Reverb..deeper meaning.. | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 580 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614121
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Reverb..deeper meaning..
 

offline exsub from United Kingdom on 2006-01-28 04:55 [#01828913]
Points: 524 Status: Lurker



Reverb has so much to change the way music is played out to
be.

for me, it matters so much because even though some people
have their stereo's in their living room and that makes up
some acoustic reflection creating reverb..

but since i have my monitors either side of me listening to
music which has very well made out mastering ( with reverb
etc ) makes it so much deepe,r it's as if i'm in another
place..

it's quite odd, but what made me think of this was listening
to Polynomial C, what makes that song ( i feel ) is the fast
ryth in the background, it just makes that track i feel
because its extremly atmospheric ..



 

offline DaggerHappy from Australia on 2006-01-28 05:00 [#01828915]
Points: 662 Status: Lurker



fucking hell, people around love their reverb, all the spams
are totally drenched in it. and here you are crapping on.

there are loads of cool effects out there, and i think
reverb is quite overused.


 

offline Fah from Netherlands, The on 2006-01-28 06:12 [#01828934]
Points: 6428 Status: Regular | Followup to DaggerHappy: #01828915



YES! we should live in Flanger from time to time. Reverb is
boring after a while


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2006-01-28 06:20 [#01828940]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular | Followup to exsub: #01828913



oh c'mon, you've got to be taking the piss now...


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2006-01-28 15:03 [#01829186]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular | Followup to exsub: #01828913



how many tracks with reverb have you heard without their
reverb exactly?


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-01-28 15:14 [#01829189]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



Reverb is a tool to help assist producers in creating a
natural sounding acoustic space where recording in a
controled environment is necessary. But the problem is
people are using it as an effect, where it should be used
more as a tool. Its kind of like people have swapped their
priorities. Compression should be used as an effect, not as
a tool, and reverb should be used as a tool, not as an
effect.


 

offline steve mcqueen from caerdydd (United Kingdom) on 2006-01-28 15:16 [#01829190]
Points: 6563 Status: Regular



whats the difference between an effect and a tool?


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-01-28 15:23 [#01829192]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to steve mcqueen: #01829190



Well, tools are more utilitarian, and effects are more
additive.

Lets put it this way.

Compression should be used to add a certain sound to what
you are making, but it has been used more as an auto leveler
lately.

Reverb should be used to give accoustic space to recordings
done in controlled environments and sounds that have been
generated and sent straight to the mixer without having any
accoustic space, but it has been used as something to add a
certain sound to what you are making.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-01-28 15:24 [#01829193]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



But thats all imo.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2006-01-28 15:33 [#01829197]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to Taxidermist: #01829193



I know what you mean. Lots of people just 'put some reverb
on' forgetting the merits and failures of doing so. It's a
great tool to fool the ears especially the Impulse response
things. I think it's ignorance or lazy programming to make
it sound 'Lush'. It can be used creatively too but I
haven't heard any notable uses lately.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-01-28 15:39 [#01829201]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to JivverDicker: #01829197



Definately. I am a big fan of sounds that are designed to be
interesting, and pleasant to listen to. I try to avoid
adding reverb as part of a designed sound. If I want that
kind of effect, I usually just try to stick to delay.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2006-01-28 15:42 [#01829204]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



I don't know, a lot of stuff I hear seems to be too dry. It
seems like people want all their stuff right up front and in
your face, with no care for creating spaces.

Yes, too much reverb sounds bad, but when used well, it does
exactly what its supposed to do, as a tool.


 

offline scup_bucket from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2006-01-28 15:42 [#01829205]
Points: 4540 Status: Regular



I generally don't make music as to avoid all problems
therein


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2006-01-28 15:43 [#01829206]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to Taxidermist: #01829201



Have you played with altiverb? It's great! I used to use a
TC electronics M3000 but I haven't touched it for ages now.
You can download a demo here


 

offline Sempoo from Barlinek (Pluto) on 2006-01-28 15:49 [#01829210]
Points: 621 Status: Regular



You are not allowed to add reverb everywhere. That is all in
this matter almost.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-01-28 15:49 [#01829211]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to JivverDicker: #01829206



Well, when I use software, I usually use the waves ir1. I
have a convolution modeller as well, but haven't really had
a chance to try it out much, as I kind of stick mostly to
hardware. I intend on saving up and getting a lexicon
multieffect unit soon, but right now, I mostly use my
quadraverb gt.


 

offline Sempoo from Barlinek (Pluto) on 2006-01-28 15:51 [#01829212]
Points: 621 Status: Regular



You need to be very frugal with reverb. Delay often makes
better job.


 

offline Sempoo from Barlinek (Pluto) on 2006-01-28 15:54 [#01829214]
Points: 621 Status: Regular



Impulse reverbs are great, they can even simulate Lexicons
and other ware, also special fx can be easily created.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2006-01-28 15:56 [#01829215]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to Taxidermist: #01829211



I use this thing called wormhole 2 that makes any spare
computer share the work. One of the computers just runs
altiverb like a standalone effect and it's more than
convincing, you can get lost in it.


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2006-01-28 16:00 [#01829217]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



the reverb on pro radii is fucking delicious


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2006-01-28 16:01 [#01829218]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



for me its mainly reverb on snares and some drum kits cause
i think it sounds real old school and phat like that


 

offline big from lsg on 2006-01-28 16:24 [#01829228]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i put it on because people say i need to


 

offline exsub from United Kingdom on 2006-01-28 20:02 [#01829322]
Points: 524 Status: Lurker



thank you atlast!

I wasn't saying that reverb should be put on everything, but
listening to that track just made me really think about it.

thats why i like that track so much, because that reverb on
the synth just made that song.

If it hadn't had reverb the feel of the song would have been
dry, and the atmosphere gone...

Perhaps i'm just extremly stupid, or whatever, i don't
fuckign care, but point being i just thought about it a lot.


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2006-01-28 20:10 [#01829326]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular



there are no rules for making music. if you want reverb, use
it. if you don't then, uh, don't. its pretty simple. i love
people who get degrees in music tech. they will be mastering
all my music when i'm famous.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2006-01-28 20:14 [#01829327]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker | Followup to i_x_ten: #01829326



since when was this topic about people getting degrees in
music tech?


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2006-01-28 20:19 [#01829330]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular | Followup to Zeus: #01829327



since when was this topic about asking people whether the
topic is about asking people is they have degrees in music
tech?


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2006-01-28 20:23 [#01829334]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



touche


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2006-01-28 20:27 [#01829337]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular | Followup to Zeus: #01829334



zing!

:D


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2006-01-28 20:47 [#01829341]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to exsub: #01829322



hee hee.


 

offline geraldine on 2006-01-28 21:17 [#01829353]
Points: 164 Status: Regular



Reverb..deeper meaning..


 

offline exsub from United Kingdom on 2006-01-28 22:07 [#01829369]
Points: 524 Status: Lurker



geraldine

are you taking the piss?....

People use reverb as an effect usually, this has been
stated. but if you use it properly you can use it in such a
better way, that being to create a realistic enviroment
where the listener feels he is in while he plays the track.

I find this topic title relevent, if you'd like to mock me
some more just fucking privately message me


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2006-01-28 22:10 [#01829370]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker | Followup to exsub: #01828913



i LOVE reverb. i have a digitech rp7 effects valve i've been
using in my music recently. if you want to hear the results,
check THE PARABLE OF YOU AND ME. Nothing like a spring decay at 100
percent with level 10 decay... oh the beauty!


 

offline exsub from United Kingdom on 2006-01-28 22:15 [#01829372]
Points: 524 Status: Lurker



Oddioblender
i like this, the drums are a bit flakey ( the snare
specifically )..

wait, it's getting better, but err, if you make the synth a
lot quieter then fade it in with the reverb still on, it
will give it a better atmospheric feeling..

e.g. listen to Polynomial C by aphex twin.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2006-01-28 22:17 [#01829374]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to JivverDicker: #01829206 | Show recordbag



both altiverb and wormhole seem like interesting programs,
but I really like the idea of using the two combined to have
a dedicated reverb generator, so to speak. thank you for the
links.


 

offline exsub from United Kingdom on 2006-01-28 22:17 [#01829375]
Points: 524 Status: Lurker



oddioblender, fucking hell, you've got too much time on your
hands, you could have left out the description on your
myspace on 'Sounds Like'.. you could of made a whole
finished song if you spend that time otherwise, maybe even
two songs.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-01-29 02:08 [#01829406]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



"there are no rules for making music"

I love it when people say this. There are no rules for
making music. The truth is there are rules. I am too drunk
to explain properly right now, but most of the people who
say this usually make music in 4/4 time.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-01-29 02:11 [#01829407]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #01829406



Forget I said that. Thats a can of worms that I don't want
to discuss.


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2006-01-29 06:05 [#01829517]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #01829407



The first rule of music making is you don't talk about music
making.

The second rule of music making is you don't talk about
music making.

The third rule of music making is if a sound is in 4/4 then
it is music, otherwise it is just a sound. Lots of people
have 'invented' other time signatures, but these are
actually just alternate names for white noise.

The fourth rule of music making is that reverb cannot be
used at any times whatsoever, neither as an effect, tool or
on headphones.

Thankyou for your continuing support.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

BTW gated reverb on drums is pretty cool and contrary to
popular belief was invented by Peter Gabriel not Phil
Collins so is acceptable for use. (Secretly I actually like
Phil Collins, but that's a big secret).



 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-01-29 06:08 [#01829521]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



LOL.

And the fifth rule is that you have to try to "break all
rules" at one time or another.


 

offline isnieZot from pooptown (Belgium) on 2006-01-29 06:49 [#01829551]
Points: 4949 Status: Lurker



taxidermist your "compression as an effect" statemant is a
bit wrong imo. a compressor is actually a tool. you CAN
however use it as an effect when using a bit more extreme
settings. because then it will audibly change your sound.
good compression is compression you can't notice.


 

offline steve mcqueen from caerdydd (United Kingdom) on 2006-01-29 07:24 [#01829581]
Points: 6563 Status: Regular



yeah get a bit of pumping maybe

daveg -> i thought i heard his studio engineer invented it
by accident cos of a noise gate threshhold being set to high
???


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2006-01-29 07:54 [#01829594]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker | Followup to steve mcqueen: #01829581



No. When Peter Gabriel was in Genesis, Phil Collins was the
(rather fantastic) drummer. The drums were patched to a
noise gate on the mixer and they had forgotten to un patch
it. Peter decided to add some reverb to the drums and it was
chopped by the gate, producing the gated reverb sound.
So it was only really discovered by accident.

I think they didn't use it on any Genesis stuff, but years
later Phil Collins remembered it and used it famously on the
drums in "In the Air Tonight"


 


Messageboard index