The Final Debate | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 463 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614149
Today 1
Topics 127544
  
 
Messageboard index
The Final Debate
 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-10-13 23:00 [#01362594]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



i didn't think the mentioning of cheney's daughter was a low
blow, because i don't think it was a blow at all... who was
being insulted? cheney's daughter has been explicitly
mentioned in this campaign by the republicans before...
maybe it wasn't necessary, but really he's just giving a
human face to the issue... it would have made a lot less
sense for him to choose anyone else, really... to just pick
a name out of nowhere... like, say: Ellen... it'd be silly
now... really... let's stop wearing the partisan on our
sleeves..


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-10-13 23:02 [#01362596]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



i'm comfused and i just wanna watch a re-run of the debate
but but.. but...


 

offline wimp on 2004-10-13 23:13 [#01362597]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker



I agree with DeadEight. How was mentioning Cheney's lesbian
daughter a "low blow"? Is it because she's a lesbian? Is it
because it is wrong to be a lesbian? Is it because as a
father, the Vice President should be ashamed of his
daughter's sexual orientation? How was stating that Cheney's
daughter is a lesbian a shot below the belt?

It's homophobic bullshit. If I were Cheney, I'd be more
insulted by the reaction from the media regarding Kerry's
statement rather than the statement itself. There is nothing
wrong with the statement because it is a fact, a fact that
should not be considered a potshot because there is nothing
insulting about it whatsoever. She's gay.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2004-10-13 23:52 [#01362601]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to wimp: #01362597



i totally agree


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-10-14 03:12 [#01362650]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to wimp: #01362593 | Show recordbag



"Jesus, you and I must not have been watching the same
debate."

he probably watched the 'highlights' on fox news :)


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2004-10-14 22:53 [#01363658]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to elusive: #01362577



You are really stretching to try to justify what was no
doubt just another instance of Bush's idiot-speak. The guy
can't talk. He has a limited vocabulary and a self
proclaimed inability to speak intelligibly. It's what makes
him so likable to the ignorant masses.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2004-10-14 22:57 [#01363660]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to wimp: #01362597



they think it's a low-blow, because they know that many bush
supporters are:

1 Ignorant - they may not have heard that Cheney's daughter
is a Lesbian because they don't pay attention to the news.

2 Homophobic - when they find out that Cheney is breeding
gays, they might think less of him.



 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2004-10-14 23:04 [#01363662]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict



cheney has alot of pent up anger, so its always extra funny
to me when kerry or edwards mentions his daughter.


 

offline OK on 2004-10-15 00:07 [#01363667]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



Bush used to know how to talk


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-10-15 04:20 [#01363739]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



i watched it earlier tonight.

my god, bush is such a little boy. i wonder how many study
sessions he had to have before the debate.


 

offline Draaihund on 2004-10-15 04:29 [#01363745]
Points: 47 Status: Addict



haha, i hope bush wins, kerry is such a fake intellectual

at least bush seems sincere


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2004-10-15 04:31 [#01363747]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to Draaihund: #01363745



sincere in his hatred of mankind. the guy is evil. a
fundamentalist christian on a mission to destroy the world.


 

offline Tourism from Boulder, Colorado (United States) on 2004-10-15 04:44 [#01363757]
Points: 5 Status: Regular



In politics, you lose points for playing sincerely, but gain
them by Seeming Sincere.

I think women understand the way this works better than men.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-10-15 09:18 [#01363893]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



muahahaa :P

i dunno. i mean, i think bush lost a lot of his focus.. he
was just giggling and being defensive and trashing kerry in
every response or answer. he didn't focus on all the good
he's done in the last 4 years, or the good he's going to do
if he gets re-elected. he was acting very, intensely
childish... i couldn't believe it. he kept talking about all
these made up ideals of how things should be.. things that
sound good, but don't work in practice.

like for example his view on abortion. he made it sound like
adoption could replace abortion... yes, keep overpopulating
the foster homes so you and your country can raise more
poverty shriken children to go fight your make believe wars.


i think it's a lot more productive to not have kids at all
then to give them a shitty life. not saying that all
adoptions end up having shitty lives, but im sure it's not
the greatest thing to go through as a child and or parents.
no woman should be forced to have a child.

why wouldn't he leave abortion availble but not necessarily
the first option?

why not use prevention menthods.. more sex education in
schools that isn't only about girls mensturating? what about
more widely available free contraception.... education. not
stripping a woman of her rights. shit happens.. you
shouldn't have to suffer for the rest of your life because
of it. especially when it's soo easily preventable.

anyways, bush just spits out ideals... things he studied,
was taught or forced to repeat. (he did repeat curtain
irrelevant points a lot)

i don't necessarily TRUST or even like Kerry.. but he is
obviously the better intellect here, and isn't that cruscial
in picking a president?


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2004-10-15 10:40 [#01363965]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to Draaihund: #01363745



Yeah, a president has no need for intellect!


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-10-15 10:58 [#01363977]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to Draaihund: #01363745



sincere? a person who rapes or murders can be 100% sincere
in what they do.

so buch is sincere? sincere in what excatly? not being fit
to run a country.. but he's sincere in it.. so that's okay?


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2004-10-15 13:11 [#01364077]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to corrupted-girl: #01363977



He appears sincere because he actually believes his own
fundamentalist bull-shit!



 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-10-15 13:32 [#01364088]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to OK: #01363667 | Show recordbag



haha, thanks... can't believe the difference is so big


 

offline godataloss from Cleveland (United States) on 2004-10-15 13:47 [#01364094]
Points: 1416 Status: Lurker



Bush is considered sincere because he has the Thumb-thrust
gesture down pat.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-10-15 13:50 [#01364095]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator







Attached picture

 

offline godataloss from Cleveland (United States) on 2004-10-15 13:59 [#01364101]
Points: 1416 Status: Lurker



That's rediculious

He can't read.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-10-15 21:33 [#01364425]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to godataloss: #01364101



HAHA!


 

offline wimp on 2004-10-15 21:36 [#01364431]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker



That's my Bush.


 

offline godataloss from Cleveland (United States) on 2004-10-15 21:58 [#01364442]
Points: 1416 Status: Lurker



me mum used to dress me in that same overcoat
and tell me I could be anything


 

offline big from lsg on 2004-10-16 00:04 [#01364454]
Points: 23730 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



nudee pictures of barbara bush jr pleaze


 

offline Empiricus from South Carolina (United States) on 2004-10-16 00:15 [#01364455]
Points: 774 Status: Lurker



There is no "debate" if the two constituent already agree
on the major philosophical/ethical issues. Steamroll me
please. I am unaware.



 


Messageboard index