[OT] strange question. | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
recycle
Roger Wilco
...and 414 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614093
Today 6
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
[OT] strange question.
 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-14 19:10 [#02032424]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



i just had an altercation with a genuine paedophile over
MSN. this 41 year old guy kept messaging my sister on
myspace asking for her email address. i told her to give him
mine and id have a bit of fun with the prick.
he comes online and instantly starts with the 'your pics are
so beautiful do you have any more?' i tell him im only 15
and ive never done anything like this before. i get 'it
doesnt matter how old you are. ill put a sexy one of me in
my profile then you put one up. do you have webcam?' i say
you DO realise im only 15. he says 'yes' then posts a
picture of his cock. i ask him about the kid in his myspace
page and he says its his but he's divorced. then 'take your
clothes off for me i want to see you naked' i say are you
sure this is legal? 'its ok we're both bored'. i decide to
send him a picture of a ladyboy with his face on it. i say
again im only 15 are you sure you want to see this? 'yeh
honey dont be shy' i tell him i am shy so im gonna cover my
face. then i send:

Sam is Grate says:
guess what i covered my face with?
phil says:
dunno lol

Transfer of "forphil.jpg" is complete.

Sam is Grate says:
the mug of a fucking paedophile
Sam is Grate says:
son of a bitch
Sam is Grate says:
cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt
cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunting son of a fucking
bitch
Sam is Grate says:
I hope to fucking god you dont have custody of that poor
kid!

then he goes. so my question is is what next? ive saved the
conversation. i have his email and myspace. should i do
anything?

also i know i wasnt very poetic in the conversation i was
just so bloody angry.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2007-01-14 19:13 [#02032426]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to Indeksical: #02032424



He could probably be prosecuted, yes. Btw, paedophilia
applies to pre-pubescent people, not teenagers.


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-14 19:14 [#02032430]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



i thought it was under age of consent. stauatory rape up to
the age of 23. paedophilia afterwards?

not my area of expertise though.


 

offline EVOL from a long time ago on 2007-01-14 19:14 [#02032431]
Points: 4921 Status: Lurker



kill him?


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-14 19:15 [#02032432]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Followup to Indeksical: #02032430 | Show recordbag



im refering to the age of the offender not the victim :)


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2007-01-14 19:15 [#02032433]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to Indeksical: #02032430



No, paedophilia is definitely having sexual desire for
pre-pubescent children. There is another term for sexual
attraction to teenagers.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2007-01-14 19:21 [#02032437]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to EVOL: #02032431



why do people berate me for my "rabid anti-Americanism" when
they never fail to invariably come out with shit like this?

Why?

Yeah I suppose it's just a few bad eggs.. nothing to do with
a rot at the core of your society.

Anyways, yes, carry on, paedophiles, yes, you really
should've done a netstat while that file transfer was going
on, you could've picked up his IP and with that and the time
of the conversation the police would be able to contact the
ISP and issue an order to provide them with information on
the chap.

Since it doesn't look like you did that, send them on the
logs and his myspace..

I don't know, could stuff like that really stand up in
court?

I suppose it did with that republican senator fella, but,
hmm..


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-14 19:24 [#02032439]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Followup to redrum: #02032437 | Show recordbag



yeh i dont know about any of that netstat stuff etc. i dont
get where america comes into this though?


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-14 19:26 [#02032441]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



Clint Eastwood was gonna or did marry a 15 year old in pale
rider. She was fine as hell too.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2007-01-14 19:26 [#02032442]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to Indeksical: #02032439



i'm drunk and pissed off and that part was replying to
evol's post. don't you mind it.

g'luck.


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-14 19:27 [#02032443]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Followup to redrum: #02032442 | Show recordbag



cheers man


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2007-01-14 19:29 [#02032444]
Points: 12423 Status: Regular



What, do you want to send a guy to prison because he wanted
to have sex with a 15-year-old girl?


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2007-01-14 19:32 [#02032445]
Points: 12423 Status: Regular



Haha, shit, look what I found.

Teen girl charged with posting nude photos on Internet

This is a ridiculous world.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-14 19:38 [#02032447]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



If you are under 18 you can't ever get naked or you'll be in
possession of your own self as child pornography. I hate
laws.


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-14 19:40 [#02032451]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Followup to dariusgriffin: #02032444 | Show recordbag



youre right. 41 year old men should be allowed to pressurise
young girls into giving them nude photos over the internet.
what'd be even better would be if he went out in the street
and did it in real life!

im not saying i want to send this guy to prison mostly
because theres no way i can with a text file that i couldve
wrote myself. im saying i know this guy could be dangerous
to young girls and im wondering if i should notify anyone.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-14 19:41 [#02032452]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



strange questions:

when + what =
wwhheant?

who + how =
whhoow?


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2007-01-14 19:45 [#02032453]
Points: 12423 Status: Regular | Followup to Indeksical: #02032451



1) He's not a pedophile and there's no evidence that he's
raping everyone around him
2) She's fucking 15, which should be more than old enough
for her to be in charge of her own sexuality. There will
always be creepy 41-year-old men, whether she's 15 or 18 or
whatever the fuck the legal age is.


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2007-01-14 19:50 [#02032456]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker | Followup to dariusgriffin: #02032445



I like how that article explicitly says that "Authorities
did not say how police learned about the girl."


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-14 19:59 [#02032463]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Followup to dariusgriffin: #02032453 | Show recordbag



youre completely right. i never said hes raping everyone
around him i said 'i know this guy could be dangerous'
although in hindsight 'know' was a poor choice of words.
'from speaking to this man i believe this guy could be
dangerous to young girls' is what i shouldve said.

and youre right. 15 is old enough to be in charge of your
own sexuality. im just worried that the previous or next
girl was/will be a lot younger.

the fact the guys probably wanking over my sisters myspace
(as he said he was going to) has just made me angry.


 

offline EVOL from a long time ago on 2007-01-14 20:13 [#02032465]
Points: 4921 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #02032442



would i be wrong then to assume you are drunk whenever you
post? i would've said what you said but i was unable to
come up with a way to put it so eloquently as such in your
reply, ass. that and the fact i didn't think my comment
would have been taken so seriously. but hey, you're drunk
right? so that leaves you the liberty of acting like a
pompous prick and not be at fault if anyone should disagree
with your pov, am i not correct? besides your stance on the
issue of "anti-americanism" is a poor defense for such
childish behavior. the same argument could be heard coming
from racists who could easily apply it to justify their
maniacal claims. lush.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2007-01-14 20:40 [#02032475]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to EVOL: #02032465



you said "kill him?". then i said something eloquent, and
now you're calling me childish and making comparisons to
racists that defy explanation.


 

offline EVOL from a long time ago on 2007-01-14 21:42 [#02032480]
Points: 4921 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #02032475



well, you did discredit your opening statement with the
following, "Yeah I suppose it's just a few bad eggs..
nothing to do with a rot at the core of your society."

which also begs me to ask, "what in the hell are you exactly
refering to in regards to my reply?" what shit is who
coming out with? and funny how someone so removed from
"our" society, can be such a great annalytical surveyor
about the ways of a people on an entirely different
continent. but your advice in the rest of your post was
spot on, having to do with pedophiles and all. i just
didn't understand the need to drag me through it at any
point.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2007-01-15 04:58 [#02032569]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to EVOL: #02032480



Shut up.


 

offline gravity_again on 2007-01-15 06:29 [#02032641]
Points: 196 Status: Regular



You can send a message to the people who run MySpace (I dont
use MySpace so I dont know exactly who) explaining the
situation, they will at least ban his IP and delete his
profile right?


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2007-01-15 06:48 [#02032644]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker



I'd report it, they won't go and arrest him straight away or
anything, but theyll have a record, which can't hurt


 

offline EVOL from a long time ago on 2007-01-15 07:55 [#02032665]
Points: 4921 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #02032569



oh no help i'm being attacked by the clique


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-01-15 08:11 [#02032672]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



do u belief in gods?


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2007-01-15 08:28 [#02032687]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to EVOL: #02032665



No, we're being attacked by your Giant Waffle.


 

offline Combo from Sex on 2007-01-15 09:40 [#02032736]
Points: 7540 Status: Regular



Ask him his best paedophile sites please. It's for a friend.


 


Messageboard index