardly maes you want to believe it's objective journalism
though...


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-12-03 03:05 [#00466110]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to bill_hicks: #00466107



Well, if you trust the Sun's reporting...

I was merely pointing out that for someone who's
self-conception is that of an educated, intelligent
professional who peers down on moronic manual workers, you
surprise me with your choice of news source.


 

offline Spikee Dragon from Newcastle (United Kingdom) on 2002-12-03 03:10 [#00466111]
Points: 4176 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #00466108



Dude, The Sun has to be taken with a pinch of salt. The Sun
is all about Spin, posh n becks and tits. If someone is
homosexual it's a massive scandal to those guys. The Sun is
not fit for toilet paper.

The mainstream media in this country are never reliable and
a lot of the time you can smell how they are trying to sway
you.

I'm going off the point *zips his muzzle close*


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-12-03 03:14 [#00466115]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Spikee Dragon: #00466111



No, you're right Spikee. The Sun is a reactionary rag that I
wouldn't wipe my dog's arse with.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-12-03 03:24 [#00466118]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



But it's a foolish to say *everything* in it is untrue
simply because it's the Sun.

Poor quality/taste aside, some of the stuff it reports is
true, some isn't.

Sun- Newspaper of choice for pub quiz setters, labourers and
builders.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-12-03 03:44 [#00466131]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00466118



Its not necessarily about its 'truth factor', more its
political agenda and that it doesn't look beneath the
surface of things. There is no analysis of world events
whatsoever.

It saddens me that its the best selling newspaper in the UK.



 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2002-12-03 03:53 [#00466134]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to jonesy: #00466131



I find that comment to be just a smidgeon arrogant. And I'm
not getting into a debate about the pro's and con's of the
Sun. I do like Jakki Deggs, though.


 

offline Spikee Dragon from Newcastle (United Kingdom) on 2002-12-03 04:06 [#00466140]
Points: 4176 Status: Regular



I like to go to The Mirror's web site to read Victor Lewis
Smiths views.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-12-03 04:09 [#00466143]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to bill_hicks: #00466134



Arrogant? This coming from someone who labels firemen
uneducated morons and graduates as the driving force of a
progressive society.


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2002-12-03 04:14 [#00466149]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker



Have I said anything that's untrue?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-12-03 04:20 [#00466159]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to jonesy: #00466143 | Show recordbag



I know this is aimed at Bill H. but I would like to point
out I don't think fireman are uneducated morons. As I said
earlier, if the starting wage goes up to £30,000 I'll give
joining up serious consideration when I graduate...


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2002-12-03 04:28 [#00466172]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker



I like to dip my toe into the Sun now and again to see what
the hoi polloi are being told to think. Then I can modify my
behaviour and attitudes accordingly so that I can interact
with them at the weekend.


 

offline LuckyPsycho from a long way from home (United Kingdom) on 2002-12-03 04:29 [#00466174]
Points: 369 Status: Lurker



Is anyone suprised that the firemen caved... Jonesy?


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-12-03 04:29 [#00466175]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to bill_hicks: #00466172



So if that's what 'they' think, what do you think? Where do
you get your opinions, views and ideas from? they can't be
wholly original, surely.


 

offline LuckyPsycho from a long way from home (United Kingdom) on 2002-12-03 04:32 [#00466177]
Points: 369 Status: Lurker | Followup to bill_hicks: #00466172



Its important to know what the most popular news paper in
this country is saying... whatever you think of the
journalism... it is still the most popular paper and
therefore has an influence on a large section of the
populous. Thats why it is always shown at the end of
newsnight, and other such programs.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-12-03 04:33 [#00466178]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to LuckyPsycho: #00466174



They didn't 'cave' as you put it. They accepted an offer to
negotiate via ACAS. Despite the protestations of the right
wing press and the government, they've been committed to
negotiations all along. It was the government who got Bain
in (their man); it was the government who vetoed the
employer's and FBU's agreement.

At the end of the day, they want the pay rise they deserve
and they deem this as the best way to achieve it. I don't
agreee that it is but I don't view it as 'caving in'.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-12-03 04:35 [#00466179]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to LuckyPsycho: #00466177



That is true, but it was posted as news, not a
representation of news. It was neither referenced nor
referred to as the Sun's interpretation of events.


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2002-12-03 04:37 [#00466182]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker



I think that at this late stage in our evolution there is
very rarely truly original thought.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-12-03 04:39 [#00466184]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to bill_hicks: #00466172 | Show recordbag



Yes, very true. It's important to know what the masses
think.


 

offline LuckyPsycho from a long way from home (United Kingdom) on 2002-12-03 04:40 [#00466185]
Points: 369 Status: Lurker | Followup to jonesy: #00466179



I don't think that we need to start properly referencing
things that are posted here...

I knew it was an article, which means that it more than
likely has a political bias. It doesn't matter to me which
paper it came from, I judge it on the apparent facts, and
the apparent political bias...


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2002-12-03 05:04 [#00466220]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker



What about Gilchrist's threat to try and destroy new labour?
Is that true or am I just being lied to by the tabloid
media. Should I buy a nice quality paper like the guardian
to learn the truth? Tell me please jonesy


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-12-03 05:21 [#00466228]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to bill_hicks: #00466220



His attack on New Labour was not a threat to destroy it. Now
you're getting carried away and using the language of the
Sun.

He attacked New Labour's neo-liberal agenda and support of
US imperialism. Which is fair enough. He was merely pointing
out that the government say they cannot afford a pay rise
for the firefighters and other public sector workers yet
Gordon Brown has set aside £1billion for a war on Iraq.

That is not going beyond the remit of a union leader.


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2002-12-03 05:37 [#00466238]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker



http://politics.guardian.co.uk/unions/story/0,12189,851614,
00.html

Read it and apolgise jonesy, you sad deluded fool.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-12-03 05:45 [#00466246]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



If we go to war with Iraq, and as a result soliders can't
cover, the government will probably pass an emergency law
making it illegal for fire fighters to strike. You would
also hope that in time of war people would not strike.

That said, I'd hate to see the country go to war for the
above reason although I don't think that would happen.


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2002-12-03 05:47 [#00466250]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00466246



A WAR with Iraq? It's not going to be a war. A war is when
you have two sides fighting. This is going to be genocide.


 

offline LuckyPsycho from a long way from home (United Kingdom) on 2002-12-03 05:55 [#00466263]
Points: 369 Status: Lurker | Followup to bill_hicks: #00466250



Jesus!!! Relax people... there is going to be no war...
trust me!

There are already laws in place that could have been used to
stop the firefighters striking, but they weren't needed. The
army handled things well, and even if we do send some troops
into Iraq, it is unlikely to be a protracted conflict
invloving thousands of British troops. We tend to leave it
to the US to provide the cannon fodder these days.


 


Messageboard index