|
|
vlari
from beyond the valley of the LOLs on 2007-02-09 11:11 [#02047891]
Points: 13915 Status: Regular
|
|
it's up there with the tycho one
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-02-09 11:14 [#02047893]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
Listening to the samples, the album is as shit as they make out.
|
|
Brisk
from selling smack at the orphanage on 2007-02-09 11:32 [#02047907]
Points: 4667 Status: Lurker
|
|
I disagree actually. Although the samples aren't great by any means, i've still heard infinitely worse music listed on boomkat which got favourable reviews.
Again, subjectivity...
|
|
cx
from Norway on 2007-02-09 11:32 [#02047908]
Points: 4537 Status: Regular
|
|
sometimes i swear people don't even listen to whatever they are listening to.. heh
|
|
Dannn_
from United Kingdom on 2007-02-09 11:39 [#02047915]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker
|
|
All the Secede musics I've heard until now have been rather good
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-02-09 11:41 [#02047918]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
it doesn't sound like anything to get that upset over, but it doesn't sound good.
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-02-09 11:43 [#02047921]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #02047893 | Show recordbag
|
|
Just listened to it again and the first and third samples made me whince and the second one made me grimace. It's not that the music is that bad, it's just the sounds used are grating and I don't think it's intentional (it's not that kind of music).
|
|
vlari
from beyond the valley of the LOLs on 2007-02-09 11:46 [#02047924]
Points: 13915 Status: Regular
|
|
i didnt listen to the samples, i just thought it was a refreshing review
|
|
staz
on 2007-02-09 11:50 [#02047928]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular
|
|
listening to the samples, they just sound like generic "idm" stuff, nothing like boomkat's indication. it's a funny review, though. i think they do these once in a while because they probably feel this way about a lot more releases but can't afford to slate more than a few albums.
|
|
swears
from junk sleep on 2007-02-09 12:04 [#02047937]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker
|
|
They're not reviews, they're catalouge descriptions. But every now and again they'll have beef with someone and slag them off.
|
|
swears
from junk sleep on 2007-02-09 12:06 [#02047941]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker
|
|
That first track made me laugh, though.
|
|
staz
on 2007-02-09 12:15 [#02047947]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular
|
|
they seem like reviews to me.
|
|
swears
from junk sleep on 2007-02-09 12:19 [#02047949]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker | Followup to staz: #02047947
|
|
They appear that way, but they're selling the same releases they're writing about. 99% of them are positive, you don't get that on a music news and reviews site like pitchfork or something.
|
|
staz
on 2007-02-09 12:27 [#02047954]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular | Followup to swears: #02047949
|
|
true dat
|
|
swears
from junk sleep on 2007-02-09 12:36 [#02047962]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker
|
|
I think it's stuff that's so bad, it makes them look bad for stocking it. But they have to because of obligations with labels or distributors or whatever.
|
|
tolstoyed
from the ocean on 2007-02-09 13:06 [#02047969]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator
|
|
it's an awesome album too.
|
|
isnieZot
from pooptown (Belgium) on 2007-02-09 13:40 [#02047976]
Points: 4949 Status: Lurker
|
|
this review is way to harsh imo. don't think it's bad. I wouldn't buy it though.
|
|
disasemble
from United States on 2007-02-09 23:38 [#02048186]
Points: 1448 Status: Regular
|
|
so apart from boomkat not being able to write positive reviews without sounding like they are just trying to sell shit, they cant write negative reviews and let personal aesthetic biases effect their irrational and irrelevant hatred towards a release they think sucks, when its actually competent?
i dont see the difference. boomkat suck regardless of what they write. they support a lot of awful music and slag off good records constantly.
|
|
Exaph
from United Kingdom on 2007-02-10 02:06 [#02048203]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker
|
|
it averages a review of 4.8/5 on discogs, this album.
|
|
zero-cool
on 2007-02-10 02:20 [#02048206]
Points: 2720 Status: Lurker
|
|
i liked the idea of this release
|
|
sadist
from the dark side of the moon on 2007-02-10 02:28 [#02048211]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker
|
|
has anybody realised that boomkat is dissing only ex-merck artists ?
tycho ? secede ?
|
|
isnieZot
from pooptown (Belgium) on 2007-02-10 04:35 [#02048231]
Points: 4949 Status: Lurker
|
|
also, boomkat praises EVERY and I do mean EVERY dubstep release there is no matter how crappy. and believe you me most of it is crapy as hell.
|
|
Combo
from Sex on 2007-02-10 04:38 [#02048232]
Points: 7540 Status: Regular
|
|
I found the samples rather good!
|
|
sadist
from the dark side of the moon on 2007-02-10 04:58 [#02048235]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker
|
|
i think they are just moking merck
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-02-10 06:46 [#02048251]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to sadist: #02048211 | Show recordbag
|
|
Probably Giginger's influence. Death to Merck! :D
|
|
onecaseman
from Chicago (United States) on 2007-02-11 11:12 [#02048729]
Points: 374 Status: Lurker
|
|
I think the album's pretty good. Every time I read a Boomkat review I think a few more of my brain cells die.
|
|
disasemble
from United States on 2007-02-11 12:01 [#02048752]
Points: 1448 Status: Regular
|
|
it's a well done and nice cd, upbeat and enjoyable. honestly it's the only release on sending orbs id ever listen to more than once or twice, which may be heresy to some. kind of reminds me of jedi knights or the orb in some areas.
boomkat is too busy sucking dubsteps cock, praising convoluted post rock and supporting boring, terribly produced trendy minimal techno to care about good cd's.
its tough selling music.
|
|
Fah
from Netherlands, The on 2007-02-11 13:42 [#02048811]
Points: 6428 Status: Regular
|
|
i don't think it's that bad either, but that's just a difference in taste among human beings isn't it?
|
|
jackeroffer
from Aruba on 2007-02-11 14:46 [#02048856]
Points: 1038 Status: Lurker
|
|
I truly mean it – it’s like boomkat has gone through with a tick sheet of everything you should do to have a sell-out tendy catalog; Generic dubstep– check, Paint by numbers warm pads and tinkly melodies IDM – check, Nepotism spurred breakcore releases – check, Bootlegged vomitorious remixes of Windowlicker – check, Generic Avant-garde 'Sprockets" qulity music passed off as experimental – check, Pretend academic wank fest bullshit – check.
|
|
butros
on 2007-02-12 11:59 [#02049177]
Points: 25 Status: Lurker
|
|
Its funny that they sell it anyway.
|
|
sheffieldbleep
from Sheffield (United Kingdom) on 2007-02-12 12:13 [#02049184]
Points: 2466 Status: Lurker | Followup to vlari: #02047891
|
|
Have you seen Tycho's art work?
|
|
forck_02lynix
from brooklyn on 2007-02-12 12:31 [#02049187]
Points: 4000 Status: Regular | Followup to sheffieldbleep: #02049184
|
|
i have to say his artwork is pretty nice. but everything he does seems to be such an unashamed steal from boc. iso50 ? music 70
|
|
unabomber
from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2007-02-16 01:20 [#02050866]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular
|
|
This one is quite fun too....
|
|
marty
from Belfast (United Kingdom) on 2007-02-16 12:44 [#02051057]
Points: 14 Status: Lurker
|
|
Smallfish gave it a good review
|
|
Aesthetics
from the IDM Kiosk on 2007-02-17 04:17 [#02051431]
Points: 6796 Status: Lurker
|
|
This reminded me why I didn't ask Rembrandt to paint my doors.
It's a lovely Ambient release and should be rated as an Ambient release. It seems like the cover already prejudice the reviewers opinion. I do like the honesty in the review as it's still a shop that need to earn money by selling records.
The cover is the weakest amongst SO releases so far imo but they can take it because all the previous covers were amazing and fitted the music so well.
SORRY OUT OF STOCK!
|
|
Messageboard index
|