why the sniper is safe | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in
Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 214 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614240
Today 9
Topics 127550
  
 
Messageboard index
why the sniper is safe
 

offline john is fast from sacramento (United States) on 2002-10-25 00:52 [#00416170]
Points: 638 Status: Regular



I was thinking... no one knows which one if not both of the
dudes were the shooters. So if you don't know they you
can't convict them both for murder and therefor you let them
both off.... ?? This is in the case that they both keep
their mouth shut and don't confess to anything. And this is
also in the case that they don't find any proof as to which
one of them did it and what not.

I find this interesting and I'm interested to see how the
trial pans out.


 

offline john is fast from sacramento (United States) on 2002-10-25 00:53 [#00416174]
Points: 638 Status: Regular



Let me clear them up.. you can't convict them both because
it could have only been one of them, and if you can't figure
out which one then you have to let them both off.


 

offline aron from saskatoon (Canada) on 2002-10-25 00:53 [#00416175]
Points: 3756 Status: Lurker



i think you're a very crazy man

 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-10-25 00:53 [#00416176]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



"...know they you can't..."

just try that again quickly...

 

offline john is fast from sacramento (United States) on 2002-10-25 00:54 [#00416178]
Points: 638 Status: Regular



"if you dont know(which one) then you can't..."

 

offline john is fast from sacramento (United States) on 2002-10-25 00:55 [#00416179]
Points: 638 Status: Regular



Sorry I'm typing quickly

 

offline Robin from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2002-10-25 01:32 [#00416198]
Points: 102 Status: Regular



Or they can blame each other, that has worked before.

 

offline glass_eater from a blind nerves area (Switzerland) on 2002-10-25 01:48 [#00416201]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



if u think that Bush is not alone in charge of the world,
then you have to let him off

:D

 

offline Gubb on 2002-10-25 03:24 [#00416282]
Points: 439 Status: Regular | Followup to john is fast: #00416170



have you seen the prisoners the us got on cuba? i dont think
the give a fuck if they cant prove anything, the us are
above trials and such. remember that the shooter is a
muslim.. they are both pretty fucked i think.


 

offline KEYFUMBLER from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2002-10-25 04:08 [#00416350]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker



yeah.... some loophole, double indemity or whatever, is
gonna beat the US judicial system in a case where a whole
metropolitan area was laid to ransom!
.......sure. They´ll be suckin Bubbas cock before you can
say "I swear to tell the whole truth and nothin but the
truth"


 

offline regital from Baltimore (United States) on 2002-10-25 05:25 [#00416403]
Points: 800 Status: Lurker




----I was thinking... no one knows which one if not both of
the
dudes were the shooters. So if you don't know they you
can't convict them both for murder and therefor you let
them
both off.... ?? -----

It's obvious which one is the shooter:

Suspect 1: John Allen Muhammad, 41:

As a soldier, Muhammad received a Marksmanship Badge with
expert rating — the highest of three ratings —
in use of the M-16, according to Army records.

Suspect 2: John Lee Malvo, 17: Muhammads Step son and
probably the driver


 

offline C738 from Outer Space on 2002-10-25 05:59 [#00416429]
Points: 1722 Status: Regular



Okay... another theory:
What if they were set up?
They dont actually have to do anything with it, but they're
made suspects?
This as another piece to justify america's 'war on
terrorism' ?
Im NOT saying here they're innocent or guilty.
just... what if?

-C-

 

Messageboard index