US Soldiers put their foot in it again | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
belb
recycle
...and 337 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614103
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
US Soldiers put their foot in it again
 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-12-06 08:48 [#02013509]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict



assholes

LAZY_article


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2006-12-06 08:49 [#02013510]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker



I won't ever join an armed force, because really, it is a
bunch of assholes. I DO however, want to join the Peace
Corps. or the Job Corps.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-12-06 08:54 [#02013513]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict



what's there to live for?
who needs the peace corps?
think i'll just drop out
i'll go to frisco, buy a wig and sleep on owsley's floor

walk past the wig store
danced at the fillmore
i'm completely stoned
i'm hippy and i'm trippy, i'm a gypsy on my own


 

offline oyvinto on 2006-12-06 09:04 [#02013520]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



this reminds me of the father of a friend of mine. when he
was a kid he used to hang squirrels by the ears on the wall
and shoot them with an airgun


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-12-06 09:16 [#02013522]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



wankers.


 

offline grinningcat from london (United Kingdom) on 2006-12-06 09:19 [#02013523]
Points: 1073 Status: Lurker



scary to think this is just one incident, where a camera was
present AND they managed to get it back AND someone uploaded
it on youtube.


 

offline Babaouo from Dolce (Monaco) on 2006-12-06 10:44 [#02013564]
Points: 787 Status: Regular



Honestly, It doesn't really matter if Americans did it..

If It was primarily a British force or any other country
shit like this would probably happen. Esp if the
circumstances were the same, like with any 18 year old who
signs up getting there 6 month training (or however long it
is here) and then being deployed right into the heat of
it...


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-12-06 11:00 [#02013569]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Babaouo: #02013564 | Show recordbag



no, you're right, it doesn't matter what nationality they
are, they're still assholes for doing it and something needs
to be done about soldiers acting this way. since these
happened to be american along with many of the others that
have done stuff like this, it's some american leaders
responsibility to do something about it.


 

offline retape from http://retape.net (Norway) on 2006-12-06 16:13 [#02013685]
Points: 2355 Status: Lurker



/j #care


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2006-12-06 16:50 [#02013691]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



I wouldn't trust those kids. Its not good guy, bad guy there
and in that environment I could see getting really jaded.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2006-12-06 17:09 [#02013712]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to bogala: #02013691



The soldiers didn't sound very jaded.


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2006-12-06 17:31 [#02013721]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #02013712



How's that?


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2006-12-06 17:40 [#02013725]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to Rostasky: #02013721



How's that? Because they sounded quite alert and fresh and
happy with themselves.

tv armed and famous


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-12-06 17:40 [#02013726]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to bogala: #02013691 | Show recordbag



how the fuck is this about trusting the kids?! Even
if you don't trust the kids, do you have to taunt
them and make them run for miles for a bottle of water?

And in the same way, it doesn't matter if the kids aren't
angels, the soldiers are way out of line.


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2006-12-06 17:48 [#02013730]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #02013725



That means that they are no longer able to sympathize with
the Iraqis, which sounds like jaded to me. If they can do
this sort of stuff without any sort of regret or emotion, I
would call them jaded.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2006-12-06 18:05 [#02013733]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to Rostasky: #02013730



Jaded suggests they started at Point A and faded to Point
B... there's no evidence of that in the YouTube video -
didn't hear any of them mention how they used to sympathise
with the Iraqi children but now saw them as funny little
playthings, not really worth expending emotional energy on.

You're just assuming they're jaded because it makes it
easier to watch, I guess.


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2006-12-06 18:12 [#02013735]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #02013733



They never say that they recall being at Point A, but they
are clearly at Point B. I never said that they were at
Point A, though, and they never need to have been at Point A
to be jaded.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-12-06 18:13 [#02013736]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #02013733 | Show recordbag



I actually wrote a bit about soldiers and how they try to
hide from themselves that they're dealing with people in my
papers this semester. You know how they're always killing
some kind of "caricature" (meant in a more or less
metaphorical sense: cartoon characters don't die when you
shoot them) like "Ali" or "Charlie" or "Krauts?" All wars
seem to have had this sort of "nicknaming" of enemies, and I
think it's because the emotional stress a soldier would
experience if he actively thought about every person he
killed would be.. well, really really heavy. However, I also
think that they are indeed aware that they're killing
people; if you ask them, they'll say so, but when they're
out there, they're out there shooting "Ali." Not Mehmet,
father of two. Not Abdulla, son and baker.

And even though the most efficient and reliable way of
making such a caricature spread is to "let the men invent it
themselves," I believe it's also a sort of leadership tactic
in that the leaders will adopt these names and use them to
classify enemies, and in some cases they're even the
inventors of the names.

I guess in the same way, it'd be easier for people watching
this to believe that the soldiers have really successfully
deceived themselves about the humanity of the people around
them so that they can feel that the soldiers "just have to
act out" or something and when they want to, they don't do
it against what they see as people, but rather against those
that they believe they aren't able to do any wrong to.

..or something. I'm going to get some sleep.


 

offline rad smiles on 2006-12-06 18:16 [#02013737]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker




its depressing.



 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2006-12-06 18:18 [#02013738]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02013736



Yeah it's easier to kill someone you've
humiliated/dehumanised etc.

Rostasky, they aren't clearly at Point B, since that is
exactly where they may have started - point is, neither of
us can determine how 'jaded' they are - we only have the
evidence of that video, and however you try to
psychobabblise the soldiers, they cut pretty pathetic and
cruel figures.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-12-06 18:21 [#02013739]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to Rostasky: #02013735



and they never need to have been at Point A to be jaded.


They do. trust me, don't try to bullshit semantics.

The US occupation has been punctuated with abuses of power
such as this one since the very beginning. Abu Ghraib
happened a long time ago. Like bogala said, this is what you
get when you throw armed, barely-trained kids into such a
situation. I'm not saying it excuses it, it doesn't, but it
explains why it happens, and people need to be held
responsible.


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2006-12-06 18:22 [#02013740]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #02013738



Jaded does not require degrading from one "point" to the
other, it is a state that one exists in and has nothing to
do with the state you were in before being "jaded".

I guess we are talking about jaded vs. your original
personality or jaded vs. societal norms.


 

offline rad smiles on 2006-12-06 18:24 [#02013741]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



jaded or not theyre pathetic and embarrassing.



 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-12-06 18:25 [#02013742]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to Rostasky: #02013740



Jaded does not require degrading from one "point" to the
other, it is a state that one exists in and has nothing to
do with the state you were in before being "jaded".


That is absolute nonsense.

You've even used the word "degrade" completely incorrectly.

If you want to prove your point, find me one example of
something of which you're jaded but have never experience.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-12-06 18:26 [#02013743]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to redrum: #02013742



*experienced


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2006-12-06 18:41 [#02013746]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker



I'll let redrum take it from here, since I'm tired and wish
to retire with my thoughts (I use my left hand).


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2006-12-06 18:57 [#02013748]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #02013742



A) I didn't use degrade wrong. Even if I did use it a little
awkwardly, this is irrelevant.

B)You obviously have to experience something in order to
determine whether or not you are jaded towards it. However,
you don't ever have to approach the subject without callous
beforehand in order to be jaded. I know a guy who is
completely unmoved by music. I would call him jaded in that
sense, even though he has never been moved by music. My
brother never listens to anything the media says. He is
jaded. It is irrelevant as to whether or not he has
previously put faith in the media when determining if he is
jaded.

Mmm... I'm not sure if I have made myself clear. But I have
to leave (I have a gig in a 1/2 hour). I'll reply later
this evening : )


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2006-12-06 19:07 [#02013751]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to Rostasky: #02013748



You obviously use the word 'Jaded' without understanding the
weight and meaning.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-12-06 19:08 [#02013752]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to Rostasky: #02013748



a) yes you did.

b) it's not about determining whether or not you're jaded by
something that requires experience. being jaded by something
requires experience. jaded is synonymous with "tired" or
"bored".

your first example, the guy and music, is not an appropriate
usage of "jaded". he is unmoved by music, he lacks
appreciation for music, but he's not jaded by it. Saying
"he's not moved by it" is describing him as a person, as a
person who is never, and has never been moved by music.

Had he once appreciated music, and then grew to dislike
it through overexposure, he would then be fit to be classed
as being "jaded by music".


In your second example, whether or not your brother
previously put faith in the word of the media is and isn't
essential:

Scenario 1: He previously put his faith in the media. The
media betrayed his trust countless times by reporting things
he doesn't accept as fact. He is now jaded by their
unreliability and untrustworthiness. It can be said that he
is jaded by the media, but such a statement would be very
well followed up with the question, "What has jaded him?",
to which the answer is quite obvious.

Scenario 2: He is jaded by the constant bombardment of the
media. This is an unlikely scenario, since you say he never
listens to anything they say, which implies distrust.
Re-read scenario 1.

I can't believe it's taken this much to explain the meaning
of a word to you, but considering what you've come out with
in your previous posts, i guess it's to be expected.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-12-06 19:09 [#02013753]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to JivverDicker: #02013751



why didn't I just post that?

:(


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2006-12-06 19:18 [#02013758]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to redrum: #02013753



I almost wrote a massive reply but it seemed futile. Bloody
americans 'educating' us (you included) what words mean.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2006-12-06 19:19 [#02013761]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to JivverDicker: #02013758



If you don't want to be included I respect that one thousand
percant.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-12-06 19:25 [#02013762]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to JivverDicker: #02013761



oh you know me, i'll jump on any bandwagon that has "bloody
americans!" scrawled across it


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2006-12-06 19:29 [#02013763]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to JivverDicker: #02013761



how are junior and junior doing?


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2006-12-06 19:40 [#02013767]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to redrum: #02013762



great!

I knew it was this video before clicking on it. 'Jaded',
'inexperienced', 'young', 'foolish', 'having a laugh' etc.
It's not on. It's all bollocks and there's no excuses.
Taunting kids with water and wishing they could scare
children by showing arms is ridiculous.

Throwing stones/snowballs at stuff is a bit of fun.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2006-12-06 19:45 [#02013774]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to JivverDicker: #02013767



I attempted to divert you to more pleasing meadows but alas
my attempt was futile.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2006-12-06 19:48 [#02013777]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



don't stereotype everyone over there, please


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2006-12-06 19:49 [#02013781]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #02013777



Is that a message to the troops? Good on you, and people
think you compete in rallies in the General Lee!


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2006-12-06 19:54 [#02013787]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to elusive: #02013777



I don't think anyone is. It's a comment on that real lifr
thing.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2006-12-06 19:56 [#02013790]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular



that was meant to say 'life'


 

offline mimi on 2006-12-06 20:06 [#02013797]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular



it's because any enlistee who isn't absolutely brainless
joins the coast guard or the navy, only nowadays they even
send the navy over there! almost totally landlocked! makes
no sense! really, all of these people are pricks from the
bottom up, especially the officers, who would ever want to
be career military, you can only have sex in missionary
position.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2006-12-06 20:19 [#02013805]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



Everything everywhere will soon be saturated with corruption
and too complicated to understand and nobody will have the
power to change most things for the better. Survival of the
fittest and the fittest are cheats and fuckfaces.


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2006-12-06 20:21 [#02013807]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



I agree, mostly, about the common archetype of the soldier,
but there are always exceptions. (Mimi, what are your
favorite positions?) Anyway, I think a war zone like the one
in Iraq would drive me insane. The thought that I could be
sniped, shot, blown up at any moment would make me act in
ways I have never seen from myself in this reality and I'm a
calm reasonable heck of a nice guy. I'd most likely be in
Canada, though. Basically, War is hell for everybody and
nothing suprises me when it comes to how people act when
placed under such a pressure cooker..


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2006-12-06 20:32 [#02013812]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker



I'm sure those soldiers, back home, are loving and caring
and are often found in soup-kitchens feeding the homeless,
or in local taverns discussing philosophical issues in
reasonable tones while gently smoking pipe-tobacco, perhaps
allowing the occasional dream of a better and more peaceful,
understanding world to seep into their consciousness. And in
their spare time they attend marches calling attention to
inequalities within society and the prejudice suffered by
some of their fellow countrymen because of their colour,
race or faggotry, writing well-meaning letters to
politicians voicing their concern that the environment is
being destroyed and that the next generation will have to
have gas-masks surgically attached at birth if we don't slow
down the destruction of our planet.

Yep, I'm sure back home, these Army Men are wonderful human
beings and its the inhumanity of war which drove them to
taunting children.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-12-06 20:53 [#02013815]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to marlowe: #02013812



you're going to get a "stop putting words in my mouth" reply
now, just watch


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2006-12-06 21:11 [#02013818]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #02013752



Stop making up definitions plz.

jaded = calloused.

Now, try again.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2006-12-06 21:27 [#02013821]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to Rostasky: #02013818



Jaded has multiple meanings; attaching one single meaning
to it in some meagre attempt to make yourself appear correct
won't fool many people, especially since the one-word
definition you give is wrong.

Anyway, since you seem to suffer an inability to recognise
that Jaded requires a prior state to exist, it's pointless
trying to reason with you.

Merry Nukemas


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2006-12-06 21:28 [#02013822]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker | Followup to Rostasky: #02013818



I'll take your point, actually, on second look.

I've been arguing something else, I think.


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2006-12-06 21:28 [#02013823]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #02013821



Whatever.


 

offline b6662966 from ? on 2006-12-06 23:50 [#02013848]
Points: 1110 Status: Lurker



BRITISH SOLDIERS BEATING IRAQI CHILDREN


 


Messageboard index