American Concentration Camps | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
dariusgriffin
...and 312 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614249
Today 18
Topics 127550
  
 
Messageboard index
American Concentration Camps
 

offline mccabe from fuck knows .......I`m lost !!! on 2002-11-02 07:06 [#00424917]
Points: 908 Status: Lurker



im sure some of you will find this interesting


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-11-02 07:10 [#00424920]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular



well they got plenty of practice in WWII rounding up
Japanese Americans post Pearl Harbour..


 

offline mccabe from fuck knows .......I`m lost !!! on 2002-11-02 07:16 [#00424921]
Points: 908 Status: Lurker



:D,they never change......i was surprised at the camp near
alaska which can hold up to 2 million people(quite hard to
believe something that big).People should check out that
link,its very interesting(it has pictures of the camps and
letters and maps from the government about them).


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-11-02 07:20 [#00424922]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular



yeah I am just going through it

awesome link McCabe..cheers:)


 

offline Apt_Zet from Afghanistan on 2002-11-02 07:28 [#00424923]
Points: 240 Status: Addict



I would shoot this guy in the head if I could.

I just read an article outlining a new canadian bill
pertaining to new anti-terrorism measures. Some proponent
arguements basically say that "the americans are doing it,
so can we". Like holy shit! Where do I live and what kind of
lawfull reasoning is that!?



 

offline mccabe from fuck knows .......I`m lost !!! on 2002-11-02 07:28 [#00424924]
Points: 908 Status: Lurker | Followup to flea: #00424922



HeHe,no problem (and you spelt my name correctly,with the
capitols in the right place ;-o )i have more links but ive
got to go to work now :-(.......anyways see ya later,nice
pic. flea,dont know wither its a turn on or not :D


 

offline Apt_Zet from Afghanistan on 2002-11-02 07:29 [#00424925]
Points: 240 Status: Addict



9-11 sucks worse everyday.


 

offline Bremzen from utrecht (Netherlands, The) on 2002-11-02 07:30 [#00424926]
Points: 653 Status: Lurker



very interesting indeed, though not very suprising.
thanks


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-11-02 07:31 [#00424928]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular | Followup to mccabe: #00424924



no probs..:)

if yer turned on yer on..no shame in lovin plastic :)


 

offline Bremzen from utrecht (Netherlands, The) on 2002-11-02 07:32 [#00424929]
Points: 653 Status: Lurker



VERY disturbing i must add...


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-11-02 07:34 [#00424931]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular



not far off are the concentration camps in Australia for the
asylum seekers and refugees...and now they have started
raiding Indonesian Australians..particularly those with
families and little children..in the name of poor victims of
Bali..


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-11-02 07:39 [#00424933]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker



I wonder when they'll start gassing large groups of people
in those camps. I'm sure they'll have an excuse for doing
that by the time that becomes a normal procedure...


 

offline Clic on 2002-11-02 07:42 [#00424936]
Points: 5232 Status: Regular



Wow.


 

offline Bremzen from utrecht (Netherlands, The) on 2002-11-02 07:44 [#00424938]
Points: 653 Status: Lurker



even today, they're stalins everywhere. they're probably
more clever nowadays and keep a more low profile, but
they're out there and they have power...


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-11-02 07:45 [#00424940]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular | Followup to Laserbeak: #00424933



the erosion of human rights is definetly headed in that
direction...btw...gassing did get justified and applied in
moscow..so you never know!


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-11-02 07:52 [#00424948]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to flea: #00424940



But that was different because they didn't mean to kill
people with the gas...


 

offline Apt_Zet from Afghanistan on 2002-11-02 07:53 [#00424950]
Points: 240 Status: Addict



WHOA!, so I get to reading it... I deeply question this, as
much anything I read like it. I need multiple sources before
I would quote any of this. Some of this is outrageous.


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-11-02 08:08 [#00424958]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular | Followup to Laserbeak: #00424948



maybe not all but definetly the terrorists...


 

offline Bremzen from utrecht (Netherlands, The) on 2002-11-02 09:31 [#00424988]
Points: 653 Status: Lurker



the erosion of human rights is definetly headed in that
direction

I don't think there is any erosion of human rights. How much
we would like to think it is, it's just not getter better.
Generally speaking imo, human rights were neglected in the
past as much as they are now.


 

offline xlr from Boston (United States) on 2002-11-02 10:32 [#00425006]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



Well the gas used in the moscow incident was a non-lethal
mixture when used on people of good health. But the
combination of stress/lack of sleep/food/ whatever made many
hostages sick from the gas and never wake up.

What the police did actually was use the gas to knock out
the terrorists so they could then assassinate them while
they were unconcious.


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-11-02 11:33 [#00425048]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to flea: #00424940



"the erosion of human rights is definetly headed in that
direction...btw...gassing did get justified and applied in
moscow..so you never know! "

WTF??

How could using gas in that type of scenario NOT be
justified???
The entire place was wired to explode... PEOPLE were wired
to explode!!

What do you think?? That some trigger-happy special forces
guys just wanted to have some fun by risking hundreds of
lives with gas??
You think its that simple???
Something that would certainly provoke international
attention and criticism?? Official inquiries, sensational
media coverage, a PR nightmere that Russia can literally not
afford right now!
You think they fucking did it for FUN???

How naive....

Its not hard to set off a bomb tied around your waist. You
push a fucking button. You need no more htan a split
second's notice to do it.

I don't know about you, but if I was in charge of the
counter-terrorist forces at the scene and the whole world
was watching me and my government, I would not want to take
the chance that all 700 hostages plus counter-terrorist
forces and emeergency workers could die in massive
explosions.

Using gas isn't pleasent but it was the safest course of
action.
..there are a LOT worse ways that situation could have
ended.
The gas was a damn gentle, careful way of ending it, even if
some ppl died.

Siting around snivelling about human rights while the
terrorists were excecuting hostage after hostage would have
been a true trampling of human rights


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-11-02 11:35 [#00425050]
Points: 24595 Status: Regular | Followup to xlr: #00425006



Well, they used far too much gas, XLR, and then the doctors
had no idea what kind of gas it was--maybe, since you must
know what kind of gas it was (to know it was a non-lethal
gas), you should have called them and told them.


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-11-02 11:45 [#00425053]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to marlowe: #00425050



Oh, they used far too much gas did they??

I'd like to see you calculate JUST the right amount of gas
to pump into a huge building... JUST enough to knock out
terrorists who have EVERY CONCIOUS intention of detonating
explosives they have attached to their bodies... while
leaving 90 year old theatre-goers with heart conditions who
have been under the most stressful situation in their entire
lives for 3 days straight with not enough food and water.

I'm sure you'll agree that when terrorists who are ready to
die literally have their fingers on the button that will
kill hundreds... its better to be safe than sorry
even if safe means killing some people... sorry is.. well,
much worse

If XLR should call the doctors to tell them what kind of gas
it was, then you should have called to tell the spec force
just how much to use.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-11-02 11:46 [#00425056]
Points: 24595 Status: Regular | Followup to AMinal: #00425048



Hey, AMinal, the Chechens were NOT "executing hostage after
hostage" --there had been one hostage killed a few hours
before that. Why don't you list the amount of people killed
by the Chechens compared to number of people killed by the
Russians? And expand that to how many Chechens have died in
Chechnya at the hands of the Invading Russians? And, unless
the gas knocked everyone unconscious IMMEDIATELY, then the
Chechens with explosives wired to themselves, would have had
time to have utilised them, since "You need no more htan a
split
second's notice to do it." [sic]... You can't say "the
terrorists were going to do this, the terrorists were going
to kill everyone blah blah blah" because that's just your
conjecture, and not fact... the Russians killed hundreds of
people, the Chechans didn't... maybe it was the desperate
act of a desperate group of people---but shit--if some
bullyboy country was occupying your own for years after your
neighbours were 'graciously granted' their own independence,
with the rest of the world seemingly not giving a shit about
it, wouldn't you be a bit fucking desperate and pissed-off?
Or is Occupation legitimate and valid when the Western World
don't give a shit?


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-11-02 11:47 [#00425058]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



and btw:

"Russia's government has revealed the type of gas used to
subdue Chechen militants who were holding more than 750
people hostage in a Moscow theater.

Health Minister Yurii Shevchenko said today that the gas was
Fentanyl, a potent opium-based narcotic used as an
anaesthetic."


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-11-02 11:49 [#00425060]
Points: 24595 Status: Regular | Followup to AMinal: #00425053



Difference is, whilst XLR appears to condone using gas in
the first place, I don't--what was heralded as a great
triumph at the time, is being seen for the shambles it
really is; Putin fucked up--he should take Russian troops
out of Chechnya and leave them the fuck alone


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-11-02 11:51 [#00425062]
Points: 24595 Status: Regular | Followup to AMinal: #00425058



well why didn't the Health Minister pass this information to
the doctors--it would have been a bit more useful then, eh?


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-11-02 11:55 [#00425065]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to marlowe: #00425056



LOL please read more carefully before you tear appart my
responses

what i said was:
"Siting around snivelling about human rights while the
terrorists were excecuting hostage after hostage WOULD HAVE
BEEN a true trampling of human rights"

would have been ....as in, its a hypothetical situation
thank god they only got the chance to excecute one hostage,
as you said

"And expand that to how many Chechens have died in Chechnya
at the hands of the Invading Russians? "

how is this of ANY relevence???
are you saying they were justified in threatening hundreds
of civilian lives?

and btw i think that when you take over a threatre with 750+
people in it, prepared it with enough explosives to bring
down teh whole building, or at least kill everyone inside,
strap explosives to YOURSELF
then dispurse your suicide bombers evenly through the
hostages when you sense trouble, change the location of the
explosives after ever visitor leaves, repeat constantly that
you are ready and willing to die, and let foriegn nationals,
children, and muslims go....

....well, considering all that, i think its pretty safe to
believe that these terrorists mean business


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-11-02 11:57 [#00425068]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to marlowe: #00425062



yeah it would have been quite helpful, i dont know why they
kept the info from the doctors.... from what i know of the
situation, i would think that they should have told the
doctors

too bad its too late now

and too bad it has nothign to do with whether they were
justified in using the gas in the first place


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-11-02 12:03 [#00425078]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



"what was heralded as a great triumph at the time, is being
seen for the shambles it really is; Putin fucked up"

no its not

there hasn't been any excessive international political
pressure or crticism

no cries for economic sanctions or some international
tribunal of human rights trial

you know why? oh, its its because theres nothing to
criticise


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-11-02 12:11 [#00425096]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



the large scale political enviroment has nothing to do with
this
its completely irrelevent

this was a small scale tactical situation where life is
weighed per individual being threatened
which country is independant or not has nothing to do with
it

the terrorists' political motivations are irrelevent and
should hold no weight when considering the best way to sort
out a VERY dangerous situation

the only factors being considered, and should be considered,
were isolated to that building and the people inside
(and of course people directly involved but physically
removed from teh situation but i don thtink i have to say
that)

threatening hundreds of lives is not a valid political
strategy for gaining independance and so gaining
independance is not a valid concern when dealing with the
threatening of hundreds of lives


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-11-02 12:12 [#00425098]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



*phew*

lol


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-11-02 12:13 [#00425103]
Points: 24595 Status: Regular | Followup to AMinal: #00425065



I hardly based my whole response on that one little
hypothesis of yours--and fuck yeah, I think the whole
situation and what led up and caused this Hostage situation
if relevant--what kind of moron would ignore the fact that
the Russians have been occupying Chechnya and killing
Chechnans, in their own country, who have the impertinece to
want their freedom. Like I said, how would you feel if some
bullish country rampaged and occupied yours, killing
relatives and countrymen who want their freedom while the
rest of the world looks on and does nothing? Would you just
sit back and snivel about human rights, or would you be
moved into action?

I don't know how the conclusion was viewed over there in
Canada, but in Europe, it's been highly criticised since.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-11-02 12:19 [#00425112]
Points: 24595 Status: Regular | Followup to AMinal: #00425096



On your argument there, the US war of Independance wasn't
valid--and neither has any war of independence, which relies
on threatening the lives of people... Also, you think it's
A-OK for the Russians to be threatening the lives of
Chechens in Chechnya to keep them in check and not
independant?

Also, can you confirm something--Are you in favour of
Russian Occupation of Chechnya, or not? And, if not, what do
you suggest this oppressed country does for freedom when the
world leaders are ignoring its plight?


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-11-02 13:12 [#00425226]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to marlowe: #00425112



could you please explain how i suggested that the American
War of Independence wasn't legitimate?
Or how what i said could even be applied to that?

i was talking about dealing with a SPECIFIC situation in
which lives of civilians are at risk.
situations in which terrorists deliberately and specifically
target civilian lives

THAT is NOT a legitimate tactic no matter what the cause

please dont twist my words into sweeping generalizations
that condem any fight for independance, which is obviously
not what i meant.

terrorism is not a legitimate chanel for any political
change

i NEVER said or meant that the political change they want in
the first place is not legitimate


 


Messageboard index