2) a boring mixer question | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 135 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614121
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
2) a boring mixer question
 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2006-07-04 06:26 [#01931976]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker



i need a mixer now, probably 4 channels minimum but more
would be better i guess. this is so i can route my few
pieces of gear to my speakers mixed, and maybe so i can run
my computer output in there as well, and maybe mix between
some external stuff and traktor. help me out. Im not fussy
and i dont have any money whatsoever but I dont know what to
look for. thanks yo


 

offline Uelogy from Enruo (Saint Vincent And The Grenadines) on 2006-07-04 07:20 [#01931989]
Points: 90 Status: Lurker



just use an banana, if that doesnt work, try google?


 

offline _awt_ from Malmö (Sweden) on 2006-07-04 08:04 [#01932001]
Points: 2202 Status: Regular



combining question 1 and 2 makes me wonder what kind of an
soundcard you are using as in my opinion it's better to get
an decent soundcard with a few in and out's instead of
getting a crappy soundcard and a crappy mixer.


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2006-07-04 08:24 [#01932009]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker | Followup to _awt_: #01932001



the soundcard question is for a friend, this question is my
own. the problem really is i cant tell whats a crappy mixer
and what isnt, for my purposes at least


 

offline _awt_ from Malmö (Sweden) on 2006-07-04 09:03 [#01932024]
Points: 2202 Status: Regular | Followup to Dannn_: #01932009



well, incase you can't tell what an crappy mixer is then you
would probably be able to settle with one =) there's many
decent mixers in the really low budget area and they do
sound ok unless youre an complete audiohpile or soundgeek, I
mean the price range is allot bigger then the "sound good
range", to get an mixer that sounds very clean and neutral
cost allot more then to get one that just colours the sound
alittle, and one that colour the sound in some sort of old
school beauty analog way costs more then any human being
dare to think about so unless youre extremely picky I would
recommend any cheap mixer from behringer or any of those
budget companys. Then it's just up to you to decide how many
i/o's you need (remember to get a few more then you need atm
otherwise you just have to pick up a new mixer again in
alittle while.) Im sure that what ive said here doesnt help
at all but it's really hard to recommend mixers as it's
first of all up to one another what they want and need and
if you ignore small facts like "the knobs are a bit slow" or
"the eq sounds a bit round" then it's just a matter of
inputs and outputs again. But hell, good luck.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-07-04 09:24 [#01932035]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to _awt_: #01932024 | Show recordbag



What he said. I don't really like budget gear, but out of
budget gear, Behringer are the ones I object to least.


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2006-07-04 09:29 [#01932038]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker | Followup to _awt_: #01932024



can you suggest a behringer one? Im looking at this page
LAZY_TITLE and i cant really tell them apart, i dont
understand why they have some stereo and some mono channels,
and stuff, its confusing. this one?


 

offline Falito from Balenciaga on 2006-07-04 09:34 [#01932042]
Points: 3974 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i got a 1602 like this
think is good for what you talk


Attached picture

 

offline _awt_ from Malmö (Sweden) on 2006-07-04 12:44 [#01932139]
Points: 2202 Status: Regular | Followup to Dannn_: #01932038



Well, the reason there's some stereo and some mono is
probably just to make it more easy to use, for example if
you want to connect an synth (stereo) into the mixer you can
connect it's two cables into an stereo channel and control
both those channels with one fader instead of having to
connect the left/right from the synth to two different mono
channels (wich would force you to adjust two different
faders or eq's or whatever on the two mono channels whenever
you wanted to change anything etc.) The mixer you linked to
looks OK, probably does it's job and if it's 4 channels you
need then 10 will probably be an good amount to buy for
future usage. The one Falito posted a pic of looks like it
has built in FX to, I dont know how the built in FX on
behringers boards sound but it could be fun and perhaps
usable and probably doesnt change the price allot so
consider built in FX if it comes for a small extra price as
some small amount of compression can often be really usefull
on insecure signals. I would have a look at this one
costs a bit more but looks like a bit more to "grow in", I
tryed the UB series at my old school and as far as I can
remember it felt fine.


 

offline impakt from where we do not speak of! on 2006-07-04 12:46 [#01932142]
Points: 5764 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Go for a second-hand mixer, you can get fairly large vintage
mixers for a very good price!


 


Messageboard index