Netlabel Owners / Artists | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
recycle
big
...and 585 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614128
Today 7
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Netlabel Owners / Artists
 

offline KADO from The Belafonte (United Kingdom) on 2005-05-22 10:15 [#01608283]
Points: 1484 Status: Regular



Im working on a Uni project about Net Labels. One section
involves interviewing people involved with a netlabel, so it
would be awesome if you have the time and could answer some
of the following questions. (in return you should get some
exposure for your site as quite a few people will look at
this project + you get to plug away to everyone at XLT) :D

Questions:(Answer as many as you want)
1- What is the name of your label? (Lazy_URL if possible)

2- What genre/s of music do you provide?

3- How many artists are on your roster, (names)?

4- How would you describe your target audience?

5- Do you make a profit from your releases?

6- Do you think it is possible to make a living from running
a net-label?

7- How do you see the future of net-labels, could they make
the current major labels obsolete?



 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-05-22 10:39 [#01608315]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to KADO: #01608283



i've e-mailled you.


 

offline KADO from The Belafonte (United Kingdom) on 2005-05-22 10:47 [#01608321]
Points: 1484 Status: Regular | Followup to r40f: #01608315



Cheers very much :) You should have a reply in your inbox


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-05-22 10:48 [#01608324]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker



1. Plane Arium

2. Drill and Bass

3. 3/4? (chris?)

4. For me there is no target audience. I dont actually sit
down and plan on trying to reach a certain section of
people. I make the music first and foremost. Anything after
that isnt really in focus. I guess we try to target people
that are interested in experimental artists and people
interested in sound. It all breaks down to the core element
of sound. I would hope the people listening are really
analyzing the sounds that we create.

5. I dont and i dont necessarly plan on it. I dont mind my
work being free. People are more apt to listen to a free
artist then pay for something they never heard. There is
such a small audience for what we do that it will most
likely generate revenue.

6. For the most part i would say "absolutely not" but then
again there is a chance that one could develop a superstar
roster.

7. Bleak. There are new ones that surface all the time.
Everyone thinks that its a good idea to get some friends
(talented or not) and try an upstart label within a small
community. I think alot of people love the aspect of saying
that they "run a label" or what have you.

Alot of times there is little or no talent on the labels.
And with so many out there it is hard to get recognition.
Moreover people mostly want to be discovered by a bigger
label when they are housed on a smaller one. Everyone wants
a break but about 2-3% will actually show progress.

Major labels actually have a fan base that pays for various
expenses (pressing and such). With how little (if anything)
weblabels make they can never jeopardize major labels.



 

offline KADO from The Belafonte (United Kingdom) on 2005-05-22 10:55 [#01608331]
Points: 1484 Status: Regular | Followup to virginpusher: #01608324



Thanks for your time and answers :), I have two points of
view from Plane Arium now which is gonna be really useful.

The site is cool, I have heard a couple of tracks from there
before and will be linking it from my site to hopefully give
you some extra traffic.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-05-22 10:58 [#01608334]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



"research facility" ;)


 

offline KADO from The Belafonte (United Kingdom) on 2005-05-22 11:00 [#01608336]
Points: 1484 Status: Regular | Followup to r40f: #01608334



Correction noted :)

Btw what's gonna be in the microfiche library?


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-05-22 11:07 [#01608349]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to KADO: #01608336



music videos and short films. if anyone reads this and has
something to contribute, please e-mail me at:
research@planetariumrecords.com


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-05-22 11:07 [#01608352]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to KADO: #01608331



No problem! Glad to be of some service!


 

offline plantre from United States on 2005-05-22 11:52 [#01608408]
Points: 469 Status: Regular



1. Earstroke Records

2. a wide variety of electronic music; abstract, avant
Garde, idm, drill n bass, melodic electronica, and so on. we
are open to anything as long as it has a certain level of
quality to it.

3. at the moment, we've released material from 6 artists,
but already have several more releases lined up. you can
expect to see more from the following in the near future:

Asymmetrical Head
Beak
BRTLMN
Denizen
Dupe
Fieldtriqp
Mavis
Milieu
Nobushige Hirotsugu
Orange Dust
Plantre
Skytree
Tonepoem
While
Wisp
WordSalad

4. open to anyone who might find something they like from
it.

5. net releases are free to download, though we are opening
the store section this spring with shirts and releases from
Wisp, Plantre, and one from Orange Dust probably later this
year. whatever profit gained from those releases will just
go straight back into funding the next one. so, ultimately,
no one really profits but the artists.

6. yes, but the amount of time and work that would go into
it would be enormous. you would have to be in the same
position as a label like Bleep, or work very hard to get to
that point, but i believe it can be done. you can do
anything if you are passionate and willing.

7. i believe there will always be hard copy record labels.
there is a great deal of work and money that record labels
put into their business that net labels aren't always be
able to achieve. but the growing number of net labels might
be able to raise the bar for hard copy labels, so long as
the music is truly quality. it also has a lot to do with the
dedication and knowledge a net label owner has about the
music industry. a lot of people running these net labels out
there are just kids that don't know the first thing about
business. that being said, i believe record labels will
always have a place as the demand for hard copy material is
still far too popular, and wiull be for some time.


 

offline plantre from United States on 2005-05-22 11:56 [#01608417]
Points: 469 Status: Regular



i also wish to add my thoughts about the relationship net
and record labels are starting to have now that they are
becoming more common. some record labels pull artists from a
net label if they think they fit with their roster. this is
important because if a continually quality net label
releases good music, then it will get a lot of attention
from record labels. this has happened with Earstroke on more
than one occassion, and i have found that the two can work
well with eachother very well. the more friends you have,
the easier and better things get done. its nice to have a
little more support, no matter how big or small you are.

:D


 

offline KADO from The Belafonte (United Kingdom) on 2005-05-22 12:07 [#01608431]
Points: 1484 Status: Regular | Followup to plantre: #01608417



Thanks for your help, it is much apreciated. I will try my
best to send some new listeners your way. :D

r40f, VP, Plantre : Thanks to all you guys for responding,
it makes for interesting reading. All the best with the
labels' future success. I will be following the progress of
your sites for an update to my project next year.


 


Messageboard index