[Nobel Peace Price] IPCC and Al Gore! | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
DADONCK
...and 136 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613860
Today 0
Topics 127525
  
 
Messageboard index
[Nobel Peace Price] IPCC and Al Gore!
 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-12 03:17 [#02131339]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



A good pick! Hopefully this will mean that, in the very
least
, our own politicians realise they have to do
more, and actually dare to take the necessary steps.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-10-12 03:58 [#02131346]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I'm not saying it's not a worthy cause, but how is global
warming to do with peace, exactly? Is it a sort of
pre-emptive prevention of the inevitable hordes of migrants
from hotter countries being gunned down as they try to cross
into the borders of more moderately-climated places?


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-10-12 04:05 [#02131348]
Points: 23711 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



"nice" just when he got pwned by the british schooling and
justice system


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-12 04:24 [#02131353]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #02131346 | Show recordbag



In a way, yes, but it's broader: Global warming makes
resources more scarce, and resources (including land) are
what people fight and wage wars over.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-12 04:25 [#02131354]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #02131348 | Show recordbag



He's helped raise awareness. The IPCC handle the facts.


 

offline staz on 2007-10-12 04:29 [#02131355]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular



al gore seems like a decent guy. even if this does nothing
but spite republicans and libertarians, it's worthy.


 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2007-10-12 04:33 [#02131358]
Points: 4899 Status: Regular | Followup to staz: #02131355



I'm a libertarian and I like Al Gore. He's sincere.


 

offline staz on 2007-10-12 04:37 [#02131359]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular | Followup to Wolfslice: #02131358



be angry so i can enjoy myself. it is my only joy in life.


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-10-12 04:38 [#02131360]
Points: 23711 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



well i don't really believe in global warming anymore


 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2007-10-12 04:39 [#02131362]
Points: 4899 Status: Regular | Followup to Wolfslice: #02131358



The government should strong-arm the heavy polluting
corporations a bit, especially if they're doing a bunch of
toxic dumping etc.

I only have a problem federal restrictions on individuals
rights (like you can't BBQ because of air pollutants etc).
That should just be personal accountability.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-12 04:43 [#02131363]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #02131360 | Show recordbag



Why not?


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-10-12 04:46 [#02131365]
Points: 23711 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02131363 | Show recordbag



it's prolly sunactivity
that's what a friend told me who'd seen that
anti-documentary.
i don't really feel like forming an opinion about this
anymore, i'm not a scientist. i'm for being careful of the
environment anyway, so no loss


 

offline staz on 2007-10-12 04:48 [#02131367]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular



there are anti-documentaries for everything these days.
sigh.


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-10-12 04:52 [#02131369]
Points: 23711 Status: Lurker | Followup to staz: #02131367 | Show recordbag



yea, lol

i guess gore was asking for it though


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-12 04:57 [#02131370]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #02131365 | Show recordbag



It's pretty certain that it isn't sun activity; research
done by researchers from the World Radiation Centre in Davos
shows so, and when it comes to the sun, those are the guys
to trust (it's where other guys have to go to calibrate
their equipment).

Plus, if we followed the sun's cycle, we'd be entering a new
ice age right now, as predicted back in the 70s or whatever.
Their predictions were correct even though we aren't in a
new ice age: We are, technically, in a new ice age
and that is the reason why the temperature hasn't risen more
quickly.


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-10-12 05:00 [#02131371]
Points: 23711 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02131370 | Show recordbag



the first paragraph i believe, the second i do not


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-12 05:05 [#02131372]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #02131371 | Show recordbag



The red area is deviation from how the temperature should
proceed, if our temperature followed only natural
variations.

Also: "An analysis of the records of all of the
Sun's activities over the past few decades - such as sunspot
cycles and magnetic fields - shows that since 1985 solar
activity has decreased significantly, while global warming
has continued to increase.
"


Attached picture

 

offline big from lsg on 2007-10-12 05:12 [#02131375]
Points: 23711 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



my penis is getting warmer


 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2007-10-12 05:12 [#02131376]
Points: 4899 Status: Regular



Here's some reading on the Ice Age deal.


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-10-12 05:16 [#02131377]
Points: 23711 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02131372 | Show recordbag



man can't predict ice ages


 

offline Co-existence from Bergen (Norway) on 2007-10-12 05:22 [#02131380]
Points: 3388 Status: Regular



Tipper


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-12 05:23 [#02131381]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #02131377 | Show recordbag



You're trolling, but the climate has, up until now, been
going in a rather regular pattern, and it is this pattern
plus observations of the sun's patterns, that enables us to
predict how the climate would have been.


 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2007-10-12 05:25 [#02131382]
Points: 4899 Status: Regular | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02131381



I'm not buying that were "supposed to be in an ice age"
right now. At least not one of any substantial magnitude.
There are some indicators that one may be coming in the
future, though.


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-10-12 05:26 [#02131383]
Points: 23711 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



im not trolling, i pulled out my penis prematurely is all ;)


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-12 05:27 [#02131384]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Wolfslice: #02131376 | Show recordbag



Hahahah!

"the Global Warming mill (really the anti-industry,
anti-population lobby, headed and pumped with money by the
Royal Consort Prince Philip, and former Nazi Party member
Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands)
"


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-12 05:28 [#02131385]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Wolfslice: #02131382 | Show recordbag



It's a small ice-age (compare on the graph to the lowest
point, which is a full-blown one).


 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2007-10-12 05:32 [#02131386]
Points: 4899 Status: Regular | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02131384



haha, when I saw that line I thought you'd get a kick out of
it.

Despite that, the article actually sums up the Ice Age
concern pretty well (I've read some other stuff on it too
from different sources).

I haven't read much that supports the theory that global
warming is doing anything to stave off an Ice Age.


 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2007-10-12 05:34 [#02131387]
Points: 4899 Status: Regular | Followup to Wolfslice: #02131386



And that's not to belittle the possible impact of global
warming. We're pumping a shitload of co2 into the atmosphere
and that's bound to have some negative effects somewhere
along the line.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-10-12 05:40 [#02131388]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02131370 | Show recordbag



"We are, technically, in a new ice age
and that is the reason why the temperature hasn't risen more

quickly."

So basically, what you're saying is many people would
already be dead from the ice age and global warming has
actually saved our lives. And you're saying it's a badthing? :D

As an aside, I read a good quote on peak oil/global warming
paranoia the other day: "It's like that W2K nonsense all
over again, without the inconveniance of a deadline."


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-12 05:40 [#02131389]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Wolfslice: #02131386 | Show recordbag



His data don't contradict the IPCC: Global warming doesn't
mean everywhere will get hotter simultaneously, and local
"climate" changes have been predicted. In the same way, I
can't "prove" global warming by stating that the Norwegian
glaciers are as small as they've been since recording
started (true statement, not just an example). Global
warming is global and global data need to be
correlated.

Some of the more local effects of climate change can be to
make an area colder, and another area hotter, but the main
thing is that global average temperature still rises. The
ice age also still hasn't reached it's "peak" (low?), and it
is possible that it will reach enough power to
overpower our effect.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-12 05:42 [#02131390]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #02131388 | Show recordbag



No, it's a small ice age, so the change wouldn't be that
dramatic. Also, people have been dying from heat-waves (in
France for instance) lately, so it isn't a good thing that
it's getting hotter in any case.


 

offline chaosmachine from Ottawa (Canada) on 2007-10-12 05:45 [#02131394]
Points: 2330 Status: Lurker



i'm in favor of global warming. less snow. yay!


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-12 05:45 [#02131395]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #02131388 | Show recordbag



Another thing you should notice is that the ice age has a
rather slow onset while the global warming is moving at a
much faster pace, which makes it harder for us to adjust to
the changes.


 

offline oxygenfad from www.oxygenfad.com (Canada) on 2007-10-12 10:41 [#02131444]
Points: 4442 Status: Regular



"my penis is getting warmer"

HA!


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-10-15 01:16 [#02132414]
Points: 23711 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



it's one-issueness anyway, making comprehendable all the
world's environmental problems into one boogeyman
we now have stupid shit like climateneutral flying (when the
trees are cut all the co2 comes back anyway)
i'm just happy gore didn't succeed into make glad global
warming as hip as as breast cancer


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-15 02:30 [#02132421]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #02132414 | Show recordbag



It's more about taking responsibility for the things you
can take responsibility for, and, yes, some of the
"solutions" really are crap, but mostly because economists
are running things.


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-10-15 02:46 [#02132425]
Points: 23711 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



it's just the modern original sin. best get rid of most of
the worlds population


 

offline Gaelle on 2007-10-15 03:02 [#02132442]
Points: 13 Status: Addict



I POLLUTE THE WORLD, AND I GOT ONE OF THOSE TOO


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-15 03:05 [#02132452]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #02132425 | Show recordbag



I am the original sin!


 


Messageboard index