Atheists | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
recycle
...and 575 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Atheists
 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2007-02-19 08:19 [#02052084]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker



Why are some of the so stupid and not be able to understand
the nature of religion?


 

offline tridenti from Milano (Italy) on 2007-02-19 08:19 [#02052085]
Points: 14653 Status: Lurker



Boring.


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2007-02-19 08:22 [#02052087]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular



you're some of the so stupid


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2007-02-19 08:22 [#02052088]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker



What do my daily problems, or the meaning in life have to do
with science anyway?


 

offline Sclah from Freudian Slipmat on 2007-02-19 08:30 [#02052094]
Points: 3121 Status: Lurker



Air


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2007-02-19 08:41 [#02052096]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



the war on atheists have begun in amerika.

it's becoming a bit too scary imho. i dunno, i consider
myself one but not in a promoting type way. i dont get all
freaked out about having "one nation under god" or anything
like that. i dont want any of that removed, i can ignore it
just fine.

but there is some serious hate in this country regarding
atheists. and im just coming to realization about it


 

offline chaosmachine from Ottawa (Canada) on 2007-02-19 09:02 [#02052102]
Points: 2330 Status: Lurker



we are nothing more than a complex chemical reaction,
burning up and burning out, leaving nothing but dust. ours
is to be scattered across the great deserts of a dead earth,
till the fires of the sun reclaim us, its final dawn making
all as one. and as the nova fades, our atoms collapsing, we
slip past the event horizon, sand through the hourglass,
forgotten into perpetual night.

pray hard that your god might save you, if only a god could
exist in a place such as this...


 

offline staz on 2007-02-19 09:04 [#02052103]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular



eh, i don't care if you believe in god, you're fucked at the
end anyway.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-02-19 09:05 [#02052105]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to chaosmachine: #02052102 | Show recordbag



Nothing more?


 

offline gl0tch from www.gl0tch.com     on 2007-02-19 09:25 [#02052110]
Points: 2708 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #02052084



Why are some of the so stupid and not be able to
understand
the nature of religion?


You can't really be serious can you? The reason they are
Atheists IS because they understand the nature of religion.

Religion is_____________


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2007-02-19 09:35 [#02052119]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



I will pray long and hard for anyone who takes monoid
seriously.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2007-02-19 09:39 [#02052123]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to gl0tch: #02052110



Atheism is another form of religion


 

offline gl0tch from www.gl0tch.com     on 2007-02-19 09:41 [#02052126]
Points: 2708 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #02052123



That's like saying "Invisible" is a new form of color.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2007-02-19 09:46 [#02052129]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to gl0tch: #02052126



I know what im talking about, shut up.....


 

offline gl0tch from www.gl0tch.com     on 2007-02-19 09:49 [#02052130]
Points: 2708 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #02052129



OK, now I'm sure you're joking. I get it, I get it.
Well played. LOL, brillant!


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2007-02-19 09:57 [#02052132]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker



whatever man


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2007-02-19 10:03 [#02052133]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



you sure it is another form?


 

offline chaosmachine from Ottawa (Canada) on 2007-02-19 10:07 [#02052134]
Points: 2330 Status: Lurker



actually, it's not so bad..

given the inevitable consequences of gravity, all matter is
eventually drawn into its nearest black hole. and like dust
clouds forming planets, the holes pull together, creating
unfathomable superclusters, doubling and redoubling until,
finally, there is but one ultimate mass. unable to retain
any form, the universe collapses, unto the point of
infinity, where upon gravity ceases to exist. freed from its
bonds, spacetime is loosed in a great, crashing wave,
expanding to the farthest reaches of itself. and thus we
begin again.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2007-02-19 10:08 [#02052135]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker



"a strong belief" - Yes, it takes a strong believe to
believe what scientists say about quantum physics or the
cosmolgical model of our universe


 

offline edgey from New York (United States) on 2007-02-19 10:08 [#02052136]
Points: 408 Status: Regular



Door to Door Atheists


 

offline gl0tch from www.gl0tch.com     on 2007-02-19 10:09 [#02052137]
Points: 2708 Status: Lurker | Followup to chaosmachine: #02052134



Sounds like some of the earliest world-views to me....


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2007-02-19 10:10 [#02052140]
Points: 12423 Status: Regular



Humanity is bullshit and I don't want it any other way.


 

offline gl0tch from www.gl0tch.com     on 2007-02-19 10:10 [#02052141]
Points: 2708 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #02052135



Yeah, because Mathematics is so like, fake and stuff...


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2007-02-19 11:04 [#02052166]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict | Followup to Monoid: #02052135



atheism is a lack of belief.
i deal in proof, and/or convincing evidence. not belief.


 

offline edgey from New York (United States) on 2007-02-19 11:10 [#02052170]
Points: 408 Status: Regular | Followup to chaosmachine: #02052134



Actually, we're already part of 'one ultimate mass', there
just happens to be alot of distance between the molecules
currently.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2007-02-19 11:23 [#02052179]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #02052166



I'm defining religion as a codified believe system. You
appear to be defining it in some dumbfuck way.



 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2007-02-19 12:32 [#02052213]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



Monoid will you be my friend


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2007-02-19 12:41 [#02052219]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



that's like saying - i believe in proven facts -
therefore, you "believe" in something, (like another form of
religion)
ermm, i dont think so
it's a bit rhetorical



 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2007-02-19 12:42 [#02052221]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to elusive: #02052219



I think it's impossible to prove anything nowadays


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2007-02-19 13:12 [#02052240]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker



It's "cool" to be an "atheist".


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2007-02-19 13:41 [#02052249]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



how do you figure that?

although i have come across some people who feel the need to
"display" that they are one, or that they are somehow better
blah blah.

ive never really told anyone in real life and generally if
asked i just say that's none or your business or that my
views change based on events in my life.



 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2007-02-19 13:44 [#02052251]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker



Of Course its impossible to prove or disprove religion.


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2007-02-19 13:57 [#02052253]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



richard dawkins is our god


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2007-02-19 14:03 [#02052257]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular | Followup to Monoid: #02052179



as per usual u r right. ppl mock what they dont understand.
athiesm is as naiive as religion. why choose at all?


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2007-02-19 14:11 [#02052260]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



that's where im coming from
it's not a choice
i dont hardset myself in not believing anything
im young and my views have changed over the years. i realize
this and expect to see more changes in the coming...

bah, this one is too hard to put into words. hate it when
that happens, ttyl


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2007-02-19 14:19 [#02052263]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



if you're talking strong atheism, where you make a factual
statement that no god exists, then yeah that's a logical
fallacy.

but, if you're saying that since there is absolutely no
evidence that a god exists then it makes sense to assume
that there isn't one, i suppose that's more understandable.


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2007-02-19 14:27 [#02052267]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular | Followup to epohs: #02052263



to quote the boondocks "the absence of evidence is not the
evidence of absence."

i think its more reasonable to believe that if there is any
kind of higher intelligence, it is far beyond our grasp, and
we could never have a chance at understanding it,
scientifically or not. i hope if such a being exists, that
its way more complex than the petty, self-centered rendition
most of the world's sacred texts have given it.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2007-02-19 14:39 [#02052276]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to hedphukkerr: #02052267



right, yeah i agree. i don't think that quote conflicts with
what i said.

i mean, we don't have any explicit evidence that unicorns
don't exist yet most of us would find it to be perfectly
acceptable to proceed with our lives as if they didn't.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-02-19 14:57 [#02052279]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #02052166 | Show recordbag



..or is that what you believe?


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2007-02-19 15:39 [#02052296]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



has anyone mentioned the flying spaghetti monster yet?


 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2007-02-19 17:35 [#02052333]
Points: 4909 Status: Regular



I have the same problem with athiests that I do with most
religious types:

They wont admit the possibility that they're wrong; that
they DON'T know the answers and that no one alive does.

Stop pretending like you know everybody. Agnostic 4 lyfe


 

offline NannouV4 from United States on 2007-02-19 17:47 [#02052334]
Points: 86 Status: Lurker



I doubt gods existence, for various reasons, but I wouldn't
call my self an Atheist. Atheism, like organized religion,
requires a certain amount of Faith, which I do not posses.
I mean, it seems nearly as silly to say definitively that
"god does not exist" as it does to say "god lives in the
clouds above us". I'll readily admit that "I don't know if
god does or does not exist".

Which is why I am a spineless Agnostic.


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2007-02-19 17:52 [#02052337]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular | Followup to NannouV4: #02052334



but thats the point. agnosticism is far from spineless, on
the contrary. you have to be brave and perhaps even
misguided to have to deal with the prospect of dealiing with
a large arena of a knowledge base you really think you
deserve to know the answer to but probably never will.


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2007-02-19 17:53 [#02052338]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02052279



no, its not. i am [currently] convinced god does not
exist. i do not believe god does not exist. evidence
convines me. but if i ever see evidence to the contrary, or
have a religious experience or whatever, my situation might
change. like science itself, my viewpoint is not static.


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2007-02-19 17:57 [#02052339]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #02052338



maybe that is an agnostic position. i don't know. but i call
it atheism. or humanism sometimes. meh.


 

offline NannouV4 from United States on 2007-02-19 18:00 [#02052341]
Points: 86 Status: Lurker



No, see I meant spineless literally.

The doctors were forced to remove my spine after a
horrendous childhood ping pong accident.



 

offline edgey from New York (United States) on 2007-02-19 18:05 [#02052343]
Points: 408 Status: Regular



To summarize...

Atheism, is the denial of belief of the existence of
god.

Agnosticism, is the acceptance of possibility in the
belief
of a god (or other higher power /
existence / intelligence).

There is no "belief" in atheism. There is only denial.
(Although some may argue, denial implies ackowledgement,
which implies existence). :)



 

offline NannouV4 from United States on 2007-02-19 18:29 [#02052346]
Points: 86 Status: Lurker



The denial of belief of the existence of god sounds like a
belief in and of itself.

Not only is Agnosticism the acceptance of the possibility
that there is a god or gods, but also the acceptance of the
possibility that there is not one or any.



 

offline B123 from The wicked underbelly (Australia) on 2007-02-19 21:14 [#02052369]
Points: 1361 Status: Lurker



oh JESUS this thread could end up being huge. Monoid just
except that some people don't want to believe in your
fucking backward, contradictory, superstitious, irrelevent
to a modern world religion ok?

Its not a matter of intelligence its a matter of choice.
Something religion does not embrace very well.

B123 commin atcha :P

Personally I don't care what any of you believe in. I'm here
to share good ol xlt times with you. peace


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2007-02-19 21:52 [#02052380]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker



wait a minute

belief describes the leap of faith required to bridge the
unknown. belief is distinct from knowledge.

so it would require belief to argue with conviction either
for or against the presence of a god, unless you really do
know for sure.

we can only really speak with conviction for what we have
experienced, and what we know to be real.


 


Messageboard index