|
|
PORICK
from fucking IRELAND on 2007-10-15 08:40 [#02132608]
Points: 1911 Status: Lurker
|
|
LAZY_TITLE
Sure, you may get yourself a ticket from local police if you roll around with that in-car stereo cranked, but at least you're not being sued for £200,000 ($407,680). Unfortunately for the Edinburgh-based Kwik-Fit automotive repair center, it actually is being taken to court for that astronomical amount by the Performing Rights Society, which "collects royalties for songwriters and performers." The PRS alleges that "Kwik-Fit mechanics routinely used personal radios while working at locales across the UK and that music, protected by copyright, could be heard by colleagues and customers." Astoundingly, Lord Emslie ruled that the case could actually be heard, so we guess we'll be relying exclusively on headphones from here on out.
[emphasis mine]
oh, WOW. Seriously. What?
What's going on?
|
|
sneakattack
on 2007-10-15 08:42 [#02132612]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to PORICK: #02132608
|
|
I've been bitching about this sort of garbage for a while. Imagine when we have synthetically augmented memories, with protections of all sorts, and you can no longer whistle a tune you heard in passing.
TAKE SOME SHITS ON PEOPLE
|
|
Brisk
from selling smack at the orphanage on 2007-10-15 09:07 [#02132654]
Points: 4667 Status: Lurker
|
|
The question is, how did the PRS actually find out about this? Did a customer speak to them specifically with the complaint that they could hear music coming from the garages or something? It is just so bizarre.
|
|
PORICK
from fucking IRELAND on 2007-10-15 09:09 [#02132659]
Points: 1911 Status: Lurker | Followup to Brisk: #02132654
|
|
Maybe someone finally twigged it in a board meeting.
|
|
Brisk
from selling smack at the orphanage on 2007-10-15 09:10 [#02132660]
Points: 4667 Status: Lurker
|
|
What about open-back headphones on the train? Could this make me money?
|
|
Raz0rBlade_uk
on 2007-10-15 09:52 [#02132682]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag
|
|
any reason bit a bit of extra cash
cashcunts
|
|
Raz0rBlade_uk
on 2007-10-15 09:52 [#02132684]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Followup to Raz0rBlade_uk: #02132682 | Show recordbag
|
|
christ i'm stoned
|
|
recycle
from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2007-10-15 09:53 [#02132686]
Points: 40030 Status: Addict
|
|
350 degrees for 45 minutes
|
|
Raz0rBlade_uk
on 2007-10-15 09:53 [#02132688]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Followup to Raz0rBlade_uk: #02132682 | Show recordbag
|
|
that did seem like a perfect sentence when i typed it
maybe on a higher sense it is superior
|
|
anon
from ^_^ (United Kingdom) on 2007-10-15 09:59 [#02132697]
Points: 1828 Status: Lurker | Followup to Brisk: #02132654
|
|
There are people, that go round and check if you have a music licence.if you are in a shop/hairdressers/garage/cafe etc,and music can be heard by the public..even radio.you need to pay for a licence.
is that even how you spell licence? i dont think it is
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-15 10:10 [#02132703]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Hopefully, that judge is hoping the case will set precedence.. in favour of the people who want to listen to radios while working, that is.
*license
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-15 10:12 [#02132704]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Unless that wording is confusing me; lord whatever refers to a judge, and that the case can be heard means it can get a court hearing, right?
|
|
Laserbeak
from Netherlands, The on 2007-10-15 10:21 [#02132706]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker
|
|
...and making copies for yourself is also stealing
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2007-10-15 11:13 [#02132783]
Points: 24587 Status: Lurker
|
|
Licence = U.K. spelling (traditional)
License = U.S. spelling, soon to be ubiquitous.
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2007-10-15 11:15 [#02132788]
Points: 24587 Status: Lurker
|
|
Like the Roman Empire, these people are getting more insane the nearer to death they come.
|
|
glasse
from Harrisburg (United States) on 2007-10-15 11:53 [#02132800]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
The issue needs to be formally addressed by international courts with final binding resolutions made, taking all the time needed to address each what if or what about situation. It is a multi faceted issue with A LOT of grey area.
Downloading, sharing and cataloging entire albums and never buying them IS wrong and it IS stealing. To me that is pretty black and white. We can thank these people for making this such a big issue and ruining it for the rest of us who approach digital music somewhat ethically.
Sharing music for other reason such as; to hear what an album sounds like before buying it (sometimes 30 sec clips don't really cut it), to get rarities or deleted albums, live cuts, breezeblocks, etc to me is ethical use. Converting your CDs to MP3s or making a backup so your original doesn't get scratched up is also ethical use IMO.
What is going to end up happening or maybe needs to happen is that the PEOPLE need to stand up and say, you know what, the culture is changing, technology is changing, and WE THE PEOPLE choose to embrace this technology and assimilate it into our culture. You the music industry can either adapt, or not, but if you continue to fight by suing us, policing us, etc THERE WILL BE A REVOLUTION, THERE WILL BE A CIVIL WAR, WE WILL GO BOSTON TEA PARTY ON YOUR ASSES AND THROW YOU IN THE FUCKING RIVER.
|
|
Messageboard index
|