Ceri JC celebration | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 292 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613457
Today 3
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
Ceri JC celebration
 

offline bingob on 2007-10-16 06:42 [#02133148]
Points: 675 Status: Lurker



He is over with his master! Celebrate! Hooray!


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2007-10-16 06:46 [#02133150]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



wut ?


 

offline bingob on 2007-10-16 06:48 [#02133153]
Points: 675 Status: Lurker



He is done working with it :D


 

offline bingob on 2007-10-16 06:48 [#02133154]
Points: 675 Status: Lurker



He handed it in! He gave the master-thesis a hand-job!


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2007-10-16 06:50 [#02133155]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



a


 

offline recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2007-10-16 07:18 [#02133165]
Points: 39976 Status: Regular



Ceri JC for moderator!!!


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-16 07:20 [#02133169]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Congratulations to Ceri!

What was the master on, again? You said what it was a while
back, but it was something of the sort that I forget easily.


 

offline bingob on 2007-10-16 07:25 [#02133176]
Points: 675 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02133169



It was the two articles:
"messageboard trolls in the new millennium: wankshots or
mods best friend?"
"XLT v2: before or after chinese democracy?"


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-16 07:27 [#02133177]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to bingob: #02133176 | Show recordbag



Awesome! I'll take twenty copies!


 

offline recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2007-10-16 07:30 [#02133178]
Points: 39976 Status: Regular | Followup to bingob: #02133176



Nice, can I be on the mailing list, $10/Year, right-


 

offline oyvinto on 2007-10-16 07:33 [#02133180]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



he got a D


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-10-16 07:51 [#02133194]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02133169 | Show recordbag



Ta mate. Information Security and Computer Crime was the
course title. Thesis was on the Data Protection Act 1998.
Only the viva left to go and that will be done in under a
week. Woohoo.

Oyvinto: Nope, either a merit or a distinction.



 

offline oyvinto on 2007-10-16 07:53 [#02133195]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



ok. congs man. i did mine in a week or so. lol, worst master
ever.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-16 07:58 [#02133196]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #02133194 | Show recordbag



Hmm.. what approach do you take to it? Technical, legal,
practical or philosophical? ..or any other..?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-10-16 08:24 [#02133203]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02133196 | Show recordbag



Bit of all 4: My basic view is that it is a good idea and
the rights it confers to individuals are a welcome change in
a world where the trend is for our freedoms to be stripped
away, rather than them being protected by legislation. The
problem with it is that even with the UK's (one of the most
realistic/easy to comply with) implementation of the EU
directive that sparked it all, it's nearly impossible to
comply with in a modern business environment, even if you're
not intentionally doing anything morally wrong.

The 2 main conclusions I reached were:
1. That there needs to be a greater incentive to comply with
the act and the recent threat of jailtime is not sufficient
on its own. A system whereby you could get certified as
having good data protection standards, a bit like the ISO
standard mark would benefit everyone. Companies because
those who were good would be recognised and could trade on
this fact, those who were bad would lose business.
Individuals would benefit because companies would take their
obligations more seriously (whereas currently compliance is
often viewed as a cost without benefits).

2. Better DP practices often have an administrative overhead
not present in current systems. At the same time, many of
these functions could be largely automated. Automation would
not only reduce the workload of those who have to comply
with the act, but also make sure that the way they behaved
in relation to the DPA was consistant.

I'm going to develop this latter idea into a paper for
publication.

I also talked about the ethics of data mining without
consent (thats the philosophical bit). I was actually
nattering with the head of a govt. think tank on this
subject yesterday and she reckoned that it was moral, which
is the view I lean towards. I'm not allowed to discuss the
"technical" bits of the project, as this was classified, but
there was a fair bit on this.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-10-16 08:25 [#02133206]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to oyvinto: #02133195 | Show recordbag



He he. Sounds much better than my "wake up at 4am every
morning to do 5 hours on it before work for the last month
and a half and work on it every weekend for 3 months"
approach. :)


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-16 08:59 [#02133225]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #02133203 | Show recordbag



Hmm.. the most interesting part of that post, to me, is that
you believe your rights are being stripped, and I'd like to
understand what you mean by it, but the other stuff,
especially the whip/carrot thing with corporations is also
quite interesting: I'm taking a class where some of the
focus is on intellectual property rights and how they aren't
particularly beneficial to developing countries, especially
since stuff like medicines and toys are all swept under the
same protection regime, leading to poorer real access to
medicines for poor people and countries. There's a bit of a
debate about whether you need the whip or the carrot, and
whether or not the system of patents really is a carrot for
research and development, and if it should be enforced
throughout the world without taking into consideration which
country it is in... there's a lot of stuff to get into
there, but no-one has any conclusive evidence as to what
helps the most.


 

offline PORICK from fucking IRELAND on 2007-10-16 09:08 [#02133230]
Points: 1911 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #02133194



This might be of interest to you -

Data protection... Irish style.

just a bit fucked up.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-10-16 09:18 [#02133233]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02133225 | Show recordbag



With regard to our rights being stripped: Well, we (in the
UK at least) live in a society where surveillance is
becoming ever more prevalent, ID cards are needed by kids in
schools to get into their classrooms, police are only ever
given more powers, never are old ones taken from them.

With regard to the whip/carrot: Well, toddlers respond
better to carrots than whips, why should CEOs of
multinationals be any different? :)

Seriously though, good carrots work better than poor whips:
The threat of jail time is a poor whip, unless CEOs are
regularly winding up in jail. Given the current slack rate
of DP prosecutions in criminal (rather than civil) court
here, the threat it poses is practically non-existent. A
fair number of people don't even realise the law has changed
and still think it's only a fine (not their own money, in
any event) that they can receive. Consequently, they are
extremely resistant to changing their data protection
practices if doing so costs them money.

A "charter mark" type thing that they can put all over their
flyers/software and that their salespeople can bang on
about, however, is something they see the point of. They see
it as resulting in more sales and if they don't have one,
but the competitors do, as losing out. You could even
actually have a 2 tier award (say, silver and gold) and
actually demand far more stringent practices to achieve gold
than you reasonably could demand under law. It'd even pretty
much fund itself as the cost of being audited/certified
would be born by the companies themselves.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-10-16 09:23 [#02133234]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to PORICK: #02133230 | Show recordbag



Nice! Sounds a bit like our R V Brown case. Essentially an
(alleged! *cough*Bollocks*cough*) bent copper moonlighted as
a debt collector for a mate (no doubt in uniform and waving
his badge about, although this was never claimed/proven). He
used the police database system to find out about people who
owed debts and their assets (cars, houses, etc.) and then
pursued them.

Due to a retarded technicallity regarding the definition of
the word 'use', he got away scott free, despite clearly
being guilty of a (moral) crime.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-16 09:35 [#02133242]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #02133233 | Show recordbag



Well, considering the evidence (whips & carrots), what you
say is a guess at best, and the way I see it, the lack of
conclusive evidence points towards a pragmatic solution: You
can't use the same thing for all companies and for all
things; what may be appropriate in one case, could be
inappropriate in another. At the same time, it is not
desirable to have the sort of American system where
everything is tried by courts, because once a court has
ruled, it becomes, as the word hints, a rule, once again
making it applicable across the line.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-10-16 09:46 [#02133248]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



It's not a guess, it's based on my research. The current
attitude in industry to DP-matters is generally this:
1) It's expensive and generally a ball ache to comply.
2) No one ever gets prosecuted for this, why should I spend

time and money on making sure what we are doing is right.

It's true that some organisations choose to have
meaningful, detailed DP-compliance audits carried out
voluntarily (I don't have exact figures, but an educated
guess would place it at less than 1%), but even then, they
very rarely correct the really expensive/time consuming
faults (see point 2 above).

Remember my political bias, I am not some anti-capitalist
lefty who disingenuously assumes the worst of companies by
default. I came to this conclusion for a reason.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-10-16 09:51 [#02133251]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02133242 | Show recordbag



I agree with you re: the tried by the courts aspect. It just
doesn't work with DP law for some reason. You get the most
ludicrous unjust outcomes, which then go on to form
precedent so the whole thing just gets more and more
fuckwitted as time rolls on. You even get normally quite
sensible legal commentators infering all sort of stupid and
unrelated things from the rulings and saying, "oh, so that
means this completely unrelated, nothing to do with the
original case, is allowed." I suspect it's something to do
with the vast majority of them not coming from a computing
background and not really understanding what is going on at
a row/column level within the database (without which, IMO,
you aren't really qualified to speak as an authority on DP
law- this was another thing I identified in my work).

Fortunately our Information Commissioners so far have been
pretty sound and they have a rather unique/powerful position
where they can basically override all this nonsense and give
the official interpretation which about 95% of the time, I
agree with.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-10-16 09:52 [#02133253]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Anyway, enough of this DP bollocks, I've had months of that.
I want to get my crunk up. w00t!


 

offline recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2007-10-16 09:56 [#02133255]
Points: 39976 Status: Regular



Sound like you two need to get laid, with or w/out each
other


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-10-16 10:01 [#02133261]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to recycle: #02133255 | Show recordbag



Gf is ill at the moment. Any chance you can help?


 

offline recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2007-10-16 10:03 [#02133265]
Points: 39976 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #02133261



She was ok last night :)
O'snap.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-10-16 10:11 [#02133269]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to recycle: #02133265 | Show recordbag



I thought she was a long time in the toilet at that chinese
restaurant we were in...


 

offline recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2007-10-16 10:19 [#02133273]
Points: 39976 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #02133269



She got ill from a chinese restaurant? bummer, send her my
condolences mate-


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-10-16 10:22 [#02133275]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to recycle: #02133273 | Show recordbag



No, we think it was from a family member, too soon after
chinese to be food poisoning.


 

offline recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2007-10-16 10:28 [#02133279]
Points: 39976 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #02133275



it can happen within 24 hours, or there is a lot of that
going on over the pond as well, i was ill for about 3 days


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-10-16 10:32 [#02133282]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to recycle: #02133279 | Show recordbag



This was more like 2 hours.

I also had all the same as her as we shared everything we
ordered (lobster, yum!) and I'm fine. Still, even if it
were, I don't think I'll launch any lawsuit against them,
it's a Triad run place. :)


 

offline oxygenfad from www.oxygenfad.com (Canada) on 2007-10-16 10:42 [#02133290]
Points: 4442 Status: Regular



Congrats, it's a lot of hard work, that will pay off :D

Cha ching !


 

offline recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2007-10-16 10:43 [#02133291]
Points: 39976 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #02133282



Whats a Triad run place-


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-10-17 02:41 [#02133785]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to recycle: #02133291 | Show recordbag



It's owned by the Triads (chinese mafia) and they use it to
launder money. I don't even have to say "allegedly" as they
were busted for it a couple of years back. :D

Ta oxygenfad!


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-17 03:03 [#02133795]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #02133248 | Show recordbag



Yes, but I was saying you can't apply the same remedy across
the line because generally, the broader the study, the less
obvious it is what is the best way of resolving the issue.
I'm not shitting on your data or research or anything (god
forbid, when someone has actually done any research to back
up what they say for once, it should be shat upon), I'm just
saying everything I've read on the subject (albeit within
the area of intellectual property rights) says there's no
simple conclusion to draw from the data.

But I'll let you rest your mental faculties, and, once
again, congratulate you on finishing your thesis!


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-10-17 03:07 [#02133798]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02133795 | Show recordbag



Ta mate.


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2007-10-17 03:28 [#02133799]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



congs! :)


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-10-17 03:53 [#02133802]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to cygnus: #02133799 | Show recordbag



Thansk ;)


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2007-10-17 04:03 [#02133804]
Points: 19368 Status: Lurker



big congs


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2011-10-27 17:44 [#02422775]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Oh yeah, update, I got a distinction.


 


Messageboard index