|
|
WooferAttack
from Milano (Italy) on 2005-09-14 07:43 [#01722820]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker
|
|
Questions:
1] - What does it really mean 'Woofter'? 2] - Which was the first Xltronic member to call me 'Woofter'?
Who will give the right answers will win an original Woofter Attack autograph.
\/\/oofty
|
|
Taffmonster
from dog_belch (Japan) on 2005-09-14 07:47 [#01722821]
Points: 6196 Status: Lurker
|
|
Woofter = a homosexual or a wimp
|
|
WooferAttack
from Milano (Italy) on 2005-09-14 07:51 [#01722825]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taffmonster: #01722821
|
|
nice
|
|
dog_belch
from Netherlands, The on 2005-09-14 08:28 [#01722839]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag
|
|
I'd like to think it was me that first said Woofter, but I doubt it. Bill_hicks, maybe? Woofter is just a play on Woofer, but it does also, as Taffy points out, have a fairly antiquated meaning, as far as I'm aware, of someone who is either gay or just acts in a camp manner. Willy Woofter I think is the full on term. I just think it sounds funny, and we all know what a success with the ladies Woofty is so noone's suggesting that you're gay, nor indeed, if you were, that that would be a bad thing. I love \ / \ /oofter, and if that makes me a woofter, then so be it.
|
|
tridenti
from Milano (Italy) on 2005-09-14 08:33 [#01722844]
Points: 14653 Status: Lurker
|
|
I like you all guys <3
How about some funny names for me? :)
|
|
Taffmonster
from dog_belch (Japan) on 2005-09-14 08:33 [#01722845]
Points: 6196 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01722839
|
|
actually its wee willy woofter ;)
|
|
impakt
from where we do not speak of! on 2005-09-14 08:47 [#01722857]
Points: 5764 Status: Lurker | Followup to tridenti: #01722844 | Show recordbag
|
|
Tridenti = Diner Tit, Tin in Red, Dirt Nite, Dire Tint, Tired Tin or I, Nerd Tit.
|
|
impakt
from where we do not speak of! on 2005-09-14 08:47 [#01722859]
Points: 5764 Status: Lurker | Followup to impakt: #01722857 | Show recordbag
|
|
I meant Tit in Red.
|
|
dog_belch
from Netherlands, The on 2005-09-14 08:49 [#01722863]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag
|
|
Tri-Denti++ Three Teeth 3-DNT That fucking Tridenti
|
|
tridenti
from Milano (Italy) on 2005-09-14 09:00 [#01722877]
Points: 14653 Status: Lurker
|
|
Yeah! Tridentae++ was the best
|
|
tridenti
from Milano (Italy) on 2005-09-14 09:02 [#01722881]
Points: 14653 Status: Lurker | Followup to impakt: #01722857
|
|
Nice one! :o!!
|
|
WooferAttack
from Milano (Italy) on 2005-09-14 09:04 [#01722882]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker
|
|
Answers:
1] - Finally I understood exactly what it means... 1 point to dog
2] - bill_hicks... another point to dog
the winner is... DOOOG...BELCHHHHHHHHCHHHH!!!! wuahahaha...
your deserved premium will arrive soon...
|
|
dog_belch
from Netherlands, The on 2005-09-14 09:06 [#01722883]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag
|
|
Aces! Young Xeron could learn a lesson from Woofty here about running a goddamn competition.
|
|
Taffmonster
from dog_belch (Japan) on 2005-09-14 09:08 [#01722885]
Points: 6196 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01722883
|
|
thats no fair i told him the answer to 1
what a fuking woofter
|
|
Xeron
from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-09-14 09:08 [#01722886]
Points: 2638 Status: Regular | Followup to dog_belch: #01722883
|
|
just cos you won.....
please be a judge ;)
|
|
dog_belch
from Netherlands, The on 2005-09-14 09:08 [#01722887]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to WooferAttack: #01722882 | Show recordbag
|
|
Actually, can my prize be that you let me download all your rare BOC that I've cued up from you on slsk?
|
|
tridenti
from Milano (Italy) on 2005-09-14 09:09 [#01722888]
Points: 14653 Status: Lurker | Followup to WooferAttack: #01722882
|
|
Where is bill_hicks post? I didn't see it.
Doggy: ehehe!
|
|
Xeron
from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-09-14 09:09 [#01722889]
Points: 2638 Status: Regular | Followup to Xeron: #01722886
|
|
plus this wasn't an ambitious competition.
|
|
WooferAttack
from Milano (Italy) on 2005-09-14 09:12 [#01722891]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker
|
|
as promised the original WoofterAttack autograph just for the winner dog_belch... i hope you will put on your wall with a pretty frame ;-)
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
tridenti
from Milano (Italy) on 2005-09-14 09:16 [#01722895]
Points: 14653 Status: Lurker | Followup to WooferAttack: #01722891
|
|
Super!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
horsefactory
from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2005-09-14 09:18 [#01722898]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular
|
|
WoostezAtteck!!!
|
|
WooferAttack
from Milano (Italy) on 2005-09-14 09:19 [#01722900]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01722887
|
|
ok, rare BoC are free for you now :-)
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-09-14 09:20 [#01722901]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Semifreddoattack
|
|
WooferAttack
from Milano (Italy) on 2005-09-14 09:21 [#01722903]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker
|
|
würstelattack
|
|
tridenti
from Milano (Italy) on 2005-09-14 09:22 [#01722904]
Points: 14653 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01722901
|
|
Io amo i semi-freddi! :P
|
|
dog_belch
from Netherlands, The on 2005-09-14 09:23 [#01722908]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to WooferAttack: #01722891 | Show recordbag
|
|
Thank you, I have printed it out and removed a picture of my child from its frame to replace it with an autograph from my favourite pollmaster. ...WoosterAffleck!
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-09-14 09:25 [#01722910]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Capoattack?
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-09-14 09:25 [#01722911]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Sandalattack
|
|
WooferAttack
from Milano (Italy) on 2005-09-14 09:25 [#01722912]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01722908
|
|
lol!
burgHerattack
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-09-14 09:25 [#01722913]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Sneakattack
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-09-14 09:26 [#01722914]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Wasabiattack
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-09-14 09:26 [#01722915]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Wrongattack
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-09-14 09:27 [#01722917]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
sorry I misread the rules
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-09-14 09:27 [#01722918]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
FAQ
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-09-14 09:28 [#01722919]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
sorry, that was a typo, it should read FAG
|
|
Taffmonster
from dog_belch (Japan) on 2005-09-14 09:28 [#01722920]
Points: 6196 Status: Lurker
|
|
lol u ar a....
|
|
Taffmonster
from dog_belch (Japan) on 2005-09-14 09:29 [#01722921]
Points: 6196 Status: Lurker
|
|
....post whore
|
|
Taffmonster
from dog_belch (Japan) on 2005-09-14 09:29 [#01722923]
Points: 6196 Status: Lurker
|
|
like post rock, but post whore
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-09-14 09:31 [#01722924]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
free point
- jocco
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-09-14 09:32 [#01722926]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
XLTronic+ membership required to view content
|
|
tridenti
from Milano (Italy) on 2005-09-14 13:57 [#01723117]
Points: 14653 Status: Lurker
|
|
lol
|
|
virginpusher
from County Clare on 2005-09-14 14:09 [#01723127]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to tridenti: #01723117
|
|
"El oh el", "LOL" and "lolzor" is a copyrighted trade mark of the Trolls Brigade Internet Society (TBIS)
Any usage of this coined phrase will/may result in federal court appearences under the copyright infringement clause of 1996 (ALT-F11 vs The United States Circut Court of Appeals) and (Campbell v.Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., in the [Copyright - Fair Use - Parody] Clause)
Also note that SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
NEW YORK TIMES CO., INC., et al. v. TASINI et al. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Held: Section 201(c) does not authorize the copying at issue here. The Publishers are not sheltered by §201(c) because the Databases reproduce and distribute articles standing alone and not in context, not “as part of that particular collective work” to which the author contributed, “as part of … any revision” thereof, or “as part of … any later collective work in the same series.” Pp. 8—21.
(c) The Publishers’ warning that a ruling for the Authors will have “devastating” consequences, punching gaping holes in the electronic record of history, is unavailing. It hardly follows from this decision that an injunction against the inclusion of these Articles in the Databases (much less all freelance articles in any databases) must issue. The Authors and Publishers may enter into an agreement allowing continued electronic reproduction of the Authors’ works; they, and if necessary the courts and Congress, may draw on numerous models for distributing copyrighted works and remunerating authors for their distribution. In any event, speculation about future harms is no basis for this Court to shrink authorial rights created by Congress. The Court leaves remedial issues open for initial airing and decision in the District Court. Pp. 19—21.
|
|
virginpusher
from County Clare on 2005-09-14 14:11 [#01723129]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker
|
|
More Over.....
§ 506. Criminal offenses
Release date: 2005-08-01
(a) Criminal Infringement.— Any person who infringes a copyright willfully either—
(1) for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain, or
(2) by the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during any 180-day period, of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000,
shall be punished as provided under section 2319 of title 18, United States Code. For purposes of this subsection, evidence of reproduction or distribution of a copyrighted work, by itself, shall not be sufficient to establish willful infringement.
(b) Forfeiture and Destruction.— When any person is convicted of any violation of subsection (a), the court in its judgment of conviction shall, in addition to the penalty therein prescribed, order the forfeiture and destruction or other disposition of all infringing copies or phonorecords and all implements, devices, or equipment used in the manufacture of such infringing copies or phonorecords.
(c) Fraudulent Copyright Notice.— Any person who, with fraudulent intent, places on any article a notice of copyright or words of the same purport that such person knows to be false, or who, with fraudulent intent, publicly distributes or imports for public distribution any article bearing such notice or words that such person knows to be false, shall be fined not more than $2,500.
|
|
virginpusher
from County Clare on 2005-09-14 14:12 [#01723131]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker
|
|
Continued......
(d) Fraudulent Removal of Copyright Notice.— Any person who, with fraudulent intent, removes or alters any notice of copyright appearing on a copy of a copyrighted work shall be fined not more than $2,500.
(e) False Representation.— Any person who knowingly makes a false representation of a material fact in the application for copyright registration provided for by section 409, or in any written statement filed in connection with the application, shall be fined not more than $2,500.
(f) Rights of Attribution and Integrity.— Nothing in this section applies to infringement of the rights conferred by section 106A (a).
|
|
tridenti
from Milano (Italy) on 2005-09-14 14:14 [#01723133]
Points: 14653 Status: Lurker | Followup to virginpusher: #01723127
|
|
Whoah! Thank you!
Usually I don't use "LOLS" in my posts. Don't ask me why but I'm thinking to use it more frequently.
|
|
virginpusher
from County Clare on 2005-09-14 14:15 [#01723134]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker
|
|
Summary.... nest time you post LOL in or out of context you will be in violation of United States law and we will be forced to invade your country.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Virginpusher (Founding Father of Trolls Brigade Internet Society (TBIS) )
|
|
Xeron
from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-09-15 12:22 [#01724087]
Points: 2638 Status: Regular | Followup to virginpusher: #01723134
|
|
I'd like to see them invade Britain so LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL and so on......
|
|
virginpusher
from County Clare on 2005-09-15 12:27 [#01724090]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Xeron: #01724087
|
|
careful
Pentagon Revises Nuclear Strike Plan
The Pentagon has drafted a revised doctrine for the use of nuclear weapons that allows commanders to request presidential approval to use them to preempt an attack by a nation or a terrorist group using weapons of mass destruction. The draft would also allow the option of using nuclear arms to destroy known enemy stockpiles of nuclear, biological or chemical weapons.
|
|
Xeron
from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-09-15 12:32 [#01724100]
Points: 2638 Status: Regular | Followup to virginpusher: #01724090
|
|
America wouldn't dare, plus they'd be killing their own kin. The majority of americans are descended from european settlers.
Nuclear weapons my arse, just let them try. I'll chase them off with a stick.
|
|
virginpusher
from County Clare on 2005-09-15 12:36 [#01724105]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Xeron: #01724100
|
|
Too bad the ignorant people that run this bitch dont think of that.
Dont worry i luv ya! :)
|
|
Messageboard index
|