Future of Photography? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 356 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614114
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Future of Photography?
 

offline Mr Brazil from Oh Joan, I love you so... on 2006-08-28 00:35 [#01960786]
Points: 1970 Status: Lurker



Bacterial Photography


 

offline zero-cool on 2006-08-28 01:36 [#01960802]
Points: 2720 Status: Lurker



genius, pure genius


 

offline gl0tch from www.gl0tch.com     on 2006-08-28 01:44 [#01960804]
Points: 2708 Status: Lurker



gimmicky


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2006-08-28 01:50 [#01960805]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



3D projection without the glasses seems quite futuristic.


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2006-08-28 04:52 [#01960859]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



That aint shit, check this shit out!!


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2006-08-28 04:55 [#01960862]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



movie of it. Incredible! (warning, loads quicktime file)


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2006-08-28 05:29 [#01960877]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker



Nick Knight says photography's all over. Because if the 80's
and 90's were all about putting twists on old ideas, where
does that leave us now? Not only has everything been done,
everything's been redone.


 

offline NIL-0 from trans pennine express on 2006-08-28 06:23 [#01960896]
Points: 216 Status: Lurker



you can say that about a lot of art and culture in
general...


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2006-08-28 07:20 [#01960911]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker



What I think could be interesting is really hi-resolution DV
cameras. And when you take out a still frame, it looks like
a perfectly clear photo. That would save having to take
millions of posed photos. You could just film a model or
whoever walking around for a few minutes, and then find the
exact frame that works perfectly without being too
self-conscious about it.


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2006-08-28 20:51 [#01961270]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



cool idea swears


 

offline Paco from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2006-08-28 21:03 [#01961272]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker



There are cameras in development that can be refocused
digitally afterwards. I forgot the name, but there are
examples up..somewhere. It seems crazy when you see it,
really short DOF and still they're able to shift the
focusing distance.

Swears, how do you solve lighting? The light from a flash
generates almost no heat compared to a continuous lamp AND
is hundreds, if not thousands of times brighter. Using exact
lighting is critical in studio photography.


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2006-08-28 22:05 [#01961274]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



infrared. read the heat of the scene and have the camera
interpret the lighting.


 

offline Mr Brazil from Oh Joan, I love you so... on 2006-08-28 22:27 [#01961280]
Points: 1970 Status: Lurker



What about those cameras that make large objects look like
small toys? Has anyone applied that method to actual film
making (movies as opposed to photography)?


 

offline Paco from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2006-08-29 10:47 [#01961581]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker | Followup to Mr Brazil: #01961280



If you mean tilt/shift lenses, then yes, check out a movie
called 'In the cut' with Meg Ryan. It uses alot of selective
focus, but it's used for creating a mood, not miniaturizing
objects. The colors in that movie look great too. No wonder
really, it's the same photographer who worked on Collateral
and now Miami Vice.


 

offline Paco from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2006-08-29 10:53 [#01961584]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker



Here's more on the evil future of photography..or
"registering images" as it will be called in the year 2525.

Plenoptic camera..crazy!


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2006-08-29 11:00 [#01961586]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Followup to Paco: #01961584 | Show recordbag



what the fuck? how the fuck does that work?!


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2006-08-29 12:25 [#01961617]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker | Followup to Paco: #01961272



Well, I suppose it wouldn't work for flash photography, but
for everything else, you could just use whatever lighting
you were using before.


 

offline chaosmachine from Ottawa (Canada) on 2006-08-29 12:29 [#01961621]
Points: 2330 Status: Lurker | Followup to Paco: #01961584



yeah, that is really awesome. stick a 100mp, 24-bit sensor
behind it, and you've got the camera of 2015.


 

offline oxygenfad from www.oxygenfad.com (Canada) on 2006-08-29 12:30 [#01961623]
Points: 4442 Status: Regular



Seems like everything we dream up has is becoming a reality.
Hope the replican thing doesn`t happen :D


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2006-08-29 13:44 [#01961685]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



Ive been waiting for the Holideck all my life.


 


Messageboard index