Kewl Aphex Fan observation | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 89 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2609013
Today 4
Topics 127236
  
 
Messageboard index
Kewl Aphex Fan observation
 

PostModernVancouver from Vancouverrr on 2002-01-24 23:49 [#00074612]



A Panegyric on Aphex Twin

A disciple of electro's high priest prepares for the
forthcoming Drukqs.

by Josh Emmons

September 24, 2001

"He who sees the Infinite in all things, sees God. He who
sees the Ratio only, sees himself only. Therefore God
becomes as we are, that we may be as he is."
—William Blake

People who know and love Aphex Twin—you bulletin board
boosters, you chat room rompers, you penniless
completists—don’t need the sort of hard-sell that I’m
about to make for the works of Richard D. James (alias Aphex
Twin, Caustic Window, AFX, Polygon Window), though you
should read this anyway. Being sick, obsessive fans you
should find relief in discovering others like you out there.
Because ecstasy, like misery, loves company. And because
trauma and transcendence are what Aphex Twin does with the
sort of manic bravura that would paint Mozart green. Because
his is music that punishes and rewards us for crimes and
kindnesses that we’ve committed and forgotten. Aphex
Twin’s are songs that collude with God, that loathe our
Original Sin on one hand and revere our pneuma on the other.
They’re Beatrice skipping ahead of us through Hell and
Heaven. They’re Milton as he wrestles with our Manichaean
natures and is, as Blake believed, "of the Devil’s party
without knowing it."

To lay the ground rules: Aphex Twin makes electro music, an
umbrella category that keeps dry dozens of subcategories
like drum and bass, downtempo, house, garage, two-step, etc.
that are unimportant for this discussion. These genres will
disappear soon. Their practitioners will disappear soon.
Electro, like hip-hop, has a short attention span and is
content to discard acts after one or two albums. This is
partly because trends and tastes change quickly in our silly
broadband world, and partly because most acts have only one
or two good albums in them, if that. And is this such a bad
thing? How might the world have been a better place if our
era’s instamnesia had made the Grateful Dead get real jobs
after Anthem of the Sun in 1968! Or Eric Clapton after
"Layla." There are exceptions to this, musicians past and
present who’ve made practically no bad music and whose
collected works are necessary and self-justifying—Elvis
Costello, the Beatles, Björk, Blur, Radiohead, the Smiths,
Outkast—but the point is that we shouldn’t lament the
short lifespans of many of today’s musical acts.

The categorization of Aphex Twin as an electro artist is
misleading in that it suggests a narrowness of scope that is
as inappropriate as saying that Shakespeare was merely an
Elizabethan playwright. With genius, pigeonholing does a
disservice both to the artist and to the people who avoid
them because they don’t like, say, electro music or
Elizabethan drama. It suggests that a wall can be built
around the sky. Aphex Twin, I think, deserves your
consideration because his music is sublime; it achieves the
kind of altitude and clarity of feeling that many ambitious
artists try to evoke and fail, but that great works, by
definition, give to their discerning viewers and listeners
and readers.

I bought my first Aphex Twin album in 1994, Selected Ambient
Works Vol. II, which was nominally the sequel to 1992’s
Selected Ambient Works 1985-1992 (these two works are
abbreviated among the faithful as SAWI and SAWII). I was in
college in Ohio and suffering for the usual reasons, despair
being chief among them. As an English major I was morbidly
fixated on the decoder ring of semiotics, paranoid and
cynical, so that when I sat down with SAWII in the tiny dorm
room I shared with the first gay black male baritone from
Rogers Park, IL I ever lived with, it’s fair to say I was
lifted up out of the morass of college and shown that there
were modes of vision and joy that were still extant. The
album, a two-disc set, comprises 23 soundscapes that conjure
many of the great mental and physiological conditions that
we approach art for: acceptance, disillusionment, pain,
release, quietude, industry, fear, reverence. I slept and
woke with the album. I was taken there. A year later, in the
spring of 1995, the seminal ...I Care Because You Do came
out, and I learned that Aphex Twin’s was ongoing
revelation. I won’t describe the crescendo melody of its
opening track, "Acrid Avid Jam Shred," because it is
impossible. Quite simply it’s one of the most moving
pieces of music ever written.

Later that year the masterful Donkey Rhubarb e.p. was
released, and then 1996’s Richard D. James Album, and then
1997’s Come to Daddy e.p. Each is glory. Posing as a music
journalist, I interviewed Aphex Twin in September of 1997 at
a festival concert in Los Angeles, where he was profoundly
inarticulate and destroyed me in a "friendly" game of Simon
(an old hand-held game based on remembering increasingly
complicated melodies). We sat in the back of his tour bus as
a Pam Grier movie flickered from an old RCA television and
he took bong hits. In the middle of expressing himself badly
about how little he cares for success and fame and non-drug
laced experiences, he managed a revealing sentence: "I
suppose I’ve always been interested in making really hard
stuff and combining it with the melodic." This is true. And
this is the crux of his brilliance. Aphex Twin makes loud,
abrasive music that hurts to listen to—the single from
...I Care Because You Do is called "Ventolin" and is, if it
please the court, the most abrasive and unpleasant five
minutes I’ve willingly lived through—and he also makes
ecstatic, mellifluous, deeply life-affirming and joyful
music (the live version of "Laughable Butane Bob" was
obviously composed by God with Richard D. James as his
medium, as was the first track of Analogue Bubblebath 5, and
too many others to mention here). As he later in the
interview described it: "I like juxtaposing the brutal and
the lush." Ah, yes, the brutal and the lush. It’s possible
that this is all there is. As we could say that Aphex
Twin’s music betrays a kind of ambivalence about
masculinity and femininity—that they’re diametrically
opposed, one being force and the other beatitude—or that
it blends them, or that it is ultimately unconcerned with
gendering its binaries.

Whereas Aphex Twin the man is sort of an idiot (and it pains
me to write these words, I grieve), Aphex Twin the musician
possesses the wisdom of the ages. There is more intelligence
in "Nannou," the third track on his "Windowlicker" single
from 1999, than in a thousand letter-perfect koans. I
implore you, listen to "Nannou". Concentrate on it. And on
the entire Richard D. James album. These are mysteries
wrapped in enigmas shrouded in crystalline truths. The
occasion for this article is the release on October 21st of
Drukqs, the first new Aphex Twin album in five years. Of its
30 tracks, one is already available on the Internet, "54
Cymru Beats," a frenetic and unlovable song, and it would be
disappointing if the whole album is in a similar breakbeat,
dissonant vein, though I’m pretty sure that it will not
be, that instead it will be further evidence that Aphex Twin
is one of the best things to ever happen to music.

It’s hard to find art that makes you happy and thoughtful
and surprised and dissatisfied with yourself (the best
recipe for self-improvement), and when we do find it we
should stop people in the streets and grab them by their
lapels and say, "I’ve been to the other side and I can
tell you that its heights are grander, its depths more
harrowing, its colors of a bolder hue than this, this gray
world leached of peril and exaltation. Let me take you
there!" We should all be manic street preachers. There’s
too much mediocrity not to go crazy when we find its
exceptions. God wants nothing less, nor should we.

Josh Emmons


 

Ross on 2002-01-25 00:34 [#00074620]



really good article..i was thinking last night how richard
does such harsh opposites, surely it's obvious, but it's
great how he can make a gorgeous song and then a very
intense song, and even making very crazy songs with bits of
beauty in them..Always astounds me


 

laughable butane bobby on 2002-01-25 02:55 [#00074652]



Richards strength has always been contrasting and
conflicting sounds, at its basic emotional level.

what is "drum and bass"?

a fast, often spastic, breakbeat or complex beat, contrasted
with a slower bass beat, contrasted over a beat-less
emotional or atmospheric background. complementing
contrasts. basic two or three elements contrasting to
effect, striped down to the basic elements without the
bullshit of lyrics and solos.

and that is basically what Richard does.


 


Messageboard index