reality | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 452 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
reality
 

offline chaosmachine from Ottawa (Canada) on 2007-02-17 04:19 [#02051434]
Points: 2330 Status: Lurker



i wonder if perhaps, secretly, we argue about things to
prove them to ourselves, rather than to others.

you can present new viewpoints and concepts one after
another, but in the end, it's always the other person who
chooses whether what you say is valid, and whether they want
to believe it, no matter how true it is to you, and no
matter how much you believe it yourself.

reality itself is completely up to the interpretation of the
observer, and the interpretation is reality, for them, as
much as your interpretations are your reality. reality is
self-referential; there is no final, absolute truth. if you
believe you have discovered a new reality, you have only
discovered the same reality: yours.


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2007-02-17 05:09 [#02051460]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker | Followup to chaosmachine: #02051434



It's definately subjective as no two people are exactly
alike. Although i am wondering what effect cloning human
beings will have. If it ever happens of course.


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-02-17 05:11 [#02051461]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker



ehm, aren't you supposed to be working on xlt v5.0?


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-02-17 05:17 [#02051462]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to chaosmachine: #02051434 | Show recordbag



Secretly? Like you aren't aware of it yourself? I don't
think it has anything to do with any secret wish to
re-confirm your beliefs, but discussion most certainly can
have that effect; even though it wasn't originally intended
to strengthen your beliefs, "winning" the argument probably
has that effect.

Reality, as you perceive it is, indeed, up to you, but not
completely; there's intersubjectivity and there are certain
features to the things you perceive that makes it impossible
for you to perceive it as something else unless you're
mentally ill; a sponge isn't a hammer.


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2007-02-17 05:22 [#02051465]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker



Virtual Reality


Attached picture

 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-02-17 05:27 [#02051467]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to swears: #02051465



welcome to the matrix!


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-02-17 06:50 [#02051482]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



I think each individual's brain-computed model of reality
isn't a seperate reality ("the state of being true/actual"),
merely a seperate interpretation of it stored on a different
evolved brain (though all human brains are genetically very
similar, gathering information with the same senses so most
interpretations are similar)

Everything probably is one exact 'correct' logical specific
way (a single 'reality'). Non earth life forms either do or
don't exist. It is definately one or the other and that
information is encoded in reality right now as a definate
yes or no (meaning far far away on some planet there are
aliens, or there are no aliens anywhere). We as humans with
our limited brain models simply don't have access to this
information, like light that is that far away that we can
see.

In fact, truth only has relevance to a brain/computer trying
to understand reality. A brain can make incorrect
calculations. But to reality itself, everything is some
exact way, so everything is 'true' as far as its concerned.
It doesn't have to 'compute' the validity of anything
because it is everything, which would make truth
meaningless.


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2007-02-17 07:02 [#02051486]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict | Followup to swears: #02051465



wtf?!


Attached picture

 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2007-02-17 07:10 [#02051488]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker



I would have said 'reality' is absolute by definition, your
interaction with it is another animal


 

offline Combo from Sex on 2007-02-17 07:11 [#02051489]
Points: 7540 Status: Regular | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02051462



Funny avy as i'm reading the "Seductor's Diary" these days!


 

offline stefano_azevedo from Pindorama (Brazil) on 2007-02-17 09:36 [#02051574]
Points: 4396 Status: Regular | Followup to chaosmachine: #02051434



actually you are mixing two diferent concepts: truth and
reality. the first, as you said, is up to the subjectivity,
but reality is up to objectivity.

read this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality


 

offline OK on 2007-02-17 10:12 [#02051578]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



reality is the lowest common denominator of the set of
perceptions.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2007-02-17 11:05 [#02051588]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



I only believe in good real reality, not bad fake reality.

The unbelievers must be spongehammered until they repent!


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2007-02-17 11:08 [#02051590]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular



excellent album, recommending


Attached picture

 

offline thatne from United States on 2007-02-17 12:15 [#02051604]
Points: 3026 Status: Lurker



i practiced transfiguration turning a cig
arette into a quarter-dollar and it work
ed but just momently in my minds eye.
im not convinced that the cigarette be
came a quarter only it was a nice trick.


 


Messageboard index