|
|
M
on 2001-05-11 06:58 [#00006137]
|
|
I think I accidentally bought those 12 inch thingies for confield instead of a regular cd. Who the hell owns a 12 inch thingy player? What is this one of those ancient records? Who the hell has a record player? What a waste of money except the picture I can look at, I'm a fucking ittiot.
|
|
Glitch
from New Zealand on 2001-05-11 10:07 [#00006142]
|
|
aww, poor M.
now youll have to put up with superior audio quality, if you get a decent vinyl player though
|
|
M
on 2001-05-11 17:38 [#00006166]
|
|
Which I don't have (and havn't even heard of). I guess I'll have to sell it back on ebay and eat the shipping I already payed.
|
|
po{e}
from the uk on 2001-05-11 17:39 [#00006167]
|
|
vinyl rocks!!!!!!!!!!
u sad newbies!
|
|
Glitch
from New Zealand on 2001-05-11 18:26 [#00006171]
|
|
Hey Im all for Vinyl, M was the one complaining, what was the point in your post anyway ?
|
|
sic
from netherlands on 2001-05-11 19:05 [#00006178]
|
|
yeah, i'm still enjoying my technic's....vinyl=o.k.
|
|
po{e}
from the uk on 2001-05-11 19:07 [#00006179]
|
|
just to say vinyl is good, why else do you think i posted?
|
|
M
on 2001-05-12 05:54 [#00006201]
|
|
Is "vinyl" the same as a "record"?
|
|
Glitch
from New Zealand on 2001-05-12 12:10 [#00006205]
|
|
I hope your being silly, but yes, yes it is
though electronic music sounds like a strange thing to put on a hardly sterile thing like a record, it does add alot of warmth to it. and there is actually a certain frequency which records have that CDs cant reproduce, neat ehh ?
|
|
po{e}
from the uk on 2001-05-12 12:13 [#00006206]
|
|
thats why i prefer records (vinyl), it is a better sound that makes it so much better than the sterile cd's
|
|
Messageboard index
|