Feral Children | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
belb
recycle
...and 347 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614103
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Feral Children
 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-12-08 11:01 [#02014638]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict



Fascinating, but very upsetting.. One example:


Sujit Kumar (born October 4, 1973) is a man who was raised
as a chicken for several years of his life.

A native of Suva, Fiji, Kumar was locked in a chicken coop
from the time he was a baby. He received little to no
attention during this time and mimicked chickens as a
result. On the death of his father he was handed over to his
grandfather. At the age of eight Kumar was placed in a home
for the elderly. Due to his wild, aggressive behaviour, the
staff were unsure how to treat him and confined him for 22
years, tied to his bed for most of it.


I nearly got sick reading that last sentence.

For more, look up "Feral Children" on wiki, or you can watch
this documentary:

documentary


 

offline SValx from United Kingdom on 2006-12-08 11:06 [#02014639]
Points: 2586 Status: Regular



Thank you so much for this. I've been so interested in it
for ages, particularly cos of my degree but I've never got
round to finding out about it.x


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2006-12-08 11:11 [#02014641]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



oh my god that's perfect for my autumn depressive mood now


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-12-08 11:26 [#02014645]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



i heard you cant teach feral children to speak. its as if
you need to learn to talk while you are a kid before you
reach a certain age.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-12-08 11:32 [#02014646]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #02014645



yes, that's true, although there's no certain cut-off
point.

if you haven't been exposed to language by around 5 or 6,
you won't be able to speak or communicate thoughts properly
for the rest of your life.

it's just like second language acquisition - this is why
it's a good idea to raise a child in a bilingual
environment, even if the parents only have a rudimentary
understanding of the second language.. if you start learning
a language at age 12 or 13 when you go into secondary
school, you're not actually "learning" it.. you're teaching
yourself to remember it..

whereas if the kid has already been exposed to plenty of it,
they'll have a much better grasp of it.

look up chomsky's theory of the innateness of language for
more.


 

offline stefano_azevedo from Pindorama (Brazil) on 2006-12-08 11:37 [#02014648]
Points: 4396 Status: Regular



Fascinating, but very upsetting, indeed


 

offline SValx from United Kingdom on 2006-12-08 11:49 [#02014655]
Points: 2586 Status: Regular | Followup to redrum: #02014646



Hahahah "ICH LIEBE CHOMCHOM"


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2006-12-08 11:59 [#02014661]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Big ups to the wolves that raised her, that was cool of
them. I don't have time to watch this in full right now but
those shots of her that open the documentary... did they get
them before they rehabilitated her? Bizarre.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-12-08 12:08 [#02014665]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to Ophecks: #02014661



yes.. her bark is so real and dog-like..

i'd really reccomend you add it to your favourites and watch
it some time. it's fucking powerful and bizarre stuff.

really, make sure you see it.


 

offline SValx from United Kingdom on 2006-12-08 12:10 [#02014666]
Points: 2586 Status: Regular | Followup to Ophecks: #02014661



They were her pet dogs that looked after her. I think those
shots were after they've found her but not managed to
rehabilitate her at all at that stage.


 

offline SValx from United Kingdom on 2006-12-08 12:14 [#02014671]
Points: 2586 Status: Regular



That film was really amazing.. It was so eye-opening seeing
real films and real people rather than just photographs and
re-enactments.


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2006-12-08 12:15 [#02014673]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #02014646



that's a bit dated. adults can learn to use a second
language as well as children. i won't deny it can't be
harder, but saying adults can only learn a second language
by 'remembering' is nonsense. there are enough examples of
peoples who start a job in another country and who, after a
couple of years, start to 'think' in their second language.


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2006-12-08 12:16 [#02014674]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker



o god...typing peoples in a thread by redrum about
language....if there's is something you shouldn't do THIS IS
IT

pray for me...


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2006-12-08 12:23 [#02014679]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #02014673



you didn't get it.

you can in fact learn a language when you already know one.
so of course an adult may learn another language and speak
it fluently (although i'm not sure if he actually can
"think" that way too but that's unimportant now)

but there is nearly no chance to learn someone a language if
he has never spoken before.

that's two different things


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2006-12-08 12:26 [#02014682]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to sadist: #02014679



well yeah, in the case of feral children. but redrum used it
in the context of normal children and why it would be better
to raise them in a bilingual environment.


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2006-12-08 12:27 [#02014683]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



i don't really like documentaries like these because you can
never tell how much they are bullshitting you.

i mean - okay i can imagine that this girl crouching and
barfing may be a recording of her BEFORE she got to the
therapy, but it just might be her after the therapy acting
to give that documentary a bit more drama.

has been made so often before


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-12-08 12:29 [#02014685]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



just goes to show that none of human social behaviour is
made by our biology.


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2006-12-08 12:40 [#02014688]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to sadist: #02014679



although i'm not sure if he actually can
"think" that way too but that's unimportant now


when someone learns something new in the context of his
second language, he'll have a tendency to start to think in
his second language aboout the new subject. it happened to a
couple of foreign students. even moreso to people who were
forced to leave the country they were born in and start to
do a study in their new country.
a friend of mine told me he could switch into different
thinking modes (language). and mostly in the case of things
he'd studied, he's newer experiences, were in his second
language. he moved from croatia to holland when he was 16.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-12-08 12:50 [#02014696]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to goDel: #02014673



yeah, i didn't express it very well, ok, here's what i
meant:

the neural processes used by a child when learning language
are different those used by an adult when learning a
language as an adult.

the same goes for the neural processes that come into play
in the usage of language.


 

offline LuminousAphid from home (United States) on 2006-12-08 12:51 [#02014699]
Points: 540 Status: Lurker



I don't agree that there's no chance of learning and
speaking a language fluently after the initial language
stages early in life, but I think it becomes exponentially
harder to learn and have a new language become "natural" to
you.

There's definately something to be said with the sort of
blank slate combined with the specific stage when children
usually learn language that makes it much easier. I don't
really have any first-hand experience with living in an
environment like a foreign county, where you have to learn
the language, but it seems like even then it would be much,
much harder to learn a language. I guess you'd have general
linguistic knowledge to help you learn at this stage, but no
more impressionability like in childhood.

Although it makes sense that it's even harder for someone
who was raised ferally to learn. They have no linguistic
knowledge whatsoever and are past the "natural" language
stage. I haven't watched the video yet, but I have a feeling
I'll be surprised at how they "rehailitate" this person.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-12-08 12:58 [#02014703]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #02014688 | Show recordbag



but is it learning or memorising? Many of the texts in my
curriculum are in english, and when I read something there,
I tend to remember the english words so I sometimes say the
english word when I'm trying to explain it to someone and
then there's a "..oh.. eh [norwegian word]."

However, I've known english almost all my life, so I don't
think I have just memorised the language and its rules, but
I think what redrum was saying was that while you may very
well somehow understand and speak a language after growing
up, it may not be in the same way as how your primary
languages are learnt, but rather be more of a form of
memorising..?

The difference in this when it comes to language may,
however, be a simply formal one (at some brain state level),
as you, to be a competent language user have to
actually have learnt it and not just memorised it;
owning a dictionary doesn't qualify you to be a competent
language user, and if you've merely memorised the language,
that's like having the dictionary.

One of the things that can demonstrate this is how
immigrants usually have the biggest trouble understanding
metaphors (even "dead" ones), sarcasm, irony, and other ways
in which a competent language user is using his language.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-12-08 13:02 [#02014707]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02014703 | Show recordbag



he beated me 2 itz


 

offline Brisk from selling smack at the orphanage on 2006-12-08 13:11 [#02014713]
Points: 4667 Status: Lurker



"Sujit Kumar (born October 4, 1973) is a man who was raised

as a chicken for several years of his life."

Apparently, he liked the sound of BOC though. BOC BOC BOC.


 

offline SValx from United Kingdom on 2006-12-08 13:14 [#02014715]
Points: 2586 Status: Regular | Followup to Brisk: #02014713



You should be ashamed of yourself. you horrific excuse of a
person.


 

offline Brisk from selling smack at the orphanage on 2006-12-08 13:14 [#02014716]
Points: 4667 Status: Lurker



BOC? :(


 

offline SValx from United Kingdom on 2006-12-08 13:15 [#02014717]
Points: 2586 Status: Regular | Followup to Brisk: #02014716



get out


 

offline Brisk from selling smack at the orphanage on 2006-12-08 13:17 [#02014719]
Points: 4667 Status: Lurker



But seriously, I watched the CH4 documentary (and its follow
up) last year, and it was engrossing as it was surreal. The
girl who was raised by dogs made pretty incredible progress
by the time the second documentary was filmed, but the
"reunion" with her father was pretty difficult viewing. He
should have been ashamed of himself.


 

offline SValx from United Kingdom on 2006-12-08 13:22 [#02014722]
Points: 2586 Status: Regular | Followup to Brisk: #02014719



I know, that fucking cunt.. that distance between them was
so powerful...

I don't understand, the girl whose mother had cateracts..
whose choice was it to let her go back to live with her? (Ps
am I using "whose" right in this context? I'm sure it's not
who's..)


 

offline Mr Brazil from Oh Joan, I love you so... on 2006-12-08 13:24 [#02014725]
Points: 1970 Status: Lurker



boc boc boc BOC!


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2006-12-08 13:26 [#02014728]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #02014696



agreed. the 'machinery' (loose analogy) for language
develops at a young age. i won't deny that. but i do think
that once this machinery is properly installed it's flexible
enough to learn other languages. there are people who are
fluent in a lot of languages (10 or more). the so-called
talents (using optimal machinery). and surely, it's not the
case that they've learned all of them in their youth.
of course, odds are they were brought up bi- or more
lingual. which adds points to your case.

and about the neural processes. well yeah, different areas
will be used (the same areas might even be used as well),
but what conclusions can be drawn from that? analysing
neural processes is like running on ice. if there is one
area where it's very easy to draw wrong conclusions, this is
it. the conclusions drawn in this scientific areas are far
from facts. although nowadays a lot can be measured, the
conclusions are still not much better than subjective
interpretations.

but anyways, i probably make it appear as if were on
opposites sides of a coin. where in reality we aren't.


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2006-12-08 13:37 [#02014739]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker



fuck. while writing posts like this threads can actually
evolve into entirely different creatures...
fuck2. and i make it sound like it's a new experience
too...o god. this is NOT my thread


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-12-08 13:39 [#02014742]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to SValx: #02014722



yeah, whose.



 


Messageboard index