Fast Editing | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in
Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
recycle
...and 626 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614121
Today 4
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Fast Editing
 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-10-29 06:18 [#01764448]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



In TV shows. I find verry annoying. When the camerra cuts
back and forrth frrom closeup to long distance shots of
people talking, I get a headache. I'm talking specifically
when it's to no effect at all otherr than an easy way to add
some kind of life to a dull scrript orr to be quirrky.


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2005-10-29 06:21 [#01764449]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker



Same goes for the newer horror movies. Hell, even cunningham
is getting a bit boring using that effect all the time. I'm
starting to find fast editing less appealing.


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2005-10-29 06:22 [#01764450]
Points: 12426 Status: Regular



Yep, stuff like The Shield is absolutely unwatchable,
it doesn't even make sense.


 

offline pigster from melbs on 2005-10-29 06:23 [#01764451]
Points: 4480 Status: Lurker



cunningham is the god of editing!
silly man..

as for tv shows,.. i know exactly what u mean (though, ive
never considering making a topic about it in xlt : P)


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2005-10-29 06:31 [#01764454]
Points: 12426 Status: Regular | Followup to pigster: #01764451



Oh, no, that would be Dziga Vertov.

 

offline ecnadniarb on 2005-10-29 06:36 [#01764455]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I hate fast editing, shaky cameras and all that other stupid
'modern' stuff.


 

offline pigster from melbs on 2005-10-29 06:42 [#01764460]
Points: 4480 Status: Lurker



Dziga Vertov?
never heard of him. quick search, he's from 1920-1950s.
now how can he be best editor with the technology they had
back then? : P


 

offline pigster from melbs on 2005-10-29 06:42 [#01764461]
Points: 4480 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01764455



haha, watching kids shows of today is fucken tedious!!

 

offline clint from Silencio... (United Kingdom) on 2005-10-29 06:55 [#01764469]
Points: 3447 Status: Lurker



I've noticed that American TV is much much faster edited
than British. I think perhaps British viewers have something
of a longer attention span.


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2005-10-29 08:59 [#01764516]
Points: 12426 Status: Regular | Followup to pigster: #01764460



By being incredibly inventive and groundbreaking instead of
being gimmicky and annoying, I suppose.

Man with the Movie Camera

 

offline Bremzen from utrecht (Netherlands, The) on 2005-10-29 11:42 [#01764604]
Points: 653 Status: Lurker



did anyone ever see The Dub Room Special by Frank Zappa? Now
there's some fast editing for you...


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-10-29 11:53 [#01764608]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



they just want people to get the feeling there's
something going on.

it sucks.

on the opposite side: those fucking reality shows where
they, right before "revealing the one to be voted out," take
a three-ten minute break in talking and just show all the
peoples ugly faces with annoying "tension" music (heavy
reverbed drums and distant piano) are fucking annoying crap
penis torch ass.


 

Messageboard index