|
|
horsefactory
from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2007-08-11 19:17 [#02110593]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular
|
|
the mix of urban jerk and hardcore IDM was amazing!
|
|
Fah
from Netherlands, The on 2007-08-11 19:17 [#02110594]
Points: 6428 Status: Regular
|
|
that's wicked!
|
|
Aesthetics
from the IDM Kiosk on 2007-08-11 19:23 [#02110597]
Points: 6796 Status: Lurker
|
|
WTF!!! Someone got inspired by my Mash-up! I'm not joking here..
My Mash-up Luckely it sounds way better! :)
|
|
roygbivcore
from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2007-08-11 22:37 [#02110616]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker
|
|
it was really obviously done in ableton
|
|
brian trageskin
from London on 2007-08-11 23:06 [#02110618]
Points: 136 Status: Regular
|
|
haha dagibit that was fun!
|
|
futureimage
from buy FIR from Juno (United Kingdom) on 2007-08-12 03:25 [#02110631]
Points: 6427 Status: Lurker
|
|
Hahaha lush!
|
|
Raz0rBlade_uk
on 2007-08-12 03:48 [#02110633]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag
|
|
i think i pointed out the similarity between these two tracks about a year ago. made a thread too! someone was obviously inspired
|
|
Aesthetics
from the IDM Kiosk on 2007-08-12 03:59 [#02110634]
Points: 6796 Status: Lurker | Followup to Raz0rBlade_uk: #02110633
|
|
You sure put an idea into my head. :)
|
|
goDel
from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-08-12 04:08 [#02110635]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker
|
|
hahahaha
great!
|
|
Jaser
from Castle Greyskull (United Kingdom) on 2007-08-12 05:38 [#02110636]
Points: 2101 Status: Regular
|
|
I really don't know why people bother. I must be a purist.
|
|
brian trageskin
from London on 2007-08-12 11:00 [#02110661]
Points: 136 Status: Regular
|
|
hey guys have you seen this one?
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2007-08-12 11:13 [#02110664]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jaser: #02110636
|
|
Logically, purists are fucking morons.
|
|
Chin Bwoy Phat
from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-08-12 11:23 [#02110665]
Points: 574 Status: Lurker
|
|
this is fucking stupid. fuck snoop doggggggggggggggggggggggggg.
|
|
rotunda
on 2007-08-12 13:45 [#02110682]
Points: 359 Status: Regular
|
|
Wicked, I want a better quality version! Always thought that tune had a kind of lowrider thing about it, or something
|
|
rotunda
on 2007-08-12 13:54 [#02110684]
Points: 359 Status: Regular | Followup to brian trageskin: #02110661
|
|
Shit that was cool as well, they did a good job
|
|
goDel
from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-08-12 15:44 [#02110709]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #02110664
|
|
purism is just another kind of extremism. may bush call a jihad on his head.
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-08-12 16:04 [#02110720]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Hahahah! Awesomes!
|
|
portal13
from United Kingdom on 2007-08-12 16:55 [#02110724]
Points: 295 Status: Regular
|
|
hahaha, that was absolutely hilarous. It worked in a strange and curiously arrousing way. Although i'm no fan of rap by any stretch of the imagination, I gave it some head boppin since, afterall, Agiespolis was playing too.
To answer your question about how to get vocals isolated. There's a production technique surprisingly easy to do if you got a half decent DAW. It should be under an audio process menu of some kind. All you do is "subtract" the left and right channels to a stereo file or track. Obviously it will depend on L,R content but it should get rid of the beat most of the time if nothing else.
|
|
Aesthetics
from the IDM Kiosk on 2007-08-12 17:15 [#02110727]
Points: 6796 Status: Lurker | Followup to rotunda: #02110682
|
|
See the link I posted a few posts up... it's a version I did 2 years ago. It's slightly different but of a much higher quality.
@portal13: The beat/song is so much alike that it's not necessary to isolate the vocals.
|
|
dave_g
from United Kingdom on 2007-08-12 17:26 [#02110728]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker | Followup to portal13: #02110724
|
|
yeah, the technique is really simple. Normally vocals are recorded without any panning. This means they are equally in the left and right channels of a stereo mix. By inverting one channel and mixing with the other, the vocals will cancel out and most of the rest will remain.
The remaining instrumental can then be subtracted from the vocal+music track of the original to leave only vocals. The fact that the human voice uses much less bandwidth than music means that filtering can also be employed to remove any further traces of music.
Even without lots of special functions, a simple editor can do it. Even without a DAW, a simple electronic circuit with about 4 opamps (1 chip and a few passive components) can be used.
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-08-12 17:49 [#02110730]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
I think the easiest way to isolate the vocals in this case is to buy the 12" with the acapella.
bitches!
|
|
futureimage
from buy FIR from Juno (United Kingdom) on 2007-08-13 03:51 [#02110770]
Points: 6427 Status: Lurker | Followup to brian trageskin: #02110661
|
|
fucking brilliant.
|
|
swears
from junk sleep on 2007-08-13 04:40 [#02110774]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker
|
|
I don't usually like this Aphex Twin character, but adding Snoop and Pharrell's excellent rhymes it's just about listenable.
|
|
portal13
from United Kingdom on 2007-08-13 08:40 [#02110792]
Points: 295 Status: Regular
|
|
swears...perhaps you have to listen to more Aphex if you think excelent rhythmes come from Snoop Dogg.
|
|
futureimage
from buy FIR from Juno (United Kingdom) on 2007-08-13 08:54 [#02110796]
Points: 6427 Status: Lurker | Followup to portal13: #02110792
|
|
lmao welcome to XLT. don't take anyone seriously here, this place aint meant for that.
|
|
Brisk
from selling smack at the orphanage on 2007-08-13 09:00 [#02110799]
Points: 4667 Status: Lurker
|
|
I've heard much better bastard pop mixes, but it was still quite cool.
|
|
Messageboard index
|