audio media: DAT? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
recycle
w M w
...and 264 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614262
Today 9
Topics 127551
  
 
Messageboard index
audio media: DAT?
 

offline uzim on 2002-11-14 07:13 [#00441557]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



what is this? ' _ '


 

offline wayout from the street of crocodiles on 2002-11-14 07:33 [#00441566]
Points: 2849 Status: Lurker



digital audio tape

the prefered recording media prior to minidisc

not really used for just listening


 

offline uzim on 2002-11-14 07:37 [#00441567]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



thanks :)


 

offline Binaural Tea from Christmas City (Christmas Island) on 2002-11-14 07:37 [#00441568]
Points: 1912 Status: Lurker



its great for listening though. i have lots of old
electroacoustic tracks on dat.


 

offline Bremzen from utrecht (Netherlands, The) on 2002-11-14 07:39 [#00441569]
Points: 653 Status: Lurker



little article on DAT


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2002-11-14 07:57 [#00441575]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular



why is minidisc a prefered recording format?

as far as i knew, the way minidiscs compress the audio onto
a disc that small is because it uses similar compression to
MP3 (or something that involves cutting out certain
frequencies)

*confused....possibly stupid*


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-11-14 08:04 [#00441584]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Mainly used by PROs now...never really caught on with the
general public...

Sounds better as it's 48 samplingrate...a bit more than the
44.1.of CD....

(altho these new SACDs go as far as 96 at 24bit I believe,
rather than 16....that does make a HUGE difference...)




 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2002-11-14 08:05 [#00441587]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular



SACD's go that far?

fuck

that's good

i bet the fucking hardware to play em will cost a bomb

forget about having a personal SACD player!


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-11-14 08:44 [#00441627]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to jand: #00441584 | Show recordbag



(altho these new SACDs go as far as 96 at 24bit I believe,
rather than 16....that does make a HUGE difference...)

Yep, that's what I'd heard. And DAT does 96,000khz now too
right?


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2002-11-14 08:51 [#00441631]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular



my ex-bf had a portable dat for sampling

wonderful little machine

i wish i'd still have it (shame the boy was a jerk)


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-11-14 08:52 [#00441633]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to neetta: #00441631 | Show recordbag



I want a portable dat and a good pair of mics sooo badly ;(


 

offline xlr from Boston (United States) on 2002-11-14 09:53 [#00441696]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



I've always assumed DAT was strictly a professional format.
Similar to the DVCAM tapes we use for video recording here.


Minidiscs are very hard to come by in America for some
reason. They never realy caught on as a widespread consumer
format, unlike in Japan.


 

offline child810 from boston (United States) on 2002-11-14 10:08 [#00441701]
Points: 2103 Status: Lurker



i live by minidisc, it is a shame more people don't use
them. I always wanted a player in my car.


 

offline wayout from the street of crocodiles on 2002-11-14 11:07 [#00441762]
Points: 2849 Status: Lurker



i think minidiscs have come into favor because they're more
compatable with computers ..and have more space


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2002-11-14 11:19 [#00441776]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular



i don't really like md for some reason. the only thing we
use it for is to record stuff which we play or make


 

offline C738 from Outer Space on 2002-11-14 11:36 [#00441799]
Points: 1722 Status: Regular



recently bought a portable minidisc recorder. I was really
surprised by the sound. Just that little more depth in bass
and treble.
Sounds better than 44.1kHz recordings.
Really happy with it


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-11-14 23:42 [#00442676]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #00441627 | Show recordbag



yeah, I reckon..

The big problem with them is they've got that bastard DRM
(Digital Rights Management) thing built-in...& all the
players I've seen so far don't have digital outs...so
there's gonna be some definate loss of freedom there...

Besdie that big gotcha, it's a great format SACD on the
quality front & there's already a load of releases (Aphex
has done one even - The Gavin Bryers Sinking of the Titanic
remix CD is a SACD....)...

oh yeah, it fully supports 5.1 as well....

I have a feeling the industry abhoars the CD as a
format...too unprotected - SACD is where they'd really us
like to go...the recent BMG annoucments about copy proting
all their CD releases makes me suspect they want the CD to
die as soon as pos...

(be warned....a lot of DVD players say they will play SACDs
; & yeah, they do play em but you won't hear anything from
the digital out; it's silent...
)



 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2002-11-15 00:08 [#00442680]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker



Yeah, DAT is a beautiful gift from the audio gods.



 


Messageboard index