did the trees... | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 318 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614116
Today 2
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
did the trees...
 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2005-11-14 05:45 [#01777410]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



...in the garden of eden have age rings?


Attached picture

 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-11-14 05:48 [#01777411]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



7


 

offline yann_g from now on 2005-11-14 05:55 [#01777414]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker



well 1 year is the time the erath takes for 1 revolution
around the sun, so if the garden of eden was on earth then
yes.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-11-14 06:00 [#01777420]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict



salut


 

offline yann_g from now on 2005-11-14 06:39 [#01777436]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #01777420



bien?


 

offline uzim on 2005-11-14 06:43 [#01777437]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



good question, ask your local priest about it.

personally i don't believe in those things, and i'm really
glad to know (or at least, believe) that above sky there is
space, not heaven... i can't be certain of anything, but now
i really don't get anymore how christians can feel
comfortable in believing what the bible says, believing in a
god that would have all and every power over them, and would
-just one example, there are dozens of them- change a woman
into a statue of salt just because she turned over to
watch
a city being destroyed by him. tell me now, how
fucked up and wrong (not to mention silly) is that?.. i
don't think this is more likely to be real than any other
religion, legend, fairy tale or whatever just because
millions and millions of people believe it and have believed
in it for a very long time.


 

offline kaen from the magical land of moo (United Kingdom) on 2005-11-14 06:47 [#01777438]
Points: 154 Status: Lurker



there is no god, only watmm.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2005-11-14 06:59 [#01777440]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Fools. The Invisible Pink Unicorn created the cosmos with
the appearance of age. It was actually created last
Thursday.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-11-14 07:21 [#01777447]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01777440 | Show recordbag



yes, because ridiculing people is the best way of
criticizing. way to go. you probably enjoyed that guy who
said that if people believe in god they may just as well
believe in a large flying spaghetti man. yay argument go.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-11-14 07:21 [#01777448]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01777447 | Show recordbag



sorry, I get annoyed at stuff that annoys me.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-11-14 07:42 [#01777454]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to kaen: #01777438



tre bien, merci


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-11-14 07:42 [#01777456]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to redrum: #01777454



err, followup to yann_g. kthx


 

offline yann_g from now on 2005-11-14 07:42 [#01777457]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01777440



wow now that's impressive!


 

offline yann_g from now on 2005-11-14 07:43 [#01777458]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #01777456



damn i thought you changed your friend. i shitted in my
pants! brb


 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-11-14 07:47 [#01777461]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker | Followup to uzim: #01777437



Well, I suppose you could view religious texts as mythical,
life-affirming spiritual truths that use fantastical stories
as representations of basic truths about "God"...

I know a fair few intelligent Christians who can reconcille
their faith with what the majority of scientists believe and
have reasonable explinations for believing what they do.

Sorry to take this thread astray! Just thought that needed
saying.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2005-11-14 07:47 [#01777462]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01777447



He asks if trees in the garden of eden had rings and you're
telling me the invisible pink unicorn is ridiculous?

They're perfectly isomorphic examples of nonsense.


 

offline yann_g from now on 2005-11-14 07:57 [#01777464]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker | Followup to CS2x: #01777461



well that's just the only way church could use to keep the
faith in their believers. once they're proven wrong by
science they wait a few years and say "yes but actually it's
all just symbols". when it was written it was a bunch of
hypothesis about the creation of earth, and a tool to
organize society with rules that are not meant to be
crossed. i guess god just represents the knowledge we're not
able to reach in a lifetime, or something like that. maybe
there is a god who created earth and all that, we'll probly
never know (or maybe when we die) but what we know for sure
is that religions were the creations of humans, and
therefore cannot be healthily trusted.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-11-14 07:58 [#01777465]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01777462 | Show recordbag



well, I didn't react to you in this setting. I just reacted
to the stupid reply to anything that has to do with
christianity. I'm not going into this again, however, so
carry on. I've stated my mind.


 

offline yann_g from now on 2005-11-14 07:59 [#01777467]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker | Followup to yann_g: #01777464



one should read "a few _hundred_ years", sorry.


 

offline yann_g from now on 2005-11-14 08:00 [#01777468]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01777447



LOL @ the spaghetti man.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2005-11-14 08:01 [#01777469]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01777465



Just for the record I have nothing against Christianity,
only against fundamentalist / literalist interpretations of
the Bible that fail to place clearly mythical accounts into
a cultural context.


 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-11-14 08:03 [#01777471]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker | Followup to yann_g: #01777464



Even if religions are purely the work of humans with no
spiritual intervention at all, why can't we learn something
from them and enjoy what they have to offer?

I don't like to view things in a purely dry, mathematical
and "accurate" scientific way. I'm not saying you do at all,
but sometimes the ideas of religions are beneficial for your
worldview; viewing the world through myths, poetry, stories
and exaggerated opposites has its place, imho.



 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-11-14 08:16 [#01777481]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker | Followup to CS2x: #01777471



That said, I do believe it is important to rely on the
scientific method. I'm not supporting belief in young earth
creationism or any such nonsense. But I think it is possible
to accept scientific facts about the universe, yet also view
people, life, and the world in a more fantastical, poetic
sense. Religion is merely an expression of this, imho.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2005-11-14 08:20 [#01777483]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to fleetmouse: #01777440 | Show recordbag



You can tell which posts are part of this illusion and not
created by any living person: They're the ones with black,
non-clickable, user names.


 

offline yann_g from now on 2005-11-14 08:24 [#01777484]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker | Followup to CS2x: #01777471



sure, but there are many atheist philosophers that spread
what's good in religions. the justice/legislative(does that
word make sense?) systems are meant to replace many codes
written in the holy books. like don't kill etc. fact is that
people/societies evolve. religions are far away from
up-to-date. they're irrelevant until god comes again and
says "hey i exist". just like fleetmouse i don't have much
(well he has "nothing") against christianity (or other
religions) apart from the fact that they are based on many
human sicknesses, and help them driving back(?) what they
want to drive back(?) (i use a very old french-english
dictionnary). faith is a system of beliefs based on
absolutely nothing concrete, it is just the gathering of
things we *want* to believe. if someone challenges this
system he often becomes an enemy because deep inside the
believer knows that he has no proof for what he believes. he
can then either 1) change his mind (never occurs does it) 2)
kill the idea (or if not possible the man himself, hence
many religion wars) 3) be so blind he gives no credit to the
challenging ideas. religions are about brainwashing might it
be self-made or school/parents-driven. u notice that the
worst fundamentalists, the most extreme ones are those
freshly converted as we can see in france with muslims for
instance.

for the myths, poetry etc. well humans have to find a
balance between reality and imaginary lands. some religion
things can enter the balance of course but imo if you put
the whole religion in the balance you don't have room enough
for reality.

sorry for my crap english :)


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2005-11-14 08:24 [#01777485]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01777483



Ha ha!


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2005-11-14 08:29 [#01777487]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



how effective would christianity be if it didn't talk about
an afterlife?

heaven is essentialy appealing to peoples greed.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2005-11-14 08:36 [#01777488]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Raz0rBlade_uk: #01777487



Like any religion Christianity has esoteric and exoteric
flavors. I've always thought Taoism was pretty subtle but
the other day I found a book written by two Chinese Taoists
who advocated nonsense about meditating postures, Taoist sex
principles, etc. On the back cover one of them is wearing a
special Taoist hat of some sort. Lao Tzu and Chuang Tzu must
be spinning in their graves.

Anyhoo it is helpful to look at some of the things like the
Gospel of Thomas that were left out of the "official" bible:

3. Jesus said, "If your leaders say to you, 'Look, the
(Father's) kingdom is in the sky,' then the birds of the sky
will precede you. If they say to you, 'It is in the sea,'
then the fish will precede you. Rather, the (Father's)
kingdom is within you and it is outside you.



 

offline staz on 2005-11-14 08:38 [#01777490]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular



haha, religion.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2005-11-14 08:40 [#01777492]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to yann_g: #01777484



I think that trying to differentiate between religion and
secularism as a binary opposition is misleading - religion
is simply an older model of the universe, and like most old
writings it needs to be read selectively and with attention
to context but includes great insights.


 

offline yann_g from now on 2005-11-14 08:41 [#01777493]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker | Followup to CS2x: #01777481



Religion is merely an expression of this, imho.

religion was a tool to control people. it anachronic (se
dice en ingles?) now. we have democracies and dictatorships.
the poetry in religions is the sugar around the pill.


 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-11-14 08:43 [#01777498]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker | Followup to yann_g: #01777484



Don't worry about the english, that was better than a lot of
my attempts at explaining myself!

I don't always understand this obsession with "moving
forward" and the idea that religious values must be out of
date. I can understand why that would be said of, say, the
Old Testament, or the many bizzare and detailed laws of
Islam (something I have looked into a lot as of late), but
I'd consider aspects of Buddhism, Christianity (not
mainstream evangelical fundimentalist Christianity, more
Eastern Orthadox/Methodist groups) and other religions and
spiritual beliefs timeless. Their "rules" will never need to
be updated-only expanded upon and defined in a deeper sense.



 

offline yann_g from now on 2005-11-14 08:44 [#01777499]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01777492



don't get your first sentence but i agree with the rest.


 

offline yann_g from now on 2005-11-14 08:55 [#01777512]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker | Followup to CS2x: #01777498



it's not that they *must* be out of date, it's that many
*are* out of date, hopefully there are ideas about
generosity(?) that are good, but very often they go to far.
sacrifice is shown as a very good thing in many cases, i
think it's plain stupid. you can give a lot without
sacrifying yourself. the sacrifice is the limit in most
cases imo. you can give whatever you want to whoever you
want until it starts causing you a trauma.
there is also that question of guiltiness. jesus died for my
sins? wtf! he doesn't even know me = not possible, not
mentionning the fact that he died hundred years before i was
born. and if one chooses to do so when you don't ask him,
you don't owe him anything. i am old enough to be
responsible for my mistakes/sins, thank you. imo all this is
just a way of controlling people. you owe jesus (and the
church is the link) much more than you can give. not
mentionning that to let people pay for your deeds does not
help you at all.
there are so many things in christianism and islam (i guess
in judaism too) that lead men to psychosis or neurosis (well
maybe they don't lead but they're very much helpful on the
way) i think if the only way to get rid of the bad things
were to get rid of religions it would be worth it. BUT i
doubt it would change anything anyway, cause men are sick
and would find some other system to remain the sad fuck that
they are, myself included :)

BUT I'M TRYING !!!


 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-11-14 08:55 [#01777513]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker



"religion was a tool to control people. it anachronic (se
dice en ingles?) now. we have democracies and dictatorships.

the poetry in religions is the sugar around the pill."

It may have been a tool to control people in some instances,
but don't you think it is a little contrived to claim that
this is all there is to the developement of religion? And
I'm not talking about a possible spiritual influence here. I
just dislike it when people write "religion" off as a "tool
to control people", in the same way I dislike marxists who
claim that history is only determined by economic factors.



 

offline yann_g from now on 2005-11-14 08:57 [#01777515]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker | Followup to yann_g: #01777512



LOL que boludo que soy :)


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2005-11-14 08:59 [#01777519]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



"I just dislike it when people write "religion" off as a
"tool to control people"

nobody likes this idea but sadly it's likely to be true


 

offline yann_g from now on 2005-11-14 09:05 [#01777527]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker | Followup to CS2x: #01777513



It may have been a tool to control people in some
instances, but don't you think it is a little contrived to
claim that this is all there is to the developement of
religion? And I'm not talking about a possible spiritual
influence here. I just dislike it when people write
"religion" off as a "tool to control people", in the same
way I dislike marxists who claim that history is only
determined by economic factors.


i mean it's one of the reasons why it exists. another reason
is that people like someone to tell them what to believe in.
i guess television and corporates do this very well nowadays
:(

to say that history is only determined by economic factors
is a belief, not a fact :P but truth is economic factors
have more than a huge influence. slavery is the result of
economic factors (at least the white use of black lives in
the recent history) and this sole example had repercussions
that we can't count. hopefully among them there is jazz and
reggae but that wasn't worth the horror was it? and that's
only one general example. i'm not talking about the
individual lives wasted and the damages that remain in the
sons of the sons of those slaves.


 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-11-14 09:09 [#01777533]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker | Followup to Raz0rBlade_uk: #01777519



I'm sure religion has been USED as a means to control
people, and that some religions have even came into
existence due to our desires to control others, but I think
some have developed gradually for other reasons too. :-)

Perhaps some people genuinely believed that they had
experienced the "divine", and told others about it, and they
seperated themselves to form a group who believed in similar
spiritual ideals? Maybe my view of far too naive, but I do
believe that genuine cases like this do occur. Of course,
later on, these practices can be abused and used to control
people. However, the initial forming of spiritual ideas and
religions need not always be out of a desire to control and
subjugate others, imho.



 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-11-14 09:11 [#01777540]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker | Followup to yann_g: #01777527



You have some good points there :-)

I'm sure economic factors play a large part in many changes
that occur, but they're not the only thing that affects our
political, social, and artistic developements imo.


 

offline yann_g from now on 2005-11-14 09:13 [#01777542]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker | Followup to CS2x: #01777533



Perhaps some people genuinely believed that they had
experienced the "divine", and told others about it

one can genuinely believe that he had experienced the divine
by unconsciently wanting to control over other ppl. this is
sick anyway. we all experience weird things. there are
differences in the way we interpret those experiences. what
we imagine is the cause of something that happened. and
those differences come from the mind, from ourselves, not
from the outside. they are human.


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2005-11-14 09:21 [#01777552]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular



spiritual belief is one thing, religion is another.

on my course at uni there are quite a number of christians,
and in these people i see no form of introspection or
spiritual/intellectual exploration, they are the product of
a christian upbringing. this troubles me quite a lot.

I have no conclusive point to make, which almost is my
point. How can you explore your spirituality if your
boundaries are predefined by a religion?


 

offline yann_g from now on 2005-11-14 09:22 [#01777553]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker | Followup to CS2x: #01777540



course not. some of those other things were mentionned in
the "religion" discussion ;)

one very important thing is the relation between 1) people
wanting to control over the others and 2) people wanting to
be controlled. religion (in the past, not now anymore) and
politics are both connected to this, and the way humans (and
many animals) organize themselves too. few people want to
have that amount of responsibilities that come with power (i
don't). most, like me would rather be driven but want to
chose who to be driven by. truth is in our society we don't
chose anymore because our access to information is getting
more and more ridiculous, because some (if not most? i hope
not!) systems are made to make electoral fraud possible.
some people have more and more money (= more and more power)
as a consequence, the others have less and less, until god (
:P ) knows what happens. i think we need a revolution but
we're almost all too busy with our selfish lives to gather
and think about a way to replace the existing system. i
don't mention the stupid ideas raised up from times to
times. and communism was a nice idea but nice doesn't mean
good, plus we know now that it doesn't work.

(damn i am so serious today *fart*)


 

offline yann_g from now on 2005-11-14 09:24 [#01777558]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker | Followup to yann_g: #01777553



religion (in the past, not now anymore)
am i forgetting the usa and the islamic countries? and all
the other countries where church is not properly separated
from their government?


 


Messageboard index