WTC Information | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 300 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614114
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
WTC Information
 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2006-09-20 19:13 [#01974783]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



nevermind...


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2006-09-20 19:28 [#01974784]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



you could probably hold a 5 or 6 cinder blocks over your
head, but if someone droped them on you from 10 feet up it'd
suck.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2006-09-20 19:45 [#01974785]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



this footage is pretty amazing

it kinda cuts up right when the buildings are falling, but
it's crazy that you can see how slow one of the actuall
towers goes down.. you can see it through the smoke. also,
it shows how intense the fire was.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2006-09-20 21:18 [#01974807]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to epohs: #01974785



wow, you can see the center column stands much longer than
the outside, toppling after he closes the window. this is
not how the conspiracy doccos recount it.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2006-09-21 07:26 [#01974937]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



yeah it's nuts. kinda sureal.

it sucks too watching the build up of people at the bottom
of the towers.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2006-09-21 09:02 [#01974967]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



yeah, when you just talk about it, it's no big deal
then you spend some time going back through these videos
and it brings up a lot of ....

: - /


 

offline Morton from out (Netherlands, The) on 2006-09-21 16:38 [#01975316]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict | Followup to elusive: #01974773



that'd be the first time it would work that way. no other
steel building did ever collapse so beautifully, or rather,
did ever collapse at all

it's kind of moving though how so many americans still
defend their 'reliable' government :)


 

offline Dinky Pimp from United Kingdom on 2006-09-21 17:27 [#01975362]
Points: 218 Status: Regular



bogala: Yeah the cassetteboy track is pretty rough
listening, it takes a sick sense of humour to like it.

OK: Catholic Church formed after the Christ business,
obviously. I do believe there are forces trying to control
the world, if you can think outside the box it isn't that
paranoidy at all. Humans may be mortal, but those involved
in this try their best to carry it on throughout history,
they believe in it so they drum it into their descendants in
order for it to eventually happen. I think Blair only found
this out a few years back, and he's fundamentally a
politician who's got way too deep in it to turn back now.


 

offline funkadil from United States on 2006-09-21 23:46 [#01975468]
Points: 160 Status: Lurker



lol at "black smoke indicates a cool fire"

yeah right, maybe a wood fire.


 

offline funkadil from United States on 2006-09-21 23:48 [#01975469]
Points: 160 Status: Lurker



Also a guy whos official title is "architechture critic".


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2006-09-22 03:05 [#01975510]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



I have a sick sense of humour. That track was ignorant. Not
clever or sick.


 

offline B123 from The wicked underbelly (Australia) on 2006-09-22 05:34 [#01975545]
Points: 1361 Status: Lurker



Im loving all these calls to have the WTC reconstructed and
test the theorys, I've had similer thoughts myself.

Problem is that how hard it would be to verify the
authenticity of the reconstruction process. We have heard
coutroom eveidence of vote fixing efforts by the US
government and other tricky behaviour, infiltrating the
efforts of those trying to find the answers by
reconstructing the WTC would be quite within the Bush
admin's ethos.

None the less I think we need to call for a WTC
reconstruction..


 

offline OK on 2006-09-22 17:39 [#01975882]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



dinky pimp: yeah my thoughts exactly (well... kinda)

b123: of course are this calls are mainly humorous, it would
be hella expensive to do it, and it wouldn't prove anything
because all it would prove is that THAT building didn't
collapse. they'd also have to "age" the thing i suppose. the
reconstruction of WTC is inviable if it's for the purpouse
of crashing a plane into it.


 

offline B123 from The wicked underbelly (Australia) on 2006-09-22 17:50 [#01975890]
Points: 1361 Status: Lurker | Followup to OK: #01975882



clearly


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2006-09-22 19:56 [#01975961]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker



Wasn't building 7 rigged with explosives on 9/11? Like its
been recorded on tape the owner of the WTC telling them to
demolish it?

Perhaps a coincidence? Perhaps I have facts mixed up?


 

offline batch from CT (United States) on 2006-09-23 01:52 [#01976008]
Points: 37 Status: Lurker



bin laden didn't blow up the projects

it was you nigga

tell the truth nigga


 

offline batch from CT (United States) on 2006-09-23 01:55 [#01976009]
Points: 37 Status: Lurker



yeah building 7 was "pulled"

the owner dude is on video stating that

it's pretty fuckin sketchy how they could demo it the same
day. that shit takes a while to setup.

search for david icke on youtube..he obvs a nutter but its a
fun (and creepy) watch


 


Messageboard index