| 
          | 
        
        
         | 
                     
	  |           
        
        
           Zeus
             from San Francisco (United States) on 2005-02-01 02:55 [#01483942]
         Points: 14042 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
 A 12 tone piece (not strict) for flute, oboe, and piano.
  Watching Flowers Wilt
  Enjoy!
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           bryce_berny
             from chronno (Canada) on 2005-02-01 03:30 [#01483953]
         Points: 1568 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
sounds like I am watching a scary drama tv show from the 80s
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           zero-cool
             on 2005-02-01 03:44 [#01483960]
         Points: 2720 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
SPAM
  spank
  peppies
  asshole
  mike
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           obara
             from Utrecht on 2005-02-01 05:13 [#01483987]
         Points: 19430 Status: Regular
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
very nice and sounds proffesional - but too sad for me :(
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           big
             from lsg on 2005-02-01 06:58 [#01484042]
         Points: 24091 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
it sounds a bit too pretentious for me, sorry
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Dannn_
             from United Kingdom on 2005-02-01 08:39 [#01484136]
         Points: 7877 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
I hope thats not real piano because if it is, whoever is  playing it is very bad. I don't like it... the third  instrument to come in, I assume its the flute? Sounds  horrible. Maybe you made this to be played on live  instruments in which case it might work a bit better. It  does sound a bit like an 80s daytime soap scene in which  someone investigates something in the dark and possibly  finds an incriminating photograph. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           bryce_berny
             from chronno (Canada) on 2005-02-01 08:54 [#01484146]
         Points: 1568 Status: Lurker | Followup to Dannn_: #01484136
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
of donkey sex "eeeuuugh"
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Zeus
             from San Francisco (United States) on 2005-02-01 09:04 [#01484152]
         Points: 14042 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
thanks for listening guys :)
  dannn_ yeah, its done on the computer, so there is a lot  missing from a real performance.
 
  just curious what you mean by the piano playing being bad?  If you are refering to the anticipated notes, thats  intended. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           blrr
             from the block on 2005-02-01 09:09 [#01484154]
         Points: 585 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
is it serial or just atonal? I really doesn't sound serial  at all to me.  
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Zeus
             from San Francisco (United States) on 2005-02-01 09:12 [#01484155]
         Points: 14042 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
its serial. I just constructed the row to have tonal  implications. (which is why I say its  not strict) 
 
 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Dannn_
             from United Kingdom on 2005-02-01 09:14 [#01484157]
         Points: 7877 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
The piano, it seems like the keys are being hit too hard...  some parts it sounds like just random notes being played  again and again 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Zeus
             from San Francisco (United States) on 2005-02-01 09:25 [#01484169]
         Points: 14042 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
"some parts it sounds like just random notes being played  again and again"
  thats 12 tone for ya :D
  but yeah... it was sequenced, so theres a lot of stuff that  is missing, including proper performance techniques etc. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           virginpusher
             from County Clare on 2005-02-01 09:27 [#01484171]
         Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to bryce_berny: #01483953
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
A TV show done by roman polanski. :D
  *currently listening*
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           virginpusher
             from County Clare on 2005-02-01 09:39 [#01484179]
         Points: 27325 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
overall i found it to be an enjoyable track. I liked what  you did with it. Are you more or less making music like this  now? I remember when you were making ambient. Do you still  do that or are you looking to add (Stuff like this?) to it? 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Zeus
             from San Francisco (United States) on 2005-02-01 09:59 [#01484198]
         Points: 14042 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
well, Im doing a duel major in composition and music  sythesis... and for the composition major, only  chamber/orchestral works are allowed... so it all has to be  real instruments.
 
  this piece was for class, and its this instrumentation  because these are the players that were availible to read  the compositions.
 
  Im still doing ambient, but yes I would like to add more  orchestral elements to it. Not over the top, but subtle  stuff. Do you know the Solaris  soundtrack, by cliff  martinez? Something like that, mixed with more synths and  sounddesign/soundscape stuff. 
 
  this is the first real 12 tone piece ive written, and while  it was very interesting, I dont think its for me. I like  sustaining chords and slight harmonic changes... the  constant motion of the tones without repitition until the  cycle completes can be frusterating at times. It certainly  is good for coming up with new sounds etc, and I could see  myself incorperating some of the techniques into other  works, but no straight up 12 tone pieces.
 
  Im glad you liked it btw :) Thanks for listening!
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           bryce_berny
             from chronno (Canada) on 2005-02-01 23:14 [#01484744]
         Points: 1568 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
bewwp
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           zero-cool
             on 2005-02-02 06:06 [#01484846]
         Points: 2720 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
700 miligrams of cum injected into my veins
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Dannn_
             from United Kingdom on 2005-02-02 14:16 [#01485326]
         Points: 7877 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Maybe I missed what you were trying to do here because I  don't know what 12 tone means... 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Zeus
             from San Francisco (United States) on 2005-02-02 14:43 [#01485343]
         Points: 14042 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
indepth explination
  but the basic idea is that you make a "row" of pitches,  using all the 12 availible notes. how you order them,  defines the overall sound you will get.
 
  you then use this row (and all the various inversions,  retrogrades, and transpositions) to write music with.
 
  one of the main rules, is that you do not repeat a note  again, until youve gone through the entire sequence of notes  first. You can develop both chords and melodic lines this  way, and you may also combine the various row  transpositions, inversions, and retrogrades in any way you  feel.
 
  in strict 12 tone writing, you try to avoid any tonal  implications, however many composers have used the 12 tone  technique in tonal ways. 
 
  my piece is oodles of tonal implications, which is why I  said it was un-strict. But I am still following the basic  concepts and rules of the 12 tone. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Zeus
             from San Francisco (United States) on 2005-02-02 14:47 [#01485344]
         Points: 14042 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
*the point of 12 tone, is to free the use of intervals  without expected resolution, like in traditional harmony.  its the relationship from one pitch to another that is  emphasised, and not a "harmonic motion" etc.  
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Dannn_
             from United Kingdom on 2005-02-02 16:02 [#01485383]
         Points: 7877 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Wacky stuff.
  sounds like it probably worth ignoring
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           big
             from lsg on 2005-02-02 16:27 [#01485418]
         Points: 24091 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
i like webern though
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2005-02-02 16:29 [#01485420]
         Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to Zeus: #01485343
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
that sounds interesting.  i should try it sometime...   thanks for explaining it here. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Zeus
             from San Francisco (United States) on 2005-02-02 18:33 [#01485553]
         Points: 14042 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01485418
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
webern was a genius.
  sorry my first attempt at something he did all his life  doesnt live up. :-P 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           JivverDicker
             from my house on 2005-02-02 18:37 [#01485557]
         Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to Zeus: #01485553
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
You must know that it's the most un-emotive shit ever. 12  tone is a technicality that's bullshit.  Did you expect any  positive results from heare or were you going to rejoice in  their ineptness? 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Zeus
             from San Francisco (United States) on 2005-02-02 18:43 [#01485566]
         Points: 14042 Status: Lurker | Followup to JivverDicker: #01485557
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
I think you are very wrong.
  Sure, some of it can be, but some of it can be amazingly  beautiful too.
 
  And it is a dying/dead form.... some people still use it,  and mostly its only little concepts here and there... but to  say all of it as a whole is crap, well thats just idiotic.
 
  This piece was an assignment for class. Kind of like writing  a fugue just for the educational value, thats how this  assignment was... for historical perspective. So im not  defending 12 tone with my life here... its just I think to  say its all unemotive shit, is silly. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           JivverDicker
             from my house on 2005-02-02 18:47 [#01485570]
         Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to Zeus: #01485566
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Don't answer honestly! I'm being silly.
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Zeus
             from San Francisco (United States) on 2005-02-02 18:48 [#01485573]
         Points: 14042 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
youre silly.
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           earthleakage
             from tell the world you're winning on 2005-02-02 18:49 [#01485574]
         Points: 27859 Status: Regular
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
william orbit would be so proud...
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Zeus
             from San Francisco (United States) on 2005-02-02 18:49 [#01485576]
         Points: 14042 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
youre william orbit.
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           JivverDicker
             from my house on 2005-02-02 18:50 [#01485577]
         Points: 12102 Status: Regular
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
I'm not here to discuss my music that's for sure
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           big
             from lsg on 2005-02-02 18:51 [#01485579]
         Points: 24091 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
hehe, it's just he said that the system was just just a means to  an end of making music and this sounded a bit to much let's  make something pretentious. 
  i really digged your la mia mente though, as i stated before   
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Zeus
             from San Francisco (United States) on 2005-02-02 18:51 [#01485580]
         Points: 14042 Status: Lurker | Followup to JivverDicker: #01485577
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
and?
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Zeus
             from San Francisco (United States) on 2005-02-02 18:53 [#01485584]
         Points: 14042 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
I think the term "pretentious" is thrown around a lot, and  in quite literally, a very pretentious way.
 
  :D
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           JivverDicker
             from my house on 2005-02-02 18:57 [#01485590]
         Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to Zeus: #01485580
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Don't 'Zeus'. your music whether it was interpretated  through live musicians was shit!  Emotivley it means  absoloutley nothing.  Have you heard 'Contact' by bridget  Bardot?  That has more to say tonally than any pseudo  nonsense you seem to be in to.  I'm trying not to be  horrible to you but there's more to music than the academic  interpretation of emotion. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           big
             from lsg on 2005-02-02 18:57 [#01485591]
         Points: 24091 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
the idea behind the series is, i figured, you get as little  repetition of notes as possible, hence it's the most  difficult to make catchy stuff, hence it's better if you do  anyway 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           earthleakage
             from tell the world you're winning on 2005-02-02 18:58 [#01485592]
         Points: 27859 Status: Regular | Followup to JivverDicker: #01485577
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
neither am i. but if you think for a moment, you have to  understand that some people like to nurture their groovy  distortions otherwise their musical ideas will freeze. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           JivverDicker
             from my house on 2005-02-02 19:01 [#01485593]
         Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to earthleakage: #01485592
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Stop it! I'm sure the pioneers of the hypnotic groove would  make them freak. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           earthleakage
             from tell the world you're winning on 2005-02-02 19:01 [#01485594]
         Points: 27859 Status: Regular
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
what i'm trying to say is if you want your music to advance,  you have to be unafraid to linger around here, otherwise you  become all tied up & shut down 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           JivverDicker
             from my house on 2005-02-02 19:03 [#01485596]
         Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to earthleakage: #01485594
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
I know this! I'm going to probe other vents of my silly  mentokness. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Zeus
             from San Francisco (United States) on 2005-02-02 19:03 [#01485597]
         Points: 14042 Status: Lurker | Followup to JivverDicker: #01485590
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
thats true, the music is there... but there is something  thats lost from computer mockups of music, or else players  would become pointless, and software would rule.
 
  if you dont like it, thats fine. but please dont assume that  Im into some soulless academic ideal of music. If that was  the case, I wouldnt spend a lot of my time on an electronic  music msg board. I think there is a lot of interesting  things in academic music, that id like to apply to my own  music, and thus I study it. Which inevitably means that I am  required to write music according to an academic standard  for my courses. but you are very, VERY wrong if you think I  am obsessed with, and living in a world of academic music.  
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Drunken Mastah
             from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-02-02 19:05 [#01485598]
         Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
hmm.. it sounds a lot like free-jazz... you should have had  a upright bass instead of the oboe, though... it's a good,  but not great track... much like this jazz-concert I was at  last saturday (drums, bass, sax.. I don't really like  sax-sound...). It was.. OK.
 
  it's dark in a way that would justify immense amounts of  reverb and jan garbarek on horns, which isn't bad, nor good,  but the song is merely a skeleton as it is now, isn't it?  the pianoman, a drummer and a guy on upright bass  (figuratively speaking) would make a classic trio, and these  often sound pretty damned good (which is the reason there  are so many of them), so if you change the instruments and  add some nice impro-drums, the entire mood of the track  could change... and if I were you, I'd record the piano  notes with midi or preferrably a real piano to make them  sound more "natural." 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           big
             from lsg on 2005-02-02 19:08 [#01485599]
         Points: 24091 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
are you allowed to use hackzed software you might have for  assignments zeus? 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           JivverDicker
             from my house on 2005-02-02 19:08 [#01485600]
         Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to Zeus: #01485597
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Ha Ha! My girlfriend has done your course and she's a  'Master' at the moment. She studied in Boston, London and  Amsterdam.  I'm not trying to be - little your efforts.  I  think it's great!  You've got to take critisism at face  value not at your life plan. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Zeus
             from San Francisco (United States) on 2005-02-02 19:09 [#01485601]
         Points: 14042 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
well, the instrumentation was based solely on the players  that we had to perform the pieces in class.  
 
  as for the piano... I could have gone into a lot of editing  detail, but we werent turning in a recording... we were  turning in music to be read and performed... I just put this  together to get peoples feedback on the  basic musicality of  it.
 
  Thanks for listening!
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           JivverDicker
             from my house on 2005-02-02 19:15 [#01485604]
         Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to Zeus: #01485601
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Can you post a sibelieus file for fun? 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Zeus
             from San Francisco (United States) on 2005-02-02 19:15 [#01485605]
         Points: 14042 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
wtf. I wrote a reply, and realized I hadnt click on your #,  and when I did, it cleared my response! Bah!
 
  What I had said though, was I just tend to get pissed easily  when people tend to assume they know my thoughts on music  and etc, based solely on the fact that I study music (and it  happens a lot actually... its fucking annoying.) So I can  get snappy about it, easily...
 
  I do appriciate your feedback, and so Im sorry for being  snappy with you.  
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           JivverDicker
             from my house on 2005-02-02 19:16 [#01485608]
         Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to Zeus: #01485605
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Forget it. My spelling is crap!  Do you work in Sibelius?
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Zeus
             from San Francisco (United States) on 2005-02-02 19:19 [#01485612]
         Points: 14042 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
I do! score
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           JivverDicker
             from my house on 2005-02-02 19:29 [#01485627]
         Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to Zeus: #01485612
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
I need loads of passwords and that
 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
         
         
Messageboard index 
              
        
 
	 
	  |