clip | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 317 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614116
Today 2
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
clip
 

online big from lsg on 2006-07-25 07:46 [#01942898]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



found this on another sight, good read

LAZY_TITLE


 

offline _gvarek_ from next to you (Poland) on 2006-07-25 07:54 [#01942901]
Points: 4882 Status: Lurker



indeed, pretty amazing.


 

online big from lsg on 2006-07-25 07:57 [#01942904]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



maybe the rest is good too. ill look into them later,
guess they're not written by the same mystery guy though


 

online big from lsg on 2006-07-25 07:59 [#01942905]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



that ricky martin cd must be pretty good


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-07-25 08:15 [#01942908]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict | Followup to big: #01942905



yikes !


 

online big from lsg on 2006-07-25 08:17 [#01942910]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i mean it


 

online big from lsg on 2006-08-02 13:09 [#01947952]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



http://www.prorec.com/prorec/articles.nsf/articles/8A133F52
D0FD71AB86256C2E005DAF1C
http://www.cdmasteringservices.com/dynamicrange.htm

i still don't really get it, i thought the idea is you use
maximizers when producing to get the sound as loud as
possible without getting clipping..
being a noob engineer i thought those square cutoffs were
actually maximized to invisible round waves
(however i did notice clipping on my tracks when i put a
maximizer to 'brick wall' to 0db after i'd mixed well over
0db)
i guess what i'm asking is when does the maximizing become
too much, i think before i hear clipping actually because
the sound can go bad before it becomes so bad you hear the
clipping. i guess i'd have to mix close to 0db, with just a
few point over it and then put on the brick wall.. and then
maximize?


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2006-08-02 13:12 [#01947956]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



when you say "maximizing", are you talking about
normalising?

I thought normalising is about just as bad as simply
compressing it, that it in fact pretty much works as
compression.


 

offline imdex from Argentina on 2006-08-02 13:18 [#01947961]
Points: 1689 Status: Regular



thank you


 

online big from lsg on 2006-08-02 13:26 [#01947970]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Followup to qrter: #01947956 | Show recordbag



i've been careless with the exact terms
when i say maximizing i think i mean normalizing with a
brick wall, the last being a tool that makes it so the
volume doesn't go over 0 db, thus it is like you say like
compression
normalizing in itself isn't bad, it's explained in this
article i linked:
http://www.prorec.com/prorec/articles.nsf/articles/8A133F52
D0FD71AB86256C2E005DAF1C
it's just making louder, that's not bad when you don't get
compression

i wanna know when it goes wrong exactly, but i think i
figured it out myself in my own question there: you
shouldn't have to many cutoff, clipped, waves


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2006-08-02 13:29 [#01947974]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to big: #01947970



hmm, I read a post on a different messageboard by some guy
who said he does mastering professionally and he said you
should never use normalisation software, as it does a shit
job and actually does work like a compress0r.

he could've been a li0r, ofcourse.


 

online big from lsg on 2006-08-02 13:32 [#01947976]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Followup to qrter: #01947974 | Show recordbag



yea, but i think he meant a tool i described
however now i don't understand how a normalizer is different
from just turning up the volume..
when you don't want to use a maximizer you'd have to
manually control the peaks with volume or compressors i
guess


 

online big from lsg on 2006-08-02 13:38 [#01947979]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



im confused and now know less then before, hehe


 

offline Fah from Netherlands, The on 2006-08-02 13:39 [#01947980]
Points: 6428 Status: Regular



i never knew Ricky Martin could rave that loud


 

offline isnieZot from pooptown (Belgium) on 2006-08-02 13:40 [#01947981]
Points: 4949 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01947976



normalizing is different from just turning up the volume
because when you normalize it takes the highest peak in your
music and calculates how much it's below the maximum 0db.
it then lifts the highest peak to 0db and also lifts
everyhing else by that same amount it had to lift the
highest peak.

if you just record a bit louder you probably never have to
use normalizing


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-08-02 13:41 [#01947982]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



hgf


 

offline isnieZot from pooptown (Belgium) on 2006-08-02 13:45 [#01947988]
Points: 4949 Status: Lurker | Followup to isnieZot: #01947981



also, normalizing is normally used for a series of tracks,
that means if you have like 10 tracks you wanna put on a cd
you use normalizing so all the tracks have the same volume.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-08-02 13:49 [#01947990]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



And if you thought this song was bad enough, hold on and be
prepared for a very sickening sight below...

1999
Ricky Martin (C2/Columbia CK 69891)

By now I don't think I have to explain what you see below.
And in this case, it probably will help explain why your
ears start to hurt after listening to "Livin' La Vida Loca"
even for just a short time!

{image}

And as we zoom in, the audio carnage is apparent:


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-08-02 13:49 [#01947991]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to r40f: #01947990



lol


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-08-02 13:52 [#01947993]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to qrter: #01947974



my understanding is that in different software/equipment,
"normalizing" means either thing... ie, in audacity, it
does mangle the sound, whereas in cooledit, it simply raises
the volume.


 

online big from lsg on 2006-08-02 13:53 [#01947994]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



aha!


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-08-02 13:56 [#01947996]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to big: #01942898



this article is retarded. it is better to have CDs mastered
at the highest possible level without clipping, yes. the
difference between the old techniques and the new ones are
that they are compressing the motherfuck out of everything
nowadays.

it's not distortion you hear like you're listening to the
v/vm remix of a song (as the article implies). it is a
deliberate choice made by the producer and/or mastering
person to make it sound like a damn beer commercial. it's
not going to go away and who gives a shit anyway.


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2006-08-02 14:56 [#01948038]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01947976



A normalizer is exactly just like turning up the volume.
Like isnie says - it takes the highest peak - put its to 0
then does the same addition for the rest of the sample.

maximizing (or 'hard limiting') is when normalizing isn't
"loud enough". You can maximize the sample beyond 0 to
increase it to devastatingly loud dbs. However because
digital software cuts off after 0 you lose a lot of the
sound quality. Hard limiting will actually avoid clipping
but it is balanced by a 'dropping out' of frequencies
(usually the lower bassier freq). Try it out with some
samples and see for yourself. Experiment.


 

online big from lsg on 2006-08-02 14:58 [#01948041]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01947996 | Show recordbag



so the cut off waves you see aren't distorted? i didn't get
it because i don't understand what the use of those
expensive plugins like waves l2, is then. i understand the
compression
help


 

online big from lsg on 2006-08-02 14:59 [#01948043]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Followup to weatheredstoner: #01948038 | Show recordbag



but then all those guys have it wrong in those articles

im going to post this in the forum i got this from


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2006-08-02 15:02 [#01948046]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker | Followup to weatheredstoner: #01948038



sorry it does "clip" but not in a traditional sense of
hearing 'crackling' noises - but rather hearing a sort of
bottoming out. I'm dumb.

The hard limiting lets you set a 'limit' usually 0db or
maybe -.2 or something close to 0. Then you enter how loud
you want it to go say +10 db. Well if anything existed
between 0 and -10 then that part of the waveform would be
slammed against your 'limit'. It's possible that you can
squish a lot of sounds without any noticeable difference and
then it's basically like a compressor of sorts - quite
unlike normalizing (which is awesome imo)


 

online big from lsg on 2006-08-02 15:05 [#01948048]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Followup to weatheredstoner: #01948046 | Show recordbag



ok i now understand thanks :)
i have experimented. i took it too far eventually and mixed
well over 0db and the put the maximizer brick wall on it,
that made some distortions. otherwise the compression
function of it is awesome, because im making dance music ffs


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2006-08-02 15:08 [#01948050]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01948043



The articles are correct. You shouldn't have to fill the
entire waveform past 0db. If you are you kinda suck a
engineering music. But it could be a problem with the
original composer who knows fuckall about eq and compression
so when it hits the mastering studio the engineer has no
choice but to increase and clip because the artist/whoever
wants their track to be as loud as everyone elses.


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2006-08-02 15:08 [#01948051]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker



Yeah, I've read a few things about this trend, one stating
that "What's the Story, Morning Glory" by Oasis owed part of
it's huge success to the fact it's mastered really fucking
loud.
It does have an impact on the sound, it may not sound like
it's coming through a Boss distortion pedal, but when music
clips that much you lose a lot of nuances and dynamic
range.
Some parts of songs are supposed to be quiet.
One article said that the last album by drippy piano trio
Keane is TWICE as loud as Nevermind by Nirvana.
WTF?


 


Messageboard index