Is reality really real? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
dariusgriffin
...and 304 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614242
Today 11
Topics 127550
  
 
Messageboard index
Is reality really real?
 

offline zzligg from Allen,TX (United States) on 2002-10-23 09:04 [#00413982]
Points: 347 Status: Addict



Reality is all based on perception. "I think therefore I
am". Is reality a plausible concept then, or is it all based
on what we perceive it as. If a man thinks he is an apple,
then that is his perception and it is real to him. It may be
false to how someone else perceives it but his perception
makes it reality. So therefore the is no such thing as a
broadened concept of reality.


 

offline uzim on 2002-10-23 09:08 [#00413984]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



a man died from cold in a freezing room in a boat once.
before dying, he related every day in a diary, describing
his feelings, how the cold slowly killed him.

but what was strange is that the freezing was off, so the
freezing room was at a normal temperature.

not knowing it, the man only died because he thought
it was freezing.

(read this on 'empire of the ants' by b. werber... sorry for
the bad english once again)


 

offline J-HOK on 2002-10-23 09:09 [#00413985]
Points: 904 Status: Addict



therefore, you don't exist


 

offline uzim on 2002-10-23 09:09 [#00413986]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



but this kind of stories are really rare...
i wish i could "control reality" in some way like this. ' _
'


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-10-23 09:13 [#00413990]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to uzim: #00413984 | Show recordbag



Yeah, Empire of the Ants is great.

This thread should be called, "Existentialism for Beginners"
:)
There's a good bit in the book "Hannibal" where he's being
burnt and manages to ignore the pain by concentrating on the
cool marble of a statue... I can do similair stuff, but only
to a very mild degree. It'd be cool to have a lot of
control over stuf flike that though. It'd be like lucid
dreaming when you were awake to a degree...


 

offline str_ph from Cambridge (United Kingdom) on 2002-10-23 09:15 [#00413993]
Points: 779 Status: Regular



I think you are mixing different concepts together: truth,
perception, consciousness, relation to the world...


 

offline zzligg from Allen,TX (United States) on 2002-10-23 09:40 [#00414012]
Points: 347 Status: Addict



I too have heard the story of the freezing man. It only
proves my point


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-10-23 11:50 [#00414178]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



let me shoot you to answer your question!


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2002-10-23 11:56 [#00414185]
Points: 27799 Status: Regular



i am aware of thinking, therefore i am


 

offline two from Rataq (Qatar) on 2002-10-23 11:57 [#00414186]
Points: 91 Status: Lurker



i hate, therefore, i am.


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2002-10-23 12:03 [#00414196]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker



reminds me of a quote from Mtv's Æon Flux:
"Light, in the absence of eyes, illuminates nothing. Visual
forms are not inherent in the world, but are granted by the
act of seeing. Events contain no meaning in themselves, only
the meaning that the mind imposes on them. Yet, the world
endures, wether or not the mind exists."


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-10-23 12:07 [#00414202]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



this is stupid though. cause i could say

"hey look im a frog faced dog"

you could obviously see im human. this whole perception
thing is just dumb. it makes no sense.


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2002-10-23 12:09 [#00414205]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker



but if u truly believed u were a frog faced dog it would be
reality for u. doesn't really matter what anyone else
thinks, because we can't have a group mind.


 

offline death-pengwin from Medicine Hat (Canada) on 2002-10-23 12:15 [#00414211]
Points: 601 Status: Lurker



watch the matrix



 

offline rasec from mty (Mexico) on 2002-10-23 12:19 [#00414216]
Points: 654 Status: Regular



what if our reality is just a dream.. and when we are
dreaming we are living our own reality, and when we think we
are awake we are actually dreaming?

this can be heard on "Dreams" by Forest for the trees.. it
goes like this:
"when i am dreaming i dont' know if i'm truly sleep or if
i'm awake... when i get up i don't know if i'm truly awake
or if i'm still dreaming"

so, our reality is just a product of our perception.. it can
be distorted.. but, who can say what is real? who has the
power to determine this? another man whos has a distorted
perception of what is real?


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2002-10-23 12:23 [#00414221]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker



here it is: Everything is real.


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2002-10-23 12:25 [#00414224]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



reality is a ride on the bus...


 

offline KEYFUMBLER from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2002-10-23 12:42 [#00414241]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker




A tree, as we know it has a trunk, branches and leaves. But
a tree is mostly made up of the roots which we don´t
normally see. They have more volume and have an extremely
important role with the forest network underground and the
soil. Yet we dont equate a tree to this more abundent facet.
Its all relative anyway. There is no black and white in
nature, only relationships between things - from the macro
to the micro.
I am an individual organism buit at the same time i am
intimately connected to my environment .. its natural side
and my culkture.
Reality stems from the results of many relationships. Ghosts
are not "real" by and large because they do not emerge from
a tangable set of relationships. I am "real" because the
fact that i exist is constantly being re-enforced through
complicated relationships with every aspect of myself. MAD


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2002-10-23 12:50 [#00414246]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker



well, ghosts are not considered real by a large part of the
population, but that's not the point. if someone believes
they've seen a ghost, then they are having a relationship
with their Percieved environment aren't they? Something has
triggered them to see or feel or experience something.
therefore that experience is real and labled ghost if the
person so chooses.


 

offline KEYFUMBLER from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2002-10-23 13:04 [#00414250]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker



Crocomire..You are correct sir. The ghost is "real" for that
person.

ah, but lets use the term "real" as in scientifically
"real". Then ghosts aren´t real. (unless, science in
general has fucked up)
"Real" itself is too much of a black and white word because
we find it is inadequate for describing all the different
realites. We have to qualify it by saying "scientifically
real"... which may have to be qualified by "scientifically
real western methods" etc etc. where does one end? Back at
the start one suspects. Not everything has an answer!



 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2002-10-23 13:14 [#00414254]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker



i think it's possible science could someday solve what
triggers the ghost phenomenon.
the scientifically real world is but a cork bobbing on the
surface of the dark vast sea of reality, that's someones
paraphrased quote, cant remember who.


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2002-10-23 13:56 [#00414299]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker



which is more real, the scientifically real or the
experientially real?


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-10-23 14:10 [#00414320]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Regardless of what we think is real or fake or whatever,
we're all still going to be stuck in 9 to 5 jobs till we're
60, then die. At best. So reality bites.


 

offline KEYFUMBLER from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2002-10-23 14:42 [#00414351]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker



Croco. Ya ain´t there yet. Experiments need to be
scientific for them to be of any validity with the rest of
the known scientific world....i.e general reality.
"More real" is one of those phrases that only makes sense in
a specific context, with solid frames of reference.
Ultimately you ain´t gona get an answer to the Reality
question until you explicity define what you mean.



 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2002-10-23 14:52 [#00414368]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker



it was a trick question. they are both as real as the other.
our reality is anything that can be experienced. reality as
a whole is everything we can experience plus everything we
can't.


 

offline KEYFUMBLER from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2002-10-23 14:53 [#00414372]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker



bang on.

whats virtual reality then?

(k i d d i n g)


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2002-10-23 14:59 [#00414381]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker



haha!

it's porn and opinions as far as i can tell ;0]


 

offline glass_eater from a blind nerves area (Switzerland) on 2002-10-23 16:07 [#00414483]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



(just responding at the first topic)
no no man,
matrix was right since man walked on earth
lol


 

offline CORTEX from Canada on 2002-10-23 16:07 [#00414484]
Points: 3346 Status: Regular



reality exists, just not in an objective manner.

for that ghost thing, who says that what the person sees is
what triggered that same person to experience this 'contact'
with the ghost? perhaps it's a hallucination (not triggered
by an external stimulus), i.e. the voices that a
schizophrenic hears, or people they see.


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2002-10-23 16:53 [#00414516]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker



if it's a h9allucination it's no less real. because the
experience still exists in experiential reality which is no
less real than any other kind of reality. see?


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2002-10-23 16:54 [#00414517]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker



in other words, nothing that we know of is UNreal.
in other words, reality is one.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-10-23 16:58 [#00414520]
Points: 24593 Status: Regular



reality is only a word


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2002-10-23 17:00 [#00414524]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker



hmm that's true, since reality is only an idea...


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2002-10-23 17:02 [#00414525]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker



but doesn't reality exist without anyone to think of it?
there's the true question.


 

offline glass_eater from a blind nerves area (Switzerland) on 2002-10-23 17:03 [#00414527]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



the answer is yes


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2002-10-23 17:16 [#00414539]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker



how do you know? :D


 

offline pachi from yo momma (United States) on 2002-10-23 17:21 [#00414542]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker



reality is really as real as fallacy is falsely false.


 

offline glass_eater from a blind nerves area (Switzerland) on 2002-10-23 17:23 [#00414543]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



i got many secrets
;DD


 

offline CORTEX from Canada on 2002-10-23 17:59 [#00414572]
Points: 3346 Status: Regular | Followup to CORTEX: #00414484



i think there's a fundamental disnction we have to make
here. the reality we experience by being stimulated by an
external stimulus (in the physical world) is different than
what schizophrenics experience as being hallucinogenic (sp?)
because they arent caused by an external stimulus. in this
case, i dont think real. but of course it's arguable to say
that it's real for him and him only...

in your case, you must then think that your dreams are real.


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2002-10-23 18:02 [#00414577]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker



what people have to realize is that reality is multifaceted.
dreams are not real in the same way as waking life is real,
but dreams are just as real as far as ultimate reality is
concerned.


 

offline glass_eater from a blind nerves area (Switzerland) on 2002-10-23 18:05 [#00414580]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



my dreams are true, unlikely as my nightmares too...
lolol



 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2002-10-23 18:07 [#00414582]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



yes.

wait... no.


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2002-10-23 18:11 [#00414584]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker



yes, the paradox of ultimate reality is that it's
multifaceted yet it's all the same.


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2002-10-23 18:13 [#00414585]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



YOU'RE MULTIFACETED


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2002-10-23 18:15 [#00414587]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker



unless you're talking about unreality.


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2002-10-23 18:35 [#00414599]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict



anytime you attempt to define reality you fall into the trap
of defining nonsense. take this for example:
The greek philosopher Parmenides taught that the only things
that are real are things that never change...and the greek
philosopher Herclitus taught that everything changes. If you
superimpose their two views, you get this result: nothing is
real.
There is a fascinating next step in this though: Parminedes
could never have existed because he grew old and died and
disappeared, so, according to his own philosophy, he did not
exist. And heraclitus may have been right- so if he was
right, then Parminedes did exist, and therefore, according
to Heraclitus' philosophy, perhaps Parminedes was right,
since Parminedes fulfilled the conditions by which
Heraclitus judged things as being real.


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2002-10-23 18:48 [#00414613]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



zzligg: i can show you the matrix.


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2002-10-23 18:50 [#00414614]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker



I think there is one universal reality, but we each perceive
it slightly different... because if there wasn't one such
universal reality, why do we all seem to perceive things in
pretty much the same ways? Like the physical world...


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2002-10-23 18:52 [#00414616]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict



or perhaps there are multiple realities that we shift in and
out of, and at any moment i'm in a different reality than
you but perhaps i occupy the same one as you as well. see my
above statement as talk of reality really leads to nonsense.


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2002-10-23 18:55 [#00414619]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to zaphod: #00414599



ok, I just read that and my mind is now tied in a knot...

now I understand why I'm not doing philosophy, because it
seems like a lot of pointless questioning of everything...
:)


 


Messageboard index