|
|
sneakattack
on 2004-10-30 23:50 [#01377070]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker
|
|
Should 'threshold' be spelled with two consecutive instances of the letter h following the s?
The german language was 'updated' a few years ago for the composite of Schiff and Fahrer to be schifffahrer--originally two instances of the letter f.
(I say 'instances of..' because making a single letter plural looks crap no matter how you do it (maybe a subscript would work))
|
|
sneakattack
on 2004-10-30 23:51 [#01377072]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to sneakattack: #01377070
|
|
erm, I mean, german was updated for a whole category of things, including composites which dropped letters in the spelling, not just Schifffahrer. fucking english.
|
|
boobah
from pants on 2004-10-30 23:57 [#01377074]
Points: 613 Status: Lurker
|
|
I think we should all smile!, I mean, you know... why not?
|
|
horsefactory
from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2004-10-30 23:58 [#01377075]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular
|
|
I don't think they should change it, 'threshhold' doesn't look right.
Phobiazero: pin this topic please
|
|
sneakattack
on 2004-10-31 00:02 [#01377077]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to horsefactory: #01377075
|
|
it looks awful, yes, but I feel terrible pronouncing 'threshold' properly.
all my topics are A+++
p.s. bump
|
|
sneakattack
on 2004-10-31 00:02 [#01377078]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to sneakattack: #01377077
|
|
rule 0 to being an asshole: use lots of "quotation marks"
|
|
horsefactory
from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2004-10-31 00:05 [#01377079]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular
|
|
Yeah, it's more true to the pronunciation the other way, but FUCK it looks so rubbish when you write it! I mean FUCK!
threshhold
FUCK!
|
|
sneakattack
on 2004-10-31 00:07 [#01377082]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to horsefactory: #01377079
|
|
=((((((((((((((
|
|
sneakattack
on 2004-10-31 00:08 [#01377083]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to horsefactory: #01377079
|
|
Hey wanna hear a ridiculous piece of trivia? I'm doing research with the dude that invented the fucking smiley. no, really
|
|
sneakattack
on 2004-10-31 00:09 [#01377084]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to sneakattack: #01377082
|
|
I stole the repeated parenthesis form from you, of course
|
|
sneakattack
on 2004-10-31 00:09 [#01377085]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker
|
|
one more post, just for good measure.
I feel like punching phobia every time this place tells me to post less frequently
|
|
horsefactory
from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2004-10-31 00:17 [#01377087]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular
|
|
Ha ha! Amazing! I remember a news article on TV when smileys first became popular, and it said how you should place a smiley in the left margin of any line to indicate the mood of that line. "Stupid idiots", I thought.
Are you looking at the SCONE project? That sounds interesting but a bit daunting... also, did the guy get the idea for the smiley from his own face?
|
|
horsefactory
from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2004-10-31 00:19 [#01377089]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular
|
|
I have one more thing to say about the SCONE project and it is this:
the SCONE project is named after a cake (scone) it s the fastest cake!!! Hahaha! I am going to bed.
|
|
sneakattack
on 2004-10-31 00:21 [#01377091]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to horsefactory: #01377087
|
|
Yeah a lot of the initial ideas sounded pretty dorky, but when I found out he started it (after I decided to work with him!), I read the email thread which gestated the idea and found it all pretty funny.
Yeah his face is uncannily symmetrical and fitting for it..
I'm working on SCONE right now; he laid down all the theory of it in his PhD thesis nearly 30 years ago; pretty impressive.
He's a pretty badass dude; I feel like a real cunt/idiot when I argue something (I'm just as much a bitch in real life).
|
|
dungbeetle
on 2004-10-31 00:24 [#01377112]
Points: 7 Status: Regular
|
|
30 more minutes of mutiny!! gravity is going up, I'm spearing pigs from the fifth floor, getting fat from the drippings of lardddd
|
|
rockenjohnny
from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-10-31 00:45 [#01377113]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker
|
|
if 'threshhold' is suggested, then 'thresh-hold' or 'thresh hold' are implied, neither of which are meaningful terms
|
|
happy cycling
from berlin on 2004-10-31 02:28 [#01377115]
Points: 2786 Status: Regular
|
|
Q: How do you rank yourself among writers (living) and of the immediate past?
Nabokov: I often think there should exist a special typographical sign for a smile – some sort of concave mark, a supine round bracket, which I would now like to trace in reply to your question.
he is GOD. how else could he answer such a manipulative question with such infinite grace, such irreproachable arrogance?
|
|
gnocelot
from Greifswald (Germany) on 2004-10-31 07:22 [#01377244]
Points: 288 Status: Lurker
|
|
Fun fact: while "Schifffahrt" et al. and some other new rules actually make sense, so much of that reform is so asinine that a lot of people are refusing to accept it. One thing that annoys me as a dork is that they literally elevated "to what words would a complete idiot think this word is related?" to a guiding principle - but more importantly, there are lots of different ways they've increased inconsistency and needless ambiguity in the name of decreasing it.
|
|
sneakattack
on 2004-10-31 08:50 [#01377263]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to gnocelot: #01377244
|
|
cool thanks for the good info; I plan on picking up my german in a few years, I'll look into it.
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-10-31 12:41 [#01377358]
Points: 21454 Status: Regular
|
|
skiing
|
|
Messageboard index
|