the problem with electronic music | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 341 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614116
Today 2
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
the problem with electronic music
 

offline aphextriplet from your mothers bedroom (United Kingdom) on 2006-01-02 08:19 [#01810345]
Points: 4731 Status: Lurker




these days its inaudible garbage thanks to everyone trying
to push the boundaries. I preferred it when they included
melodies and structure. I know, it's probably old fashioned
and uncool to like music that doesn't make your ears bleed
or leave you wondering if your cd is scratched or not. Give
me amber or hard normal daddy, you can take back untilted
and 2/3 of aphex twins entire catalogue.




 

offline aphextriplet from your mothers bedroom (United Kingdom) on 2006-01-02 08:19 [#01810348]
Points: 4731 Status: Lurker



< /rant>


 

offline oyvinto on 2006-01-02 08:20 [#01810352]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



welcome to 2006


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2006-01-02 08:23 [#01810355]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker | Followup to aphextriplet: #01810345



No, no, no. They need to push the boundaries in different
ways. And make some dancefloor jams!


 

offline glasseater from Switzerland on 2006-01-02 08:32 [#01810368]
Points: 531 Status: Regular



hung up, im hunging back on you !


 

offline -crazone from smashing acid over and over on 2006-01-02 08:56 [#01810387]
Points: 11234 Status: Lurker | Followup to aphextriplet: #01810345 | Show recordbag



they still make electronic music with melodies and
structure..they call it trance or techno..what ever you
like.


 

offline furoi from Udine (Eriko Sato's undies) (Italy) on 2006-01-02 09:10 [#01810393]
Points: 1706 Status: Lurker



anyone likes different things as different artists do
electronic in they own way
i


 

offline Exaph from United Kingdom on 2006-01-02 09:15 [#01810398]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker



i know what you mean, id love to hear some of autechre's
older stuff. id be happy to buy it.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2006-01-02 09:16 [#01810399]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to aphextriplet: #01810345 | Show recordbag



Dad, get off of the Internet!


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-01-02 09:22 [#01810404]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



i agree with aphextriplet! it is high time these artists
stop making interesting art and start re-doing everything
that's already been done! god damn it, the whole reason i
got into aphex twin was because i fully expected him to move
towards trance anthems! he isn't doing what i wanted!
outrageous!


 

offline QRDL from Poland on 2006-01-02 09:24 [#01810407]
Points: 2838 Status: Lurker



I prefer it as it is now.


 

offline Chri5py from my Solarbear (United Kingdom) on 2006-01-02 09:49 [#01810426]
Points: 2903 Status: Lurker



I prefer to listen to music I like. I don't give a shit who
created it.


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2006-01-02 09:51 [#01810428]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker



the problem is that there's no grayspace anymore. you can be
successful, but you will likely sacrifice some artistic
control and street cred if you do so, and you can be
artistic, but you likely to never make a dime let alone be
heard. and if you're not on one end of the spectrum then
everyone complains for you to move to one side or the other.
experimentalism is good, but i can't listen to splatters of
sound effects for hours on end.


 

offline hanal from k_maty only (United Kingdom) on 2006-01-02 09:54 [#01810430]
Points: 13379 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i like old and new but mostly vagina


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2006-01-02 09:55 [#01810431]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker | Followup to Oddioblender: #01810428



I agree.

The music industry automatically makes anyone in it a
hypocrite.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2006-01-02 09:56 [#01810433]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to hanal: #01810430



same herre


 

offline Chihiro from twins land on 2006-01-02 10:12 [#01810443]
Points: 4650 Status: Regular



the thing is... if all electronic musicians were making the
same stuff over and over again... there wouldnt be many
electro records in shops. Im glad that music evolves...
structures are much harder to percieve nowdays. I say
invent a new style... no rules... as long as there is
something moving that pleases the ear... : )

music doesn't have to be structured in my opinion


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2006-01-02 10:23 [#01810446]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker



I wanna hear more innovate dancefloor tracks. ike "Rocker"
by Alter Ego. That was so fuckin' fresh and it even ended up
being played in cheesy dance clubs. (Usually as a crappy
trance remix.)


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2006-01-02 11:41 [#01810488]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker



I think experimentalyness gets a bit annoying... seems tough
to get signed unless you can be described in a way that
makes you sound unique... people like Wisp get slammed.

the opposite happens in hiphop, its either going for the
lowest common denominator, or trying to recreate the old
days. And that whole scene has gone boring


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2006-01-02 11:54 [#01810491]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker



I like it when something is innovative and accessable. Like
the early house and techno records, it was new but people
went nuts for it.
I'm gonna get shit for saying this, but a lot of two-step
garage records between '98-'01 had that sort of fresh feel
to them.


 

offline impakt from where we do not speak of! on 2006-01-02 11:57 [#01810492]
Points: 5764 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Fuck what everyone thinks, make 10 different albums in 10
different styles!


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2006-01-02 12:01 [#01810493]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to impakt: #01810492



Make one album in your own style.


 

offline impakt from where we do not speak of! on 2006-01-02 12:04 [#01810494]
Points: 5764 Status: Lurker | Followup to JivverDicker: #01810493 | Show recordbag



Everyone doesn't have their own style or want to be limited
by it...


 

offline impakt from where we do not speak of! on 2006-01-02 12:06 [#01810495]
Points: 5764 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



But everyone puts their own signature-feel on the style
they're working with.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2006-01-02 12:09 [#01810496]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to impakt: #01810495



Nah, that's a cop out.


 

offline impakt from where we do not speak of! on 2006-01-02 12:10 [#01810497]
Points: 5764 Status: Lurker | Followup to JivverDicker: #01810496 | Show recordbag



No, it's not.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2006-01-02 12:12 [#01810499]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to impakt: #01810497



Yes it is.


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2006-01-02 12:24 [#01810501]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker | Followup to swears: #01810491



"1999's heavy-rotation pirate smash is Architechs'
unofficial 2-step remix of Brandy & Monica's "The Boy Is
Mine," which resurrects hardcore's infamous sped-up chipmunk
vocals by whipping the dueting divas into a creamy warble of
wobbly, high-pitched melisma. [9] But 2-step's favorite R&B
goddess is Aaliyah, whose Timbaland-produced "One In A
Million" has been extensively pillaged. [10] Best of the
bunch is Groove Chronicles's "Stone Cold", which samples a
handful of vocal phrases ("you don't know/what you do to
me," "desire," and other splinters of yearning) and deploys
them to create endlessly fresh accents against the groove.
The original song's mood is totally subverted: what had been
a devotional paean becomes a baleful ballad of sexual
dependency, with Aaliyah digitally dis-integrated into a
multitracked wraith of herself, stranded in a locked groove
of desolated desire."

Simon Reynolds writing about 2step.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2006-01-02 12:26 [#01810503]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



impakt and jivver discuss electronic music


Attached picture

 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2006-01-02 12:27 [#01810505]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular



He's behind you!


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2006-01-02 12:28 [#01810506]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to swears: #01810501



His blissblog is great.


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2006-01-02 12:29 [#01810507]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker | Followup to swears: #01810491



there's good in any genre, you just have to find it, which
can be tough.


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2006-01-02 12:32 [#01810509]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker | Followup to JivverDicker: #01810506



Indeed it is.

Anyway, the problem with electronica is that it is "head
music" for sitting around listening to. We need some freaky
dance floor music girls can get into. People on this board
talk about all these shifting micro-genres like "Breakcore"
(ugh) or "Noise" or whatever.
It's all the same shit: BOY MUSIC.


 

offline oyvinto on 2006-01-02 12:34 [#01810511]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01810503 | Show recordbag



jivver on the left i assume?


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2006-01-02 12:37 [#01810515]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker | Followup to swears: #01810509



that's a excellent point, and i agree. what's the point of
music if it doesn't move you? i was at an autechre show last
year, a very good show, and i swear i was one of only eight
people dancing, because all the other people were busy just
sitting there staring at them and ogling in their holy IDM
light or whatever.

the problem is that getting the kind of non-reserved people
who dance to this kind of music requires breaking into a
less artistic environment, and many are too stubborn to
realize that so they keep making "Art." That's actually how
GWAR came about, they were a group of art students who were
pissed off that people couldn't take a joke, or their dirty
satire anyways, and they joined with a punk band and did
their own thing. Now people worship them.

Art, in the end, must be appreciated by someone besides the
creator, or else it's simply functionless.


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2006-01-02 12:41 [#01810519]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker



Yeah. You have cheesy shit like Trance or Breakcore that
people dance to, and that's okay for them, but musically it
sucks. Then you have all the "experimental" stuff (a lot of
which isn't that experimental) which is okay to listen to on
the bus, but would clear the floor in a nightclub.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2006-01-02 12:45 [#01810521]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to swears: #01810509



I agree, you do hear a lot of people fawning over an
imaginary girlfriend that loves IDM and appreciates their
'weirdness'. It's not my idea of fun having some skeletal
lank haired IDM girl stroking my spotty cheeks in time to
7/13 blips.


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2006-01-02 12:49 [#01810523]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker | Followup to JivverDicker: #01810521



Yeah, I like regular, fun girls that aren't interested in
"artsy" pursuits.


 

offline QRDL from Poland on 2006-01-02 12:53 [#01810525]
Points: 2838 Status: Lurker | Followup to swears: #01810519



So? Where's the problem? There is music to serve both
goals.

Why the fuck listening to Autechre is worse than dancing to
Autechre?

What do you all want to say? I totally don't get it. As I
see it, every artist has his own way. If he wants to make
house for money, let him earn his doe, if Autechre or the
glitchmakers want to stay underground and twid their knobs,
I don't see a problem with that.If you can't see any music
in the middleground, than the only problem is the narrowness
of your middleground.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2006-01-02 12:56 [#01810526]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to Oddioblender: #01810515



"what's the point of music if it doesn't move you?"

then again, when does music move you? when you dance to it?
when it makes you happy? when you enjoy it in your own way?

who the fuck are you to tell me or anyone how we should
listen and experience music?

I'm getting pretty tired of the You-Must-Dance-Gestapo
trying to make it sound as if that's the Correct Way To
Enjoy Music.
dance if you want to, don't dance if you don't want to and
shut the fuck up about it already.


 

offline QRDL from Poland on 2006-01-02 12:58 [#01810527]
Points: 2838 Status: Lurker



So what purpose would this hipothetical dance-inducing music
with some artistical qualities serve if you don't need your
imaginary IDM-appreciating girls. Where did they come from
anyway?


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2006-01-02 12:58 [#01810528]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



NexGen.


Attached picture

 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2006-01-02 13:02 [#01810530]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker | Followup to qrter: #01810526



I don't know about Oddioblender but...

Yes, there are loads of "head music" IDM records we enjoy.
But it would be really refreshing if there were more
IDM-style tracks for the dancefloor. It would be fun and
interesting, that's all.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2006-01-02 13:11 [#01810531]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



I know! It's like classical music, come on, sex it up, stick
some beats in. That William Orbit had the right idea, make
ladies move to electronikakakakakaka......

There's loads of music out there meets your criteria of
Intelligent Dance Music. But there's no point picking on
certain artists who don't provide the service you require
and suggesting that they change to become this one,
amorphous sexy - music - with - a - twist -that -even-
*gasp* - girls - like is... as qrter says, a bit tiring and
is only going to lead to frustration for everyone
involved
.


 

offline disasemble from United States on 2006-01-02 13:13 [#01810532]
Points: 1448 Status: Regular | Followup to swears: #01810530



t.raumschmiere
portable
[a]pendics.shuffle
geoff white
sutekh
twerk
jetone
tresor
basic channel
monolake
vladislav delay
luomo
anders ilar
akufen
kompakt
traum
dB
frivolous
audion
mikkel metal
theo parrish

to name a very small few.

all of these artists, to some degree or another, have
apparent "idm" stylings to their music. some more minimal,
some more melodic, some more dubby, but it still has that
focus. and its all dance floor oriented.


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2006-01-02 13:26 [#01810535]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker | Followup to disasemble: #01810532



Yeah, I like some these guys. (Although some of it is just
straight up techno) I'm talking about stuff that is very
danceable and very innovative at the same time. I guess I
have high expectations.

What I'm saying is, if the overall emphasis of electronica
shifted towards the dancefloor rather than home listening
(which could happen) it would be well, exiciting. Nobody is
suggesting throwing all your WATMM compilations in the bin.

Look at the electro scene:

1998: it's Daniel Rother and IF, great tunes but no one
gives a fuck.

2002: It's International Deejay Gigolos, Felix the Housecat,
girls, drugs, and some of the best nights out I've ever
had.



 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2006-01-02 13:42 [#01810539]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to qrter: #01810526



HaHa! Can't you see something special in 'tainted love' for
example? An unrequited love song (even though it is a
motown track), I can appreciate it for the sounds used and
listen again and again but... you could play it at a
wedding and your mum and dad would love it too. I can
listen to daft noises all day but it's something else if you
can 'dance' to it. The Gigolo example is a perfect one.


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2006-01-02 13:51 [#01810542]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker



http://robocop.ytmnsfw.com/


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2006-01-02 13:52 [#01810543]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker



Or the other way around.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2006-01-02 14:16 [#01810558]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



We should be proud of "electronic music", it spans the chin
stroking experimental home listening up to the dancefloor
party jams (I can't believe I just said that). I think I
know where young Swears is coming from in his argument, that
for electronic music to remain vital it needs to move out of
the ghetto. But at the same time, I think that is already
happening, always happened before and will continue to
occur, I believe that there's loads of different music under
the very broad term "electronic" music.

I also agree that when you mix something innovative and
danceable the results can be beyond teh awesome and give you
faith not only in music but that perhaps humanity isn't
completely lost. One thinks of perhaps obvious examples like
teh Windowlicker, teh Tied Up, teh Blue Monday, teh Tour de
France, teh Cybotron's Clear... ooh bugger it all.


 


Messageboard index