|
|
x0hx
from Lysdexia (United States) on 2007-08-28 17:13 [#02115474]
Points: 1318 Status: Regular
|
|
I mean, why? Just... why?
You can tell on "Cactus" on Surfer Rosa, but still!
|
|
optimus prime
on 2007-08-28 17:18 [#02115477]
Points: 6447 Status: Lurker
|
|
generally it's to present older music the way it was meant to be heard. think of movie remasters where all the dirt and scratches are removed from the images.
|
|
optimus prime
on 2007-08-28 17:19 [#02115478]
Points: 6447 Status: Lurker
|
|
listen to one of the craptacular beatles cd releases and you'll hear why cds sometimes need to be remastered.
|
|
x0hx
from Lysdexia (United States) on 2007-08-28 17:36 [#02115479]
Points: 1318 Status: Regular
|
|
Right, but copies are only as good as source / method of master.
IMHO most times the general population can't really tell "Oh my god, did you hear the cymbal panned rear left?!! And that vocal midcenter?!"
Monetarily, of course, it makes sense. Like you stated, maybe on a Beatles or Hendrix track, but otherwise... neh.
|
|
Sclah
from Freudian Slipmat on 2007-08-28 18:34 [#02115492]
Points: 3121 Status: Lurker
|
|
A source of income for record companies struggling with dropping record sales. MP3 kills music etc.
|
|
mylittlesister
from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2007-08-28 18:53 [#02115500]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular
|
|
the sonic youth remasters sound pretty good to me.
|
|
Ophecks
from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2007-08-28 18:58 [#02115503]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
The Beatles remasters are going to be revelatory. The stereo on the CD masters make my brain itch. But none of the vinyl or mono mixes really cut it either.
|
|
optimus prime
on 2007-08-28 19:05 [#02115504]
Points: 6447 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ophecks: #02115503
|
|
but they're basically never going to be released, right?
|
|
x0hx
from Lysdexia (United States) on 2007-08-28 19:08 [#02115505]
Points: 1318 Status: Regular | Followup to mylittlesister: #02115500
|
|
Sonic Youth anything is good. Wonder if Psychic Hearts remaster is, as well
|
|
rad smiles
on 2007-08-28 19:29 [#02115512]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker
|
|
i like those wire remasters as such
|
|
futureimage
from buy FIR from Juno (United Kingdom) on 2007-08-29 03:20 [#02115571]
Points: 6427 Status: Lurker
|
|
I think most albums get remastered just because they need to be reissued, but they don't want to just rerelease the same thing, they want a new (heavily compressed, undynamic and over loud) version.
|
|
Sido Dyas
from a computer on 2007-08-29 10:50 [#02115717]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker
|
|
I like Monolake's remastered stuff. That guy is all about deep well produced sounds and i can see why he would do such a thing.
|
|
mrgypsum
on 2007-08-29 16:04 [#02115837]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker
|
|
all of CAN's remastered stuff blows the old stuff out of the water, the older version of Future Days, you cant even hear the album unless the volume it turned up to max, now the volume and sound are great, its gives me a tuss.
|
|
earthleakage
from tell the world you're winning on 2007-08-29 16:30 [#02115839]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular | Followup to x0hx: #02115474
|
|
money
|
|
Skink
from A cesspool in eden on 2007-08-29 17:20 [#02115852]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker
|
|
The recent cure reissues sound really awesome. If you like that kind of thing...
|
|
rad smiles
on 2007-08-29 17:38 [#02115873]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker
|
|
Skink is right. got all of em up through Pornography. i wasnt expecting pornography to sound good for obvious reasons but it really is great.
and mrgypsum is right. Tago Mago sounds amazing.
the talking heads ones are great too. and the Fennesz one. i could keep going...Marquee Moon...
|
|
optimus prime
on 2007-08-29 20:45 [#02115934]
Points: 6447 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #02115837
|
|
your use of tuss gives me tuss.
|
|
mrgypsum
on 2007-08-29 20:47 [#02115935]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to optimus prime: #02115934
|
|
its a sentence enchancer
|
|
futureimage
from buy FIR from Juno (United Kingdom) on 2007-08-30 03:13 [#02115976]
Points: 6427 Status: Lurker | Followup to rad smiles: #02115873
|
|
Yeah I do want at least Remain In Light cos my vinyl copy's worn out so much.
|
|
staz
on 2007-08-30 03:24 [#02115981]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular
|
|
a lot of remasters sound fucking fantastic compared to the old versions, that's why. the raw power remaster is a travesty, though.
|
|
Vin3islih
from United Kingdom on 2007-08-31 11:57 [#02116401]
Points: 1066 Status: Regular
|
|
Because some old CD's and CD's of stuff from the 60's, which came out in the 80's sound all muddy and shite. A bit like the old 'Rolling Stones' catalogue.
I guess your point is why remaster stuff, which came out 10 years before. In truth, that's still pretty pointless, however on some stuff you can really tell the difference. You mentioned the Pixies album.
|
|
Vin3islih
from United Kingdom on 2007-08-31 12:01 [#02116402]
Points: 1066 Status: Regular | Followup to Ophecks: #02115503
|
|
Well.. they do. Especially the Mirror Spock stuff.
|
|
Messageboard index
|