 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (1)big ...and 189 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2614116 Today 2 Topics 127542 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Gimme 3 Autechre songs I like anvil vampre cd and Ganz Graf Just trying to hear more. Gimme 3 Richard Devine Tracks and for everyone else gimme your top 3 fav IDM (and only IDM) tracks |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
sure, but can you first explain why the thread is called "light"? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
a light, a sign of hope in the darkness! autechre: laughing quarter windwind netlon sentinel |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
mariah carey- shake it off remix featuring jay-z and young jeezy |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
don't worry, only my threads will get closed, it's an old grudge at play. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yulquen bike the trees |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Garbagemx, maphive, eggshell |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
hahahahha the trees I will kill you |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
hahahahahaha go integrate something, you big man you!!!! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
INTEGRAL OF DIRAC DELTA FUNCTION OVER ANY DOMAIN CONTAINING IT IS ONE EVEN THOUGH THE ONLY NONZERO POINT IN THE DIRAC FUNTION HAS INIFINITE (ALEPH NULL) VALUE THERE ARE YOU SATISFIED OR DO YOU WANT ME TO DO SOMETHING CHALLENGING |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
more more!!!! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
toe tac tic: crunch otto von schirach: some tracks own idm. others are funny and weird but not quite as good. best richard devine track i've heard is the one on the compilation, like a 10 minute track or so. I forget what the compilation is called but i think it's the first track. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
ok how about this. you know the set of reals is strictly larger than the set of integers. how? here's the proof, due to cantor (I'm paraphrasing it) if they have the same size, use the integers to enumerate the reals between zero and one, exclusive (this is bijective with the full real line trivially, just use inverse tangent). now consider the real number consisting of all the diagonal entries. that is, it's first digit is the first digit of the first number, the 2nd digit is the 2nd digit of the 2nd number, etc. call that number x. now consider another real number which has a five anywhere x has something other than five, and a four where x has a five. call this number y. y cannot be in our list of numbers. why? because, since x spans the whole list, it must have the same jth digit as x for some integer j. but that would mean some digit would have both a five and a non-five!! contradiction, and hence, the reals are strictly greater than the integers. nice, eh? that's his second proof. it's traditionally done in decimal expansion how I said it, though binary makes it leaner. I was paraphrasing but it's roughly the usual presentation. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
did you get the puke CD? I want it. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
..... and yet you are still here! :) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I don't get it. Trying to prove there is a greater quantity of decimal pointed numbers than whole numbers? 'self evident' I probably don't know what I'm writing about. I don't have impuktor- it might not be on cd yet but will be I think. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
pen expers eidetic casein clipper |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
