Accessibility of Music | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 316 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614116
Today 2
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Accessibility of Music
 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2005-11-16 14:29 [#01779695]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



Does anyone have any thoughts on the accessibility of
music?

I'm talking about music which we don't "get" right away, or
cannot fully appreciate either because it sounds too simple
or too noisy/random/complex upon first exposure.

To some degree, this is culturally relative. One
composition which one person can not enjoy until they listen
many times and adapt to the patterns/style may be easily
accessible to another, especially if the patters are more
common in the popular music of their cultural environment.

But I would like to know what, if anything, makes music more
or less moving, captivating--makes you want to pay attention
and think about it or feel it rather than tune
out--regardless of ones cultural experience.

I'll suggest complexity. Perhaps there is a universal range
of complexity within which humans are physiologically
equipped to appreciate or understand to be music and not
random noise. The further away from the average or outside
of the range a composition is the more exposure a person
would need before they could adapt to it--and before they
could appreciate it without effort.



 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-11-16 14:32 [#01779698]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



adapting to and letting music grow on you sucks. if you
don't like it, you don't like it, and that should be enough.
why torment yourself when you don't like it?


 

offline euphonicfilter from illadelphia (United States) on 2005-11-16 14:33 [#01779699]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict



i said that last week and people on this board LOST it

my point was that my life is too short to fuck w/ bad music
- next


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-11-16 14:34 [#01779703]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to euphonicfilter: #01779699 | Show recordbag



that's just because they've spent too much time getting used
to stuff and want to justify their actions.


 

offline euphonicfilter from illadelphia (United States) on 2005-11-16 14:35 [#01779705]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict



and they get mad when i dont think everything autechre shits
out is life altering


 

offline euphonicfilter from illadelphia (United States) on 2005-11-16 14:37 [#01779709]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict



albums get 3 listens from me, TOPS - after that, shelved,
thrown away, used as an ashtray / frisbee / plate, etc

some argue that because i do this that means im a simple
human being (simple minded is the usual attack) which i
disagree with but i hardly feel the need to let electronic
kids hurt my feelings or ego...dig


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-11-16 14:38 [#01779712]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to euphonicfilter: #01779709 | Show recordbag



even albums you like?


 

offline euphonicfilter from illadelphia (United States) on 2005-11-16 14:40 [#01779719]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict



no - i mean before i decide if i keep them or not


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-11-16 14:41 [#01779721]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to euphonicfilter: #01779719 | Show recordbag



ah. carry on.


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2005-11-16 14:45 [#01779724]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular | Followup to euphonicfilter: #01779705



autechre don't shit out their records. it's the record
company which releases them.


 

offline clint from Silencio... (United Kingdom) on 2005-11-16 14:47 [#01779726]
Points: 3447 Status: Lurker



Hmmm, I can't imagine listening like that, I would never
have listened to my fave albums if I'd thrown them away
after a couple of listens...


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2005-11-16 14:51 [#01779732]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to euphonicfilter: #01779705



your just building a "straw man" and torching it up...
perhaps because people on this board tend to legitimate
flammable stawmen?

i don't think there is anything wrong with your approach to
music. but i think it's a bit stupid if you think that
everyone who doesn't follow your three listens policy is
unwise. there are a countless ways to enjoy music and i
think lowly of anyone who wants everyone to obey their
personal way. we have enough damned puppets in this world i
see no need to promote monoculture.

and my point is that "bad music" might be a relative term.
do you really believe that your brain's response to music is
the ultimate measure of how good/bad a piece of music is?
this is kind of worthless ideology that fuels intolerance
the world over.


 

offline euphonicfilter from illadelphia (United States) on 2005-11-16 14:56 [#01779734]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict



i wasnt saying anyone needs to follow my example, quite the
opposite

i was saying people shouldnt expect me to listen the way
they do


 

offline euphonicfilter from illadelphia (United States) on 2005-11-16 14:57 [#01779735]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict



i get jumped on like a pretty girl at a star trek convention
when i say that the new BOC

"isn't good"

pure and simple


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-11-16 15:25 [#01779747]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



*jumps on euphonicfilter*


 

offline vlari from beyond the valley of the LOLs on 2005-11-16 15:26 [#01779749]
Points: 13915 Status: Regular | Followup to euphonicfilter: #01779735



jivver, tolstoyed and qrter did a far better job than you at
it


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2005-11-16 15:34 [#01779761]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



what's worse, being irritated with people who don't share
your tastes, or being irritated with people who are
irritated that you don't share their tastes?

i believe that music possesses no meaningful features; all
features are created by the listener (but are frequently
attributed to the music itself). human beings agree about
most things, so not surprisingly they often agree on the
"good and bad" in music, especially when they share
programming.

more interestingly, there are some individuals who have a
strong reaction to music, and some who have no strong
reactions to music, who share the same cultural programming
and agree about most things.

i try to avoid kneejerk reactions to music because i've seen
myself change my mind many times.

this post isn't 100% accurate but it's close enough.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2005-11-16 15:35 [#01779762]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #01779695



Who cares


 

offline Torture Garden from Feelin' 2Pacish on 2005-11-16 15:55 [#01779773]
Points: 974 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #01779695



There is no torment involved in listening to music I don't
like. Initial curiousity often leads to enjoyment and I
don't really see a problem either, it's just natural. Do you
have a right to tell people how to listen to music?


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2005-11-16 16:09 [#01779780]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



i think 3 listens is fair.

i often don't even give that. but sometimes, sometimes
something will sneak in after 3 listens. rarely though.

goes both ways though. sometimes i might like something on
1 listen and on the 3rd i'm sick of it.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2005-11-16 16:18 [#01779786]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to evolume: #01779780



I don't think accessibility has anything to do with the
music. It all has to do with the person. The music itself
isn't accessible or inaccessible, the person is.


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2005-11-16 16:20 [#01779787]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker



sometimes you just dont want to listen to it a second time,
so why force it. it needs some redeeming features. then
again sometimes these can come from recommendations etc and
not the music itself


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2005-11-16 18:46 [#01779816]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



both people and music exist in the world, which is decidedly
not a vacuum and thus i don't think it can be said that all
of the features of music are in the head of the listener,
nor are they all to be found in the piece of music
itself.... it is always a dialogue, and the things that draw
us to music and keep us away from it are always a result of
our relative orientation to one another (me and the music
that is)... not very conclusive i know. i guess i just think
there isn't a good answer for this question. i like Torture
Garden's point about bad music not necessarily being an
unpleasant experience.


 


Messageboard index