fruity loops studio 6 | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 647 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614121
Today 4
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
fruity loops studio 6
 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2006-01-22 05:03 [#01824239]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



fruity loops is finally getting more and more professional,
they implented a few more functions in number 6 (at last):

- few midi controllers can be used at once - that was gross!
i mean you could use just one knob box at once until now...


- hard disk recording of channels - known as the "freeze"
funciton. yay! at last! drastically lowers the cpu
requirements.

- multiband compressor - no comment - one of the few
features that were just too necessary.

- new sampler - haven't used it yet - but seems quite ok.

- new 8-part delay

- new reverb

and so much more. download the demo and look for
yourself.

just one thing that i discovered - it's more and more cpu
hungry... i hope that won't be that bad on my pc :/


 

offline futureimage from buy FIR from Juno (United Kingdom) on 2006-01-22 05:06 [#01824242]
Points: 6427 Status: Lurker



HOLY SHIT! I need to get the lifetime updates now....


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2006-01-22 05:09 [#01824243]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to futureimage: #01824242



floops is more and more worth the money...

if you could just change that cheesy layout :|


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-01-22 05:11 [#01824245]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



FLP updates history:

the first version is always laden with new features,
extremely buggy, and extremely processor heavy. This is
usually fun as hell, but after a couple days you open up the
last version, because you can't work with it shutting down
on you every five minutes.

But version *.3 they fix the bugs, and optimize the
programming, so that it doesn't hog your entire system, and
its workable. They also throw in a free bag to put all the
hair that you pulled out when version *.0 was released, so
you can get it surgically re-implanted.

Version *.5 usually includes as many added features as
version *.0, but keeps the processor overhead low, and a few
new bugs pop up. this is also the update where every single
one of your favorite vst effects don't work.

Version *.9. Finally, everything works beautifully, low
processor, it all fits together. Then they tell you about
the new features that you can't live without on the next
version.

Repeat cycle.


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2006-01-22 05:16 [#01824248]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular



"it's more and more cpu
hungry" - the opposite on my old pc [945mhz cpu] - it works
much smoother than FL5 - you just need to adjust the cpu
usage priority in audio settings.


 

offline impakt from where we do not speak of! on 2006-01-22 05:29 [#01824256]
Points: 5764 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



The track freezing has been there a long time...


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2006-01-22 05:39 [#01824259]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to impakt: #01824256



in floops 5 ? are you serious ?


 

offline stilaktive from a place on 2006-01-22 05:51 [#01824268]
Points: 3162 Status: Lurker



(ejay for people who think they're clever)


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2006-01-22 05:55 [#01824269]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to stilaktive: #01824268





you have no idea


 

offline impakt from where we do not speak of! on 2006-01-22 05:57 [#01824270]
Points: 5764 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #01824245 | Show recordbag



Isn't that more or less the history of almost any sequencer,
hehe :p


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2006-01-22 06:03 [#01824272]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to impakt: #01824270



actually - it works for every program, computer, car, mobile
phone, toothbrush in the world


 

offline impakt from where we do not speak of! on 2006-01-22 06:04 [#01824275]
Points: 5764 Status: Lurker | Followup to sadist: #01824272 | Show recordbag



Yeah, as long as you leave out the vst-effects part. It's
called marketing.


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2006-01-22 06:09 [#01824279]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to impakt: #01824275



i'm studying about building houses you know... dunno
anything about marketing really


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2006-01-22 06:21 [#01824282]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular | Followup to stilaktive: #01824268



(show your music, we'll judge the fruit of your work)


 

offline Fah from Netherlands, The on 2006-01-22 06:25 [#01824284]
Points: 6428 Status: Regular



i'm not really that impressed with the new fruity standard
effect updates, i use vst's only anyway


 

online big from lsg on 2006-01-22 06:30 [#01824290]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



how do you guys render tracks then?
for the whole song or small loops (pattern?) without effects
so you can disguise the fact that it's a loop
i never do it because i don't know wether i'll want to use
the pattern again or i'm afraid you'll here it loop


 

offline Fah from Netherlands, The on 2006-01-22 06:34 [#01824291]
Points: 6428 Status: Regular | Followup to big: #01824290



what?
just render it in full glory


 

online big from lsg on 2006-01-22 06:42 [#01824295]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Followup to Fah: #01824291 | Show recordbag



i presume you don't delete the channel so you can later use
it again (and don't lose settings and patterns)? (but then
it still takes up cpu, even with 'smart disable for all')


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2006-01-22 06:45 [#01824296]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular | Followup to big: #01824295



you can render each channel seperately to a quality wave
file for further knob twisting and production !


 

online big from lsg on 2006-01-22 06:57 [#01824298]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Followup to obara: #01824296 | Show recordbag



right, so you'll save cpu from the plugin in the channel
i guess i'll still try to do everything in one go though, as
i'll always want to be able to change anything everywhere in
the track,
i should use send for reverb, though i found out it does
sound different from a reverb on the channel


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2006-01-22 07:02 [#01824302]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01824298



if your computer is that slow you can add reverb to a
channel, export that channel and add it to your track as a
wave file....


 

offline impakt from where we do not speak of! on 2006-01-22 07:06 [#01824304]
Points: 5764 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01824298 | Show recordbag



Be sure to use send-reverb units/settings.


 

online big from lsg on 2006-01-22 07:07 [#01824306]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



my computer is supposed to be really powerful (3 gig
pentiumIV and stuff) but some channels with reverb use up
alot of cpu. i understand your method but i won't do it
cause rendering during making a track breaks my workflow, i
worry i lose stuff and such
it is useful to know how others do this however


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2006-01-22 07:10 [#01824308]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01824306



hm... then you have to make something really wrong or you're
just using too cpu hungry reverbs...

i mean i sometimes have a shitload of effects on my channels
and my laptop never really said "no"



 

online big from lsg on 2006-01-22 07:11 [#01824310]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Followup to impakt: #01824304 | Show recordbag



i once did an experiment on a track with singing, send
reverb really sounds different (not worse i though but
different) for using it directly on the channel. maybe
because it's added on with send (i know you set wet to 100%
and use the send knob on the channel for wetting)


 

online big from lsg on 2006-01-22 07:17 [#01824313]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Followup to sadist: #01824308 | Show recordbag



well it's the waves rverb, so i guess that's the reason (the
samples buffer length in fruity is at max), what i said
about the send sounding different i guess isn't really
audible with instrument channels so i should use send. as i
understood for making the reverb sound real you should have
the settings on all reverbs the same anyway (like decay)


 

offline impakt from where we do not speak of! on 2006-01-22 07:18 [#01824314]
Points: 5764 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01824310 | Show recordbag



I normally just use one instance of reverb pr track, impulse
reverb on one of the sends. Works great.


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2006-01-22 07:27 [#01824317]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular | Followup to big: #01824306



i'm not sure i made myself quite clear.....i just make a
track and after [plus i make sure i played the whole track
not one pattern] i render the whole track. not while working
on a track.


 

online big from lsg on 2006-01-22 07:30 [#01824318]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Followup to impakt: #01824314 | Show recordbag



i cant find out what impulse reverb is exactly


 

online big from lsg on 2006-01-22 07:31 [#01824320]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Followup to obara: #01824317 | Show recordbag



ok, the problem is these days im putting all the effects on
while working on the track


 

offline impakt from where we do not speak of! on 2006-01-22 07:34 [#01824321]
Points: 5764 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01824318 | Show recordbag



A convolution reverb is a plugin for sound editors like
Digital Performer, ProTools, Logic and Cubase VST. It is a
room simulator and it works with samples from real acoustic
spaces. These spaces are 'captured' using a special sweep
tone played by a speaker and recorded by microphones in the
actual space, or by firing an alarm pistol and recording
that with microphones. A convolution reverb adds the same
sound to any sound that it is used on as what the room did
to the gunshot or sweep. This sample is called an impulse
response, in short: IR.

In other words you get a good digital clone of the reverb
effect in any hall, reverb-unit and whatnot you record the
impulse from.


 

offline futureimage from buy FIR from Juno (United Kingdom) on 2006-01-22 10:04 [#01824461]
Points: 6427 Status: Lurker | Followup to stilaktive: #01824268



You should hear some of Impakt's stuff. When I found out it
was FL, I was blown away.


 

online big from lsg on 2006-01-22 10:09 [#01824468]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



what was bad about fruity again (exept the plugins) did it
miss some frequencies?


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-01-22 10:17 [#01824477]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01824468



By default the levels of all channels are turned down a bit,
which makes people think it doesn't sound as good because it
isn't as loud. The human ear hears midrange much better than
bass and treble, so having the volume lower gives the
illusion the sound is flatter or duller.

Solution - either turn up the volume on your computer, or
turn up the levels on each instrument channel to 100% in the
channel palette.

(if you export a track to wav and it's too quiet / dull you
can normalize it in a wave editor)


Attached picture

 

online big from lsg on 2006-01-22 10:36 [#01824492]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



do you mean that this button is on 78%?

i think this is weird. but for the sound quality it doesn't
matter then


Attached picture

 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2006-01-22 10:37 [#01824493]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular | Followup to fleetmouse: #01824477



why not put a compressor on master in F9 at the beginning of
work on a track ? instead of turning all the instrument
knobs. seems a bit easier to me.


 

online big from lsg on 2006-01-22 10:42 [#01824499]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



oh, it means the same button

still this is weird. so you always turn up those buttons?


 

offline exsub from United Kingdom on 2006-01-22 10:46 [#01824508]
Points: 524 Status: Lurker



stilaktive
hahaha..

I personally use tracktion. I used cubase sx3 but i fucking
hate that FUCKING thing now, so yes, i'm all tracktion. I
might get FL 6 if it's decent and use it with ReWire
(incombination with tracktion 2)


 

offline exsub from United Kingdom on 2006-01-22 10:52 [#01824518]
Points: 524 Status: Lurker



big

you dont always need to use reverb, a simple mono delay
coupeled witha chorus will sound as good and it doesn't make
the mix sound muddy. Of course, you also save a lot of CPU
in the process.

For me personally, i'm off to KVR to get a shit/extremly low
cpu reverb.

Currently i use Ozone and it just feeds off my processor
like a huge fat CPU intensive pig who hasn't eaton for a
long long time.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-01-22 10:55 [#01824520]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Big: not the same knob. Use the ojne in the channel
palette.

Putting a compressor on the master instead of adjusting your
levels is what give tracks the characteristic overcompressed
FruityLoops sound, lacking in dynamics.

You can save channel presets with the volume turned up, or
save a song template.

Or you can simply turn the sound card's volume up to hear
better, and worry about the level of the track after you've
exported it to wav - normalize, compress, whatever you like.


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2006-01-22 11:05 [#01824527]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



"tracks the characteristic overcompressed
FruityLoops sound"

- when using the old floops compressor - right

but there are plenty of other compressors on kvr for example
that work just perfectly. especially multiband's


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2006-01-22 11:14 [#01824538]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



so is this cracked yet? :P


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2006-01-22 11:23 [#01824551]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to hedphukkerr: #01824538



nope


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2006-01-22 11:23 [#01824554]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



i mean not yet


 

online big from lsg on 2006-01-22 11:29 [#01824562]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01824520 | Show recordbag



but it means the same thing, if you turn one of those knobs
highlighted in our pictures the other will turn as well


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-01-22 12:15 [#01824585]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01824562



Oh? Then they've changed it. It used to be that they were
separate - you'd use the volume in the channel palette to
set overall sound and the other one to record your volume
automation. I installed the FL6 update but haven't used it
much.


 

online big from lsg on 2006-01-22 12:23 [#01824590]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



im talking about 5 though, didn't you get confused by the
volume on the misc tab of the channel settings, i thought
you were talking about that to begin with: i've read you tip
like three times now:D


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2006-01-22 14:23 [#01824656]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker



Another great thing about FL Studio 6 is that it can also be
used as... a hat.


Attached picture

 

offline geraldine on 2006-01-22 14:49 [#01824679]
Points: 164 Status: Regular



omg loll


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-01-22 14:56 [#01824687]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



omg loll


 


Messageboard index