Copyright Infringement | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
DADONCK
...and 189 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613860
Today 0
Topics 127525
  
 
Messageboard index
Copyright Infringement
 

offline PORICK from fucking IRELAND on 2007-10-15 08:40 [#02132608]
Points: 1911 Status: Lurker



LAZY_TITLE

Sure, you may get yourself a ticket from local police if you
roll around with that in-car stereo cranked, but at least
you're not being sued for £200,000 ($407,680).
Unfortunately for the Edinburgh-based Kwik-Fit automotive
repair center, it actually is being taken to court for that
astronomical amount by the Performing Rights Society, which
"collects royalties for songwriters and performers." The
PRS alleges that "Kwik-Fit mechanics routinely used personal
radios while working at locales across the UK and that
music, protected by copyright, could be heard by colleagues
and customers."
Astoundingly, Lord Emslie ruled that the
case could actually be heard, so we guess we'll be relying
exclusively on headphones from here on out.


[emphasis mine]

oh, WOW. Seriously. What?

What's going on?


 

offline sneakattack on 2007-10-15 08:42 [#02132612]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to PORICK: #02132608



I've been bitching about this sort of garbage for a while.
Imagine when we have synthetically augmented memories, with
protections of all sorts, and you can no longer whistle a
tune you heard in passing.

TAKE SOME SHITS ON PEOPLE


 

offline Brisk from selling smack at the orphanage on 2007-10-15 09:07 [#02132654]
Points: 4667 Status: Lurker



The question is, how did the PRS actually find out about
this? Did a customer speak to them specifically with the
complaint that they could hear music coming from the garages
or something? It is just so bizarre.


 

offline PORICK from fucking IRELAND on 2007-10-15 09:09 [#02132659]
Points: 1911 Status: Lurker | Followup to Brisk: #02132654



Maybe someone finally twigged it in a board meeting.


 

offline Brisk from selling smack at the orphanage on 2007-10-15 09:10 [#02132660]
Points: 4667 Status: Lurker



What about open-back headphones on the train? Could this
make me money?


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2007-10-15 09:52 [#02132682]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



any reason bit a bit of extra cash

cashcunts


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2007-10-15 09:52 [#02132684]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Followup to Raz0rBlade_uk: #02132682 | Show recordbag



christ i'm stoned


 

offline recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2007-10-15 09:53 [#02132686]
Points: 40030 Status: Addict



350 degrees for 45 minutes


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2007-10-15 09:53 [#02132688]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Followup to Raz0rBlade_uk: #02132682 | Show recordbag



that did seem like a perfect sentence when i typed it

maybe on a higher sense it is superior


 

offline anon from ^_^ (United Kingdom) on 2007-10-15 09:59 [#02132697]
Points: 1828 Status: Lurker | Followup to Brisk: #02132654



There are people, that go round and check if you have a
music licence.if you are in a shop/hairdressers/garage/cafe
etc,and music can be heard by the public..even radio.you
need to pay for a licence.

is that even how you spell licence?
i dont think it is



 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-15 10:10 [#02132703]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Hopefully, that judge is hoping the case will set
precedence.. in favour of the people who want to listen to
radios while working, that is.

*license


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-15 10:12 [#02132704]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Unless that wording is confusing me; lord whatever refers to
a judge, and that the case can be heard means it can get a
court hearing, right?


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2007-10-15 10:21 [#02132706]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker



...and making copies for yourself is also stealing


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2007-10-15 11:13 [#02132783]
Points: 24587 Status: Lurker



Licence = U.K. spelling (traditional)

License = U.S. spelling, soon to be ubiquitous.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2007-10-15 11:15 [#02132788]
Points: 24587 Status: Lurker



Like the Roman Empire, these people are getting more insane
the nearer to death they come.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2007-10-15 11:53 [#02132800]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



The issue needs to be formally addressed by international
courts with final binding resolutions made, taking all the
time needed to address each what if or what about situation.
It is a multi faceted issue with A LOT of grey area.

Downloading, sharing and cataloging entire albums and never
buying them IS wrong and it IS stealing. To me that is
pretty black and white. We can thank these people for
making this such a big issue and ruining it for the rest of
us who approach digital music somewhat ethically.

Sharing music for other reason such as; to hear what an
album sounds like before buying it (sometimes 30 sec clips
don't really cut it), to get rarities or deleted albums,
live cuts, breezeblocks, etc to me is ethical use.
Converting your CDs to MP3s or making a backup so your
original doesn't get scratched up is also ethical use IMO.

What is going to end up happening or maybe needs to happen
is that the PEOPLE need to stand up and say, you know what,
the culture is changing, technology is changing, and WE THE
PEOPLE choose to embrace this technology and assimilate it
into our culture. You the music industry can either adapt,
or not, but if you continue to fight by suing us, policing
us, etc THERE WILL BE A REVOLUTION, THERE WILL BE A CIVIL
WAR, WE WILL GO BOSTON TEA PARTY ON YOUR ASSES AND THROW YOU
IN THE FUCKING RIVER.


 


Messageboard index