... | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 81 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2609015
Today 2
Topics 127236
  
 
Messageboard index
...
 

conacure from Alaska on 2002-01-23 23:44 [#00074242]



hmm


 

Lydia from Hell, yeah on 2002-01-23 23:57 [#00074246]



*ponders the meaning of it all*


 

Loogie from UK on 2002-01-23 23:59 [#00074247]



*strokes chin*


 

Nathan Fritz from Morgantown/WV/USA on 2002-01-24 00:05 [#00074248]



Hrrm... well, ponder all you want, but just make sure that
you realize that whatever the meaning of it all used to be,
it has changed, especially with the environment we've placed
this world into, instead of the natural course of events
that would have been taken otherwise had not humans begun to
exist. The only meaning I suggest there may still be is to
attempt to return to this natural order, accomodate for the
ruin we've brought to the concept, and to engage your fellow
species-members in a consistent check-sum of each other. Any
point that there once was, there really isn't much of one
anymore. Even supposing god (in any sense) exists, you still
need to realize that your actions here WILL have an effect
on the world, and you can't live life supposing that since
you're dying and going somewhere special (or no where at
all) that you can mess things up for the creatures (or even
lack thereof) coming afterwards. If you don't care at all,
go kill yourself now and get it over with... well, Oh yeah,
there's that natural selection idea? Think about it - not
the killing part, the theory behind it. Not such a bad
concept, huh?


 

conacure from Alaska on 2002-01-24 00:25 [#00074258]



.........


 

conacure from Alaska on 2002-01-24 00:27 [#00074260]



It's free interpretation for all!


 

evolume from seattle WA usa on 2002-01-24 00:33 [#00074263]



humans are part of the natural order, evolved upon this
planet along with all the other critters. unless you
believe in creationism in which case i agree with you.



 

Rustopher Krussel from New York on 2002-01-24 00:46 [#00074267]



yes indeed...


 

conacure from Alaska on 2002-01-24 02:31 [#00074299]



So the topic here is evolution?


 

Nathan Fritz from Morgantown/WV/USA on 2002-01-24 08:12 [#00074362]



Hrrm... no, specifically in reference to humans evolving in
accordance with the natural order - no, I do not believe in
creationism, in fact, I am a rather hearty skeptic. My point
is simply such that whatever evolutionary or intermediary
process has landed up in our current situation is such that
we need to temper the intelligence we use to create our
technology and ideals with the wisdom of the right and wrong
of where we stand with how things would be otherwise....

FOR INSTANCE - no other organism on this planet has the
capability to LIE. specifically, being not deception nor
trickery, but blatant misrepresentation of a falsehood to be
the truth.

We as human beings have begun - and/or are well along the
path of - the sidestepping of evolutionary procedures that
have (even in the short time theists will allow the earth
have existed) show distinct, obvious, and undeniable affects
upon the progeny of the earlier generations of homo
sapiens...

need I also mention the fact that we are NO LONGER HUMAN...
Homo Sapiens... the literal latin word meaning the same as
the English noun human, is not what the species we modern
theorists wish to call human, any longer. Our furtherment of
the disadvantages of de-evolution as reasons to aid people
has resulted in, over time, the effect of our race now being
classified by Antropologists (the same people you rely upon
to tell you how biblical cities DID exist) as HOMO SAPIENS
SAPIENS - human superior superior, specifically in that we
have no longer continued to evolve in order to fit our
environment, but as now a completely seperate race, attempt
to fit our environment to our personal preferences...
realizing that wearing a wool sweater (in order to feel
warm) is adapting your environment to fit your personal
preference.


 

jand from Essex on 2002-01-24 09:27 [#00074373]



Shite, I thought this thread was another MiniPop figure of
Craig David....


 

conacure from Alaska on 2002-01-24 23:53 [#00074613]



I'm not a religious person either, but are human
institutions considered unnatural? We ourselves are
physically natural. So perhaps the unnatural was produced by
the natural?


 

hevquip from 45.697 bits of electricity on 2002-01-24 23:59 [#00074615]



why couldn't things have stayed silent? it is much better
that way...


 

conacure from Alaska on 2002-01-25 00:25 [#00074617]



...


 

Taxi? on 2002-01-25 03:14 [#00074666]



Oh yeah? You silly pretentious liar!!!

(insert 15 paragraph argument, all in caps)

So take that you psuedo-intelectual tripe-head.


 

laughable butane bobby on 2002-01-25 04:01 [#00074687]



natural selection is almost a non-factor in human evolution.
the production of children is not based on quality, health,
intelligence, or beauty of the parents. in fact, the top
33% quality individuals of human society probably have the
least amount of children percentage wise. the ugly breed.
the sick breed. already america and england are countries
full of whiny, sickly people who complain all day long.

you know, the traditional Islamic system is actually much
better from a biologists viewpoint, with the alpha males
breeding with 50 handpicked beautiful women. my
conclusion.



 

Intruder from chicago on 2002-01-25 04:04 [#00074690]



...


 

Intruder from chicago on 2002-01-25 04:04 [#00074691]



?


 

conacure from Alaska on 2002-01-25 04:05 [#00074692]



THAT'S MY LINE! AGH! YOU THIEF!


 

Intruder from chicago on 2002-01-25 04:05 [#00074693]



*scratches nuts*

AHHHH! quiet time! i get it!


 

conacure from Alaska on 2002-01-25 04:09 [#00074696]



(heavy sigh)


 

AMinal from toronto, canada on 2002-01-25 04:15 [#00074702]



laughable butane bobby
..yes ive thought of that too..
how can we continue to evolve if those of us with better
genetic qualities (strength, health, how much nutrience we
can extract from grain, efficiency of our lungs, etc.)
(especially intelligence)
dont reproduce more than those who are "weaker" (even
reproduce LESS..)


 

laughable butane bobby on 2002-01-25 04:23 [#00074706]



Evolve doesn't have to mean getting better or improved or
smarter.


 

Intruder from chicago on 2002-01-25 04:28 [#00074713]



well. apparently youve nver heard of powerpills!
theyre magically delicious...AND will open up your mind to a
WHOLE new way of thinking.

unlike those OTHER brands, that just fuck with your crebral
cortex.


 

AMinal from toronto, canada on 2002-01-25 04:34 [#00074716]



ya i know evolveing doesn't necesarily mean "better/smarter"
but it dOES mean change..

i just meant that it seems humanity will remain relatively
stagnant in terms of development (or any sort of change)
until:
1) we are isolated into smaller breeding groups where
changes actually have a chance to spread/make a difference
AND/OR
2) greater inviromental stresses (w/ the super-pampered life
in most of teh world (even developing world) we dont have
many chances to actually have an advantage.. even if we WERE
smarter (or some other mutation) life is so easy for
everyone that others would have just as much chance to pass
on genes.

yes, i realize life is very difficult in the huge majority
of the world (compared to life in north america/europe) but
its still pretty easy compared to most animals.. where the
large majority of offspring dont even make it to
adulthood..



 

AMinal from toronto, canada on 2002-01-25 04:41 [#00074720]



i meant "Environmental"


 

m on 2002-01-25 09:43 [#00074766]



I'm glad other people are realizing this. read "evolution
isn't what it used to be" the last chapter. lying is common
among life forms. for example an angler fish (i recon
they're called) has a worm like biological organ on the end
of a long thingy on their face and they dangle it in front
of their victims, thus lying that it is a worm and devouring
them.
mutation is the driving force in evolution. It just happens
that the copying process of dna isn't perfect. I don't
remember or know much of the specifics but "point mutations"
etc, where the genetic replication gets a bit fucked results
in phenotypes which are a bit fucked, sometimes these
weirdos happen to succeed by blind witless chance and they
therefore produce more offspring in a higher ratio and pass
these genes. what chances are there that a mutation will be
beneficial? hardly any, if you think about it obviously. so
anyway, we are still mutating, our species. but no one is
getting selected. we're fucked and doomed and whatnot. we're
against the very process that created us. we're
antibiological. civilization... I predict an epic action
will take place to balance the equilibrium because it's
currently unstable.


 

Loogie from UK on 2002-01-25 12:35 [#00074806]



*plucks nasal hair*


 

laughable butane bobby on 2002-01-25 13:02 [#00074813]



my dog tries to lie all the time. she is a brat.


 

AMinal on 2002-01-25 13:58 [#00074832]



lol


 

Nathan Fritz from Morgantown/WV/USA on 2002-01-25 21:01 [#00074935]



Umm... actually, there's a rather important difference
between trickery and lies. Trickery is avoiding the truth.
Lying is telling a falsehood. Big difference.


 

conacure from Alaska on 2002-01-25 23:36 [#00074956]



opinion seems to be coherent with logic here (and vice
versa)


 

evolume from seattle, wa on 2002-01-26 00:00 [#00074959]



for a thread titled
"..."

this got stupid a long time ago


 

conacure from Alaska on 2002-01-26 06:09 [#00075022]



Why such a vague topic title?

-I was eager to see which direction it would go.


 

laughable butane bob on 2002-01-26 06:35 [#00075031]



i wish i was dead. life is so fucking overated and boring.
bleh.


 

borix on 2002-01-26 17:08 [#00075084]



You can only rate your own life.

So it seems to me that you underrate your own life.


 


Messageboard index