|
|
Peter File
from the future!!! Ooooh chase me! on 2004-10-31 18:18 [#01377483]
Points: 2020 Status: Lurker | Followup to Peter File: #01377478
|
|
Sorry, didn't mean to come across as an arse with that post!
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2004-10-31 18:57 [#01377506]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
this is the best argument i've heard in favor of voting for bush. and, it's almost good enough to convince me.
i'm still voting badnarik though.
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2004-10-31 19:07 [#01377516]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
I'm voting Bush,
but really not going to go into details because it will just explode.
|
|
rockenjohnny
from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-10-31 19:22 [#01377524]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #01377516
|
|
best not to. i could compare it to our recent au federal election. howard faced a lot of opposition for his support of bush, but has been voted back in with control of the senate - partly because the opposition was unconvincing.
|
|
Atli
from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2004-11-01 02:43 [#01377715]
Points: 1309 Status: Lurker
|
|
those 60.000 votes sure are gonna cause some problem...
|
|
pOgO
from behind your belly button fluff on 2004-11-01 02:50 [#01377719]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker
|
|
I'm voting for myself
|
|
bill_hicks
from my city is amazing it is calle on 2004-11-01 02:51 [#01377720]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker
|
|
I am a big fan of BUSH. I can't get enough of BUSH. I want more BUSH please!
|
|
rockenjohnny
from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-11-01 02:59 [#01377725]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to rockenjohnny: #01377524
|
|
i worded that badly. by the first 'opposition' i meant criticism. the 2nd 'opposition' refers to the labour party.
|
|
nanotech
from Sukavasti Amitaba Pureland (United States) on 2004-11-01 07:28 [#01378065]
Points: 3727 Status: Regular
|
|
because i want to technologically clense the masses with capitalistic finicide!. becasue i want to kill the poor, and fucking depopulate your land. that's fucking why. hoser. this is MY land!
|
|
evolume
from seattle (United States) on 2004-11-01 13:13 [#01378407]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular
|
|
IF YOU ARE VOTING BUSH, YOU SHOULD ALSO BE ENLISTING TO FIGHT HIS BULLSHIT WAR!!
put your ass where your vote is!
|
|
pf
from Finland on 2004-11-01 13:31 [#01378414]
Points: 3316 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #01377516
|
|
elusive, tell me why. I really would like to know?
|
|
pf
from Finland on 2004-11-01 13:34 [#01378421]
Points: 3316 Status: Lurker
|
|
Boyakasha, I thinkl he has a very good point.ö
|
|
ChildrenTalking
from United States on 2004-11-01 13:45 [#01378436]
Points: 2712 Status: Addict | Followup to pf: #01378421
|
|
yes because china as we all know has such a great economy. *insert huge sarcasm here*
anyways the only way we get china to have talks with kim jong il in regards to n.korea's ability contain the profileration of nuclear weapons, is when the u.s. has to threaten china with certain sanctions. so that should pretty much give you a good idea as to how interested they're with the well being of the entire world.
|
|
evolume
from seattle (United States) on 2004-11-01 13:48 [#01378437]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular
|
|
i actually have a feeling that Kerry is gonna win it by a wide margin. but my 'feeling' comes from a distrust of current polling practices and is also reinforced by this recent cell phone only poll.
so hmm.. guess we'll see!
|
|
evolume
from seattle (United States) on 2004-11-01 13:51 [#01378438]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to ChildrenTalking: #01378436
|
|
are you familiar with the mission statement of the Project for a New American Century?
Their ultimate goal is to extend American influence globally.
which is what Mr Qian is accusing the Bush administration of!
|
|
hobbes
from age on 2004-11-01 13:58 [#01378443]
Points: 8168 Status: Lurker
|
|
We will all still be regarded as "the beast" whatever happens, and as long as "it" continues this way.
|
|
sneakattack
on 2004-11-01 14:02 [#01378448]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker
|
|
counter productive. pretentious-gibberish-splat-barf
|
|
hobbes
from age on 2004-11-01 14:04 [#01378454]
Points: 8168 Status: Lurker | Followup to sneakattack: #01378448
|
|
you really are upset!
|
|
sneakattack
on 2004-11-01 14:13 [#01378473]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to hobbes: #01378454
|
|
partially true. I've been belligerent on here lately just for the sake of a few laughs, so anything I do is 80% ridiculous jest. BUT!!! but I have one weak spot, and that's people being pretentious. That always ticks me off (elusive, this newly crowned wanker, etc etc)
|
|
big
from lsg on 2004-11-01 14:15 [#01378476]
Points: 23730 Status: Lurker | Followup to evolume: #01378407 | Show recordbag
|
|
of course not, than you lie about being in the reserve core and send niggers overseas to do your fighting
|
|
hobbes
from age on 2004-11-01 14:23 [#01378490]
Points: 8168 Status: Lurker | Followup to sneakattack: #01378473
|
|
the thought police is always hovering above, i just feel that way.
but part of it has made this place adventurous, and the crowning of jedi wrist as moderator marks the end of a chapter and the start of a new era in this everlasting saga.
|
|
sneakattack
on 2004-11-01 14:30 [#01378502]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to hobbes: #01378490
|
|
there will be no change. If people choose to express themselves, they will either bend this medium or find another. no problem.
|
|
hobbes
from age on 2004-11-01 14:32 [#01378507]
Points: 8168 Status: Lurker | Followup to sneakattack: #01378502
|
|
great climax there sneak. how do we sell the second part now?
|
|
sneakattack
on 2004-11-01 14:37 [#01378518]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to hobbes: #01378507
|
|
take the profits and run!
|
|
Messageboard index
|