CD's vs. Vinyl | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
dariusgriffin
...and 27 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2609412
Today 7
Topics 127256
  
 
Messageboard index
CD's vs. Vinyl
 

offline grinningcat from london (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-04 00:32 [#00078971]
Points: 1073 Status: Lurker



shall i start buying all my stuff on vinyl?

in a recent aphex interview apparetly he says he prefers
vinyl for 'dynamics' and it will never die. in another
interview he says he only listens to mp3's now. but anyway:

how does vinyl sound better when it is recorded at 44.1 khz
16bit, same as CD?? when someone samples tracks of CD's at
that rate, makes a track and puts it out on vinyl, how can
it sound better than originally?

and vinyls are bulky and u cant play them in ur car. but
they again they feel nice, and prospects of DJing may be
round the corner.

help me please.



 

offline Mike from Leeds (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-04 00:38 [#00078979]
Points: 79 Status: Lurker



"in a recent aphex interview apparetly he says he prefers

vinyl for 'dynamics' and it will never die"


That was a fake interview... personally I prefer CDs.


 

offline chapman from United Kingdom on 2002-02-04 00:39 [#00078982]
Points: 1134 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



CDs and vinyls serve different purposes really


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2002-02-04 00:40 [#00078983]
Points: 10979 Status: Regular



The best music is released only on vinyl nowadays, me
thinks....But dont bother... Vinyl is expensive and it
contains only 4 or 5 tracks per record


 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-04 00:42 [#00078988]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker



I only buy limited edition vinyl, stuff that is swanky
packaged or selling stupidly cheap in vinyl shops... my
Pearl Jam collection of vinyl cost me about £50, it's worth
£2000, that's why I buy vinyl


 

offline ReZiN8R from United Kingdom on 2002-02-04 00:44 [#00078990]
Points: 61 Status: Lurker



i like the little Metal Slug man for ur pic grinningcat.
nice1 ;)


 

offline grinningcat from london (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-04 00:48 [#00078993]
Points: 1073 Status: Lurker



wow thanks for the replies crew i only posted that like
20mins ago!!

yeah i know that gif is cool! nicked it off some guy on
another msgboard!

u guys better find some cool gifs to put up to!


 

offline Xanatos from New York City (United States) on 2002-02-04 01:04 [#00079009]
Points: 3316 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I would buy vinyl too, its just a nicer thing to have, I
like the quality of the sound too...


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2002-02-04 03:31 [#00079087]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker



aren't vinyls more expensive? So my question is, why pay
more for them? CDs are awesome...


 

offline dave from saskatoon (Canada) on 2002-02-04 03:36 [#00079090]
Points: 1135 Status: Regular



most records are pritty cheap but they can get up to
hundreds of dollars, i want to start buying vinyl, i have
two records , theres just no store's near me i have to like
take a bus all the way downtown and im lazy as hell


 

offline Morg DOBWCPT from Davis (United States) on 2002-02-04 03:37 [#00079091]
Points: 154 Status: Lurker



CDs make more sense to buy, but vinyl just seems special...I
can't really put my finger on what it is.

And with regards to all the really good music coming out on
vinyl now, I would argue that the best music is the stuff
you find online after digging around for a while.

But then, I'm an mp3 whore, right down to the nomad II
player, so maybe I don't get to talk.


 

offline 6dBspl from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-04 04:20 [#00079101]
Points: 20 Status: Lurker



Hi grinningcat, u r just missing a HUGE difference!(sorry, i
don't mean 2 b rude). Vynil (unlike CD) is an analog medium
and can't be recorded at 16 bit (it just doesn't make sense
to talk about bit depth in the analog domain). Vynil has a
very limited dynamic range (about 75dB) compared to CD
(96dB). Vynil will never support surround recordind due to
its physical nature but u can't scratch on CD's and a cd
player is not as sexy as a 1210...hav phun, mate


 

offline Intruder from Chicago (United States) on 2002-02-04 06:03 [#00079120]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



I dont buy vinyl anymore unless i have to.
as it is, i dont have that much anymore.
ive got both HAB's, the recent SP untitled, and a bunch of
other misc. stuff.
mouse on mars, plaid, etc.



 

offline hungrig from Sweden on 2002-02-04 11:14 [#00079245]
Points: 692 Status: Lurker



vinyl. thank you.


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-04 11:37 [#00079251]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Richie Hawtin been singing the praises of Final Scratch...
it's a software/hardware combo that lets you play &
manipulate Digital sound as you would with Vinyl i.e. you
can beatmix, scratch etc. MP3s...

There have been previous attempts at this but latency, the
time between you asking a bit of SW/HW to do something and
when it actually does it, was always a problem (as Digital
Guitarists will tell you)... FS has solved this problem and
from the reports I've heard, is very very responsive...

It's pretty expensive at the moment as it comes with a
dedicated SONY laptop but I believe Native Instruments are
in talks with FS about using this sort of interface on their
sampler software....

It's gonna take a few years but this sort of Tech is
definately the way of the future...

Check out the web site at www.finalscratch.com ....


 

offline grinningcat from london (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-04 11:39 [#00079252]
Points: 1073 Status: Lurker



yep but whats i was saying was...

for example, any electronic musician masters his music at a
particular bitrate and resolution, for example an artist may
use many 16 bit samples... and once the track is finished on
computer in its 16bit form, it cannot gain anything by
pressing it onto vinyl. i guess with like a jazz record,
mastered from tape it would be different.

maybe i shud stick to CDs after all then...

yep vinyls are more expensive, but for some reason there
seems to be a particular affection for them... whereas CD
comparitively are spawn of the devil


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-04 12:00 [#00079268]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Yep, I understand where you are coming from with regard to
using 16bit samples etc...

One thing to bear in mind is the mastering process itself
can have a huge effect on the end sound...when a Vinyl
master is cut, the cutting engineer has to re-EQ & Compress
the track which alters the finished sound...

The process is different for both CD's & Vinyl...hence a
Vinyl copy can sound different than a CD copy...

Whether that difference equates to Better is wholly
subjective...some people prefer the sound of CD, others
prefer Vinyl...

Personally I find CDs to be whole lot more convenient for my
uses than Vinyl - if I were a DJ and had to use decks then
obviously, Vinyl is the way to go (at the moment)... for day
to day use at home, CD is easily the more convenient
format...


 

offline hepburnenthorpe from sydney (Australia) on 2002-02-04 13:28 [#00079355]
Points: 1365 Status: Lurker



vinyl has a bigger frequency response than cd. meaning the
bass will be deeper, and the treble will be brighter. this
is probably still the main reason it gets played out in
clubs, its a bigger sound.
i personally only buy a limited amount of vinyl. its hard to
store, easy to scratch. i do however love the packaging of
vinyl, you seem to get more for your money.

thorpe
___________________________
www.hepoburnenthorpe.zzn.com


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-02-04 15:12 [#00079459]
Points: 23549 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



It's funny how people always cite the greater range of
frequencies as reason for vinyl. However, if music is made
electronically, it has a limited bit-rate anyway, so vinyl
won't magically add frequencies in between. Imagine if you
recorded MP3's to vinyl, they wouldn't sound any better.

Although it's just a matter of opinion I (and lots of my
friends) prefer Mp3's to CD or vinyl. I find that it
stripping away the frequencies you can't hear makes it a lot
easier to hear "embedded" sounds and very quite detail that
you can't normally hear on CD. I also like the fact you can
fit 20 hrs worth on a CD!


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-02-04 15:14 [#00079461]
Points: 23549 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



BTW how do you get animated pics? Just use animated .Gifs?

I predict that another audio standard like MP3 will come out
but one that uses AI to pick up on certain frequencies to
boost them for clarity based on what else is being played at
the time.


 

offline Toxic Bass PJ from Birmingham (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-04 15:21 [#00079465]
Points: 181 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00079461



I generally rip all audio to my computer in ogg format due
to its open nature, its gunna catch on big time IMO. Find
out more about it www.ogg.org.

Of course almost all that I download will be mp3.

(* Yea just a Gif)

_TB_


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-04 15:39 [#00079478]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Check out the Myths section of r3mix.net for the facts on CD
vs Mp3 vs Vinyl...

Yep, OGG is pretty cool & you get smaller files at the same
bitrate as MP3 but there are very few hardware MP3 players
that can play the files...there are a couple that do but
they are pretty rare...

Ceri...theres already quite a few standards that are
messurably better than MP3...MP3Pro, AAC, OGG, SHN, Liquid
Audio etc... but they are coming to play a bit late in the
day...

To my mind, MP3 is one of those "good enough" formats that
becomes the defacto standard (which MP3 has)...even when
technically superior formats become available... a la VHS &
BETAMAX...

So like it or not, it's gonna be the standard for quite a
few years to come...that seems to be the way these standards
work...


 

offline IronLung from the 91fwy in soCAL (United States) on 2002-02-04 15:45 [#00079484]
Points: 8032 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I would have to go with Cd's....
This comes from the fun fact that you can get ANY new album
online....for free...
File sharing is far from dead.....

I have not had to buy a cd in 2 years....

(psssst...vinyl is still fun....)


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-02-04 16:11 [#00079530]
Points: 23549 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I read that r3mix.org stuff, quite interesting.

The argument about CD etc. is very true. 16.7 million
colours is more than the eye can see (distinguish between)
yet people insist on using it. I agree that if you played
two notes, the minimal volume and/or pitch difference would
not be noticable to *anyone*, I believe.


 

offline hepburnenthorpe from sydney (Australia) on 2002-02-04 16:56 [#00079622]
Points: 1365 Status: Lurker



if the recording is done in analogue vinyl will hold more of
the original signal. not that anyone is mastering in
analogue these days.


 

offline bob from Nottingham (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-04 16:59 [#00079627]
Points: 4669 Status: Lurker



i prefer vinyl, where i live (uk) it is cheaper in some
shops than cd, and you do get better stuff, like picture
discs n stuff. loads of ltd editions too.
i love vinyl.


 

offline 6dBspl from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-05 02:06 [#00080120]
Points: 20 Status: Lurker



sorry hep, u'd better revise some of yer studies cuz .1
vynil has not a bigger frequency response than cd since is
very very limited in LF 2. "big sound" in club is achieved
only by heavy compression(almost 95% of them play in mono)
3. cutting a master in vynil can introduce serious phase
correlation problems 4. if you can hear freq. above Nyquist
one you must be a dog or you are listening to some really
expensive loudspeaker 5. have u ever heard about
oversampling theory? 6. once again, vynil will never support
surround sound.Anyway let's dance to some funky crappy vynil
and listen to CD's on great speakers. Personally i love
vynil despite the fact is an obsolete technology


 

offline Zombiekev from Ardmore (United States) on 2002-02-05 03:30 [#00080199]
Points: 2857 Status: Lurker



cd's hold more
vinyl is got a nice mixable sound that is kinda nostalgic


 

offline dave from saskatoon (Canada) on 2002-02-05 03:46 [#00080213]
Points: 1135 Status: Regular



iyou can also cover your walls with records and it will be
better of sound quality


 

offline Ubik from United States on 2002-02-05 03:54 [#00080217]
Points: 662 Status: Lurker



cds play in my car loud. much easier to buy and find.
convience is a strong point. i've already spent way too
much on what i've bought anyway.

records wear out. easier to scratch (damage) when you are
fucked up. sound great though, fun to collect sure, no
doubt.


 

offline watermelon man from auckland (New Zealand) on 2002-02-05 04:15 [#00080221]
Points: 86 Status: Lurker



the only difference IMO is that old analogue made music on
vinyl sounds better. from my experience my jazz records are
far better than their cd versions. same with the vu,
beatles, eno, talking heads, magazine etc. all sounding
better on vinyl. but listening to newer music i can't
notice differences only that cd is more practical. vinyl
can also be dirt cheap.


 

offline fat kaimo from Finland on 2002-02-05 12:55 [#00080521]
Points: 2003 Status: Lurker



look at my pic and see what i'm thinking...

<---

i love cd too.
and cassette.


 

offline Aphexking from Petersfield (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-05 13:10 [#00080527]
Points: 23 Status: Lurker



I use to love just to buy cd's but now I love the sound of
listening to vinyls. Not long ago i brought HAB2 for a
wicked price in amazing condition and listening to that on
vinyl is lovely. I am now trying to buy as much Aphex on
vinly as I can.


 

offline Peter File from the future!!! Ooooh chase me! on 2002-02-05 13:15 [#00080530]
Points: 2020 Status: Lurker



I prefer CDs, because vinyl deteriorates the more you play
it.


 

offline phiz from Liverpool (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-05 13:27 [#00080536]
Points: 2622 Status: Lurker



vinyl


 

offline Loogie from Oxford (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-05 13:36 [#00080544]
Points: 1371 Status: Lurker



I like both. Talking about the playback rather than the
recording:

both CD and vinyl have a frequency response of about
20-20000Hz

CD has superior dynamic range and signal to noise ratio than
vinyl

CD being a non-contact media is FAR longer lasting than
vinyl. Play a CD 100 times, a record 100 times and the
record might deteriorate slightly. CD will not (unless you
physically scratch it)

CD is more convenient

Vinyl is often easier on the ear, CD can sound tiring.
Invest in a decent turntable (a beltdrive NOT some Technics
bollocks) and you will appreciate vinyl for its unique
qualities.


 

offline Loogie from Oxford (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-05 13:38 [#00080545]
Points: 1371 Status: Lurker



I like both. Talking about the playback rather than the
recording:

both CD and vinyl have a frequency response of about
20-20000Hz

CD has superior dynamic range and signal to noise ratio than
vinyl

CD being a non-contact media is FAR longer lasting than
vinyl. Play a CD 100 times, a record 100 times and the
record might deteriorate slightly. CD will not (unless you
physically scratch it)

CD is more convenient

Vinyl is often easier on the ear, CD can sound tiring.
Invest in a decent turntable (a beltdrive, NOT some Technics
bollocks) and you will appreciate vinyl for its unique
qualities.


 

offline Loogie from Oxford (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-05 13:40 [#00080547]
Points: 1371 Status: Lurker



I like both. Talking about the playback rather than the
recording:

both CD and vinyl have a frequency response of about
20-20000Hz

CD has superior dynamic range and signal to noise ratio than
vinyl

CD being a non-contact media is FAR longer lasting than
vinyl. Play a CD 100 times, a record 100 times and the
record might deteriorate slightly. CD will not (unless you
physically scratch it)

CD is more convenient

Vinyl is often easier on the ear, CD can sound tiring.
Invest in a decent turntable (a beltdrive NOT some Technics
bollocks) and you will appreciate vinyl for its unique
qualities.


 

offline Loogie from Oxford (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-05 13:43 [#00080552]
Points: 1371 Status: Lurker | Followup to Loogie: #00080547



sorry about that, bloody multi-posters ey?!


 

offline grinningcat from london (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-05 13:43 [#00080554]
Points: 1073 Status: Lurker



so basically theres no point in me buying vinyl then unless
i wanna DJ, and when some1 says vinyl sounds 'better'
they're lying, as technically CD is perfect, all they're
hearing is a bit of hiss and this contributes to the
apparenty 'warmth' of vinyl sound?!

:-) ok cool


 

offline dave from saskatoon (Canada) on 2002-02-05 14:08 [#00080575]
Points: 1135 Status: Regular



i guess losts of people like cd's because theres more of a
selection and there easyer to find, but alot of artists put
out stuff that you can only find on vinyl


 

offline Loogie from Oxford (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-05 14:32 [#00080602]
Points: 1371 Status: Lurker



Yeah they do, the bastards!
Why aren't those Boards of Canada/Hell Interface tracks
available on CD?!!!


 

offline fat kaimo from Finland on 2002-02-05 19:25 [#00080853]
Points: 2003 Status: Lurker | Followup to Loogie: #00080602



because vinyl is a lot cooler...


 

offline fat kaimo from Finland on 2002-02-05 19:27 [#00080854]
Points: 2003 Status: Lurker



they are trying to get people into vinyl records.

like this rock group "hellacopters" from sweden. they
release all their albums on both cd and vinyl, but there's
always an bonus track on the vinyl version.


 

offline 6dBspl from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-05 21:02 [#00080887]
Points: 20 Status: Lurker | Followup to Loogie: #00080547



Theory says that you can record signal well above 20K on
vinyl but how many of you own electrostatic loudspeakers?
How many of you reckon to be able to hear upper
harmonics?Vinyl doesn't go down to 20Hz and unless you have
pro-monitor (PMC, Mackie HR824, Quested, Genelec)you'll
never hear 20Hz(no matter how loud u r playing your music).
CD has error correction algorithm, vinyl hasn't.CD and vinyl
are recording medium not devices so S/N ratio doesn't apply
(=someone is confusing S/N with dynamic range). Vinyl is not
"sweeter" nor "warmer" than CD but this feeling comes from
"old fashion recording".When digital recorders weren't an
industry standard, music was mastered on 2" analog tapes
(have a go with early Kraftewerk records).Tape allowed
engineers to "push" the level slightly saturating
it.Therefore a "warm", controlled "even harmonics"
distortion was introduced(2" at 30 ips..that's not your home
tape recorder).That's why someone still record on
tape(especially if u hav shitloadz of money).That's it(more
or less)


 

offline 6dBspl from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-05 21:08 [#00080898]
Points: 20 Status: Lurker



Try Magneto for some tape-like feeling, then add Grungelizer
and....!!!!Digital becomes crackly, hummy, phasey vinyl


 

offline dave from saskatoon (Canada) on 2002-02-05 21:20 [#00080909]
Points: 1135 Status: Regular



wow this is a popular one


 

offline Loogie from Oxford (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-05 21:38 [#00080924]
Points: 1371 Status: Lurker | Followup to 6dBspl: #00080887



6dBspl
My Arcam Alpha 8SE CD player has an S/N ratio of >105dB, it
says so in the manual so S/N ratio does apply

My Ortofon 510 cartridge has a frequency response of
20-20000Hz... whether or not you can here 20Hz is a
different matter.

Also CD has NO error correction whatsoever. CDROM is a
different story altogether, that has error correction.

And finally if a CD and Vinyl were to be pressed from the
same mastertape, vinyl would sound warmer... it just does.


 

offline fat kaimo from Finland on 2002-02-05 21:42 [#00080925]
Points: 2003 Status: Lurker



you can feel the 20hz...



 

offline TKR from B'joke (United Kingdom) on 2002-02-05 21:47 [#00080928]
Points: 190 Status: Addict



VINYL JUNKY ME


 


Messageboard index