Anti-copying Technology | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 339 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614116
Today 2
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Anti-copying Technology
 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-04-28 12:31 [#00197765]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker



I was just looking on Amazon for the soundtrack to the new
Star Wars film (released Tuesday here), and I noticed that
it mentioned the following:-

'This CD includes anti-copying technology that is intended
to prevent unlawful copying of the CD with a PC. This may
affect playability of the CD on certain computer devices
such as PCs and gaming platforms.'

....is this something new?



 

offline eric_hard_jams on 2002-04-28 12:36 [#00197769]
Points: 1986 Status: Addict



it's not new but it is very wrong


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-04-28 12:38 [#00197770]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker



I usually use Media Player to copy cds onto my computers
harddrive - so that I haven't got to keep changing the cd.
Does this technology prevent this?

And will this technology bring about the end of gadgets such
as MP3 players eventually?


 

offline nanotech from Sukavasti Amitaba Pureland (United States) on 2002-04-28 12:39 [#00197771]
Points: 3727 Status: Regular



i've heard that in diablo 2 there is something that actually
stpos the laser from reading/writing the info...i was at a
friends trieng the theroy out...and it didn't copy...but i
know that there's ways around it...

think of it like this...if it's burnt onto any medium in the
first place...then it's can be reburnt...i sugest for anyone
who's having troubles /w this, to get "clone CD" a great
blind read/write cd copier...


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-04-28 12:42 [#00197772]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker



It won't play in your PC. It means the CD is defective, it
doesn't qualify as an "audio CD", don't buy it, download it
from someone who circumvented the protection.


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-04-28 12:44 [#00197773]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker



My hi-fi equipment is hooked up to my PC though, presumably
if I wanted, I could simply record any cd tracks like these
via my soundcards 'line in' and save them as MP3 or WAV


 

offline eric_hard_jams on 2002-04-28 12:46 [#00197774]
Points: 1986 Status: Addict



i hope this will not prevent me copying to my minidisc
recorder.


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-04-28 12:46 [#00197775]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00197773



Yes, do that and return the CD saying it doesn't work in
your CD player


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-04-28 12:48 [#00197777]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to Laserbeak: #00197775



Sneaky!! And then you could transfer the files to an MP3
player that way as well couldn't you?


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-04-28 12:51 [#00197779]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00197777



Yep :)
We must do something about these defective CDs...


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-04-28 12:52 [#00197780]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to Laserbeak: #00197779



*smiles*


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-04-28 13:11 [#00197790]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



AntiCopying stuff is *so* lame...

Why do they bother?...it just inconveniences people who have
actually paid for the disc...It only takes one person to
make a decent copy and put it on any file sharing system so
they'll never be able to stop that...

Record Companies need to embrace the new possibilites rather
than try and control things so much...

(Wasn't the European (NON-UK) version of drukqs come with
this copy protection lark..on ZOMBA, I think??....totally
pointless, as MP3s were on the net 6 months before the
fuckng release anyway...

from what I heard, AFX wasn't informed this was happening
and wasn't too pleased when he found out...)...



 

offline eric_hard_jams on 2002-04-28 13:14 [#00197794]
Points: 1986 Status: Addict



it's a shame the music industry cares more about money than
good music.


 

offline evilsushi from Huddersfield (United Kingdom) on 2002-04-28 13:20 [#00197802]
Points: 13 Status: Lurker



It wont stop you recording it to MD bwahah another reason
why its beter than MP3 players


 

offline Cheffe1979 from fuck (Austria) on 2002-04-28 13:22 [#00197803]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker



since cd's must be at least capable of being played, there
is no doubt a possibility to make your cd-drive play it.
druqks came with cd-protection, first it didnt work, i
updated my driver at gamecopyworld , it worked perfectly.
usually the protection is cracked long before it comes out;
also check out thecrack.net or sharekey .
i hope the links work...



 

offline Cheffe1979 from fuck (Austria) on 2002-04-28 13:23 [#00197805]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker



it's this one.


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-04-28 13:28 [#00197808]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to Cheffe1979: #00197805



The new ones are much 'better' protected. Besides, we
shouldn't have to rely on hackers to play our CDs...


 

offline Cheffe1979 from fuck (Austria) on 2002-04-28 13:33 [#00197811]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker | Followup to Laserbeak: #00197808



true...
but 20 years of research haven't brought up a protection
yet, so i doubt there will ever be one. i bought a cd
yesterday, which came out 2 weeks ago and it also said
"protected"; i dunno what the protection was, it worked
perfectly. maybe 'twas a bluff. still nobody can prevent
you from downloading, and if they were at 8-10 ? and not
fucking 20? i'd probably buy more and dl less.


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-04-28 13:37 [#00197814]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Followup to evilsushi: #00197802 | Show recordbag



MD > MP3???...MD makes a nice replacement for tape but I
think MP3's in general are much better in terms of
convience, quality & usability...

You can get far better quality from a well encoded MP3 than
with MD's ATRAC compression scheme...and having only around
80 mins on one MD seems a bit wack (and those 2x & 4x modes
work by downing the quality...)...These new netMD walkmans
from SONY look interesting but it's still basically a MD
with the ability to record MP3s at faster than realtime...

Sizewise, MD players seem pretty close to decent MP3
players...I've got a MP3CD walkman and that suits me fine; a
good 10 hrs of hiquality stuff on one disc & it plays CD's
as well so I'm well happy with it...bigger than a MD player
obviously but not a problem for me...

Give it a year and Ipod-Alike MP3 HardDisk players will drop
to well below MD prices...still a little pricey at the mo
but it's only a matter of time...


 

offline uzim on 2002-04-28 13:40 [#00197818]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



reminds me of this idea they had... paying mp3s... lol


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-04-28 13:42 [#00197820]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to Cheffe1979: #00197811



The new Celine Dion has the latest protection, it can crash
your PC if you try to play it...


 

offline Cheffe1979 from fuck (Austria) on 2002-04-28 13:42 [#00197821]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker



i compared the spectra of a 160kbps VBR encoded mp3 (using
the new lame encoder, came with cdex) and the wav (where i
filtered out the >19khz) and there was no difference
measurable. the track was bine/confield, which usually is
very bad for mp3's. those programming guys now seem to be
able to handle the problems that made mp3 so shitty a few
years ago. i compared it also on my stereo (which wasn't too
expensive) and i couldn't hear any difference. (at 160kbps)


 

offline Cheffe1979 from fuck (Austria) on 2002-04-28 13:43 [#00197822]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker | Followup to Laserbeak: #00197820



do you know how it works?


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-04-28 13:50 [#00197826]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to Cheffe1979: #00197822



The discs are protected against digital copying using
Key2Audio technology developed by the Sony DADC unit:

During glass mastering, several special hidden signatures,
similar to a unique fingerprint, are applied outside the
music data area. These signatures can neither be duplicated
by CD-R/RW burners, nor by professional glass mastering
systems.

Audio discs protected with the current version cannot be
recognised by standard CD/DVD-ROM, CD-R and CD-RW drives,
thus they do not play on PC, Apple Macintosh or other
systems equipped with CD-ROM, CD-R, CD-RW, DVD-ROM and DVD-R
devices. This ensures the highest efficiency currently
available. Due to the fact that key2audioâ„¢ protected discs
do not play on PC, no ripping is possible. Analogue copies,
on the contrary, can be made to any analogue devices. (eg
MC).



 

offline hungrig from Sweden on 2002-04-28 13:50 [#00197828]
Points: 692 Status: Lurker



fuck the recordcompanys! they are just scared because they
know it's all over soon. traditional recordcompanys will
fade away. i promise. you'll see.


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-04-28 13:55 [#00197830]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Followup to Cheffe1979: #00197821 | Show recordbag



cool...the Lame encoder is one of the best, if not the best,
encoder out there...and it's a toss up between EAC & CDEX
when it comes to top quality ripping (CDEX is easier to use,
EAC can be a bit complex but does a slightly better job on
difficult CDs with errors on em)...

it's certainly easier to create hiqual MP3's nowadays...not
so many 128kbs rips about & the quality of the encoders have
improved no end...

I guess filesize was a priority when MP3s got going on the
internet to start with but now more people have got faster
access, it's not such an issue...

The ability to choose between quality & filesize is one of
the best features of MP3s, I think...theres not many formats
that have this sort of ability to be all things to all
people...


 

offline Cheffe1979 from fuck (Austria) on 2002-04-28 13:56 [#00197831]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker



so what does prevent me from ripping the analogue copy?
maybe search kazaa if it's there, i'm sure it is. there are
also several .dll's that make your cd-rom capable of
simulating an ordinary cd-player, and since it has to be
played, there will be a way for ripping.

anbyways, protecting celine dion is NO problem for me. maybe
she prevents herself from getting spread to vast... that
would be fine tho


 

offline Cheffe1979 from fuck (Austria) on 2002-04-28 14:00 [#00197834]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker



there actually has to be only one fucking person in the
whole world who successfully rips it;
take gantz graf ep, it started with a single copy and now
everybody who is interested has it.
hungrig, your right, definitly.


 

offline Cheffe1979 from fuck (Austria) on 2002-04-28 14:07 [#00197843]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker | Followup to jand: #00197830



HA! slowly approaching #500


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-04-28 14:16 [#00197852]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Followup to Laserbeak: #00197826 | Show recordbag



They don't seem to realise that a lot of people wanna listen
to music on their PCs...if they want to alienate this
section of their customers then fine, it'll only cause
people to download the MP3s from whereever and not bother
buying the CD at all...

And they wonder why people are buying less CDs!!!...

I'm a thick bastard but even I can see how stupid a scheme
this is...so stupid, in fact, that I reckon record companies
are gonna turn CDs into a format no-one wants, just so they
can bring out a new format that has hardcore Copy-Protection
built-in (which it'll be illegal to "circumvent or
reverse-engineer" - check the Digital Millienium Copyright
Act (DMCA) for more info..)...I'm bet they secretly wish CDs
had never been invented now that they understand more fully
the issues involved in Digital formats...



 

offline eric_hard_jams on 2002-04-28 15:04 [#00197888]
Points: 1986 Status: Addict | Followup to Laserbeak: #00197820



forgive me if i pass on that one :)


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-04-28 15:14 [#00197896]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to eric_hard_jams: #00197888



Doesn't anyone here like Celine Dion?
hehe ;)


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-04-28 15:57 [#00197938]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00197770 | Show recordbag



There is technology like this on Shakira's new CD to stop
you MP3ing it. One day they'll realise it's tupid as anyone
can easily get around it by plugging the line out into the
line in, recording it as a 44khz .wav then do whatever they
like with it with no discernable loss of quality.

One would hope that people in the music industry would be
tech enough to spot this, oh well...


 

offline urb from Trondheim (Norway) on 2002-04-28 18:35 [#00198109]
Points: 568 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #00197938



For now that is true. In the industry's future, everything
is digital right down to your speakers and monitor/tv, so
you'd have to either record the sound coming out of them or
place a camera in front of your tv-set to capture the
output.

and of course everything is encrypted, so eavesdropping
won't do. there will probably be ways around this, but
nothing so feasible as just pressing record.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-04-28 18:51 [#00198117]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



At some stage though, music must be "hearable". As long as
we keep and maintain current technology, we will always have
a way of recording it. Even if future PCs get rid of line
ins (can't see how Sony et all would convince Creative of
doing that) current ones will still be able to record all
music.


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-04-28 18:56 [#00198128]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00198117



There's no way they could convince the judge to force
manufacturers to disable the analoge line ins and outs. If
that was the case, how on earth could musicians record music
in the first place? Highly unlikely...


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-04-28 19:02 [#00198138]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Laserbeak: #00198128 | Show recordbag



I know, what I said was to prove that there never will be
*effective* copy protection on music.


 

offline urb from Trondheim (Norway) on 2002-04-28 19:44 [#00198233]
Points: 568 Status: Regular | Followup to Laserbeak: #00198128



Why would anybody need to be forced to do anything? The big
electronic companies are very much in bed with the big
content providers.

And of course, there will never be 100%
effective anti copying measures, but they will severly
restrict the way most people get to handle their media.

That anlaog lines will disappear from standard consumer
equipment is not an uneducated guess by me, it's a fact.


 

offline OK on 2002-04-28 19:52 [#00198251]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



if record companies made records cheaper (and they can) they
wouldn't have anything to worry about.

i would be buying a lot of music instead of waiting hours to
download 5 tracks.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-04-28 19:55 [#00198262]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to urb: #00198233 | Show recordbag



Nope, there'll always be some rogue companies (like those
that make MP3 players now) that just cover their stuff in
disclaimers saying it's only to make
compilations/backups/record your own music, that will
provide the facility.


 

offline urb from Trondheim (Norway) on 2002-04-28 20:09 [#00198292]
Points: 568 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #00198262



Not if the ones providing the content haven't given that
manufacturer license to decode their material. You would
need the right keys etc. Even if you could make equipment
that circumvented this, it would probably be illegal, and
those companies wouldn't last for long.

This is the future. People should wake up and take action
now. Support your local EFF chapter for example, they're
about the only ones fighting this.

And of course.. you will always have the option to make
inferior analog copies (like placing a mic infront of your
speakers). Better watermarking techniques would probably
make this a bit risky too, as one would be able to trace the
copies too you.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-04-28 20:33 [#00198354]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to urb: #00198292 | Show recordbag



EFF?


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-04-28 20:38 [#00198364]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to urb: #00198292



What about ear and eye encryption, would that be possible?
That way you can't even hear music that your friend
purchased. Of course there are ways to circumvent it but it
would be illegal and we would immediately get caught because
of the built-in GPS transmitters. This is the future :)


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-04-28 20:39 [#00198366]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I'll be really annoyed if I have to pay to listen to music
I've made...


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-04-28 20:42 [#00198369]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00198366



LOL


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-04-28 20:49 [#00198375]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Still there's always the option of disgusing our tapes as
robots eagles or panthers...


 

offline urb from Trondheim (Norway) on 2002-04-28 21:15 [#00198418]
Points: 568 Status: Regular | Followup to Laserbeak: #00198364



yeah that's funny.. but there are plans for this already.
just check out mpeg21 framework.


 

offline Paco from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2002-04-28 21:41 [#00198466]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker



"When a CD is not a CD
Philips, because of conformity issues, has warned the record
labels that the discs are actually not CDs at all and must
bear warning labels to inform consumers"

read about it here:
http://news.com.com/2100-1023-817937.html

I think it's great from Philips to go out and force labels
on "CDs" that are protected. Then you know which ones not to
buy.

-P


 

offline RobE from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-04-28 22:07 [#00198507]
Points: 1608 Status: Regular



Interesting topic. If memory serves,Natalie Imbruglia's
latest cd LP,was the first to feature this technology.This
reminds me of the hometaping phenomena of the early
80's...the logo of a skull and crossbones with the words
"Home Taping is Killing Music"...major record co's are
always in fear,but they still make an obscene amount of
money.(remember cd's used to be £16+? in UK).Now,they are
at a *proper* price considering how much it costs to
make...so some good has come out of it.Personally,I rip old
and new stuff you just cant get anymore,as opposed to
"regular" stuff,as i still get a buzz from buying the shiny
little discs. Finally,has anyone got/seen that terrific mp3
player from Archos? }:>


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-04-28 23:17 [#00198589]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to urb: #00198418



There are plans for a lot of things, it doesn't mean they
will get away with it...
Besides, in my country it's still allowed to make a backup
for yourself.



 


Messageboard index