organic food | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
recycle
...and 97 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2616825
Today 4
Topics 127719
  
 
Messageboard index
organic food
 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-07 05:15 [#02027690]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



'ave it

why the hell do organic food people hate non-organic food?
its just a "eeeeuuuurrrgh yuck, nasty chemicals" thing isnt
it?
theres nothing wrong with them. the evidence is here.
organic food is over-priced and over-rated and pointless.



 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-07 05:18 [#02027692]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



GM food = IDM


 

offline pigster from melbs on 2007-01-07 05:20 [#02027694]
Points: 4480 Status: Lurker



holy shit, my friends dad is an elite member of the the soil
association! they're an awfully committed bunch of folk, and
i wouldn't trust a word they say about your organic goods.


 

offline stefano_azevedo from Pindorama (Brazil) on 2007-01-07 05:29 [#02027703]
Points: 4396 Status: Regular



eating organic food is like a religion. it makes you feel
that will be saved.


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2007-01-07 05:31 [#02027704]
Points: 9860 Status: Lurker



its not really valid information when you have someone
defending and nay saying. it should be about options and
their pros and cons, thats it. this is a load of shit.


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2007-01-07 05:31 [#02027705]
Points: 9860 Status: Lurker | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #02027704



organic shit


 

offline j4ck from United Kingdom on 2007-01-07 05:37 [#02027708]
Points: 1102 Status: Regular



im lodging at the moment with village 'small holders' and
they say organic is rubbish. just make sure its grown in
britain as we have tighter laws than europe on chemicals
that they spray on them.

they also said its worth having organic milk as it doesnt
have one thing or another in it, normal milk reduces your
resistance to disease in the long run.


 

offline uzim on 2007-01-07 07:23 [#02027764]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



my parents always buy organic food when they can... i can't
say i'm fully convinced by it. i think the idea is good in
theory, and i'm ready to support it if it's good for the
environment, but in practice you have less choice, it often
turns out to be more expensive and not always tasting better
(it's even sometimes the contrary). i like my fancy
industrially processed breakfast cereal, biscuits and
desserts, even if there are weird ingredients in them.


 

offline staz on 2007-01-07 07:25 [#02027767]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular



most of it tastes way better. i don't buy it though, too
expensive.


 

offline OK on 2007-01-07 12:45 [#02027885]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



It tastes better, it probably is healthier in the long run.
but in the long run we're all dead so..


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2007-01-07 13:51 [#02027936]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



my housemate works at a hippie health food store, and we eat
mostly organic at home, and i can say ive generally never
felt healthier (besides the cigarettes and binge drinking of
course)


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-01-07 14:03 [#02027945]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



it's more expensive, but it's also more often "righteous" in
that you get some kind of guarantee that all those involved
get a fair deal when it comes to wages and treatment, etc.
It's not necessarily a link, but it's often so.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-01-07 14:27 [#02027952]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



"Organic" food, like "free range" eggs doesn't actually
really mean a lot in many cases. That is, aside from real
organic food not being (provably) any better for you, a lot
of food that claims to be organic isn't really grown on some
little fairytale farm by a farmer and his wife and
watered/fed by hand. It's still, by and large, intensively
farmed and in any event there is seepage of
pesticides/growth supplements from nearby (non-organic)
farms anyway.

It's predominantely a hippie fad used to sell overpriced
food to people with too much disposable income. I mean,
organic oven chips, wtf? If you cared about your health some
much, would you really be eating chips at all, let alone
ready made ones?

Although I don't agree with DM's link between fair trade and
organic (I actually saw a news story suggesting this wasn't
the case last year), I think he makes a valid point. It'd be
far more important to me to buy fair trade goods than
organic ones.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-01-07 14:36 [#02027964]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #02027952 | Show recordbag



As I said, it isn't a necessary link, but the people who
care about their food being organic also often care about it
being righteous. Thus, if you're in the organic food
business, you don't want customers to shun you, so you're
better off if you make it fair trade as well.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2007-01-07 15:38 [#02027996]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #02027952



it's not just about being more healthy, it's also about it
being better for the environment.

if there is seepage from farmers who do use pesticides that
can hardly be called a valid argument not to propose organic
foods - that's a bit like saying you should smoke because
other people smoke and you'll be inhaling second hand smoke
anyway.

also, it is quite healthy to eat fatty foods - it simply
depends on how much fatty foods you eat.

your whole thinking on this seems to be in extremes, which
doesn't do much justice to reality.


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2007-01-07 15:45 [#02028005]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #02027952



Genetically modified foods are also bad for the environment.
Because all of the plants in a field are exactly the same,
if one is vulnerable to a pest or disease, they all are.
With the likelihood that gm plants will become somewhat
standardized, that means that it is probable that a pest or
disease could wipe out hundreds of acres of cropland.

Also, there have been cases of people being allergic to
certain gm foods (just to add, if we are listing pros and
cons).


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2007-01-07 15:47 [#02028007]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker | Followup to Rostasky: #02028005



Agriculture, not the environment. Though they do often
promote the use of pesticides, because on of the main uses
of creating gm plants is to immunize them to pesticides so
that the pests can be wiped out without hurting the crop.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-01-07 15:50 [#02028010]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to qrter: #02027996 | Show recordbag



there are actually negative consequences for the
nature with ecological food as well.. even "natural"
fertilizer will get into rivers and stimulate algae growth
(which leads to the algae using up all the oxygen so that
the fish can't survive there, etc, plus the stuff is
in some cases toxic to the fish).


 

offline oyvinto on 2007-01-07 21:07 [#02028113]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i only eat hydrophonically grown phood


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2007-01-07 21:10 [#02028115]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker



I only eat Doritos and Chicken McNuggets!


 

offline OK on 2007-01-08 00:38 [#02028139]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



It's predominantely a hippie fad used to sell overpriced
food to people with too much disposable income. I mean,
organic oven chips, wtf? If you cared about your health
some
much, would you really be eating chips at all, let alone
ready made ones?


I don't think this could be true. If it were, then some
organic farmer would sell his products cheaper to sell
more, causing all others to lower the prices and so on...
prices are probably at an equilibrium of production costs
and demand/supply. This means that it would make no sense to
try to overprice, because this wouldn't mean a higher
revenue. (did that make sense?)

IMO the premise of organic food makes sense, not eating
hormones sounds like a good idea to me (the same for gm
vegetables). You can even see and taste the difference in
most cases.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2007-01-08 00:40 [#02028141]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict



It's tastier, healthier, and proper.

To properly and extensively introduce GM foods into the food
chain would be a tragedy, in my opinion.


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-08 05:35 [#02028232]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict | Followup to redrum: #02028141



healthier: doesnt the BBC page talk about how it isn't
healtiher?
and why "proper"?


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2007-01-08 05:44 [#02028238]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker



Its funny that this article puts organic food vs pesticides,
because there are also hormones and stuff to be considered.


There was a study that showed that bovine growth hormone
pushes girls(humans) into puberty faster.

I wonder who funded this study.


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2007-01-08 05:45 [#02028239]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker | Followup to Rostasky: #02028238



Oh, the Soil Administration is a government thing?

Oh.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-01-08 05:53 [#02028245]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #02028232 | Show recordbag



Ezkerraldean, people just like the "idea" of it, it sounds
natural, whereas chemicals being used in their food sounds
like it's bad and playing with nature. They then try to
justify it any way they can. Once you've started spending
lots more money on it (which if it's no better for you,
you've effectively pissed up the wall, compared to buying
non-organic food) there's an even greater psychological
commitment to it and you're highly unlikely to say, "yeah,
it's a waste of time and money." no matter how conclusive
the proof that it is.

Yes, GM foods (if they're all the same, which they needn't
be) are more susceptible to disease in the sense that the
whole lot could be wiped out. To a degree, this is offset by
the fact that they're more resistant to disease in the first
place. I agree we should keep some different to ensure that
there wouldn't be a world famine, but this could be achieved
by different strains of crop (none of which need actually be
non-GM). Besides, it's not likely we'd get a disease that
would affect all vegetables; it'd be more like all potatoes,
or all carrots. I don't think many people would starve as a
result.

In any event, it's nothing to do with them being organic.
Yes, Organic food is generally non-GM. That doesn't mean all
non-organic food is GM and it's not what we're discussing
here.

Besides, there's actually very little evidence that GM is
bad for us. According to a mate who is a doctor, the whole
argument behind it is flawed. The inital "breakthrough"
demonstrating it to be dangerous was made using a rather
biased experiment to get sensationalist results by a
researcher who was about to lose his research grant. The
experiment landed him several years more funding. Hardly
impartial...

For the record, most of our food is organic, but that's
because my gf buys it. I've reasoned with her, but she won't
listen. It's not like when we eat at other people's
houses/out at restaurants I'll ask if it's organic though.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-01-08 05:56 [#02028249]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Rostasky: #02028238 | Show recordbag



There's also a lot of evidence to suggest our more well
rounded diets (not to mention greater quantities of food
being available) is the main reason for kids, girl in
particular, going through puberty sooner. It's not like
hormones on food are the sole reason it occurs years earlier
than it did 100 years ago...


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-08 05:58 [#02028251]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



its not that i am against it, it just annoys me when people
(a lot of people do round here) defend it so rigorously when
there really is no noticeable benefit.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-01-08 07:23 [#02028301]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #02028251 | Show recordbag



Yes. I have nothing against it per se (as it happens,
the last thing I ate was an organic bean burger, with
organic lettuce on organic wholemeal bread). It's more the
attitude that, "it must be better for you and you're stupid
if you think otherwise" (in spite of a lack of evidence)
that gets on my nerves.



 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2007-01-08 07:25 [#02028303]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker



seriously, what is the fuss. shouldnt we be grateful that we
have a choice of produce in the first place?


 

offline CC303 from Manc (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-08 09:18 [#02028351]
Points: 157 Status: Lurker



you can't beat organic heinz tomato ketchup mmmm...


 

offline OK on 2007-01-08 12:09 [#02028428]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



CERI:
It's as simple as this: if it goes into your body, it WILL
have an effect on it, you may not know what the effect is
but as the old saying goes 'better evil known than evil to
be known'. The hormones thing is well studied. And, as it's
been said before, you can see and taste the difference.


 


Messageboard index