|
|
jupitah
from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-29 23:58 [#00149633]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker
|
|
This may be a lame accademic topic, but I have to write a paper on violence and need some opinions.
My thesis is basically that although there are many root causes of violence (by root I don't mean what starts a fight or riot, but what makes us think violence is neccessary to deal with the conflict) the most profoud root with the most wieght is the child-parent relationship and the environment at home. Do people agree with this and does anyone have any idea where i might look for evidence? I need sources.
|
|
hevquip
from megagram dusk sect (United States) on 2002-03-29 23:59 [#00149638]
Points: 3379 Status: Regular
|
|
my opinion:
suppression of urges
human nature as natural competitors
issues with the balance and shifting of power.
|
|
jupitah
from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-29 23:59 [#00149639]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker
|
|
other sources that are blamed like tv, vid games and other media i think are not as powerful.
|
|
JivverDicker
from my house on 2002-03-30 00:00 [#00149643]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular
|
|
No, violence is survival, not parent but peer for mating reasons.
|
|
jupitah
from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-30 00:01 [#00149646]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker
|
|
but do these issues begin in the earliest years of developmnent? are we not able to deal with the nature of competition in a nonviolent way because of our most prominent life influences: the parents and surrounding home environment?
|
|
Jedi Chris
on 2002-03-30 00:02 [#00149647]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker
|
|
I certainly think the environment in which a child is brought up in plays an important part in it. If they are brought up in an environment where violence is acceptable then I think it is obvious that the child will grow up to think that sort of behavior is acceptable.
|
|
jupitah
from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-30 00:04 [#00149653]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to JivverDicker: #00149643
|
|
I agree that violence is about survival, but in humanity we have the ability to reason more complexly than other animals. This is why we have people that choose nonviolence. Is it our viewpoint of the world inherited by our parents that allows us to opt against violence?
|
|
jupitah
from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-30 00:05 [#00149658]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker
|
|
Does anyone know of any psychological studies done that relate to this by chance? Any books?
|
|
Jedi Chris
on 2002-03-30 00:46 [#00149708]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker
|
|
Try this....I don't know whether its any good!
http://www.violence.de/bylinsky/article.html
|
|
leftrightronic
on 2002-03-30 00:48 [#00149709]
Points: 563 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #00149658
|
|
jupitah: hmm nice try you are looking in the wrong place.. go to your library and search the news databases, research with queryserver <-- good metacrawler; find journal articles those are really good
|
|
leftrightronic
on 2002-03-30 00:49 [#00149710]
Points: 563 Status: Lurker
|
|
hmm that might be a place to look, but it's not credible, you need primarily .edu resources IF you even plan on citing articles off the web
|
|
Ubik
from United States on 2002-03-30 00:51 [#00149712]
Points: 662 Status: Lurker
|
|
i think one of the biggest misunderstandings about violence is that people compare it to predatory animals. humans are opportunistic predators, no human violence is really based on any hidden predatory instinct. in some animals, they can show violence in three completely different ways, sexual pecking orders and trying to force sex, territorial, which can be a sexual territory or a feeding territory, and last, just plan eating other creatures.
humans enjoy putting others down or using others, asserting their place in the pecking order, when basic issues about sexual territories and space territories do not apply, but it is based on these behaviors.
what i think is interesting is what different people find funny. some people find violence funny that deals with a stronger person gleefully hurting and humiliating a weaker person just to prove that they are stronger. i find this pretty scary. the same type of people joke about hurting animals, find joking about kicking or hurting a cat or dog for fun really laugh out loud funny. like violence is okay if you can get away with it mentality.
|
|
REFLEX
from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-03-30 01:03 [#00149722]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular
|
|
The root of violence? who gives a shit. its there, i commit vioent acts sometimes. so what. i dont need or want to think about stuff like that... when it wont change anything let a lone the way I think.
|
|
Salma Hayek
on 2002-03-30 01:06 [#00149724]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular
|
|
when you occupy a country because you think god promised it to you and throw its people out of their homes you gotta expect a bit of violence):
|
|
jupitah
from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-30 03:49 [#00149950]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to REFLEX: #00149722
|
|
REFLEX, who cares? I left a disclaimer at the top stating that this topic might not be worth your time. I have a paper to write and I don't like doing half ass work. I think most of you are an interesting bunch and maybe someone would care to give me their input. You obviously don't.
|
|
jupitah
from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-30 03:52 [#00149959]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Salma Hayek: #00149724
|
|
Salma, your message could be interpretted many ways. I hope that you don't believe all violent conflict in America is caused by the raping of the Natives' culture and home. And even if it were, my paper is focused not on the cause of conflicts, but the reason that we choose to deal with these conflicts with violence.
|
|
jupitah
from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-30 03:54 [#00149961]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to leftrightronic: #00149710
|
|
Thanks leftronic, and I do plan on hitting the library. I just thought I'd try the board because it's so diverse.
|
|
xlr
from Boston (United States) on 2002-03-30 03:58 [#00149969]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular
|
|
I'd agree w/ you on the primary source being uprbringing and the parent-child relationship. I think media violence only affects children at a very young age. I think the biggest violent influences are parents/ peers.
|
|
jupitah
from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-30 04:08 [#00149979]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker
|
|
I think that violence in media affects everyone (you may notice I hone in on generalizations, not that I don't make them myself occasionally) but I think that young children are affected to a greater degree. It's like learning a language. A person learns their native language more efficiently and deeper than they can learn a language beginning in high school and continuing throughout the rest of their life. I jsut think this learning probably applies to behavior as well, including violence.
|
|
xlr
from Boston (United States) on 2002-03-30 04:11 [#00149984]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular
|
|
I think ALL violent/agressive/hateful behavior, in any person, is learned, not inherent. I guess you could say i'm a humanist.
|
|
jupitah
from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-30 04:17 [#00149989]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker
|
|
Well, violence exists, so it is a part of us. Something that needs be healed. What's the difference betweem learned and being a part of us anyway? Everything that is a part of us as human nature was learned at some point, but became inbedded into our genetics and "collective unconscious" if you believe in such a thing. It's all a brew.
|
|
jupitah
from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-30 04:31 [#00150018]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Salma Hayek: #00149724
|
|
For the record, a lot of Americans feel guilt about our countries situation. It's not an expressed guilt, but it's there. Do you really believe that most Americans think that the foundation of our nation was justified and that "god promised it"? If you believe that I am sick to my stomach. Maybe all of us Americans should pack up and move to your country. Would that resolve this issue?
|
|
JOB
from St. John's (Canada) on 2002-03-30 04:38 [#00150031]
Points: 453 Status: Lurker
|
|
Violence is very primitive in our minds i believe. Eventually we'll grow out of being hard headed idiots who worry about their dick being too small and for once in a long time prosper by helping each other.
|
|
xlr
from Boston (United States) on 2002-03-30 04:50 [#00150041]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular
|
|
or annhialate each other long before that ever has a chance to happen.
|
|
AMinal
from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-30 05:18 [#00150068]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular
|
|
hm.. IMO i think violence is just an expression of instincts... and very basic emotion, "animal" urges that we usually control with our logical mind..
but sometimes their too strong, or ur reasoning side is not strong enough, and tehy get through
this isn't just violence.. but all emotionally charged behavior
but enviroment definitly plays a HUGE role i think.. our enviroment practically creates us, i think
people learn their behavior at a young age.. people abused as kids learn and take up that behavior
then they are abusive towards their kids usually it is expressed as physical violence, in addition to mental abuse
on the other hand...
if u grow up in a loving and secure mental enviroment where conflicts are dealt with more peacefully, u dont feel a need to jump to physical OR emotional violence to try to resolve things
hm.. i dont think ive said anything that hasn't already been said, but oh well
btw, for ur original question: yes i agree with you!
dont know about sources.. i may be able to get some in a few minutes, ill post 'em if i do
|
|
pachi
from yo momma (United States) on 2002-03-30 06:30 [#00150181]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker
|
|
maybe it's a chain of influence
|
|
Salma Hayek
on 2002-03-30 07:55 [#00150228]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular
|
|
jupitah , my message refers to the Israel-Palastine conflict and has nothing to do with America. I find it frankly dissgusting that only the Jews can use
history from 2000 years ago to plead for land that is no longer theirs and then complain from Arab violence.... and by god promised to them i was refering to what the Jews claim, they think they're god's chosen people and that this land is promised to them exclusively by him which is quite a load of shit to put it bluntly....But this issue is obviously very political and is not what you're looking for....sorry its just what i thought of first when i read the question about violence.
|
|
REFLEX
from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-03-30 08:47 [#00150265]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular
|
|
Fine then. I dont think that violence is something to be shunned or put on the "back burner" and left for later. If not dealt with it can cause serious problems, mental and physical. This is fact.
What is not fact, is why we do it, when or who we do it to. The reasons are all different, but most likely sound the same to us all.
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-30 09:01 [#00150275]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker
|
|
Here are the facts: The tree of mana is the center of goodness pureness and beauty. When Nea died, she became the new tree of mana, but it is in men's nature to seek the power from this tree and use it for the purpose of evil. For this reason, the gemma knights including me, will defend Nea at any cost.
|
|
corngrower
from the fertile grounds of Iowa, w (United States) on 2002-03-30 09:35 [#00150312]
Points: 4404 Status: Lurker
|
|
religion has been tha main root of violence throughout history... wherther you like it or not
|
|
joey
from montréal (Canada) on 2002-03-30 16:17 [#00150521]
Points: 1220 Status: Lurker
|
|
The roots of Coincidence... a kick ass song by pat metheny group, which would probable be appreciated by most people in the messageboard here.
|
|
jupitah
from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-31 08:22 [#00151713]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Salma Hayek: #00150228
|
|
oops, sorry salma. i've just been really defensive lately hearing trash about americans from misunderstood people... and your message was kinda vague and interpretable.
|
|
pachi
from yo momma (United States) on 2002-03-31 08:24 [#00151717]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker
|
|
money cheating couples religion Britney
|
|
jupitah
from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-31 08:28 [#00151721]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to pachi: #00150181
|
|
chain of influence... kinda like what was stated in my orignal thesis, except it is not a rigid chain. certain factors can be stronger in some situations and less in others... very complex and chaotic the personality and behaior is. basically my thesis when i posted this message was that the parent-child relationship is the strongest influence in more individuals than not and so it should recieve the most attention when discussing violence.
|
|
pachi
from yo momma (United States) on 2002-03-31 08:32 [#00151726]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #00151721
|
|
is this for psychology class or social issues class or somethin? (j/w)
|
|
Salma Hayek
on 2002-03-31 08:34 [#00151730]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular
|
|
i think finding a root for violence is impossible, the question is too general...violence is caused by countless reasons and each case is different, not all violence is the same or exists for the same reasons, rape, criminal violence, demostic violence, wars its all different...humans have always resorted to violent ways but as i say for different reasons and to achieve different things.....maybe some aggressive and violent people have something in their genes, rapists etc... who knows?
|
|
AMinal
from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-31 08:35 [#00151732]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to Salma Hayek: #00151730
|
|
ya, i agree salma
btw: ur really hot!
|
|
jupitah
from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-31 08:38 [#00151734]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Salma Hayek: #00151730
|
|
i realize that violence is very broad and complex, but statistically what is the most commonly strongest factor? i say it's the parent-child relationship. i think i may focus my paper on violence among children, and possibly here in the states. i can never think micro, so all of my papers cover ridiculously broad macroscopic concepts and i just do my best.
|
|
jupitah
from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-31 08:41 [#00151736]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to pachi: #00151726
|
|
this is for a freshman composition class with a focus on urban life; violence is the current focus of the class. btw, what is j/w?
|
|
jupitah
from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-31 08:47 [#00151741]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker
|
|
j/w = just wondering
got it
|
|
Salma Hayek
on 2002-03-31 08:47 [#00151743]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular
|
|
well i can't think of one reason that is most common, sorry, it might be in the genes, it might be the social infleuence on the child, might be the parents....
and yes AMinal i do have beautiful tits...
|
|
Cheffe1979
from fuck (Austria) on 2002-03-31 09:04 [#00151760]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker
|
|
i think it's not the direct "teaching" influence of parents that affects children most but what all children learn from their parents, if they want or not, is how to react on difficult situations.
if violence is capable for them than it's also for the children.
a strange thing you have in the US is that kids going mad and killing a bunch of people at school or so. we don't have it here in europe, maybe due to the restrictions on weapons.
i dont give too much on the genetics-thing when it's about social behaviour.
Salma: don't you want to animate your pic?
|
|
jupitah
from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-31 09:10 [#00151764]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Cheffe1979: #00151760
|
|
lol, if it were animated it'd be even more distracting. don't you have a nice shot of of you burried in that sand?
i agree totally agree bout the parents influnce. when i say the child-parent relationship i mean the complete thing, not just direct teaching. kids pick up on the subtleties in their parents' attitudes. parents don't neccessarily have to be volent to raise a violent child.
|
|
pachi
from yo momma (United States) on 2002-03-31 09:11 [#00151765]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker
|
|
plus violence on US TV is not as restricted as sex, which i find questionable
|
|
jupitah
from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-31 09:14 [#00151767]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker
|
|
yes, any decent person would question that, imo. and that reflects the attitudes towards violence that people pass down to their children. merely making light of violence may be enough to affect a child.
|
|
license
from out of nowhere on 2002-03-31 09:15 [#00151768]
Points: 865 Status: Lurker
|
|
the Id is the portion of the human psyche which contains primal urges such as sex, hunger, and violence. violence is a manifestation of our needs as breathing lifeforms to show how we are better others of our species. without it, we'd be forced to rely solely on intellect which isn't as satisfying to our Id and simply doesn't afford some humans any opportunity for competition.
|
|
pachi
from yo momma (United States) on 2002-03-31 09:17 [#00151770]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker | Followup to license: #00151768
|
|
u learn that in yer psych class? ^_^
|
|
jupitah
from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-31 09:19 [#00151772]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker
|
|
yeah, i dont know if frued deserves as much credit as he gets.
|
|
license
from out of nowhere on 2002-03-31 09:20 [#00151774]
Points: 865 Status: Lurker
|
|
yesh, pachi. -_- and soon you shall as well! ^_^
|
|
pachi
from yo momma (United States) on 2002-03-31 09:20 [#00151775]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker
|
|
o, sigmund freud. to be honest i only heard bout him in my AP history class and not in great detail.
|
|
Messageboard index
|