n ts n ts n ts n ts | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in
Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 156 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613413
Today 5
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
n ts n ts n ts n ts
 

offline pachi from yo momma (United States) on 2002-02-18 19:08 [#00092837]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker



i dunno, i can't settle for that much simplicity.

 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-02-18 19:09 [#00092842]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Yeah, most people think THAT'S electronic music... stuff
made for dancing. I hate it.


 

offline pachi from yo momma (United States) on 2002-02-18 19:13 [#00092847]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker



then again, if it's too complex, how can it be savored?
balance, dynamics, and organi(s/z)ation in rhythms are
perhaps the most considerable aspects.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-18 19:13 [#00092849]
Points: 21419 Status: Regular



o 0 O o 0
U u O U 0
o u o O U 0 u U
O 0 u o U


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-02-18 19:15 [#00092850]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I think Vordhosbn is perfect, the beat is complex, but it's
not too nuts... then you have the pretty melodies behind it,
and they work so well together... Cornish Acid from the RDJ
Album has a flawless complex beat.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-18 19:16 [#00092851]
Points: 21419 Status: Regular



0 O o 0
U u O U 0
o u O U 0 u U
O 0 u
o 0 O o 0
U u O U 0
o u o O U 0 u U
O 0 u o
0 O o 0
U u O U 0
o u O U 0 u U
O 0 u o U
o 0 O o 0
U u 0
o u o O U 0 u U
O 0 u o
0 O o 0
U u O U 0
o u O U 0 u U
O 0 u
o 0 O o 0
U u O U 0
o u o O U 0 u U
O 0 u o
0 O o 0
U u O U 0
o u O U 0 u U
O 0 u o U
o 0 O o 0
U u 0
o u o O U 0 u U
O 0 u o



 

offline xlr from Boston (United States) on 2002-02-18 19:50 [#00092876]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



yep. Vordhobsn is one of my all time faves.


 

offline aperson from Brentwood, TN (United States) on 2002-02-18 19:52 [#00092878]
Points: 1134 Status: Lurker



BD OH BD OH BD OH BD CH
BD OH BD OH BD OH BD CH
BD OH BD OH BD OH BD CH
BD OH BD OH BD OH BD CH
BD OH BD OH BD OH BD CH
BD OH BD OH BD OH BD CH

I R MAKEING TEH RAVER MUSAK

 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-02-18 19:58 [#00092892]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker



do you all loathe a 4/4 beat?

 

offline fat kaimo from Finland on 2002-02-18 20:03 [#00092898]
Points: 2003 Status: Lurker



simple can be good.

you know.

less can be more.

 

offline pachi from yo momma (United States) on 2002-02-18 20:04 [#00092899]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker



are you referring to 4 counts in 1 measure?


 

offline fat kaimo from Finland on 2002-02-18 20:05 [#00092900]
Points: 2003 Status: Lurker



and i'm not talking about stupid trance or that kind of
thing.


 

offline pachi from yo momma (United States) on 2002-02-18 20:19 [#00092926]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker



most of us are accustomed to any number of beats per measure
in exponents of 2; that's what i meant by 4 counts per
measure.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2002-02-18 20:45 [#00092977]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular



The Clap or the Snare is always on the 5 and the 13

 

Messageboard index