The Root of Violence | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
dariusgriffin
...and 305 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614103
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
The Root of Violence
 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-29 23:58 [#00149633]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



This may be a lame accademic topic, but I have to write a
paper on violence and need some opinions.

My thesis is basically that although there are many root
causes of violence (by root I don't mean what starts a fight
or riot, but what makes us think violence is neccessary to
deal with the conflict) the most profoud root with the most
wieght is the child-parent relationship and the environment
at home. Do people agree with this and does anyone have any
idea where i might look for evidence? I need sources.


 

offline hevquip from megagram dusk sect (United States) on 2002-03-29 23:59 [#00149638]
Points: 3379 Status: Regular



my opinion:

suppression of urges

human nature as natural competitors

issues with the balance and shifting of power.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-29 23:59 [#00149639]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



other sources that are blamed like tv, vid games and other
media i think are not as powerful.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2002-03-30 00:00 [#00149643]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular



No, violence is survival, not parent but peer for mating
reasons.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-30 00:01 [#00149646]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



but do these issues begin in the earliest years of
developmnent? are we not able to deal with the nature of
competition in a nonviolent way because of our most
prominent life influences: the parents and surrounding home
environment?


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-03-30 00:02 [#00149647]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker



I certainly think the environment in which a child is
brought up in plays an important part in it. If they are
brought up in an environment where violence is acceptable
then I think it is obvious that the child will grow up to
think that sort of behavior is acceptable.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-30 00:04 [#00149653]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to JivverDicker: #00149643



I agree that violence is about survival, but in humanity we
have the ability to reason more complexly than other
animals. This is why we have people that choose
nonviolence. Is it our viewpoint of the world inherited by
our parents that allows us to opt against violence?


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-30 00:05 [#00149658]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



Does anyone know of any psychological studies done that
relate to this by chance? Any books?


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-03-30 00:46 [#00149708]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker



Try this....I don't know whether its any good!

http://www.violence.de/bylinsky/article.html


 

offline leftrightronic on 2002-03-30 00:48 [#00149709]
Points: 563 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #00149658



jupitah: hmm nice try you are looking in the wrong place..
go to your library and search the news databases, research
with queryserver <-- good metacrawler; find journal
articles those are really good


 

offline leftrightronic on 2002-03-30 00:49 [#00149710]
Points: 563 Status: Lurker



hmm that might be a place to look, but it's not credible,
you need primarily .edu resources IF you even plan on citing
articles off the web


 

offline Ubik from United States on 2002-03-30 00:51 [#00149712]
Points: 662 Status: Lurker



i think one of the biggest misunderstandings about violence
is that people compare it to predatory animals. humans are
opportunistic predators, no human violence is really based
on any hidden predatory instinct. in some animals, they can
show violence in three completely different ways, sexual
pecking orders and trying to force sex, territorial, which
can be a sexual territory or a feeding territory, and last,
just plan eating other creatures.

humans enjoy putting others down or using others, asserting
their place in the pecking order, when basic issues about
sexual territories and space territories do not apply, but
it is based on these behaviors.

what i think is interesting is what different people find
funny. some people find violence funny that deals with a
stronger person gleefully hurting and humiliating a weaker
person just to prove that they are stronger. i find this
pretty scary. the same type of people joke about hurting
animals, find joking about kicking or hurting a cat or dog
for fun really laugh out loud funny. like violence is okay
if you can get away with it mentality.


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-03-30 01:03 [#00149722]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



The root of violence? who gives a shit. its there, i commit
vioent acts sometimes. so what. i dont need or want to think
about stuff like that... when it wont change anything let a
lone the way I think.


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-03-30 01:06 [#00149724]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



when you occupy a country because you think god promised it
to you and throw its people out of their homes you gotta
expect a bit of violence):


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-30 03:49 [#00149950]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to REFLEX: #00149722



REFLEX, who cares? I left a disclaimer at the top stating
that this topic might not be worth your time. I have a
paper to write and I don't like doing half ass work. I
think most of you are an interesting bunch and maybe someone
would care to give me their input. You obviously don't.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-30 03:52 [#00149959]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Salma Hayek: #00149724



Salma, your message could be interpretted many ways. I hope
that you don't believe all violent conflict in America is
caused by the raping of the Natives' culture and home. And
even if it were, my paper is focused not on the cause of
conflicts, but the reason that we choose to deal with these
conflicts with violence.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-30 03:54 [#00149961]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to leftrightronic: #00149710



Thanks leftronic, and I do plan on hitting the library. I
just thought I'd try the board because it's so diverse.


 

offline xlr from Boston (United States) on 2002-03-30 03:58 [#00149969]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



I'd agree w/ you on the primary source being uprbringing and
the parent-child relationship. I think media violence only
affects children at a very young age. I think the biggest
violent influences are parents/ peers.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-30 04:08 [#00149979]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



I think that violence in media affects everyone (you may
notice I hone in on generalizations, not that I don't make
them myself occasionally) but I think that young children
are affected to a greater degree. It's like learning a
language. A person learns their native language more
efficiently and deeper than they can learn a language
beginning in high school and continuing throughout the rest
of their life. I jsut think this learning probably applies
to behavior as well, including violence.


 

offline xlr from Boston (United States) on 2002-03-30 04:11 [#00149984]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



I think ALL violent/agressive/hateful behavior, in any
person, is learned, not inherent. I guess you could say i'm
a humanist.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-30 04:17 [#00149989]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



Well, violence exists, so it is a part of us. Something
that needs be healed. What's the difference betweem learned
and being a part of us anyway? Everything that is a part of
us as human nature was learned at some point, but became
inbedded into our genetics and "collective unconscious" if
you believe in such a thing. It's all a brew.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-30 04:31 [#00150018]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Salma Hayek: #00149724



For the record, a lot of Americans feel guilt about our
countries situation. It's not an expressed guilt, but it's
there. Do you really believe that most Americans think that
the foundation of our nation was justified and that "god
promised it"? If you believe that I am sick to my stomach.
Maybe all of us Americans should pack up and move to your
country. Would that resolve this issue?


 

offline JOB from St. John's (Canada) on 2002-03-30 04:38 [#00150031]
Points: 453 Status: Lurker



Violence is very primitive in our minds i believe.
Eventually we'll grow out of being hard headed idiots who
worry about their dick being too small and for once in a
long time prosper by helping each other.


 

offline xlr from Boston (United States) on 2002-03-30 04:50 [#00150041]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



or annhialate each other long before that ever has a chance
to happen.


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-30 05:18 [#00150068]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



hm.. IMO i think violence is just an expression of
instincts... and very basic emotion, "animal" urges that we
usually control with our logical mind..
but sometimes their too strong, or ur reasoning side is not
strong enough, and tehy get through
this isn't just violence.. but all emotionally charged
behavior

but enviroment definitly plays a HUGE role i think.. our
enviroment practically creates us, i think
people learn their behavior at a young age.. people abused
as kids learn and take up that behavior
then they are abusive towards their kids
usually it is expressed as physical violence, in addition to
mental abuse

on the other hand...

if u grow up in a loving and secure mental enviroment where
conflicts are dealt with more peacefully, u dont feel a need
to jump to physical OR emotional violence to try to resolve
things

hm.. i dont think ive said anything that hasn't already been
said, but oh well

btw, for ur original question:
yes i agree with you!

dont know about sources.. i may be able to get some in a few
minutes, ill post 'em if i do


 

offline pachi from yo momma (United States) on 2002-03-30 06:30 [#00150181]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker



maybe it's a chain of influence


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-03-30 07:55 [#00150228]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



jupitah , my message refers to the Israel-Palastine conflict
and has nothing to do with America. I find it frankly
dissgusting that only the Jews can use
history from 2000 years ago to plead for land that is no
longer theirs and then complain from Arab violence.... and
by god promised to them i was refering to what the Jews
claim, they think they're god's chosen people and that this
land is promised to them exclusively by him which is quite a
load of shit to put it bluntly....But this issue is
obviously very political and is not what you're looking
for....sorry its just what i thought of first when i read
the question about violence.


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-03-30 08:47 [#00150265]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



Fine then. I dont think that violence is something to be
shunned or put on the "back burner" and left for later. If
not dealt with it can cause serious problems, mental and
physical. This is fact.

What is not fact, is why we do it, when or who we do it to.
The reasons are all different, but most likely sound the
same to us all.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-30 09:01 [#00150275]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



Here are the facts:
The tree of mana is the center of goodness pureness and
beauty. When Nea died, she became the new tree of mana, but
it is in men's nature to seek the power from this tree and
use it for the purpose of evil. For this reason, the gemma
knights including me, will defend Nea at any cost.


 

offline corngrower from the fertile grounds of Iowa, w (United States) on 2002-03-30 09:35 [#00150312]
Points: 4404 Status: Lurker



religion has been tha main root of violence throughout
history... wherther you like it or not


 

offline joey from montréal (Canada) on 2002-03-30 16:17 [#00150521]
Points: 1220 Status: Lurker



The roots of Coincidence... a kick ass song by pat metheny
group, which would probable be appreciated by most people in
the messageboard here.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-31 08:22 [#00151713]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Salma Hayek: #00150228



oops, sorry salma. i've just been really defensive lately
hearing trash about americans from misunderstood people...
and your message was kinda vague and interpretable.


 

offline pachi from yo momma (United States) on 2002-03-31 08:24 [#00151717]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker



money
cheating couples
religion
Britney


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-31 08:28 [#00151721]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to pachi: #00150181



chain of influence... kinda like what was stated in my
orignal thesis, except it is not a rigid chain. certain
factors can be stronger in some situations and less in
others... very complex and chaotic the personality and
behaior is. basically my thesis when i posted this message
was that the parent-child relationship is the strongest
influence in more individuals than not and so it should
recieve the most attention when discussing violence.


 

offline pachi from yo momma (United States) on 2002-03-31 08:32 [#00151726]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #00151721



is this for psychology class or social issues class or
somethin? (j/w)


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-03-31 08:34 [#00151730]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



i think finding a root for violence is impossible, the
question is too general...violence is caused by countless
reasons and each case is different, not all violence is the
same or exists for the same reasons, rape, criminal
violence, demostic violence, wars its all different...humans
have always resorted to violent ways but as i say for
different reasons and to achieve different things.....maybe
some aggressive and violent people have something in their
genes, rapists etc... who knows?


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-31 08:35 [#00151732]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to Salma Hayek: #00151730



ya, i agree salma

btw: ur really hot!



 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-31 08:38 [#00151734]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Salma Hayek: #00151730



i realize that violence is very broad and complex, but
statistically what is the most commonly strongest factor? i
say it's the parent-child relationship. i think i may focus
my paper on violence among children, and possibly here in
the states. i can never think micro, so all of my papers
cover ridiculously broad macroscopic concepts and i just do
my best.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-31 08:41 [#00151736]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to pachi: #00151726



this is for a freshman composition class with a focus on
urban life; violence is the current focus of the class.
btw, what is j/w?


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-31 08:47 [#00151741]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



j/w = just wondering

got it


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-03-31 08:47 [#00151743]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



well i can't think of one reason that is most common, sorry,
it might be in the genes, it might be the social infleuence
on the child, might be the parents....

and yes AMinal i do have beautiful tits...


 

offline Cheffe1979 from fuck (Austria) on 2002-03-31 09:04 [#00151760]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker



i think it's not the direct "teaching" influence of parents
that affects children most but what all children learn from
their parents, if they want or not, is how to react on
difficult situations.
if violence is capable for them than it's also for the
children.

a strange thing you have in the US is that kids going mad
and killing a bunch of people at school or so. we don't have
it here in europe, maybe due to the restrictions on
weapons.

i dont give too much on the genetics-thing when it's about
social behaviour.

Salma: don't you want to animate your pic?


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-31 09:10 [#00151764]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Cheffe1979: #00151760



lol, if it were animated it'd be even more distracting.
don't you have a nice shot of of you burried in that sand?

i agree totally agree bout the parents influnce. when i say
the child-parent relationship i mean the complete thing, not
just direct teaching. kids pick up on the subtleties in
their parents' attitudes. parents don't neccessarily have
to be volent to raise a violent child.


 

offline pachi from yo momma (United States) on 2002-03-31 09:11 [#00151765]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker



plus violence on US TV is not as restricted as sex, which i
find questionable


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-31 09:14 [#00151767]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



yes, any decent person would question that, imo. and that
reflects the attitudes towards violence that people pass
down to their children. merely making light of violence may
be enough to affect a child.


 

offline license from out of nowhere on 2002-03-31 09:15 [#00151768]
Points: 865 Status: Lurker



the Id is the portion of the human psyche which contains
primal urges such as sex, hunger, and violence. violence is
a manifestation of our needs as breathing lifeforms to show
how we are better others of our species. without it, we'd be
forced to rely solely on intellect which isn't as satisfying
to our Id and simply doesn't afford some humans any
opportunity for competition.


 

offline pachi from yo momma (United States) on 2002-03-31 09:17 [#00151770]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker | Followup to license: #00151768



u learn that in yer psych class? ^_^


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-31 09:19 [#00151772]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



yeah, i dont know if frued deserves as much credit as he
gets.


 

offline license from out of nowhere on 2002-03-31 09:20 [#00151774]
Points: 865 Status: Lurker



yesh, pachi. -_-
and soon you shall as well! ^_^


 

offline pachi from yo momma (United States) on 2002-03-31 09:20 [#00151775]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker



o, sigmund freud. to be honest i only heard bout him in my
AP history class and not in great detail.


 


Messageboard index