war of the worlds | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 589 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614121
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
war of the worlds
 

offline isnieZot from pooptown (Belgium) on 2005-08-04 04:05 [#01682803]
Points: 4949 Status: Lurker



so I saw this yesterday.
it was amusing to watch but raised quite some questions once
the movie was done. the ending was a bit...I
dunno....stupid?
the only thing that really bugged was the constant screaming
of that little girl. *AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH* that
really pissed me off at times. but she acted pretty good
though.
it's just a movie I guess.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-08-04 04:06 [#01682804]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker



the ending? what was it, let me know, i am not going to see
this anway


 

offline penexpers from Toronto (Canada) on 2005-08-04 04:07 [#01682805]
Points: 4030 Status: Regular



the film is good but speilberg dug too big a hole for
himself and therefore the ending is extremely far fetched.
An whole army couldn't kill 1 alien thing but 1 grenade from
tom cruise killed all of them.


 

offline nacmat on 2005-08-04 04:12 [#01682808]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to penexpers: #01682805



not quite that really


 

offline Aesthetics from the IDM Kiosk on 2005-08-04 04:14 [#01682809]
Points: 6796 Status: Lurker | Followup to isnieZot: #01682803



Why was the ending stupid?

I didn't really like this movie.


 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2005-08-04 04:17 [#01682814]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker



I fort it was great

HOOOONK


 

offline nacmat on 2005-08-04 04:19 [#01682816]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jarworski: #01682814



hello


 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2005-08-04 04:19 [#01682818]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #01682816



Sup Nacho :)


 

offline isnieZot from pooptown (Belgium) on 2005-08-04 04:27 [#01682825]
Points: 4949 Status: Lurker | Followup to Aesthetics: #01682809



I dunno, it just seems a bit unlikely.


 

offline isnieZot from pooptown (Belgium) on 2005-08-04 04:28 [#01682826]
Points: 4949 Status: Lurker | Followup to isnieZot: #01682825



it also didn't fit with the rest of the movie I believe.


 

offline Aesthetics from the IDM Kiosk on 2005-08-04 04:29 [#01682828]
Points: 6796 Status: Lurker | Followup to isnieZot: #01682825



The whole movie is kind of unlikely but the ending makes
sence imo.


 

offline leonid_olusegun from outside your window on 2005-08-04 05:13 [#01682875]
Points: 858 Status: Lurker



the noise those tripods made was dirty. reminded me of a
track off 26 mixes for cash...


 

offline penexpers from Toronto (Canada) on 2005-08-04 05:36 [#01682886]
Points: 4030 Status: Regular | Followup to leonid_olusegun: #01682875



At The Heart of it All


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2005-08-04 06:45 [#01682901]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



The ending didn't seem unlikely to me at all, seemed very
logical... and that was the problem, it didn't make for an
exciting resolution at all!

I liked the movie, it was well made but pretty underwhelming
stuff for a Spielberg blockbuster. Had some cool set pieces
and images (the city panic/slaughter, the tripods in the
field) but I didn't really get immersed and the bad guys
weren't all that impressive, they lost steam after the first
vaporization scene. Tom Cruise is still a stud though.


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2005-08-04 06:49 [#01682902]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular



hopefully i'll be seeing this tonight!


 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2005-08-04 06:54 [#01682905]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker



I was laughing at the people on IMDB who didn't understand
the ending and (SPOILER) thought the birds did it. I went
down for a cigarette break and was chatting to my mate about
it and a dumb-as-fuck bint said exactly the same thing. I
mean, the end narrative explains what happens, it's obvious
as fuck anyway, I'd love to see what they made of Mulholland
Drive or summat.


 

offline furoi from Udine (Eriko Sato's undies) (Italy) on 2005-08-04 07:02 [#01682916]
Points: 1706 Status: Lurker



poor spielberg


 

offline Phresch from fucking Trondheim (Norway) on 2005-08-04 07:23 [#01682930]
Points: 9989 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i enjoyed the slicing of the bridge.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2005-08-04 07:54 [#01682952]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



I didn't like it. Speilberg's style does nothing for me...
actually, it does do something for me, it aggrivates the
piss out of me.


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2005-08-04 11:26 [#01683293]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker



although i think it's an ok movie (just like pop music can
be ok....CAN), i've got one big complaint about the story.
the story would have been much more convincing if the aliens
would have had an actual strategy (instead of just chasing
random humans). a supposedly superior race of aliens
wouldn't just chase every human it sees. cooomooonnnnn

come to think of it, it was a pretty pathetic movie


 

offline Aesthetics from the IDM Kiosk on 2005-08-04 11:44 [#01683310]
Points: 6796 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #01683293



It's based on H.G.Wells novel "The War of the Worlds"

This is how they thought about it way back.

He was a visionary, but always a practical visionary. He
viewed every problem in it's universal aspect, yet
ultimately from the standpoint of the plain untethered man
whose champion he was. Abroad as well as at home, he was
recognised as one of the greatest minds of the century, or
as Anatole France styled him, "the greatest intellectual
force in the English-speaking world".


Spielberg misquote the author imo.


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2005-08-04 11:47 [#01683315]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker



thx for the info, Aesthetics

but still, Spielberg should have updated the story a bit



 

offline Aesthetics from the IDM Kiosk on 2005-08-04 11:49 [#01683318]
Points: 6796 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #01683315



Indeed.

Have you heard the musical version of it?


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2005-08-04 11:50 [#01683319]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



good film


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2005-08-04 11:53 [#01683324]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to Aesthetics: #01683318



nope.

are you talking about the original radio-transmission, or
the soundtrack?


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2005-08-04 11:53 [#01683325]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



my favorite part was when tom cruise stuck grenades into the
alien's protruding butthole.


 

offline Aesthetics from the IDM Kiosk on 2005-08-04 11:56 [#01683330]
Points: 6796 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #01683324



I'm talking about Jeff Wayne's musical version of The War of
the Worlds.

I have it on vinyl and I love it!


 

offline EVOL from a long time ago on 2005-08-04 14:09 [#01683463]
Points: 4921 Status: Lurker



i thought it was cool as fuck but the reason the ending
doesn't fit or make sense is because of the rest of the
movie being about aliens and machines and destroying the
world it was awesome almost the entire planet is gone but
not her mom in boston... wtf?! and here comes johnny at the
same time... right.

and they got force fields so the reason we were able to win
was cuz he grabbed the grenades before they caught him and
so it was smart he let that thing grab him cuz now he was
past the force fields. that and like disease and sickness
and virus' infected the aliens.


 

offline staz on 2005-08-04 15:07 [#01683543]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular



Decent movie, but it should have been M rated with more gore
and gruesomeness. Also, Ogilvy should have been a manic,
narcoleptic pedophile with a drug problem. Would've made the
whole basement thing a lot more interesting. Yes.


 

offline scup_bucket from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2005-08-04 16:11 [#01683623]
Points: 4540 Status: Regular



the plot didn't hold together at all...a tiny bit better
than "the aliens are allergic to water" but not by much.


 

offline rudster from the glasgow on 2005-08-04 17:15 [#01683680]
Points: 3169 Status: Lurker



the tripod scenes reminded me of half life 2, ok!


 

offline pachi from yo momma (United States) on 2005-08-04 17:52 [#01683727]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker | Followup to rudster: #01683680



Striders!!!



 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2005-08-04 17:59 [#01683731]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular



i quite enjoyed this film, well the first half of it.

it started it gentle down hill stroll down the proverbial
hill when the audience was privy to the actual aliens
interacting.


 

offline asymmhead from south pasadena (United States) on 2005-08-05 02:52 [#01684111]
Points: 232 Status: Regular



i didn't enjoy this film at all... the tripods were cool
though... and seeing them from a distance causing havoc was
pretty scary... but the movie sucked.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-08-05 02:55 [#01684113]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to asymmhead: #01684111



one of the basic rules of new releases is, if tom cruise is
the star - its a stinker.


 


Messageboard index