architecture - gardening doubt | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
recycle
...and 670 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614121
Today 4
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
architecture - gardening doubt
 

offline nacmat on 2006-01-22 04:19 [#01824218]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



I am working in a building and I would want to put trees in
the last floor of it (flat roof)
I wonder how much depth do I need to put really big trees
(pines)


 

offline nacmat on 2006-01-22 04:53 [#01824227]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



LAZY_TITLE


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-01-22 04:56 [#01824230]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



You don't want to put trees on the roof. Believe me, the
roots grow to be massive and they destroy the building.
Costs millions to repair. There was a trend in vancouver to
build buildings with rooftop gardens with trees, and now all
the buildings are falling apart and leaking.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-01-22 04:57 [#01824231]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



Well, its up to you whether or not you want to. It just
strikes me as being a mistake. Albeit an estheticaly
pleasing mistake.


 

offline nacmat on 2006-01-22 04:58 [#01824232]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



LAZY_TITLE


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-01-22 04:59 [#01824233]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



If you do go ahead with that plan, keep in mind that the
root system for the tree grows at least as far underground
as the part of the tree that grows above ground, and it
spreads out, not just down.


 

offline nacmat on 2006-01-22 05:00 [#01824235]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #01824231



I am not sure, thats why I am asking

I have thought of an estructural system that would give the
trees 1.5 metres of depth to grow, but I wonder if that
would be enough


 

offline nacmat on 2006-01-22 05:02 [#01824236]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #01824233



are you sure about that?

Imagine a 15 metre pine, it grows 15 mteres underground too?


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-01-22 05:03 [#01824238]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



It would be best to consult someone who's specialty is
trees. They will most likely be able to tell you what kind
of tree needs the least ammount of space for its roots.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-01-22 05:05 [#01824241]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



Not straight down, but I was told once that trees have equal
lenghts of root as it does branches.

I just know it was a topic of conversation about the
buildings downtown here, because even the small 6 or 7 foot
tall trees are tearing the buildings apart. They have to
regularly take them out and redo concrete, because the roots
are stronger.


 

offline nacmat on 2006-01-22 05:09 [#01824244]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #01824241



interesting

fortunately this building wont be built, its only a proyect
for a proyect idea prize

I thought of a system of huge beams very close together so
they can accommodate the sand for the trees... but I must
think of it if it really is not possible


 

offline ymenard on 2006-01-22 15:54 [#01824721]
Points: 1001 Status: Regular



There's tons of book on rooftop architecture. It should be
in any Architectural firm library that wants to do such
things. A simple amazon search will give you lots of hints.
After that it's up to you. Are you an architect? You
should know these things. Anyway your question is pretty
vague, there is much more information to be known to give
you *any* kind of answer.

(I work as a urban landscape architect)


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2006-01-22 16:41 [#01824745]
Points: 12426 Status: Regular



A few words from our friend Marcin:

depends what kind of beams you wantto use. structural
concrete should be good for the roof system, at least mark
B60. depends on what type of roof youre thinking about
aswell. simple concrete beam is purely not enough.you would
rather like to have some kind of slabs there, i would say at
least 200mm thick.with that, you can avoid beams,but a
pocket in wall has to be provided to protund steel from slab
to walls anyway, just to keep the stability. if it is you
whos doing a design of that,you should consult that idea,as
it was said before, with someone who knows a lot about
trees. notice that most of buildings of this kind have only
bushes / small trees on the roof. 15m is a big load,whats
worse,its centralized. you should avoid centralized loads on
roof anyway. the wind does the troubles anyway,but in this
case,the part of design consisting that trees should be
treated as a completely different part of calculations,with
summary results that should be considered as an addiction to
the whole design. thats for the organization of whole
thing.

if you are about to do a design,in which i solely doubt, you
would rather like to increase your CAD skills before tryin
even to sketch such a thing. its absolutely not about the
deepnes of the roof system. its about live loads, and
calculations which should provide stability and LOW
DEFLECTION, which is MOST IMPORTANT if were about to talk
about trees on a roof. since you have NO IDEA about that, as
i believe,you better contact some engineering company and
try to put the idea on the table. avoid talking about your
own addictions to the idea,as it would absolutely detsroy
whole building,and people inside. spanish architecture might
be good when it comes to idea of beeing a NACHO MODERN
ARCHITECT YADA YADA,but you should avoid engineering
problems as hard as you can.no good for anyone. thats my
advice. thank you.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-01-22 17:14 [#01824761]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



i didn't realize there were so many architects here. neat.



 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2006-01-22 17:19 [#01824762]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular



lol


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2006-01-22 17:24 [#01824763]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker



I'm almost 100% sure that most roots are only a few
millimeters under the soil, even in very large trees, and I
think you should definetly put a lot of very very tall trees
on top of a house right away. Any REAL architects would
agree with me.


 

online big from lsg on 2006-01-22 17:27 [#01824765]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



marcin wants you to put enforced concrete trees on the house


 

offline horsefactory from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2006-01-22 17:36 [#01824768]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular



You should grow trees from the underside of the roof,
pointing downwards into the rooms of the house, also.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-01-22 17:51 [#01824778]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



hilarious attachment


Attached picture

 

offline nacmat on 2006-01-22 17:53 [#01824779]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to ymenard: #01824721



vague?

I just wanted to know how much depth do i need to grow big
trees (so that they have enough space for roots)

the rest is my problem, I am only asking about the trees

I did a lot of google searching ... but roots dont seem to
be an issue for the internet


 

offline nacmat on 2006-01-22 17:54 [#01824780]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to horsefactory: #01824768



hqhahahahha great idea!


 

offline QRDL from Poland on 2006-01-22 18:06 [#01824785]
Points: 2838 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01824778



Yep, very funny


 

online big from lsg on 2006-01-22 18:08 [#01824786]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Followup to Dannn_: #01824763 | Show recordbag



no way, that's like just one brand of tree


 

offline nacmat on 2006-01-22 18:14 [#01824790]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



I gave up the idea, aparently pines have roots that go too
deep and wide

I ll go for smaller trees (1,5m depth is enough for lots of
species) and also I ll leave some pines in their original
site, trespassing the building


 

offline nacmat on 2006-01-22 18:18 [#01824792]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01824778



nice pic!


 

offline ymenard on 2006-01-23 09:36 [#01825131]
Points: 1001 Status: Regular



Sorry for the vague thing... it's just that there's lots of
problematic occuring in putting gardens on rooftops. What
is a pine for you? There's several of them :) And what
kind of building? How high is it? Is there any
surroundings? Urban or rural architecture? Is there more
just trees? What kind of flat roof? Working on a
building... so you're an arch? A drafter? How far is the
whole thing, is it just a design or building plans?

That's why I wrote vague :-D


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-01-23 18:36 [#01825703]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I know nothing about architecture, but if you had a shitload
of money, wouldn't it be possible to encase the dirt in
steel? I don't know if the roots would get a hold of the
steel, but then as a secondary precaution, I'd make the
steel box raised from the rest of the building (suspended on
lots of tiny pillars.. just a few inches), and if I had lots
and lots of money, the third precaution would be to make the
compartement between the building and the box a vacuum and
have things that sensed a change in air pressure so that if
a root broke through the steel, it'd give off an alarm
before the root got to any particular part of the building..
then you could just remove the root and weld the hole shut.


 

offline QRDL from Poland on 2006-01-23 18:55 [#01825708]
Points: 2838 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01825703



I would use hot molten lava instead of vacuum.


 

offline nacmat on 2006-01-23 19:50 [#01825739]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to ymenard: #01825131



building:

imagine down town. in a big city (madrid): the border
between the urban texture and an big park

right in the border I locate the building, its only two
floors, but as the floor in the park is inclined, my roof is
at the same heigh as the street level

the park itself has lots of diferent trees (its an english
garden, you know what I mean, not french)

the building is a library with some other art happenings in
it... kind of a cultural centre
and I designed it in a way that its roof is some kind of
balcony from the town to the park

I am not putting big trees in the roog anymore


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-01-24 00:26 [#01825803]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular



put some monkeys, dude.


 

offline QRDL from Poland on 2006-01-24 01:18 [#01825812]
Points: 2838 Status: Lurker



I don't see how monkeys can solve the problem of roots, but
they sure would make a nice addition to lava.


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-01-24 03:22 [#01825863]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular



I'm thinking about VERY BIG MONKEYS.
Something the size of gorillas...


 

offline AK47 on 2006-01-24 03:52 [#01825878]
Points: 386 Status: Lurker



Check out Feng Shui on internet site for type of trees and
placement as you want to create a people space firstly.


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-01-24 03:54 [#01825880]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular



People? No way, dude.
That building should be exclusive for REALLY BIG MONKEYS!!!


 

offline nacmat on 2006-01-24 09:05 [#01826007]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



I will only listen to unabomber´s suggerstions from now on


 

offline QRDL from Poland on 2006-01-24 10:14 [#01826052]
Points: 2838 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #01826007



What does Feng Shui say about the placement of lava pond?


 

offline nacmat on 2006-01-24 10:25 [#01826062]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to QRDL: #01826052



I dont like feng shui spirit sorry


 

offline QRDL from Poland on 2006-01-24 11:01 [#01826089]
Points: 2838 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #01826062



I would never accuse you of liking it.


 


Messageboard index