creationism / intelligent design | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 161 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613449
Today 2
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
creationism / intelligent design
 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2006-01-25 10:06 [#01826889]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01826874



"intelligent design" equals the biblical account of
creation. this is the sole reason the idea is incompatible
with the idea that living things evolve. without the
biblical account, the idea "intelligent design" would indeed
be as quaint as phlogiston.

a much more interesting thread, i think, would investigate
the "why" of existence.

i may be certain of only one fact, that our current model of
reality will continue to be radically altered as long as we
systematically investigate.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2006-01-25 10:07 [#01826890]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



oops, those comments weren't all necessarily directed at
f/m.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-01-25 10:10 [#01826892]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01826873 | Show recordbag



hahah, don't worry.. on the internets where it's all in
writing, it's easy to get meaning from the posts while
ignoring harshness. it's our privelegie to do so as long as
we're not dealing with each other in real life. that doesn't
mean I wouldn't come over for a whisky, but then we'd
discuss more important matters (like music and chicks and
those tiny chocolate bars that are like half the size of the
regular ones.. I mean, what the fuck?).


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2006-01-25 10:13 [#01826897]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01826892



the little Dove snack bite things are the greatest thing on
earth.

in fact, i think they are probably the best evidence i've
seen as to the existance of a diety.

:)


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2006-01-25 10:25 [#01826910]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01826873



"As you mature emotionally (or mentally, or spiritually),
you will grow out of your present way of thinking, and you
will eventually come around to my point of view."


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2006-01-25 10:25 [#01826911]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01826910



;D


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-01-25 10:31 [#01826919]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to epohs: #01826910



Didn't we already have this argument just before you went
through the de-tox program?


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-01-25 12:09 [#01826976]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01826919



Ha ha, yeah, I remember him trying to argue without taking
the crack pipe out of his mouth. Mumble mumble, puff,
mumble.


 

offline mimi on 2006-01-25 13:41 [#01827085]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular | Followup to r40f: #01826919



You're looking less repulsive than usual today.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-01-25 13:50 [#01827096]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to mimi: #01827085



That's a cruel thing to say, and I know you don't mean it.
What would your father say if he could hear you now?


 

offline mimi on 2006-01-25 14:06 [#01827113]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular | Followup to r40f: #01827096



I would like to answer your question directly, but
considering your emotional instability, I feel that to do so
would be a disservice to you at this time.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2006-01-25 14:15 [#01827130]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



It sounds as if you are saying that torturing children is a
good idea....


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-01-25 14:50 [#01827188]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to mimi: #01827113



You weren't breast fed as a child, were you?


 

offline mimi on 2006-01-25 15:45 [#01827260]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular | Followup to r40f: #01827188



I'm glad you asked. Would you like a long or a short answer?


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-01-25 15:48 [#01827264]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to mimi: #01827260



I would like a long interactive DVD with bumpy chrome menu
screens.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-01-25 15:49 [#01827266]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



A quote to get this thread back on track:

A man didn’t understand how televisions work, and was
convinced that there must be lots of little men inside the
box. manipulating images at high speed. An engineer
explained to him about high frequency modulations of the
electromagnetic spectrum, about transmitters and receivers,
about amplifiers and cathode ray tubes, about scan lines
moving across and down a phosphorescent screen. The man
listened to the engineer with careful attention, nodding his
head at every step of the argument. At the end he pronounced
himself satisfied. He really did now understand how
televisions work. "But I expect there are just a few little
men in there, aren’t there?"

-- Douglas Adams, a parable spoofing creationism that Adams
often told, as retold by Richard Dawkins in "Lament for
Douglas" (14 May 2001)


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-01-25 16:06 [#01827287]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to mimi: #01827260



Why, that is a brilliant question coming from you! Remember
last time we had an argument, and you turned out to be wrong
and wouldn't admit it? Now we're in the same spot we were
last time.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2006-01-25 20:42 [#01827405]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



what's so intelligent about monotremes? where's the genius
in a frikkin duck beaver, layin eggs and lactating without
nipples?


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2006-01-25 20:49 [#01827407]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker



Ok, Im taking a class on this right now, and I don't feel
like reading this whole thread so you are just going to have
to trust me:

ID is crap.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2006-01-25 21:05 [#01827408]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to Rostasky: #01827407



I really like the ID'ers discussion about "irreducible
complexity."

It's like, "The flagellum is so complex. it can't be broken
into smaller, functional parts. therefore, GOD DID IT."

or,

"Didn't you see 'March of the Penguins?' Obviously a funny
looking bird without all those sweet adaptations couldn't
live in antarctica. therefore, GOD DID IT."


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-01-26 04:25 [#01827564]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



 


Attached picture

 

online big from lsg on 2006-01-26 04:27 [#01827567]
Points: 23624 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



i believe fleetmouse created us


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2006-01-26 04:31 [#01827568]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular



The principle of causality consists in a relationship of
necessary connection between cause and effect, in virtue of
which the one (effect) cannot be had without the presence of
the other (cause). Hence the formulation of the principle of
causality: "Everything that begins to exist must have a
cause for its existence."

Now this principle, or this absolute necessity of connection
between the effect and its cause, is anything but exempt
from doubt. Analytical a priori reasoning is such that it
implies a proposition whose predicate is derivable from the
idea of the subject -- as in the example, "Three times five
is equal to fifteen." Now, according to Hume, the mind can
never find the effect by examination of the supposed cause;
for the effect is totally different from the cause, and
consequently can never be discovered in it.



 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-01-26 04:38 [#01827572]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01827567



I can uncreate you too.


 

online big from lsg on 2006-01-26 04:39 [#01827573]
Points: 23624 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



ill be quiet now oh mighty fleetmouse


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-01-26 04:39 [#01827574]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #01827568



Hume is fucking deep. He follows me around like a ghost.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2006-01-26 04:49 [#01827577]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular



Intelligent Design = The old Cosmological argument =
Bullshit

"The nose was created for the purpose of wearing spectacles"


-Voltaire


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2006-01-26 14:15 [#01827962]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker



Cause and effect no longer exist as a pair.


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2006-01-26 14:15 [#01827963]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker



THIS BITCH ISN'T DYING.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2006-01-26 14:23 [#01827971]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



cause and effect have nothing to do with intent.


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-01-26 14:43 [#01827985]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



well if god did create life, he did a fucking lousy job.
wars, diseases etc.

and what the fuck are toes for? they are pointless additives
to the human body, like the appendix. why would some guy in
the clouds put functionless things on the human body?


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-01-26 14:54 [#01828002]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



and what the fuck are toes for?

they're so you can walk and stand up and things like that


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2006-01-26 14:55 [#01828004]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



yeah, toes are very important.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2006-01-26 14:56 [#01828005]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



i don't think we've had a serious enough discussion about
Doveâ„¢ snack sized candy bites.


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-01-26 15:23 [#01828050]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



you dont need toes to walk! you have the heels of your feet.
a pad will do, it does not need to be differentiated into
toes. the fact that it is means it must have originally been
a purposeful arrangement, i.e. another hand for climbing
trees etc. like chimps.

douglas adams was amazing.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-01-26 15:31 [#01828060]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Ha ha! Look at old stumpy, stumping around on his heels.

He's different. He doesn't have toes.

That's funny!


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-01-26 15:40 [#01828065]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #01828050



try cutting them off and walking around


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-01-26 16:12 [#01828088]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01828005 | Show recordbag



I've never had one of those.. could you fax me one?


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2006-01-26 21:00 [#01828144]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



Nature is pretty amazing. Flawless.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-01-26 21:08 [#01828149]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to bogala: #01828144



That avatar is either awesome or extremely horrifying, which
means it's terrific.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2006-01-26 21:09 [#01828150]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Followup to fleetmouse: #01827266 | Show recordbag



--A man didn’t understand how televisions work, and was
convinced that there must be lots of little men inside the
box. manipulating images at high speed. An engineer
explained to him about high frequency modulations of the
electromagnetic spectrum, about transmitters and receivers,

about amplifiers and cathode ray tubes, about scan lines
moving across and down a phosphorescent screen. The man
listened to the engineer with careful attention, nodding his

head at every step of the argument. At the end he pronounced

himself satisfied. He really did now understand how
televisions work. "But I expect there are just a few little

men in there, aren’t there?" --

That doesn't prove anything!! That is comparable to the
little disclaimer that says "this poll is not scientific,
and only represents the opinions of those who participated."
In other words you can't make broad sweeping
generalizations about those who believe in a higher power.
In fact there are many who are more than competant in
various scientific fields and can look at true,
substantiated and accepted data and form models and theories
in favor of intellegent design from it.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2006-01-26 21:19 [#01828159]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Followup to glasse: #01828150 | Show recordbag



I am sure you have read the book Inherit the Wind or maybe
seen the movie. It is based on the famous Scopes trial here
in America where a teacher was being prosecuted for teaching
evolution. It was illegal at the time to do so. Well
anyway they got this God fearing big name prosecutor to come
down to settle this thing and at the end of the book the
defense attorney calls the prosecution, this God fearing big
name lawyer to the stand. He then asks him "Now, I heard
you say earlier that sex is evil, right.." and he says
"well by yes it is the most evil thing and dirty..." and so
on and so forth. Well then the defense grabs a bible and
turns to the geneolgies and starts reading .."and so and so
begat so and so, and so and so begat so and so.." and then
says "Now if you say sex is so evil and proclaim that the
bible says it too, then how comes there is so much begating
going on right here in the first chapter?! At this point
the prosecutor gets all flustered and sweated and I think he
may have even had a heart attack I forget exactly. Anyway,
this was the major turn in the trial that forced the judge
to only fine the defendant $1 and then the law was
eventually overtuned so evolution could be taught.

The point is that is ridiculous and does not even come close
to representing the beliefs of the christian community at
large. No one thinks that sex is evil it is a natural part
of life. Christians may believe that promiscous sex is bad
but so do many non-christians and that is just practial
anyway, right? Aids, unwanted pregancies, etc. So don't go
building straw men just so you can knock them down.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-01-26 21:27 [#01828162]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to glasse: #01828159



i'm almost positive you missed the point of the adams joke


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2006-01-26 21:29 [#01828163]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Followup to glasse: #01828159 | Show recordbag



So to point to people who at one time thought the earth was
flat, or that hell is dantes inferno at the center of the
earth, or that the earth is 6,000 years old and then say
"there, see, just a bunch of inbred morons this whole God
idea is absurd" is what is really absurd because they are
throwing the baby out with the bath water.


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2006-01-26 21:33 [#01828164]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #01827985



well if god did create life, he did a fucking lousy job.

wars, diseases etc.


Violence exists in nature. If its not humans killing each
other then animals sure are. Large scale wars are a man-made
concept btw. Diseases can be attributed to many causes, some
man made, others from inbreeding, the list goes on. It can
also seen as natures way of population control. Who knows
how many species lived and died before humans even came into
the picture. Would you all be shocked if we were the next
species to get wiped out? I wouldn't be surprised.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-01-26 22:47 [#01828171]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to glasse: #01828150



I'm at peace now.

Hamburgers, brother.


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2006-01-27 10:51 [#01828477]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker | Followup to weatheredstoner: #01828164



I would, considering ~5 species are estimated to go extinct
every day.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2006-01-27 10:59 [#01828482]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to weatheredstoner: #01828164



you couldn't be surprised. you'd be wiped out.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-01-27 11:25 [#01828493]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



why can't douglas adams keep his sticky fingers out of
threads like these?


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2006-01-27 15:29 [#01828613]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



200


 


Messageboard index